Which role plays specialized palliative care in patients with relapsed and/or metastatic head and neck cancer? A retrospective analysis in Southern Switzerland.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17503-e17503
Author(s):  
Vittoria G. Espeli ◽  
Claudia Gamondi ◽  
Tanja Fusi-Schmidhauser
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care ◽  
The Impact

e17503 Background: early palliative care (PC) for patients with advanced cancer improves quality of life, promotes home deaths and can improve survival. Limited data are available regarding PC in advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. To investigate the effect of introducing specialized PC in patients with relapsed and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. Methods: between October 2010 and December 2018, the medical charts of all patients treated in the Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland with relapsed and/or metastatic HNC were reviewed. Site, status of disease (metastatic at diagnosis, locally or metastatic relapsed), type and lines of treatment, treatment response and referral to specialist palliative care (yes or no) were documented. Comparisons were made between patients referred and non-referred to PC. Results: sixty-two patients with relapsed/metastatic HNC were identified, 32 (51.6%) of which were referred to specialized PC. Patients were mainly men (47, 75.8%), with a median age of 66 years (range 43 – 86). Forty-two patients (67.7%) had a metastatic disease and the most common site of tumor was the oropharynx (35.5%), followed by oral cavity (32.3%), larynx (16.1%), hypopharynx (12.9%), and unknown primary (3.2%). Forty-eight patients (77.4%) were treated with systemic treatment (75% in the PC group and 80% in the non-PC group, p = 0.638). The median overall survival was 8.1 months for all patients, 8 months for the PC group and 8.7 months for the non-PC group, without significant difference (p = 0.440). Of the deceased patients, 70% of the PC group and 73.3% of the non-PC group received chemotherapy in the last three months of life. A greater percentage of patients in the PC group died at home, but without significant difference (39.2% vs. 19%, p = 0.134). Conclusions: only half of the patient had access to specialized PC. Whereas it did not seem to affect overall survival nor influence chemotherapy prescription, it seemed to favor home deaths. Further studies investigating the impact of early PC in recurrent and/or metastatic HNC are needed to improve access to PC and maximize benefits.

Effect of Early Palliative Care on Quality of Life of Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Phase III Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Pankaj Singhai ◽  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Atanu Bhattacharjee ◽  
Jayita Deodhar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Early Palliative Care

Abstract Background Early palliative care (EPC) is an important aspect of cancer management but has never been evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer. Hence, we performed this study to determine whether the addition of EPC to standard therapy leads to an improvement in the quality of life (QOL), decrease in symptom burden and improvement in overall survival. Methods Adult patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region planned for palliative systemic therapy, were allocated 1:1 to either standard systemic therapy without (STD arm) or with comprehensive EPC service referral (EPC arm). Patients were administered the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for head and neck cancer (FACIT HN) questionnaire at baseline and every 1 month thereafter for 3 months. The primary endpoint was a change in the QOL measured at 3 months after random assignment. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Ninety patients were randomly assigned to each arm. There was no statistical difference in the change in the FACT-H&N total score (P = .94), FACT-H&N Trial Outcome Index (P = .95), FACT- G (general) total (P = .84) and ESAS-r scores at 3 months between the two arms. The median overall survival was similar between the two arms (Hazard ratio for death = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.74–1.35). There were 5 in-hospital deaths in both arms (5.6% for both, P = .99). Conclusions In this phase III study, the integration of EPC in head and neck cancer patients did not lead to an improvement in the QOL or survival.

Effect of early integration of specialized palliative care into standard oncologic treatment on the quality of life of patients with advanced head and neck cancers: A phase III randomized controlled trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12013-12013
Author(s):  
Pankaj Singhai ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Mary Ann Muckaden ◽  
Jayita Deodhar ◽  
Naveen Salins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Early Palliative Care

12013 Background: Early palliative care is an important aspect of palliative treatment but has never been evaluated in head and neck cancer. Hence we performed this study. Methods: This was an open-label phase 3 randomised study which enrolled adult patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region which warranted palliative systemic therapy. They were 1:1 allocated to either systemic therapy with (EPC arm) or without the addition of early palliative care service (STD arm). Patients were administered the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r) and FACIT HN questionnaire at baseline and 4 weekly thereafter for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in the quality of life (QOL) measured using FACIT HN 12 weeks after randomization. The secondary endpoints were changed in symptom burden at 12 weeks in ESAS-r and overall survival. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to examine the effects of arm and stratum on change in QOL (or symptom score), after controlling for baseline score. Results: Ninety patients were randomised in each arm between 1st June 2016 to 14th August 2017. The compliance with the questionnaires was 100% at baseline. In EPC arm the 70 patients were alive at 3 months and 67 (95.7%) completed the FACIT HN and 64 (91.4%) completed ESAS-r questionnaires. While in the STD arm out of 69 alive the corresponding figures were 61(88.4%) and 59 (85.5%) respectively. There was no statistical difference in change in QOL scores and ΔESAS-r at 12 weeks between the 2 arms (Table). The median overall survival was similar between the 2 arms. (Hazard ratio for death-1.006 (95%CI 0.7347-1.346)). Conclusion: In this phase 3 study, integration of early palliative care in head and neck cancer patients did not result in improvement in the quality of life scores, symptom scores or overall survival. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2016/03/006693 . [Table: see text]

