Phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab for advanced rare genitourinary cancers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5018-5018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
Matthew T Campbell ◽  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Subrina Farah ◽  
Mehmet Asim Bilen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Differentiation ◽  
Adrenal Tumors ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Genitourinary Cancers

5018 Background: Patients with rare genitourinary malignancies (Bladder cancer of variant histologies (BCVH), adrenal tumors, chemotherapy refractory germ cell tumors (CRGCT), penile carcinoma and prostate cancer of variant histology (PCVH)) have poor outcomes. Nivolumab and ipilimumab has demonstrated safety and efficacy in genitourinary malignancies. In this multicenter, single arm, multi-cohort phase II trial we evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab in pts with advanced rare genitourinary cancers (NCT 03333616). Herein, we report the results of the fully accrued BCVH, adrenal and other cohorts. Methods: Eligible pts had a metastatic rare genitourinary malignancy, ECOG performance status of 0-2 and no prior immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure; aside from CRGCT pts could be treatment naïve. Eligible pts received nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses with continued nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Results: 56 pts were enrolled at 6 institutions between 4/2018 and 7/2019 in 3 cohorts: BCVH (N = 19), adrenal tumors (n = 18) and other tumors (n = 19). Median follow-up was 9.9 (range < 1~21) months. 28(50%) pts received all 4 doses of nivolumab and ipilimumab. 25 pts received nivolumab maintenance at a median of 4 (range 1-18) cycles. ORR in entire cohort was 16% (n = 9: 2 CR 7 PR, Table); 67% of responders (6/9) maintained response greater than 9 months. Median PFS was 2.8 (2.7-5.2) months. 22 pts (39%) developed treatment-related ≥ grade 3 toxicity; 23% required high dose steroids (≥40 mg prednisone or equivalent) and 15 (27%) pts discontinued treatment due to an AE. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 3 pts; 1 death was treatment related. Conclusions: Nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in objective responses in a subset of pts with rare GU malignancies, especially in BCVH. Biomarkers are being evaluated and an additional cohort exploring the activity in genitourinary tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation is ongoing. This combination warrants further investigation in these pts with substantial unmet needs. Clinical trial information: NCT 03333616 . [Table: see text]

Phase II Trial of Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3052-3052 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kuruvilla ◽  
Diane Taylor ◽  
Lisa Wang ◽  
Chantale Blattler ◽  
Armand Keating ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cytokine Analysis

Abstract Introduction: Patients (pts) with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) that has relapsed after or is refractory to primary therapy and subsequent high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) cannot be cured with conventional treatments. As various cytokines (IL-6,12 and 13), NF-KB and angiogenic factors have been implicated in the pathophysiology of HL, we postulated that lenalidomide, a novel agent with both immunomodulatory and anti-angiogenic properties would have activity in the relapsed (REL) or refractory (REF: defined as progression on or within 3 months of primary therapy) setting. Methods: The treatment regimen consisted of lenalidomide 25 mg PO days 1–21 on a 28 day cycle. CT scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis were obtained at baseline and were repeated every 2 cycles or earlier at the investigators’ discretion. A Fleming two stage trial design was chosen and a calculated sample size of 30 was determined based on an alpha error &lt; 0.05 and power of 0.80 and a response proportion of 0.20 to consider lenalidomide active. Serum/plasma specimens at baseline and on treatment were collected for cytokine analysis. Data analysis was performed in July 2008 after the first stage (15 patients) were accrued. Responses were categorized by International Workshop Criteria (Cheson JCO 1999) and toxicity was assessed by NCI common toxicity criteria v3.0. Results: 15 pts have been accrued with 14 evaluable patients to date. The median age was 37 (range 18–74) with 7 female pts. ECOG performance status was 0: (2) 1: (9) and 2: (4). The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range 1–4). All pts (except one pt on a pediatric protocol had received ABVD-type primary chemotherapy and 9/15 received prior radiotherapy. 10 pts had undergone prior ASCT with 10 patients having REF and 5 pts with REL disease following primary chemotherapy. 8 pts had disease recurrence within 1 year post ASCT. Of non-ASCT pts, 2 pts were refractory to chemotherapy and 3 pts were ineligible (age and/or comorbidity). The median number of treatment cycles/pt was 3 (range 0–10) with 1 pt enrolled but not starting therapy due to rapid disease progression. Best response was a PR in 2 cases (confirmed by 3rd independent radiologist in 1), and SD in 7 pts. Six pts discontinued therapy because of PD and 5 for toxicity; 4 pts remain on treatment. Median time to progression was 3.2 months and overall survival was 9.1 months. Grade 3–4 toxicities included: neutropenia:4 (1 pt had febrile neutropenia following 1 cycle of treatment), thrombocytopenia:4 and anemia:3. Five pts developed skin rash (2: grade 2) and there was 1 case of erythema multiforme. Conclusions: Preliminary results of this phase II study including heavily pre-treated pts with HL suggest lenalidomide has some evidence of activity. Toxicity is manageable although hematologic side effects are common. These results suggest that lenalidomide warrants further study and the second stage of accrual is ongoing.

