Uptake of oophorectomy in women with findings on multigene panel testing: Results from the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1508-1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
Jamie Brower ◽  
Heather Symecko ◽  
Vanessa Marcell ◽  
Michael Francis Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Personal History ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multiplex Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

1508 Background: With the expansion of multigene panel testing for cancer susceptibility, increasing numbers of patients are identified with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LP V) in genes which do not have a clearly actionable increased risk of ovarian cancer (OC) (lifetime risk of OC >5%). However, there is concern that patients and/or providers may ascribe OC risk to such genetic findings with the potential for unnecessary oophorectomy (ooph). Methods: The Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) is an online registry for individuals with a genetic alteration detected on multiplex panel testing for cancer susceptibility. Participants self-enroll and complete baseline and annual follow-up questionnaires. PROMPT has enrolled 7388 participants (6936; 93.9% women) since September 2014. Results: 1566 women in the PROMPT registry reported ooph, the indications for which were reported as either cancer treatment (n=481, 30.7%) or benign disease (n=432, 27.6%). An additional 186 (12.8%) reported PV in genes associated with lifetime OC risk >5% ( BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP, or Lynch syndrome genes). The remaining 467 did not have guideline based indications for ooph due to OC risk and are described further here. 92 (19.7%) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in genes associated with OC, 241 (51.6%) had a personal history of breast cancer (BC) and no VUS in OC genes, and 119 (25.5%) had no personal history of BC and no VUS in OC genes. The majority of women had no family history (FH) of OC in first or second degree relatives (Table). Most ooph occurred prior to age 50. Of the 405 women with CHEK2 P/LP, 11.4% reported ooph (59% under age 50 when age known), as did 13.2% (of 228) with CHEK2 VUS, 8.8% (of 261) with ATM P/LP (66.7% under age 50), and 8.3% (of 387) with ATM VUS. In addition, of the 184 women with PALB2 P/LP, 14.1% reported ooph (35.3% under age 50) as did 11.6% (of 198) with PALB2 VUS. Of those who reported provider discussions, 47.2% stated “my provider recommended this” (including >60% in the OC gene VUS group) and an additional 25.2% stated “my provider presented this as an option, but not a requirement”. In those with no FH of OC, 45.8% stated that their provider recommended ooph. Conclusions: 10-15% of women with PV/VUS in genes not associated with a high risk of OC reported ooph without a clear indication. [Table: see text]

PTEN Promoter Variants Are Not Associated With Common Cancers: Implications for Multigene Panel Testing

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Helen Black ◽  
Shuwei Li ◽  
Tina Pesaran ◽  
Holly LaDuca ◽  
Rachid Karam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personal History ◽  
Variants Of Unknown Significance ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Multiple Primary ◽  
Unknown Significance ◽  
Uterine Endometrial Cancer ◽  
History Of ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

Purpose PTEN mutations are associated with breast, colon, endometrial, kidney, and thyroid cancers. Most PTEN promoter alterations, however, are characterized as variants of unknown significance, and their contribution to cancer risk is unclear. Materials and Methods Personal and family histories of 88,333 patients undergoing PTEN analysis as part of multigene panel testing (MGPT) were retrospectively reviewed. Cases (n = 59,784) were individuals with personal history of PTEN-related cancer. Controls (n = 28,549) had no personal history of cancer. Individuals were categorized as positive for one or more mutations (PATHO), without mutations but carrying one or more promoter variant (PROM), or negative for alterations (WT). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess PTEN associations with phenotypes, adjusted for race/ethnicity, age, sex, and MGPT. Results Overall, 79 (0.09%) patients were PATHO and 791 (0.9%) were PROM carriers. Compared with WT, PATHOs were 2.30 (95% CI, 1.19 to 4.72) times as likely to have breast, 7.23 (95% CI, 2.74 to 19.14) times as likely to have bilateral/multiple primary breast, and 7.56 (95% CI, 1.97 to 23.98) times as likely to have uterine/endometrial cancer. PROMs were not significantly more likely than WT to have cancer (all 0.84 < odds ratio < 1.15; P > .05). Conclusion PTEN promoter variants were not associated with cancer. These results do not support the inclusion of PTEN promoter sequencing in MGPT.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposing Genes in Czech and Belgian Pancreatic Cancer Patients