Beyond race: The impact of ethnicity on the treatment outcome of locally advanced head and neck cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16500-16500
Author(s):  
C. J. Calfa ◽  
M. Escalon ◽  
S. Zafar ◽  
E. Lopez ◽  
V. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact

16500 Background: Self identified racial groups share an unequal burden of head and neck cancer . Recent evidence suggests that outcome among races is different and the causes are multifactorial. Nonetheless, differences among ethnic groups have not been reported. Herein, we decided to analyze differences in treatment response and outcome among our white and Hispanic patient population treated for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Methods: Patients were identified using the tumor registry. We reviewed retrospectively the data from medical records. 100 white Hispanics (WH) and 50 white non-Hispanics (WNH) diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck cancer and treated at our institution from 2004 to 2005, were eligible for the study. Standard statistical analysis, including Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard models were used. P value of <0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Results: Preliminary results reveal that, in our study population, median age at diagnosis, gender, performance status (ECOG 0–2) and squamous cell histology did not differ significantly between the two groups. Stage 4 at diagnosis was more commonly observed in Hispanics as opposed to WNH (85.7% vs 68.6%) (P = 0.1). Surgery was more commonly used as an initial treatment option in Hispanics than WNH (42.8% vs 28.6%) (P = 0.18) while chemotherapy was less likely to be used (78.6% vs. 91.4%) (P = 0.15). Hispanics were more likely to smoke than WNH (P = 0.0003) and were equally exposed to chronic alcohol use. Patients from the Hispanic group were more likely to respond to therapy than whites by Chi-squared analysis but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). No differences were seen in disease free survival. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival was 16 months for Hispanics vs. 25 months for whites but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.26). Final analysis will be available at the time of the annual meeting. Conclusion: In our experience, a trend for decrease overall survival was noted in the Hispanic ethnic group. This may be in part due to more advanced stage at presentation. Nonetheless, in order to definitively answer this question, further research is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The Association of Cachexia with Head and Neck Cancer Burden and Pathologic Features

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marelle Rukes ◽  
Alexander Jones ◽  
Leah Novinger ◽  
Kyle Davis ◽  
Vincent Campiti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck Carcinoma ◽  
Depth Of Invasion ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Index ◽  
Pathologic Features ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Background and Hypothesis: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is frequently associated with cachexia, characterized by involuntary weight loss, sarcopenia, and malnutrition. In HNC patients, dysphagia and anorexia from obstructive aerodigestive tumors propagates cachexia even further. However, the impact of pathologic features and burden of HNC on cachexia has yet to be investigated. We therefore hypothesize that larger, more aggressive tumors impose greater cachexia severity in HNC patients.     Methods: A single-institution, retrospective study of adult patients undergoing surgical resection of head and neck carcinoma from 2014-2017 was performed. Patients without 30-day preoperative abdominal CT imaging for skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm2/m2) measurements were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, nutrition data, and cancer pathology reports were collected. Cachexia was defined as unintentional weight loss >5% over 6 months or >2% with BMI <20 kg/m2. Statistical analyses were performed using 2-sided one-way Welch’s ANOVA or Pearson’s c2 tests. Significance was determined at p <0.05.      Results: The cohort included 125 predominantly white (92.0%), male (75.2%) HNC patients age 59.9 ± 11.5 years. Sixty-seven (53.6%) patients had cachexia, twenty (16.0%) of whom were severe (weight loss ≥15%). Patients with severe cachexia had larger tumors (5.5 ± 2.1 cm, p=0.021) than patients with mild-to-moderate cachexia (weight loss 5-14.9%; 4.9 ± 2.1 cm) or no cachexia (4.1 ± 1.9 cm). Worsening cachexia severity was also associated with lower SMI (p=0.004), BMI (p=0.002), and serum albumin (p=0.011). There was no statistically significant difference between cachexia groups comparing patient age, comorbidities, tumor grade, depth of invasion, nodal metastases, cancer stage, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, or extranodal extension.     Conclusion and Potential Impact: Tumor burden of HNC patients, but not adverse pathologic features, is associated with greater cachexia severity. Identifying pro-cachectic markers produced by larger tumors could provide a molecular target for anti-cachexia therapies and improve cancer patient outcomes. 

