Phase II Trial of Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3052-3052 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kuruvilla ◽  
Diane Taylor ◽  
Lisa Wang ◽  
Chantale Blattler ◽  
Armand Keating ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cytokine Analysis

Abstract Introduction: Patients (pts) with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) that has relapsed after or is refractory to primary therapy and subsequent high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) cannot be cured with conventional treatments. As various cytokines (IL-6,12 and 13), NF-KB and angiogenic factors have been implicated in the pathophysiology of HL, we postulated that lenalidomide, a novel agent with both immunomodulatory and anti-angiogenic properties would have activity in the relapsed (REL) or refractory (REF: defined as progression on or within 3 months of primary therapy) setting. Methods: The treatment regimen consisted of lenalidomide 25 mg PO days 1–21 on a 28 day cycle. CT scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis were obtained at baseline and were repeated every 2 cycles or earlier at the investigators’ discretion. A Fleming two stage trial design was chosen and a calculated sample size of 30 was determined based on an alpha error < 0.05 and power of 0.80 and a response proportion of 0.20 to consider lenalidomide active. Serum/plasma specimens at baseline and on treatment were collected for cytokine analysis. Data analysis was performed in July 2008 after the first stage (15 patients) were accrued. Responses were categorized by International Workshop Criteria (Cheson JCO 1999) and toxicity was assessed by NCI common toxicity criteria v3.0. Results: 15 pts have been accrued with 14 evaluable patients to date. The median age was 37 (range 18–74) with 7 female pts. ECOG performance status was 0: (2) 1: (9) and 2: (4). The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range 1–4). All pts (except one pt on a pediatric protocol had received ABVD-type primary chemotherapy and 9/15 received prior radiotherapy. 10 pts had undergone prior ASCT with 10 patients having REF and 5 pts with REL disease following primary chemotherapy. 8 pts had disease recurrence within 1 year post ASCT. Of non-ASCT pts, 2 pts were refractory to chemotherapy and 3 pts were ineligible (age and/or comorbidity). The median number of treatment cycles/pt was 3 (range 0–10) with 1 pt enrolled but not starting therapy due to rapid disease progression. Best response was a PR in 2 cases (confirmed by 3rd independent radiologist in 1), and SD in 7 pts. Six pts discontinued therapy because of PD and 5 for toxicity; 4 pts remain on treatment. Median time to progression was 3.2 months and overall survival was 9.1 months. Grade 3–4 toxicities included: neutropenia:4 (1 pt had febrile neutropenia following 1 cycle of treatment), thrombocytopenia:4 and anemia:3. Five pts developed skin rash (2: grade 2) and there was 1 case of erythema multiforme. Conclusions: Preliminary results of this phase II study including heavily pre-treated pts with HL suggest lenalidomide has some evidence of activity. Toxicity is manageable although hematologic side effects are common. These results suggest that lenalidomide warrants further study and the second stage of accrual is ongoing.

A phase II study of S-1 for previously treated small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19074-e19074
Author(s):  
K. Kudo ◽  
F. Ohyanagi ◽  
A. Horiike ◽  
E. Miyauchi ◽  
I. Motokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated

e19074 Background: S-1 is a novel oral 5-fluorouracil derivative that exhibits obvious activity against various tumor types including NSCLC. However, the effects of S-1 against SCLC have not been reported. The present phase II trial assesses the efficacy and safety of S-1 in previously treated SCLC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had pathologically documented SCLC that relapsed after platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2, and adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function. Patients with untreated or symptomatic brain metastasis were excluded. Treatment comprised the oral administration of S-1 at 40 mg/m2 twice each day for 28 days every 6 weeks. The primary end point was the objective tumor response rate (RECIST). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: Twenty-six evaluable patients were enrolled (Simon's two-stage optimal design; α = 0.1; β = 0.1; P0 = 0.05; P1 = 0.25) with the following characteristics: male: female, 22/4; median age, 68 (33 - 79) y; PS0–1, n = 21; PS2, n = 5. The median number of prior treatment regimens was 2 (1–3). S-1 was administered for a mean of 1.3 cycles (1 - 5). One patient (3.8%) partially responded, 10 (38.5%) had stable and 15 (57.7%) had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 3.8% and the disease control rate was 42.3%. The median time to progression was 33 days. The median survival time was 8.0 months and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. This regimen was well tolerated. The common grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (7.7%), leukopenia (7.7%), anemia (7.7%), hyponatremia (7.7%), rush (7.7%), infection (7.7%), and diarrhea (3.8%). None of the patients developed febrile neutropenia and no deaths were attributed to treatment. Conclusions: S-1 is well tolerated but has low activity as a single agent in previously treated patients with SCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of pazopanib with weekly paclitaxel in refractory urothelial cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 294-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Sujata Narayanan ◽  
Lauren Christine Harshman ◽  
Russell Kent Pachynski ◽  
Anthony P. Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