Phase II study of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin combination chemotherapy in taxane and cisplatin-based chemotherapy-refractory metastatic gastric cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15599-e15599
Author(s):  
J. Yoon ◽  
S. Cho ◽  
W. Bae ◽  
J. Hwang ◽  
H. Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Haematological Toxicity ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

e15599 Background: The role of the second line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer was not clear, but possibility of prolongation of survival is open question. Irinotecan is promising agents in gastric cancer and this phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, high dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in taxane and cisplatin based chemotherapy refractory metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: Eligible criteria were as followed; histologic confirmed adenocarcinoma of stomach, previously treated with taxane and cisplatin, age≥18, Eastern Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less, adequate organ function. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2) as a 30-min infusion and leucovorin (200 mg/m2) as a 15-min infusion were given on day 1, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2bolus infusion then 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 as a 48-hour continuous infusion. This cycle was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (range 27–73 years), and the ECOG performance status of all patients was 1. All patients were evaluable for safety and survival and twenty seven patients (79.4%) were evaluable for tumor response. The overall response rate was 18.5% (95% CI: 3.9–33.1). The median progression free survival and overall survival were 4.6 (95% CI: 2.4–6.9) and 9.3 months (95% CI: 5.2–13.4), respectively. Greater than grade 3 haematological toxicities were neutropenia in nine (26.5%), febrile neutropenia in one (2.9%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (2.9%). The major non-haematological toxicity was asthenia, but most of patients showed grade 1 or 2. Greater than grade 3 non- haematological toxicities were elevated AST/ALT in four (11.8%), hyperbilirubinemia in two (5.9%), nausea in two patients (5.9%). Conclusions: This results showed that the combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-FU and leucovorin was well tolerated and active in taxane and cisplatin refractory patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

An open, multicenter, phase II clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of S-1 split cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC): HGCSG0702—Safety analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Ichiro Iwanaga ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hiraku Fukushima ◽  
Atsushi Ishiguro ◽  
Takenori Takahata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Rest Period ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Multicenter Phase

121 Background: From the results of SPIRITS trial, S-1 plus cisplatin has been regarded as standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with AGC in Japan. However, many facilities are forced hospitalization of hydration upon administration of high dose Cisplatin (60mg/m2). Therefore, in Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (HGCSG), to investigate the safety and efficacy, we conducted a multicenter phase II clinical trials of S-1 plus split cisplatin as a therapeutic strategy that can be administered in the outpatient. Methods: Eligibility criteria included pathologically confirmed AGC; no prior chemotherapy; Age 20 to 75, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 to 1; adequate organ function; and written informed consent. S-1 (40-60 mg depending on patients body surface area) was given orally, twice daily for 3 consecutive weeks, and 30 mg/m2 cisplatin was given intravenously on day 1 and 15, followed by 2-week rest period, within a 5-week cycle. Primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, safety profile, and duration of hospitalization. Results: Between Mar 2008 and Mar 2012, 40 pts were enrolled. Patients characteristics were as follows: median age 63 years (range 41-75), Male: female 30:10, PS 0:1 33:7. Median no. of cycles was 3. The most common non-hematological adverse events (AE) were anorexia (70%), nausea (60%), fatigue (60%) and diarrhea (48%) and hematological AE were anemia (88%), neutropenia (83%), leukocytopenia (68%) and thrombocytopenia (60%). The main grade 3-4 AE were neutropenia (40%), anemia (30%), anorexia (30%) and fatigue (15%). These AE were as expected. The median dose intensity of S-1 was 270mg/m2/week (relative dose intensity (RDI) 80%), and cisplatin was 10.1mg/m2/week (RDI 84%). These toxicities were tolerable and manageable. No treatment-related death was observed. Conclusions: We conclude that this S-1 plus split cisplatin regimen was well tolerated in the treatment of AGC, and most patients could be administered in the outpatient. We are planning the final efficacy analysis for February 2013.