scholarly journals Interruptions of Head and Neck Radiotherapy Across Insured and Indigent Patient Populations

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e319-e328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Thomas ◽  
Travis Martin ◽  
Ang Gao ◽  
Chul Ahn ◽  
Holly Wilhelm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Treatment Interruptions ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose: Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer is a cornerstone of care, requiring 30 to 35 days of treatment over 6 to 7 weeks. Diligent patient compliance is crucial, and unplanned treatment interruptions reduce cure rates. We studied interruption rates in private carrier–insured and Medicare-insured populations versus indigent populations served by a single academic health system. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of electronic medical and billing records was performed analyzing treatment interruptions between January 2011 and December 2014. The study included 564 patients with head and neck cancer prescribed radiotherapy and referred from clinics run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW) and the Parkland Health and Hospital System (PHHS), which provides indigent care to Dallas County, Texas. Results: Three-hundred sixteen patients (56%) had a treatment break; 114 patients missed a single session, and 202 patients missed multiple treatments. Seventy percent of PHHS patients had treatment delays compared with 47% of UTSW patients ( P < .001). The number of interrupted days in the PHHS population was nearly twice that observed in UTSW patients. PHHS patients most commonly missed treatment for nonmedical or logistical reasons. Delay was predictive for local recurrence ( P < .001) and overall survival ( P < .001). In compliant patients, there was no significant difference in local recurrence ( P = .43) or overall survival ( P = .27) across referral sites. However, among noncompliant patients, there was a higher likelihood for local recurrence in the PHHS cohort ( P = .016). Multivariable modeling suggested treatment interruption to be a key driver of outcome differences across referral sites. Conclusion: Survival outcomes in our at-risk population were inferior to those in patients insured by commercial carriers or Medicare. Treatment interruption predicted for poor outcome across all patients but was disproportionately experienced by at-risk patients. These results highlight cancer control needs specific to disadvantaged communities at risk for poor treatment compliance.

scholarly journals Hypothyroidism and risks of cerebrovascular complications among patients with head and neck cancer after radiotherapy

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Hung Liu ◽  
Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang ◽  
Tsong-Hai Lee ◽  
Pi-Yueh Chang ◽  
Chien-Hung Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Cerebrovascular Complications ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cumulative Time ◽  
The Eu

Abstract Background Hypothyroidism (HT) and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) are complications of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The impact of post-RT HT on CAS progression remains unclear. Methods Between 2013 and 2014, HNC patients who had ever received RT and were under regular follow-up in our hospital were initially screened. Patients were categorized into euthyroid (EU) and HT groups. Details of RT and HNC were recorded. Total plaque scores and degrees of CAS were measured during annual extracranial duplex follow-up. Patients were monitored for CAS progression to > 50 % stenosis or ischemic stroke (IS). Cumulative time to CAS progression and IS between the 2 groups were compared. Data were further analyzed based on the use or nonuse of thyroxine of the HT group. Results 333 HNC patients with RT history were screened. Finally, 216 patients were recruited (94 and 122 patients in the EU and HT groups). Patients of the HT group received higher mean RT doses (HT vs. EU; 7021.55 ± 401.67 vs. 6869.69 ± 425.32 centi-grays, p = 0.02). Multivariate Cox models showed comparable CAS progression (p = 0.24) and IS occurrence (p = 0.51) between the 2 groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in time to CAS progression (p = 0.49) or IS (p = 0.31) among patients with EU and HT using and not using thyroxine supplement. Conclusions Our results did not demonstrate significant effects of HT and thyroxine supplementation on CAS progression and IS incidence in patients with HNC after RT.

scholarly journals Hypothyroidism and Risks of Cerebrovascular Complications Among Patients with Head and Neck Cancer After Radiotherapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Hung Liu ◽  
Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang ◽  
Tsong-Hai Lee ◽  
Pi-Yueh Chang ◽  
Chien-Hung Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Cerebrovascular Complications ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cumulative Time ◽  
The Eu