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4430
Author(s):  
Greet Wieme ◽  
Jan Kral ◽  
Toon Rosseel ◽  
Petra Zemankova ◽  
Bram Parton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Multiple Primary Cancers ◽  
Cancer History ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Family Cancer History ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

(1) Background: The proportion and spectrum of germline pathogenic variants (PV) associated with an increased risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) varies among populations. (2) Methods: We analyzed 72 Belgian and 226 Czech PDAC patients by multigene panel testing. The prevalence of pathogenic variants (PV) in relation to personal/family cancer history were evaluated. PDAC risks were calculated using both gnomAD-NFE and population-matched controls. (3) Results: In 35/298 (11.7%) patients a PV in an established PDAC-predisposition gene was found. BRCA1/2 PV conferred a high risk in both populations, ATM and Lynch genes only in the Belgian subgroup. PV in other known PDAC-predisposition genes were rarer. Interestingly, a high frequency of CHEK2 PV was observed in both patient populations. PV in PDAC-predisposition genes were more frequent in patients with (i) multiple primary cancers (12/38; 32%), (ii) relatives with PDAC (15/56; 27%), (iii) relatives with breast/ovarian/colorectal cancer or melanoma (15/86; 17%) but more rare in sporadic PDAC (5/149; 3.4%). PV in homologous recombination genes were associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.34–0.77). (4) Conclusions: Our analysis emphasizes the value of multigene panel testing in PDAC patients, especially in individuals with a positive family cancer history, and underlines the importance of population-matched controls for risk assessment.

scholarly journals Up-Front Multigene Panel Testing for Cancer Susceptibility in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1588-1602
Author(s):  
Monica D. Levine ◽  
Rachel Pearlman ◽  
Heather Hampel ◽  
Casey Cosgrove ◽  
David Cohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

PURPOSE Clinical utility of up-front multigene panel testing (MGPT) is directly related to the frequency of pathogenic variants (PVs) in the population screened and how genetic findings can be used to guide treatment decision making and cancer prevention efforts. The benefit of MGPT for many common malignancies remains to be determined. In this study, we evaluated up-front MGPT in unselected patients with endometrial cancer (EC) to determine the frequency of PVs in cancer susceptibility genes. METHODS Patients with EC were prospectively enrolled at nine Ohio institutions from October 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020. Nine hundred and sixty-one patients with newly diagnosed EC underwent clinical germline MGPT for 47 cancer susceptibility genes. In addition to estimating the prevalence of germline PVs, the number of individuals identified with Lynch syndrome (LS) was compared between MGPT and tumor-based screening. RESULTS Likely pathogenic variants or PVs were identified in 97 of 961 women (10.1%). LS was diagnosed in 29 of 961 patients (3%; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.3), with PVs in PMS2 most frequent. MGPT revealed nine patients with LS in addition to the 20 identified through routine tumor-based screening. BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs were found in 1% (10 of 961; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.9) of patients and that group was significantly enriched for type II ECs. CONCLUSION This prospective, multicenter study revealed potentially actionable germline variants in 10% of unselected women with newly diagnosed EC, supporting the use of up-front MGPT for all EC patients. The discovery that BRCA1 or BRCA2 heterozygotes frequently had type II cancers points to therapeutic opportunities for women with aggressive histologic EC subtypes.

scholarly journals Multigene Panel Testing Increases the Number of Loci Associated with Gastric Cancer Predisposition

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Tedaldi ◽  
Francesca Pirini ◽  
Michela Tebaldi ◽  
Valentina Zampiga ◽  
Ilaria Cangini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

The main gene involved in gastric cancer (GC) predisposition is CDH1, the pathogenic variants of which are associated with diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) and lobular breast cancer (LBC). CDH1 only explains a fraction (10–50%) of patients suspected of DGC/LBC genetic predisposition. To identify novel susceptibility genes, thus improving the management of families at risk, we performed a multigene panel testing on selected patients. We searched for germline pathogenic variants in 94 cancer-related genes in 96 GC or LBC Italian patients with early-onset and/or family history of GC. We found CDH1 pathogenic variants in 10.4% of patients. In 11.5% of cases, we identified loss-of-function variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes, as well as in MSH2, PMS2, BMPR1A, PRF1, and BLM genes. In 78.1% of patients, we did not find any variants with clear-cut clinical significance; however, 37.3% of these cases harbored rare missense variants predicted to be damaging by bioinformatics tools. Multigene panel testing decreased the number of patients that would have otherwise remained genetically unexplained. Besides CDH1, our results demonstrated that GC pathogenic variants are distributed across a number of susceptibility genes and reinforced the emerging link between gastric and breast cancer predisposition.

