scholarly journals Conflicting Interpretation of Genetic Variants and Cancer Risk by Commercial Laboratories as Assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (34) ◽  
pp. 4071-4078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Balmaña ◽  
Laura Digiovanni ◽  
Pragna Gaddam ◽  
Michael F. Walsh ◽  
Vijai Joseph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Massively Parallel Sequencing ◽  
Inherited Cancer ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Multiplex Testing

Purpose Massively parallel sequencing allows simultaneous testing of multiple genes associated with cancer susceptibility. Guidelines are available for variant classification; however, interpretation of these guidelines by laboratories and providers may differ and lead to conflicting reporting and, potentially, to inappropriate medical management. We describe conflicting variant interpretations between Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–approved commercial clinical laboratories, as reported to the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT), an online genetic registry. Methods Clinical data and genetic testing results were gathered from 1,191 individuals tested for inherited cancer susceptibility and self-enrolled in PROMPT between September 2014 and October 2015. Overall, 518 participants (603 genetic variants) had a result interpreted by more than one laboratory, including at least one submitted to ClinVar, and these were used as the final cohort for the current analysis. Results Of the 603 variants, 221 (37%) were classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), 191 (32%) as pathogenic, and 34 (6%) as benign. The interpretation differed among reporting laboratories for 155 (26%). Conflicting interpretations were most frequently reported for CHEK2 and ATM, followed by RAD51C, PALB2, BARD1, NBN, and BRIP1. Among all participants, 56 of 518 (11%) had a variant with conflicting interpretations ranging from pathogenic/likely pathogenic to VUS, a discrepancy that may alter medical management. Conclusions Conflicting interpretation of genetic findings from multiplex panel testing used in clinical practice is frequent and may have implications for medical management decisions.

Uptake of oophorectomy in women with findings on multigene panel testing: Results from the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1508-1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
Jamie Brower ◽  
Heather Symecko ◽  
Vanessa Marcell ◽  
Michael Francis Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Personal History ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multiplex Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

1508 Background: With the expansion of multigene panel testing for cancer susceptibility, increasing numbers of patients are identified with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LP V) in genes which do not have a clearly actionable increased risk of ovarian cancer (OC) (lifetime risk of OC >5%). However, there is concern that patients and/or providers may ascribe OC risk to such genetic findings with the potential for unnecessary oophorectomy (ooph). Methods: The Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing (PROMPT) is an online registry for individuals with a genetic alteration detected on multiplex panel testing for cancer susceptibility. Participants self-enroll and complete baseline and annual follow-up questionnaires. PROMPT has enrolled 7388 participants (6936; 93.9% women) since September 2014. Results: 1566 women in the PROMPT registry reported ooph, the indications for which were reported as either cancer treatment (n=481, 30.7%) or benign disease (n=432, 27.6%). An additional 186 (12.8%) reported PV in genes associated with lifetime OC risk >5% ( BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP, or Lynch syndrome genes). The remaining 467 did not have guideline based indications for ooph due to OC risk and are described further here. 92 (19.7%) had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in genes associated with OC, 241 (51.6%) had a personal history of breast cancer (BC) and no VUS in OC genes, and 119 (25.5%) had no personal history of BC and no VUS in OC genes. The majority of women had no family history (FH) of OC in first or second degree relatives (Table). Most ooph occurred prior to age 50. Of the 405 women with CHEK2 P/LP, 11.4% reported ooph (59% under age 50 when age known), as did 13.2% (of 228) with CHEK2 VUS, 8.8% (of 261) with ATM P/LP (66.7% under age 50), and 8.3% (of 387) with ATM VUS. In addition, of the 184 women with PALB2 P/LP, 14.1% reported ooph (35.3% under age 50) as did 11.6% (of 198) with PALB2 VUS. Of those who reported provider discussions, 47.2% stated “my provider recommended this” (including >60% in the OC gene VUS group) and an additional 25.2% stated “my provider presented this as an option, but not a requirement”. In those with no FH of OC, 45.8% stated that their provider recommended ooph. Conclusions: 10-15% of women with PV/VUS in genes not associated with a high risk of OC reported ooph without a clear indication. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Economic impact of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-217
Author(s):  
Stacey Dacosta Byfield ◽  
Helen Wei ◽  
Mary DuCharme ◽  
Johnathan M Lancaster
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Mean Risk ◽  
Multigene Panel

