Factors associated with physician attitude and management of financial toxicity.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18300-e18300
Author(s):  
Katrina Fischer ◽  
Anne Margaret Walling ◽  
John A. Glaspy
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Financial Stress ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Perceived Knowledge ◽  
Financial Issues

e18300 Background: Little is known about the attitudes and knowledge of oncologists who discuss financial toxicity with patients compared with those who do not. We assessed perceptions of the oncologists’ role in discussing out of pocket (OOP) costs and financial stress (FS) to inform quality improvement strategies in the management of financial toxicity. Methods: We surveyed 45 practicing medical oncologists at a large academic medical center in 2019 using Likert scale responses. Questions covered three domains; self-perceived knowledge of financial issues related to care, practice of cost discussions with patients, and perceived ability to navigate toward solutions related to FS. Results: Fifty-three percent of oncologists felt comfortable discussing OOP costs, but only 42.5% discussed FS with patients. Over half (55%) lacked confidence they could help patients experiencing FS from treatment. These providers were less likely to ask about FS than those who were confident (r0.416, p0.004). Perceived knowledge among many was low: 48% felt they had little to no knowledge of OOP treatment costs, 33-37% had little to no understanding of how private or public insurance covers treatment respectively, and 60% reported low knowledge of point of care (POC) resources. Those who ask patients about FS reported higher perceived knowledge of insurance (public r0.47, p < 0.001, private r0.452, p 0.002) and POC resources (r0.392, p 0.007), but not more knowledge of OOP cost. Three factors were associated with increased confidence in the ability to help patients; higher knowledge of POC resources (r 0.379, p 0.01); having changed a treatment because of cost within the past year (r 0.395, p 0.047), and years in practice (r 0.329, p 0.047). Conclusions: Many oncologists lack confidence that they can help patients with financial issues, particularly early on in their career. Providers who lack confidence that they can help their patients appear less likely to ask patients about financial stress. Those who do ask about financial stress report higher self-perceived knowledge of insurance coverage and POC resources. This suggests that quality improvement efforts aimed at improving education and resources for providers to help navigate financial toxicity are needed.

Warfarin Patients With Anemia Show Trend of Out-of-Range International Normalized Ratio Frequency With Point-of-Care Testing in an Anticoagulation Clinic

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina E. DeRemer ◽  
Bliss McMichael ◽  
Henry N. Young
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Anticoagulation Clinic ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Many factors influence international normalized ratio (INR); however, few studies have examined the impact of anemia in warfarin patients. The primary objective of this study was to explore the relationship between in-clinic anemia and the control of INR within an anticoagulation clinic. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on a random sample of patients seen in an academic medical center pharmacy-managed anticoagulation clinic. Hemochron® Signature Elite machine was utilized to monitor point-of-care (POC) INR. In-clinic anemia was defined as hematocrit <32%. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA MP a webbased platform ( https://www.stata.com/statamp/ ). Results: Of the 300 patients analyzed, 45 (15%) patients had in-clinic anemia. Patients with in-clinic anemia were more likely to be younger ( P < .05), female ( P < .05), and have a diagnosis of sickle cell disease or anemia ( P < .05). In the unadjusted logistic regression model, patients with in-clinic anemia were less likely to have an in-range INR ( OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.27-0.98). The adjusted regression model did not show significance. Conclusion: Study results suggest that in-clinic anemia may be more prevalent among younger, female patients prescribed warfarin, and patients diagnosed with in-clinic anemia may be a risk factor for out-of-range INR. Pharmacists practicing in anticoagulation clinics can incorporate this information into patient care practice in efforts to maintain optimal management.

scholarly journals Creation of a dedicated line team for critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multidisciplinary approach to maximize resource utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982199175
Author(s):  
Pooja Nawathe ◽  
Robert Wong ◽  
Gabriel Pollock ◽  
Jack Green ◽  
Michael Kissen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Arterial Line ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Development Organization