scholarly journals Multi-Institutional Phase II Study of High-Dose Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy in Patients With Localized, Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 460-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore S. Hong ◽  
Jennifer Y. Wo ◽  
Beow Y. Yeap ◽  
Edgar Ben-Josef ◽  
Erin I. McDonnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Proton Beam ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose, hypofractionated proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Materials and Methods In this single-arm, phase II, multi-institutional study, 92 patients with biopsy-confirmed HCC or ICC, determined to be unresectable by multidisciplinary review, with a Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (CTP) of A or B, ECOG performance status of 0 to 2, no extrahepatic disease, and no prior radiation received 15 fractions of proton therapy to a maximum total dose of 67.5 Gy equivalent. Sample size was calculated to demonstrate > 80% local control (LC) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 criteria at 2 years for HCC patients, with the parallel goal of obtaining acceptable precision for estimating outcomes for ICC. Results Eighty-three patients were evaluable: 44 with HCC, 37 with ICC, and two with mixed HCC/ICC. The CTP score was A for 79.5% of patients and B for 15.7%; 4.8% of patients had no cirrhosis. Prior treatment had been given to 31.8% of HCC patients and 61.5% of ICC patients. The median maximum dimension was 5.0 cm (range, 1.9 to 12.0 cm) for HCC patients and 6.0 cm (range, 2.2 to 10.9 cm) for ICC patients. Multiple tumors were present in 27.3% of HCC patients and in 12.8% of ICC patients. Tumor vascular thrombosis was present in 29.5% of HCC patients and in 28.2% of ICC patients. The median dose delivered to both HCC and ICC patients was 58.0 Gy. With a median follow-up among survivors of 19.5 months, the LC rate at 2 years was 94.8% for HCC and 94.1% for ICC. The overall survival rate at 2 years was 63.2% for HCC and 46.5% ICC. Conclusion High-dose hypofractionated proton therapy demonstrated high LC rates for HCC and ICC safely, supporting ongoing phase III trials of radiation in HCC and ICC.

A phase II trial of high-dose cetuximab (cmab) plus irinotecan in patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) who progressed on standard-dose cmab plus irinotecan.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 598-598
Author(s):  
A. M. Patta ◽  
J. A. McMahon ◽  
C. Samborski ◽  
M. Fakih
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Higher Doses

598 Background: Prior clinical data suggest a dose-related response to cmab when combined with irinotecan in pts with KRAS WT tumors who do not develop grade 2 and above rash with standard cmab dosing. However, the investigation of higher doses of cmab in the setting of acquired or innate resistance to standard dose cmab has not been previously investigated. We conducted a phase II clinical trial of high-dose cmab plus irinotecan in KRAS WT pts with standard-dose cmab plus irinotecan – refractory disease to address this question. Methods: Pts with KRAS WT MCRC progressing on standard dose of cmab with irinotecan were eligible for study. Pts should have received a minimum of 6 weeks of prior standard dose cmab plus irinotecan and progressed within 4 weeks from the last dose. Cmab was administered at 500 mg/m2/week and irinotecan was administered at the same dose/schedule on which the patient previously progressed. 12-week PFS rate was the primary endpoint. Results: 8 pts were treated on study: median age 68 yrs (45-85), 5 pts were males, ECOG performance status was 1 in all 8 pts. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities consisted of hypomagnesaemia (4 pts), anemia (1 pt), leucopenia (1 pt), fatigue (1 pt), and diarrhea (1 pt). 6 pts achieved stable disease (with regression in target lesions noted in 3 pts). 12 week PFS rate is 5/8 and 18 week PFS is 4/8. 3 pts remain on study at 4.5, 5, and 8 months from enrollment. Conclusions: High-dose cmab/irinotecan is well tolerated except for hypomagnesemia. Encouraging prolonged disease stabilizations warrant further investigation of this approach in pts in KRAS WT population. Accrual is ongoing. [Table: see text]