294 Background: Currently, there are no standard treatments for relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC). Discouraging results have been observed in trials evaluating established chemotherapeutics as single agents or in combination regimens. Paclitaxel has moderate activity when used alone and in combination in UC. Pazopanib is active in other solid tumors secondary to its potent anti-angiogenic effects. We report the results of a multi-center phase II study evaluating the combination of paclitaxel with pazopanib in refractory UC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had histologically confirmed UC, with disease that progressed on upto 2 chemotherapeutic regimens. Pazopanib (800 mg) was administered daily, with weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) for 3 weeks in a 28 day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the study was response-rate (RR) based on RECISTv 1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints included safety, and progression free-survival (PFS). Results: From April 2010 to September 2014, 32 patients were enrolled. Median age was 67 years (29-89) and median ECOG performance status was 1 (0-2). 17 pts (54%) had UC of the upper urinary tract disease and 15(47%) had primary bladder tumors. All pts had multiple metastatic sites, including 9 (28%) with liver metastases. Median number of prior cytotoxic regimens was 2, and 50% were considered cisplatin responsive. Objective responses were observed in 58% with 3 (12%) complete responses (CR), and 12 pts (46%) with partial responses (PR). Another 9 (35%) acheived stable disease (SD). High grade toxicities included grade 3 hypertension (n=2), grade 3 fatigue (n=4), grade 3 thrombosis (n=2) and grade 4 neutropenia (n=2). Nearly half of the patients( n= 14 ) required growth factor support. Conclusions: Our phase II study combining paclitaxel and pazopanib demonstratedsignificant anti-tumor activity in relapsed/refractory UC. This combination is safe, effective and is worthy of evaluation in randomized phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT01108055.

A single-arm, phase II study assessing the efficacy of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus radiotherapy (RT) in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather L. McArthur ◽  
Christopher Andrew Barker ◽  
Ayca Gucalp ◽  
Lizza Lebron-Zapata ◽  
Yong Hannah Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Overall Response

14 Background: Overall response rates of 13-19% have been reported with checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in chemotherapy-resistant, PD-L1-positive mTNBC. RT is frequently used to enhance local control in mTNBC and has been reported to induce distant (abscopal) tumor responses when combined with immunotherapy. In this study, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of RT combined with a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, pembro, in a single-arm, two-stage, phase II study in mTNBC. Methods: Eligible women had biopsy-proven mTNBC, ECOG performance status 0-2, and ≥2 measurable sites of metastatic disease with at least one site requiring RT. A total RT dose of 3000 cGy was delivered in 5 daily fractions. Pembro 200 mg was given intravenously within 3 days of first RT fraction, then every 3 weeks +/-3 days until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at week 13 in the non-irradiated lesions by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival. Tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline and at week 7. PD-L1 expression was not required for study entry. Results: Of the 17 women enrolled, the median age was 52 y (range 37-73y). and the median number of prior chemotherapies received for metastatic disease was 3 (range 0 to 8). Of the 8 women not evaluable at 13 weeks: 5 died secondary to disease-related complications (at weeks 2, 6, 7, 8, and 9) and 3 came off study due to disease progression prior to week 13. Of the 9 women evaluable at week 13, 3 (33%) had a partial response, 1 (11%) had stable disease and 5 (56%) had disease progression. The 3 partial responses represented 60%, 54%, and 34% decreases in tumor burden by RECIST v1.1 and were durable for 31, 21, and ongoing at 22 weeks, respectively. The stable disease response was durable for 22 weeks. Common toxicities were mild and included fatigue, myalgia and nausea. Conclusions: The combination of pembro and RT is well-tolerated. This is a poor prognosis population with 5/17 (29%) of patients dying within 12 weeks of study entry. However, durable responses were observed outside of the RT field in 3/9 (33%) patients who were unselected for PD-L1 expression and evaluable at 13 weeks. Clinical trial information: NCT02730130.

Phase II study of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin combination chemotherapy in taxane and cisplatin-based chemotherapy-refractory metastatic gastric cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15599-e15599
Author(s):  
J. Yoon ◽  
S. Cho ◽  
W. Bae ◽  
J. Hwang ◽  
H. Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Haematological Toxicity ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