Preventive surgery after multiplex genetic panel testing (MGPT).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1525-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Idos ◽  
Allison W. Kurian ◽  
Charité Ricker ◽  
Duveen Sturgeon ◽  
Julie Culver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pathogenic Variant ◽  
Personal History ◽  
Prophylactic Surgery ◽  
Cancer History ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Preventive Surgery ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Cancer

1525 Background: Guidelines recommend consideration of prophylactic surgery for patients with a germline pathogenic variant in some cancer predisposition genes. We assessed surgery utilization in a prospective, multi-institutional cohort study of MGPT. Methods: 2000 patients had MGPT and completed questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients reported surgical utilization and indication (treatment or prevention). Surgery utilization was assessed according to cancer history and MGPT test results: Positive, pathogenic variant; VUS, variant of uncertain significance; Negative, benign variants. Results: Overall, 12.9% (198/1537) of patients reported surgery after MGPT (median follow-up 13 months). Only 31.3% (62/198) of patients specified that their surgery was preventive. Preventive surgery utilization was significantly higher among patients who tested positive (n=30, 14.9%) compared to those testing negative (n=20, 2.3%, p<0.001) or VUS (n=12, 2.2%, p<0.001). Preventive surgery was very low among patients testing negative or VUS who had no personal history of cancer in the relevant organ (Table). For example, mastectomy was not reported among any patients testing negative or VUS who had no personal history of breast cancer (Table). Conclusions: More than one year after MGPT, prophylactic surgery use was low among patients with VUS or negative results, especially among those with no personal history of cancer at the relevant site. Surgery utilization. [Table: see text]

Germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes among women with invasive lobular cancer of breast.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10581-10581
Author(s):  
Siddhartha Yadav ◽  
Chunling Hu ◽  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
Jeffrey N. Weitzel ◽  
David Goldgar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Clinical Cohort ◽  
Breast Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

10581 Background: The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer predisposition genes among women with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) and the risk of ILC in PV carriers is not well-defined. Methods: The study included 2,999 women with ILC and 32,544 unaffected controls from a population-based cohort; 3,796 women with ILC and 20,323 women with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) undergoing clinical multigene panel testing (clinical cohort); and 125,748 exome sequences from unrelated women without a cancer diagnosis in the gnomAD 3.0 dataset. Frequencies of germline PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were compared between women with ILC and unaffected controls in both cohorts and between women with ILC and IDC in the clinical cohort. Results: The frequency of PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes among women with ILC was 6.5% in the clinical cohort and 5.2% in the population-based cohort. In case-control analyses, CDH1 and BRCA2 PVs were associated with high risks of ILC (Odds ratio (OR) > 4), and CHEK2, ATM and PALB2 PVs were associated with moderate (OR = 2-4) risks. BRCA1 PVs and CHEK2 p.Ile157Thr were not associated with clinically relevant risks (OR < 2) of ILC. PV frequencies in these genes in ILC and IDC were similar except for PV frequencies in BRCA1 and CDH1. Conclusions: The study establishes that PVs in ATM, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2 and PALB2 are associated with an increased risk of ILC, whereas BRCA1 PVs are not. The similar overall PV frequencies for ILC and IDC suggest that cancer histology should not influence the decision to proceed with genetic testing. While, multigene panel testing may be appropriate for women with ILC, CDH1 should be specifically discussed in the context of low prevalence and attendant gastric cancer risk.

scholarly journals Association of Germline Genetic Test Type and Results With Patient Cancer Worry After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Katz ◽  
Kevin C. Ward ◽  
Ann S. Hamilton ◽  
Paul Abrahamse ◽  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Genetic Test ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Cancer Worry ◽  
Test Type ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