Preliminary results of a phase II study of alrizomadlin (APG-115), a novel, small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor, in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic melanoma or advanced solid tumors that have failed immuno-oncologic (I-O) drugs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2506-2506
Author(s):  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
James Andrew Reeves ◽  
Meredith McKean ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Nerve Sheath Tumor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Multiple Tumor

2506 Background: Alrizomadlin (APG-115) restores TP53 function, activating p53-mediated apoptosis in tumor cells with wild-type TP53 and/or MDM2 amplification. Alrizomadlin also functions as a host immunomodulator and hence may restore antitumor activity in pts with cancers failing PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Methods: This US multicenter trial assessed alrizomadlin combined with pembrolizumab in pts with unresectable/metastatic melanoma or advanced solid tumors that had failed I-O drugs; or pts with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), liposarcoma, or ATM mutant solid tumors that had failed any standard therapy. Eligible pts had ECOG performance status of 0-2 and no CNS metastases. The phase II study cohorts included pts with melanoma, NSCLC, solid tumor with ATM mutation, well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, urothelial carcinoma, and MPNST. Alrizomadlin was administered orally at 150 mg once every other day for 2 consecutive weeks with 1 week off and pembrolizumab at 200 mg via IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Results: As of December 25, 2020, 84 pts had been treated in 6 cohorts: melanoma (n = 26), NSCLC (n = 23), ATM mutation (n = 9), liposarcoma (n = 14), urothelial (n = 9), and MPNST (n = 3). In the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-failed melanoma cohort, there was 1 confirmed partial response (PR) out of 5 pts with uveal melanoma, 2 PR (1 confirmed and 1 unconfirmed) of 5 pts with mucosal melanoma, and 1 confirmed PR of 11 pts with cutaneous melanoma. ORR in the melanoma cohort was 17.4% (4/23 evaluable pts), and the disease control rate was 60.9% (14/23). In the MPNST cohort, 1 of 3 pts had an unconfirmed ongoing PR. In I-O drug-failed NSCLC (n = 14 evaluable) and urothelial (n = 5 evaluable) cohorts, each reported 1 confirmed PR. Common treatment (alrizomadlin or pembrolizumab)-related adverse events (TRAEs) (≥ 10%) were nausea (63.1%), thrombocytopenia (36.9%), vomiting (33.3%), fatigue (31.0%), decreased appetite (27.4%), diarrhea (21.4%), neutropenia (15.4%), and anemia (11.9%). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (≥ 5%) included thrombocytopenia (20.2%), neutropenia (14.2%), and anemia (8.3%). Eleven pts discontinued treatment due to AEs: 5 were treatment related, including 2 grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and 1 each of grade 2 vomiting, grade 2 fatigue, and grade 2 posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Three treatment-related SAEs were PRES, pyrexia, and asthenia. Conclusions: Alrizomadlin combined with pembrolizumab is well tolerated and may restore antitumor effects in pts with cancer resistant to or intolerant of I-O drugs, as suggested by preliminary antitumor activities in multiple tumor types. Internal study identifiers: APG-115-US-002; Keynote MK-3475-B66. Clinical trial information: NCT03611868.