Aim: Healthcare utilization and costs were compared following 25-gene panel (panel) or single syndrome (SS) testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Materials & methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients unaffected by cancer with panel (n = 6359) or SS (n = 4681) testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (01 January 2014 to 31 December 2016). Groups were determined by test type and result (positive, negative, variant of uncertain significance [VUS]). Results: There were no differences in total unadjusted healthcare costs between the panel (US$14,425) and SS (US$14,384) groups (p = 0.942). Among VUS patients in the panel and SS groups, mean all-cause costs were US$14,404 versus US$20,607 (p = 0.361) and mean risk-reduction/early detection-specific costs were US$718 versus US$679 (p = 0.890), respectively. Adjusted medical costs were not significantly different between panel and SS cohorts. Conclusion: Healthcare utilization and costs were comparable between the SS and panel tests overall and for patients with VUS.

scholarly journals Multi-Gene Panel Testing in Gastroenterology: Are We Ready for the Results?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Flávio Pereira ◽  
Manuel R. Teixeira ◽  
Mário Dinis Ribeiro ◽  
Catarina Brandão
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Familial Cancer ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Inherited Cancer ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Gene Panel Testing ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Familial Cancer Risk

Genetic testing aims to identify patients at risk for inherited cancer susceptibility. In the last decade, there was a significant increase in the request of broader panels of genes as multi-gene panel testing became widely available. However, physicians may be faced with genetic findings for which there is lack of management evidence, despite some progress in understanding their clinical relevance. In this short review, we discuss the advantages and the drawbacks related to multi-gene panel testing in the setting of a Gastrointestinal Familial Cancer Risk clinic. We also summarize the available recommendations on management of pathogenic variant carriers.

scholarly journals Evidence for pathogenicity of variant ATM Val1729Leu in a family with ataxia telangiectasia

Neurogenetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali S. Shalash ◽  
Thomas W. Rösler ◽  
Mohamed Salama ◽  
Manuela Pendziwiat ◽  
Stefanie H. Müller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Autosomal Recessive ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
The Other ◽  
Multisystem Disorder ◽  
Serine Threonine Kinase ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Threonine Kinase ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Severe Ataxia

AbstractAtaxia telangiectasia is a rare autosomal recessive multisystem disorder caused by mutations in the gene of ATM serine/threonine kinase. It is characterized by neurodegeneration, leading to severe ataxia, immunodeficiency, increased cancer susceptibility, and telangiectasia. Here, we discovered a co-segregation of two ATM gene variants with ataxia telangiectasia in an Egyptian family. While one of these variants (NM_000051.4(ATM_i001):p.(Val128*)) has previously been reported as pathogenic, the other one (NM_000051.4(ATM_i001):p.(Val1729Leu)) is regarded as a variant of uncertain significance. Our findings in this family provide additional evidence for causality of the second variant and argue that its status should be changed to pathogenic.

Safety of multiplex gene testing for inherited cancer risk in a fully accrued prospective trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1576-1576
Author(s):  
Allison W. Kurian ◽  
Gregory Idos ◽  
Charite Nicolette Ricker ◽  
Julie Culver ◽  
Duveen Sturgeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Cancer Risk Assessment ◽  
Cancer History ◽  
Inherited Cancer ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Gene Testing ◽  
Preventive Surgery ◽  
Multiplex Testing