Background There are concerns that multigene panel testing compared with BRCA1/2-only testing after diagnosis of breast cancer may lead to unnecessary patient worry about cancer because of more ambiguous results. Methods Patients with breast cancer diagnosed from 2013 to 2015 and accrued from SEER registries in Georgia and Los Angeles were surveyed (n = 5,080; response rate, 70%), and responses were merged with SEER data and germline genetic testing and results. We examined patient reports of cancer worry by test type and results in 1,063 women who linked to a genetic test and reported undergoing testing. Results More than half of the sample (n = 640; 60.2%) received BRCA1/2-only testing versus 423 patients (39.8%) who had a multigene panel. A minority of tested patients reported substantial cancer worry after treatment: 11.1% (n = 130) reported higher impact of cancer worry, and 15.1% (n = 162) reported a high frequency of cancer worry (worrying often or almost always) in the past month. Impact of cancer worry did not substantively differ by test type, test result outcomes, or clinical or treatment factors. The odds ratio for higher impact of cancer worry was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.51 to 1.28) for multigene versus BRCA1/2-only testing. In a separate model, the odds ratios were 1.21 (95% CI, 0.54 to 2.68) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.50 to 1.62) for pathogenic variant and variant of uncertain significance, respectively, versus a negative test (the reference group). Conclusion Compared with BRCA1/2 testing alone, multigene panel testing was not associated with increased cancer worry after diagnosis of breast cancer.

scholarly journals Conflicting Interpretation of Genetic Variants and Cancer Risk by Commercial Laboratories as Assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (34) ◽  
pp. 4071-4078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Balmaña ◽  
Laura Digiovanni ◽  
Pragna Gaddam ◽  
Michael F. Walsh ◽  
Vijai Joseph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Massively Parallel Sequencing ◽  
Inherited Cancer ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Multiplex Testing

Purpose Massively parallel sequencing allows simultaneous testing of multiple genes associated with cancer susceptibility. Guidelines are available for variant classification; however, interpretation of these guidelines by laboratories and providers may differ and lead to conflicting reporting and, potentially, to inappropriate medical management. We describe conflicting variant interpretations between Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–approved commercial clinical laboratories, as reported to the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT), an online genetic registry. Methods Clinical data and genetic testing results were gathered from 1,191 individuals tested for inherited cancer susceptibility and self-enrolled in PROMPT between September 2014 and October 2015. Overall, 518 participants (603 genetic variants) had a result interpreted by more than one laboratory, including at least one submitted to ClinVar, and these were used as the final cohort for the current analysis. Results Of the 603 variants, 221 (37%) were classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 191 (32%) as pathogenic, and 34 (6%) as benign. The interpretation differed among reporting laboratories for 155 (26%). Conflicting interpretations were most frequently reported for CHEK2 and ATM, followed by RAD51C, PALB2, BARD1, NBN, and BRIP1. Among all participants, 56 of 518 (11%) had a variant with conflicting interpretations ranging from pathogenic/likely pathogenic to VUS, a discrepancy that may alter medical management. Conclusions Conflicting interpretation of genetic findings from multiplex panel testing used in clinical practice is frequent and may have implications for medical management decisions.

scholarly journals Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyan Li ◽  
Holly LaDuca ◽  
Tina Pesaran ◽  
Elizabeth C. Chao ◽  
Jill S. Dolinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
In Silico ◽  
Functional Domains ◽  
Family History Of Cancer ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
History Of ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
History Of Cancer ◽  
Multigene Panel

Abstract Purpose Genetic testing of individuals often results in identification of genomic variants of unknown significance (VUS). Multiple lines of evidence are used to help determine the clinical significance of these variants. Methods We analyzed ~138,000 individuals tested by multigene panel testing (MGPT). We used logistic regression to predict carrier status based on personal and family history of cancer. This was applied to 4644 tested individuals carrying 2383 BRCA1/2 variants to calculate likelihood ratios informing pathogenicity for each. Heterogeneity tests were performed for specific classes of variants defined by in silico predictions. Results Twenty-two variants labeled as VUS had odds of >10:1 in favor of pathogenicity. The heterogeneity analysis found that among variants in functional domains that were predicted to be benign by in silico tools, a significantly higher proportion of variants were estimated to be pathogenic than previously indicated; that missense variants outside of functional domains should be considered benign; and that variants predicted to create de novo donor sites were also largely benign. Conclusion The evidence presented here supports the use of personal and family history from MGPT in the classification of VUS and will be integrated into ongoing efforts to provide large-scale multifactorial classification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document