Phase 3 comparison of high-dose once-daily (QD) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) with standard twice-daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC): CALGB 30610 (Alliance)/RTOG 0538.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8505-8505
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A Bogart ◽  
Xiaofei F. Wang ◽  
Gregory A. Masters ◽  
Junheng Gao ◽  
Ritsuko Komaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regional Lymph Node ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Concomitant Boost ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

8505 Background: Although level 1 evidence is lacking, the majority of patients (pts) with LSCLC are treated with a high dose QD TRT regimen in clinical practice. CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 was designed to determine if administering high dose TRT would improve overall survival (OS), compared with standard 45 Gy BID TRT, in LSCLC pts treated with chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Eligible pts had LSCLC, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2 and regional lymph node involvement excluding contralateral hilar or supraclavicular nodes. This phase 3 trial was conducted in 2 stages. In the first stage, pts were randomized 1:1:1 to 45 Gy BID over 3 weeks, 70 Gy QD over 7 weeks, or 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB) over 5 weeks. For the second stage, the study planned discontinuation of one high dose arm based on interim toxicity analysis with patients then randomized 1:1 in the two remaining arms. TRT was given starting with either the 1st or 2nd (of 4 total) chemotherapy cycles. The primary endpoint was OS measured from date of randomization. Results: The trial opened 03/15/2008 and closed 12/01/2019 upon completing accrual, with the CB arm discontinued 3/11/2013 after interim analysis. This analysis includes 638 pts randomized to 45 Gy BID TRT (n = 313) or 70 Gy QD TRT (n = 325). Median age was 63 years (range 37-81), the majority of pts were Caucasian (86%), female (52%), and with ECOG PS 0-1 (95%). After median follow-up of 2.84 years (IQR:1.35 -5.61) for surviving pts, QD compared to BID did not result in a significant difference in OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76-1.2, p = 0.9). Median, 2- and 4-year OS for QD were 30.5 months (95% CI: 24.4-39.6), 56% (95% CI: 0.51-0.62), and 39% (95% CI: 0.33-0.45), and for BID 28.7 months (95% CI: 26.2-35.5), 59% (95% CI: 0.53-0.65), and 35% (95% CI: 0.29-0.42). QD also did not result in a significant difference in PFS (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18, p = 0.94). Most grade 3+ hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were similar between cohorts. Rates of grade 3+ febrile neutropenia, dyspnea, esophageal pain and dysphagia for QD were 12.6%,7%, 11.6% and 11.3%, and for BID 13.6%, 4%, 11.2 % and 9.5%. Grade 5 AEs were reported in 3.7% and 1.7% of the QD and BID cohorts, respectively. Results will be updated at presentation. Conclusions: High dose QD TRT to 70 Gy did not significantly improve OS compared with standard 45 Gy BID TRT. Nevertheless, favorable outcomes on the QD arm provide the most robust evidence available supporting high dose once-daily TRT as an acceptable option in LSCLC. Outcomes from this study, the largest conducted in LSCLC to date, will help guide TRT decisions for this patient population. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Clinical trial information: NCT00632853.

DREAMseq (Doublet, Randomized Evaluation in Advanced Melanoma Sequencing): A phase III trial—ECOG-ACRIN EA6134.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (36_suppl) ◽  
pp. 356154-356154
Author(s):  
Michael B. Atkins ◽  
Sandra J. Lee ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Antoni Ribas ◽  
Ahmad A. Tarhini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Sequence ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Evaluation ◽  
Alternate Therapy ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