1576 Background: Sequencing more genes increases the chance of finding a pathogenic mutation and/or a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Little is known about potential harms of multiplex testing for cancer risk, such as unwarranted surgery or adverse psychological effects. Methods: We conducted a prospective trial of sequencing 25 genes : APC, ATM, BARD1, BMPR1A, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CDK4, CDKN2A, CHEK2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, SMAD4, STK11, TP53. Patients were eligible if they met standard testing guidelines or predictive models estimated ≥2.5% mutation probability. Participants were surveyed 3 months post-test: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) scale measured distress, uncertainty and positive experiences. We report on the fully accrued trial (N = 2000). Results: 1998/2000 (99.9%) participants currently have reported results: 12.1% tested positive for a pathogenic mutation (Pos), 34.5% had VUS only and 53.5% tested negative (Neg). Median age was 51, 81% were female, 40% Hispanic, and 72% had a cancer history. Self-reported preventive surgery rates were low (mastectomy 9.3%, hysterectomy 1.5%, oophorectomy 1.6%), with no difference between VUS and Neg patients (p = 0.346). Most patients never or rarely had thoughts of cancer affecting daily activities (Pos 59.5%, VUS 66.9%, Neg 71.0%), never regretted testing (Pos 84.1%, VUS 90.0%, Neg 93.6%), and wanted to know all results, even those that doctors do not fully understand (Pos 81.7%, VUS 78.8%, Neg 77.1%). Pos patients had higher MICRA distress and uncertainty scores than VUS and Neg patients, whose distress and uncertainty scores did not differ significantly (p = 0.165, p = 0.129). Relatives of Pos patients completed genetic testing (30.4%) more often than VUS (5.8%) or Neg patients (5.1%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: After multiplex testing of 2000 diverse patients, few reported preventive surgery at 3 months; VUS patients had no more distress, regret or uncertainty than Neg patients. Pos patients most often advised relatives to test, suggesting that participants understood the implications of test results. Longer-term follow-up of test-related outcomes is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02324062.

scholarly journals Adrenoleukodystrophy Newborn Screening in California Since 2016: Programmatic Outcomes and Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Jamie Matteson ◽  
Stanley Sciortino ◽  
Lisa Feuchtbaum ◽  
Tracey Bishop ◽  
Richard S. Olney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Newborn Screening ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Birth Prevalence ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a recent addition to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel, prompting many states to begin screening newborns for the disorder. We provide California’s experience with ALD newborn screening, highlighting the clinical and epidemiological outcomes observed as well as program implementation challenges. In this retrospective cohort study, we examine ALD newborn screening results and clinical outcomes for 1,854,631 newborns whose specimens were received by the California Genetic Disease Screening Program from 16 February 2016 through 15 February 2020. In the first four years of ALD newborn screening in California, 355 newborns screened positive for ALD, including 147 (41%) with an ABCD1 variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and 95 males diagnosed with ALD. After modifying cutoffs, we observed an ALD birth prevalence of 1 in 14,397 males. Long-term follow-up identified 14 males with signs of adrenal involvement. This study adds to a growing body of literature reporting on outcomes of newborn screening for ALD and offering a glimpse of what other large newborn screening programs can expect when adding ALD to their screening panel.

scholarly journals Assessing Genetic Variants in Matched Biocompartments From Patients With Serous Ovarian Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110279
Author(s):  
Brooke E. Sanders ◽  
Lisa Ku ◽  
Paul Walker ◽  
Benjamin G. Bitler
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Mutant Allele ◽  
Serous Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Testing ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
University Of Colorado ◽  
Gene Panel Testing ◽  
The University ◽  
Tumor Profiling

The clinical use of molecular tumor profiling (MTP) is expanding and there is an increasing use of MTP data to manage patient care. At the University of Colorado, 18 patients were diagnosed with primary serous ovarian cancer between 9/2015 and 6/2019 and consented for banking and analysis of tumor, ascites and plasma. All 18 patients had tumor and plasma samples that were sent for MTP, and 13 of 18 patients additionally had ascites collected and sent for MTP. 50-gene panel testing and BRCA testing were performed on primary tumor. BRCA genetic variants were more likely to be identified in plasma as compared to ascites or tumor, though not statistically significant ( P = 0.17). Co-occurring genetic variants between plasma and ascites were less common in comparison to co-occurring variants between tumor and plasma or tumor and ascites, though not statistically significant ( P = 0.68). Variants in KDR (VEGFR2) and TP53 were most likely to be conserved across all 3 biocompartments. Mutant allele frequencies (MAF) of individual genetic variants varied across biocompartments, though tended to be highest in the tumor, followed by ascites.