Abstract Background: Hypothyroidism (HT) and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) are complications of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The impact of post-RT HT on CAS progression remains unclear.Methods: Between 2013 and 2014, HNC patients who had ever received RT and were under regular follow-up in our hospital were initially screened. Patients were categorized into euthyroid (EU) and HT groups. Details of RT and HNC were recorded. Total plaque scores and degrees of CAS were measured during annual extracranial duplex follow-up. Patients were monitored for CAS progression to >50% stenosis or ischemic stroke (IS). Cumulative time to CAS progression and IS between the 2 groups were compared. Data were further analyzed based on the use or nonuse of thyroxine of the HT group.Results: 333 HNC patients with RT history were screened. Finally, 216 patients were recruited (94 and 122 patients in the EU and HT groups). Patients of the HT group received higher mean RT doses (HT vs. EU; 7021.55 ± 401.67 vs. 6869.69 ± 425.32 centi-grays, p = 0.02). Multivariate Cox models showed comparable CAS progression (p = 0.24) and IS occurrence (p = 0.51) between the 2 groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in time to CAS progression (p = 0.49) or IS (p = 0.31) among patients with EU and HT using and not using thyroxine supplement.Conclusion: Our results did not demonstrate significant effects of HT and thyroxine supplementation on CAS progression and IS incidence in patients with HNC after RT.

scholarly journals Navigating the impact of COVID ‐19 on palliative care for head and neck cancer

Head & Neck ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1144-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun Gurmeet Singh ◽  
Jayita Deodhar ◽  
Pankaj Chaturvedi
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Oligometastatic head and neck cancer: Which patients benefit from radical local treatment of all tumour sites?

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Weissmann ◽  
Daniel Höfler ◽  
Markus Hecht ◽  
Sabine Semrau ◽  
Marlen Haderlein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Tumour Volume ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Total Tumour Volume

Abstract Background There is a large lack of evidence for optimal treatment in oligometastatic head and neck cancer and it is especially unclear which patients benefit from radical local treatment of all tumour sites. Methods 40 patients with newly diagnosed oligometastatic head and neck cancer received radical local treatment of all tumour sites from 14.02.2008 to 24.08.2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Time to occurrence of new distant metastases and local control were evaluated as secondary endpoints as well as prognostic factors in univariate und multivariate Cox’s regression analysis. To investigate the impact of total tumour volume on survival, all tumour sites were segmented on baseline imaging. Results Radical local treatment included radiotherapy in 90% of patients, surgery in 25% and radiofrequency ablation in 3%. Median overall survival from first diagnosis of oligometastatic disease was 23.0 months, 2-year survival was 48%, 3-year survival was 37%, 4-year survival was 24% and 5-year survival was 16%. Median time to occurrence of new distant metastases was 11.6 months with freedom from new metastases showing a tail pattern after 3 years of follow-up (22% at 3, 4- and 5-years post-treatment). In multivariate analysis, better ECOG status, absence of bone and brain metastases and lower total tumour volume were significantly associated with improved survival, whereas the number of metastases and involved organ sites was not. Conclusions Radical local treatment in oligometastatic head and neck cancer shows promising outcomes and needs to be further pursued. Patients with good performance status, absence of brain and bone metastases and low total tumour volume were identified as optimal candidates for radical local treatment in oligometastatic head and neck cancer and should be considered for selection in future prospective trials.

scholarly journals Hypothyroidism and Risks of Cerebrovascular Complications Among Patients with Head and Neck Cancer After Radiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Hung Liu ◽  
Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang ◽  
Tsong-Hai Lee ◽  
Pi-Yueh Chang ◽  
Chien-Hung Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Cerebrovascular Complications ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cumulative Time ◽  
The Eu

Abstract Background: Hypothyroidism (HT) and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) are complications of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The impact of post-RT HT on CAS progression remains unclear.Methods: Between 2013 and 2014, HNC patients who had ever received RT and were under regular follow-up in our hospital were initially screened. Patients were categorized into euthyroid (EU) and HT groups. Details of RT and HNC were recorded. Total plaque scores and degrees of CAS were measured during annual extracranial duplex follow-up. Patients were monitored for CAS progression to >50% stenosis or ischemic stroke (IS). Cumulative time to CAS progression and IS between the 2 groups were compared. Data were further analyzed based on the use or nonuse of thyroxine of the HT group.Results: 333 HNC patients with RT history were screened. Finally, 216 patients were recruited (94 and 122 patients in the EU and HT groups). Patients of the HT group received higher mean RT doses (HT vs. EU; 7021.55 ± 401.67 vs. 6869.69 ± 425.32 centi-grays, p = 0.02). Multivariate Cox models showed comparable CAS progression (p = 0.24) and IS occurrence (p = 0.51) between the 2 groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in time to CAS progression (p = 0.49) or IS (p = 0.31) among patients with EU and HT using and not using thyroxine supplement.Conclusion: Our results did not demonstrate significant effects of HT and thyroxine supplementation on CAS progression and IS incidence in patients with HNC after RT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document