Triple blinded prospective study assessing the impact of genomics: EndoPredict and artificial intelligence Watson for Oncology (WFO) on MDT’s decision of adjuvant systemic therapy for hormone receptor positive early breast carcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18013-e18013
Author(s):  
S.P. Somashekhar ◽  
Ramya Yethadka ◽  
Rohit Kumar C ◽  
Ashwin K Rajgopal ◽  
Amit Rauthan ◽  
...  

e18013 Background: : Decision on adjuvant systemic therapy in hormone positive early breast carcinoma is the only grey area in breast carcinoma management. This study was done to investigate the concordance between the results of genomic test, artificial intelligence and tumor board decision and implications of the same in clinical practice. Methods: This was a triple blinded, prospective study. Decision regarding the adjuvant systemic therapy was done by the multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT)after reviewing the pathology reports & the results correlated with Endopredict test reports & artificial intelligence(Watson for Oncology). Results: Total of 42 patients included. Mean age was 58.3 years, 71.4% were post-menopausal. Breast conservation was done in 47.6%. 64.2% were T1-2N0 stage. Infiltrating ducal carcinoma was major type (83.3%). Decision by MDT to give adjuvant chemotherapy was for 25 patients (59.5%) & hormonal therapy for rest. Recommendation by Watson for oncology was to give adjuvant chemotherapy in 50%. Endopredict score (EPclin) resulted in a low-risk group of 22 patients (52.3%), while 15(47.6%) had a high risk EPclin score. Discordance between the endopredict test, Watson & tumor board was for 11 patients (26.1%): 3 patients had high risk score, but the tumor board decision was to give hormonal therapy due to the age factor. 8 patients had low risk score, but tumor board decision was to give adjuvant chemotherapy. Extremes of age, premenopausal status, intermediate grade & high Ki 67% values were the factors associated with discordance. The treatment decision changed for 4 patients (4/11, 36%) after reviewing the endopredict test and Watson recommendation. Conclusions: Tumor board decision can be more scientific & evidence based with the help of genomics & a learnt colleague in the form of Watson for Oncology. Even though the clinical experience is the important determinant of adjuvant therapy, genomic test with artificial intelligence, which includes the scientific evidence, will guide in decision making. Long term follow up is needed for the validation in our clinical setting.

2008 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 559-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauro Bucchi ◽  
Flavia Foca ◽  
Alessandra Ravaioli ◽  
Rosa Vattiato ◽  
Chiara Balducci ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 358-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Blankenstein ◽  
Alexander C.J. van Akkooi

Cancer ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2359-2364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon H. Giordano ◽  
George H. Perkins ◽  
Kristine Broglio ◽  
Sherry G. Garcia ◽  
Lavinia P. Middleton ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 2828-2835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Lohrisch ◽  
Jeremy Jackson ◽  
Amanda Jones ◽  
Donna Mates ◽  
Ivo A. Olivotto

PURPOSE: To explore the independent prognostic impact of medial hemisphere tumor location in early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comprehensive database was used to review patients referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency from 1989 to 1995 with early breast cancer. Patients were grouped according to relapse risk (high or nonhigh) and adjuvant systemic therapy received. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether the significance of primary tumor location (medial v lateral hemisphere) was independent of known prognostic factors and treatment. RESULTS: In the adjuvant systemic therapy groups, medial location was associated with a 50% excess risk of systemic relapse and breast cancer death compared with lateral location. Five-year systemic disease-free survival rates were 66.3% and 74.2% for high-risk medial and lateral lesions, respectively (P < .005). Corresponding 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 75.7% and 80.8%, respectively (P < .03). No significant differences were observed between medial and lateral location for low-risk disease regardless of adjuvant therapy or for high-risk disease with no adjuvant therapy. Local recurrence rates were similar for all risk and therapy groups. CONCLUSION: The two-fold risk of relapse and breast cancer death associated with high-risk medial breast tumors may be due to occult spread to internal mammary nodes (IMNs). Enhanced local control, such as with irradiation of the IMN chain, may be one way to reduce the excess risk. Ongoing randomized controlled trials may provide prospective answers to the question of the optimal volume of radiotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document