scholarly journals Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Kaphingst ◽  
Wendy Kohlmann ◽  
Rachelle Lorenz Chambers ◽  
Melody S. Goodman ◽  
Richard Bradshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Cancer Genetics ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Genetic Services ◽  
Inherited Cancer ◽  
Services Delivery

Abstract Background Advances in genetics and sequencing technologies are enabling the identification of more individuals with inherited cancer susceptibility who could benefit from tailored screening and prevention recommendations. While cancer family history information is used in primary care settings to identify unaffected patients who could benefit from a cancer genetics evaluation, this information is underutilized. System-level population health management strategies are needed to assist health care systems in identifying patients who may benefit from genetic services. In addition, because of the limited number of trained genetics specialists and increasing patient volume, the development of innovative and sustainable approaches to delivering cancer genetic services is essential. Methods We are conducting a randomized controlled trial, entitled Broadening the Reach, Impact, and Delivery of Genetic Services (BRIDGE), to address these needs. The trial is comparing uptake of genetic counseling, uptake of genetic testing, and patient adherence to management recommendations for automated, patient-directed versus enhanced standard of care cancer genetics services delivery models. An algorithm-based system that utilizes structured cancer family history data available in the electronic health record (EHR) is used to identify unaffected patients who receive primary care at the study sites and meet current guidelines for cancer genetic testing. We are enrolling eligible patients at two healthcare systems (University of Utah Health and New York University Langone Health) through outreach to a randomly selected sample of 2780 eligible patients in the two sites, with 1:1 randomization to the genetic services delivery arms within sites. Study outcomes are assessed through genetics clinic records, EHR, and two follow-up questionnaires at 4 weeks and 12 months after last genetic counseling contactpre-test genetic counseling. Discussion BRIDGE is being conducted in two healthcare systems with different clinical structures and patient populations. Innovative aspects of the trial include a randomized comparison of a chatbot-based genetic services delivery model to standard of care, as well as identification of at-risk individuals through a sustainable EHR-based system. The findings from the BRIDGE trial will advance the state of the science in identification of unaffected patients with inherited cancer susceptibility and delivery of genetic services to those patients. Trial registration BRIDGE is registered as NCT03985852. The trial was registered on June 6, 2019 at clinicaltrials.gov.

scholarly journals First report of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia with a hemizygous c.1142G > C in the EDA gene: variant of uncertain significance or new pathogenic variant?

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Tumminello ◽  
Antonella Gangemi ◽  
Federico Matina ◽  
Melania Guardino ◽  
Bianca Lea Giuffrè ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ectodermal Dysplasia ◽  
Genetic Disorder ◽  
Missense Variant ◽  
Pathogenic Variant ◽  
Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Clinical Potential ◽  
Genomic Variant ◽  
Eda Gene

Abstract Background Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia (HED) is a genetic disorder which affects structures of ectodermal origin. X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) is the most common form of disease. XLHED is characterized by hypotrichosis, hypohydrosis and hypodontia. The cardinal features of classic HED become obvious during childhood. Identification of a hemizygous EDA pathogenic variant in an affected male confirms the diagnosis. Case presentation We report on a male newborn with the main clinical characteristics of the X-linked HED including hypotrichosis, hypodontia and hypohidrosis. Gene panel sequencing identified a new hemizygous missense variant of uncertain significance (VUS) c.1142G > C (p.Gly381Ala) in the EDA gene, located on the X chromosome and inherited from the healthy mother. Conclusion Despite the potential functional impact of VUS remains uncharacterized, our goal is to evaluate the clinical potential consequences of missense VUS on EDA gene. Even if the proband’s phenotype is characteristic for classic HED, further reports of patients with same clinical phenotype and the same genomic variant are needed to consider this novel VUS as responsible for the development of HED.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document