Background: Pandemics create challenges for medical centers, which call for innovative adaptations to care for patients during the unusually high census, to distribute stress and work hours among providers, to reduce the likelihood of transmission to health care workers, and to maximize resource utilization. Methods: We describe a multidisciplinary vascular access team’s development to improve frontline providers’ workflow by placing central venous and arterial catheters. Herein we describe the development, organization, and processes resulting in the rapid formation and deployment of this team, reporting on notable clinical issues encountered, which might serve as a basis for future quality improvement and investigation. We describe a retrospective, single-center descriptive study in a large, quaternary academic medical center in a major city. The COVID-19 vascular access team included physicians with specialized experience in placing invasive catheters and whose usual clinical schedule had been lessened through deferment of elective cases. The target population included patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 in the medical ICU (MICU) needing invasive catheter placement. The line team placed all invasive catheters on patients in the MICU with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Results and conclusions: Primary data collected were the number and type of catheters placed, time of team member exposure to potentially infected patients, and any complications over the first three weeks. Secondary outcomes pertained to workflow enhancement and quality improvement. 145 invasive catheters were placed on 67 patients. Of these 67 patients, 90% received arterial catheters, 64% central venous catheters, and 25% hemodialysis catheters. None of the central venous catheterizations or hemodialysis catheters were associated with early complications. Arterial line malfunction due to thrombosis was the most frequent complication. Division of labor through specialized expert procedural teams is feasible during a pandemic and offloads frontline providers while potentially conferring safety benefits.

scholarly journals 460. Point-of-Care, In-Home SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Testing to Assess Seroprevalence in At-Risk Health Care Workers

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S297-S297
Author(s):  
Eric G Meissner ◽  
Christine Litwin ◽  
Tricia Crocker ◽  
Elizabeth Mack ◽  
Lauren Card
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Health Care Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Documented Infection ◽  
Inconclusive Result ◽  
Care Workers

Abstract Background Health care workers are at significant risk for infection with the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Methods We utilized a point-of-care, lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay (RayBiotech) to conduct a seroprevalence study in a cohort of at-risk health care workers (n=339) and normal-risk controls (n=100) employed at an academic medical center. To minimize exposure risk while conducting the study, consents were performed electronically, tests were mailed and then self-administered at home using finger stick blood, and subjects uploaded a picture of the test result while answering an electronic questionnaire. We also validated the assay using de-identified serum samples from patients with PCR-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results Between April 14th and May 6th 2020, 439 subjects were enrolled. Subjects were 68% female, 93% white, and most were physicians (38%) and nurses (27%). In addition, 37% had at least 1 respiratory symptom in the prior month, 34% had cared for a patient with known SARS-CoV-2 infection, 57% and 23% were worried about exposure at work or in the community, respectively, and 5 reported prior documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. On initial testing, 3 subjects had a positive IgG test, 336 had a negative test, and 87 had an inconclusive result. Of those with an inconclusive result who conducted a repeat test (85%), 96% had a negative result. All 3 positive IgG tests were in subjects reporting prior documented infection. Laboratory validation showed that of those with PCR-proven infection more than 13 days prior, 23/30 were IgG positive (76% sensitivity), whereas 1/26 with a negative prior PCR test were seropositive (95% specificity). Repeat longitudinal serologic testing every 30 days for up to 4 times is currently in progress. Conclusion We conducted a contact-free study in the setting of a pandemic to assess SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in an at-risk group of health care workers. The only subjects found to be IgG positive were those with prior documented infection, even though a substantial proportion of subjects reported significant potential occupational or community exposure and symptoms that were potentially compatible with SARS-COV-2 infection. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals An innovative resident-driven mortality case review curriculum to teach and drive system-based practice improvements in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Nila S. Radhakrishnan ◽  
Margaret C. Lo ◽  
Rohit Bishnoi ◽  
Subhankar Samal ◽  
Robert Leverence ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Systems Of Care ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Failure To Rescue ◽  
Internal Medicine Residents ◽  
Mortality Case

Purpose: Traditionally, the morbidity and mortality conference (M&MC) is a forum where possible medical errors are discussed. Although M&MCs can facilitate identification of opportunities for systemwide improvements, few studies have described their use for this purpose, particularly in residency training programs. This paper describes the use of M&MC case review as a quality improvement activity that teaches system-based practice and can engage residents in improving systems of care. Methods: Internal medicine residents at a tertiary care academic medical center reviewed 347 consecutive mortalities from March 2014 to September 2017. The residents used case review worksheets to categorize and track causes of mortality, and then debriefed with a faculty member. Selected cases were then presented at a larger interdepartmental meeting and action items were implemented. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze the results. Results: The residents identified a possible diagnostic mismatch at some point from admission to death in 54.5% of cases (n= 189) and a possible need for improved management in 48.0% of cases. Three possible management failure themes were identified, including failure to plan, failure to communicate, and failure to rescue, which accounted for 21.9%, 10.7 %, and 10.1% of cases, respectively. Following these reviews, quality improvement initiatives proposed by residents led to system-based changes. Conclusion: A resident-driven mortality review curriculum can lead to improvements in systems of care. This novel type of curriculum can be used to teach system-based practice. The recruitment of teaching faculty with expertise in quality improvement and mortality case analyses is essential for such a project.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document