356154 Background: Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) blocking PD-1 and CTLA-4 or BRAF/MEK inhibitors have both shown significant antitumor efficacy and overall survival (OS) benefit in patients (pts) with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma (MM), leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exists to guide the choice of one over the other as initial therapy or the preferred treatment sequence in this population. The DREAMseq Trial was designed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the sequence of nivolumab/ipilimumab (N/I) followed by dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) to the converse sequence. Methods: Eligible pts with treatment-naive BRAFV600-mutant MM were stratified by ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1 and LDH level and randomized 1:1 to receive Step 1 with either N/I (Arm A) or D/T (Arm B) and at disease progression (PD) were enrolled in Step 2 receiving the alternate therapy, D/T (Arm C) or N/I (Arm D), respectively. Pts received N (1mg/kg)/I (3 mg/kg) q3 wks x 4 doses followed by N 240 IV q2 wks for up to 72 wks (Arms A and D) or D 150 mg po BID and T 2 mg po qD until PD (Arms B and C). In 2019, investigators were given the option to use alternate induction dosing of N (3mg/kg)/I (1 mg/kg) q3 wks x 4 doses for Arms A and D. Cycles were every 6 wks and imaging was obtained at baseline and q12 wks on each arm. Primary endpoint was 2-year OS. At the 4th Interim Analysis with 59% of pts being 2 yrs from enrollment, the DSMC and NCI CTEP recommended halting accrual and releasing the data. Results: Beginning 7/2015, 265 out of a proposed 300 pts were enrolled (133 Arm A and 132 Arm B). Median age was 61 (25-85) and 63% were male. Demographics for Arm A and B were balanced with 67% PS 0 and 60% with normal LDH. As of 7/16/21, at a median follow-up of 27.7 mos, 27 pts had switched to Arm C and 46 to Arm D. Overall Grade 3+ toxicity was 60% in Arm A and 52% in Arm B. Grade 5 treatment-related AEs included 2 on Arm A and 1 on Arm C. ORR to date is: Arm A 46% (52/113), Arm B 43% (49/114), Arm C 48% (11/23) and Arm D 30% (8/27). 37/42 assessed pts in Arm A and 19/37 in Arm B remain in response. Median DOR: Arm A- Not reached; Arm B-12.7 mos (95% CI: 8.2, -) (p <0.001). There were 100 deaths (Arm A to C- 38/Arm B to D- 62). 2-yr OS rate for those starting with Arm A was 72% (95% CI: 62-81%) and for Arm B 52% (95% CI: 42-62%) (log-rank p= 0.0095). PFS showed a trend in favor of Arm A (log-rank p=0.054). Both the PFS and OS curves show a biphasic pattern with Arm B being above Arm A until 6 and 10 mos, respectively. For the 115 pts with documented progression on Step 1 (Arm A-44/Arm B-71), 60 (52%) had registered for Step 2. The principal reason for not enrolling on Step 2 was death from PD within 6 mos (Arm A:15/23; Arm B: 25/32). Conclusions: For pts with advanced BRAFV600-mutant MM, the treatment sequence beginning with the CPI combination of N/I resulted in superior OS, which became evident at 10 mos, with longer Step 1 DOR and more ongoing responses than the treatment sequence beginning with D/T. Clinical trial information: NCT02224781.

High-Dose Interstitial Brachytherapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme

1994 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Micheletti ◽  
Giovanni Baroncelli ◽  
Beniamino La Face ◽  
Piero Feroldi ◽  
Marco Galelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
High Dose Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Short Treatment ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

Aims and background The long-term prognosis for survival of patients with inoperable glioblastoma multiforme (GBL) is very poor. Conventional external radiotherapy gives only transitory result. This severe prognosis led us to elaborate a high-dose rate (HDR), after-remote-loading brachytherapy treatment protocol: our aim was both therapeutic and psychologic Methods Five patients with GBL (T1 G4 UICC) were treated with stereotactic biopsy followed by HDR brachytherapy. A unique coaxial after-loading catheter was stereotactically inserted through the center of the target volume. The treatment schedule considered 5 fractions, 5 Gy/fraction at the dose specification surface, 2 fractions per day. Results The treatment was well tolerated. Tumor progression started again at the 8th to the 16th week from the end of the treatment. ECOG performance status at the 8th week was better than before the therapy in 2 of 5 patients and was stable in 2 of 5 patients. Order neuroperformance status was stable in 2 patients at 8 weeks. At the 16th week there was neurologic deterioration. The average survival was 21 weeks. Conclusions Our approach seems to be of some interest for the pal-lation of GBL, and it offers some advantages, in particular regarding the short treatment period. Our procedure can be improved: a multicatheter implant and a more fractionated schedule could be taken into account.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document