e15599 Background: The role of the second line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer was not clear, but possibility of prolongation of survival is open question. Irinotecan is promising agents in gastric cancer and this phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, high dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in taxane and cisplatin based chemotherapy refractory metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: Eligible criteria were as followed; histologic confirmed adenocarcinoma of stomach, previously treated with taxane and cisplatin, age≥18, Eastern Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less, adequate organ function. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2) as a 30-min infusion and leucovorin (200 mg/m2) as a 15-min infusion were given on day 1, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2bolus infusion then 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 as a 48-hour continuous infusion. This cycle was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (range 27–73 years), and the ECOG performance status of all patients was 1. All patients were evaluable for safety and survival and twenty seven patients (79.4%) were evaluable for tumor response. The overall response rate was 18.5% (95% CI: 3.9–33.1). The median progression free survival and overall survival were 4.6 (95% CI: 2.4–6.9) and 9.3 months (95% CI: 5.2–13.4), respectively. Greater than grade 3 haematological toxicities were neutropenia in nine (26.5%), febrile neutropenia in one (2.9%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (2.9%). The major non-haematological toxicity was asthenia, but most of patients showed grade 1 or 2. Greater than grade 3 non- haematological toxicities were elevated AST/ALT in four (11.8%), hyperbilirubinemia in two (5.9%), nausea in two patients (5.9%). Conclusions: This results showed that the combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-FU and leucovorin was well tolerated and active in taxane and cisplatin refractory patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients (pts) with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 582-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Jordan Gold ◽  
David A. Smith ◽  
Desiree Iriarte ◽  
Barry Boatman ◽  
Henry G. Kaplan
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Regimes ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

582 Background: LBH589 is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) which induces apoptosis of tumor cells. LBH589 has been shown to cause regression of colon cancer in animal models and phase I trials have shown the agent to be well tolerated, providing rationale for studying this agent in pts with MCRC. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label phase II study of single agent LBH589 in patients with MCRC who failed at least 2 prior regimens for metastatic disease. Measurable disease, adequate organ function and ECOG performance status of 0-2 were required. Pts received LBH589 30mg po on M/W/F until disease progression. Pts were evaluated for toxicity every 2 weeks and for response every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included response rate, time to progression (TTP), and toxicity. Results: 29 pts were enrolled (16 male, 13 female). The median age was 59 (range 41-76). The median number of prior treatment regimes was 3 (2-11). The median survival was 5.1 months (range 1-24+). There were no objective responses. 3 pts had SD at 8 weeks. The median TTP was 7.7 weeks (range 1-38.). Six pts had grade 4 thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion. Nine pts required dose reductions for toxicity. Conclusions: Single-agent LBH589 was not associated with objective tumor responses in this heavily pre-treated pt population. However, the median survival was comparable to that seen in other trials of single agent targeted therapy in the treatment of refractory MCRC. Thrombocytopenia was significant, and may complicate potential trials of combination therapy.

An open, multicenter, phase II clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of S-1 split cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC): HGCSG0702—Safety analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Ichiro Iwanaga ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Hiraku Fukushima ◽  
Atsushi Ishiguro ◽  
Takenori Takahata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Rest Period ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Multicenter Phase

121 Background: From the results of SPIRITS trial, S-1 plus cisplatin has been regarded as standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with AGC in Japan. However, many facilities are forced hospitalization of hydration upon administration of high dose Cisplatin (60mg/m2). Therefore, in Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (HGCSG), to investigate the safety and efficacy, we conducted a multicenter phase II clinical trials of S-1 plus split cisplatin as a therapeutic strategy that can be administered in the outpatient. Methods: Eligibility criteria included pathologically confirmed AGC; no prior chemotherapy; Age 20 to 75, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 to 1; adequate organ function; and written informed consent. S-1 (40-60 mg depending on patients body surface area) was given orally, twice daily for 3 consecutive weeks, and 30 mg/m2 cisplatin was given intravenously on day 1 and 15, followed by 2-week rest period, within a 5-week cycle. Primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, safety profile, and duration of hospitalization. Results: Between Mar 2008 and Mar 2012, 40 pts were enrolled. Patients characteristics were as follows: median age 63 years (range 41-75), Male: female 30:10, PS 0:1 33:7. Median no. of cycles was 3. The most common non-hematological adverse events (AE) were anorexia (70%), nausea (60%), fatigue (60%) and diarrhea (48%) and hematological AE were anemia (88%), neutropenia (83%), leukocytopenia (68%) and thrombocytopenia (60%). The main grade 3-4 AE were neutropenia (40%), anemia (30%), anorexia (30%) and fatigue (15%). These AE were as expected. The median dose intensity of S-1 was 270mg/m2/week (relative dose intensity (RDI) 80%), and cisplatin was 10.1mg/m2/week (RDI 84%). These toxicities were tolerable and manageable. No treatment-related death was observed. Conclusions: We conclude that this S-1 plus split cisplatin regimen was well tolerated in the treatment of AGC, and most patients could be administered in the outpatient. We are planning the final efficacy analysis for February 2013.

Phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab for advanced bladder cancer of variant histologies (BCVH).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4518-4518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
Matthew T Campbell ◽  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
Amishi Yogesh Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Poor Outcomes

4518 Background: Patients with BCVH have poor outcomes and data regarding the management of this heterogeneous group of patients is limited. Nivolumab and ipilimumab has demonstrated safety and efficacy in urothelial carcinoma and other malignancies. In this multicenter, single arm, multi-cohort phase II trial we evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with BCVH and other advanced rare genitourinary cancers (NCT 03333616). Herein, we report the preliminary results of the fully accrued BCVH cohort. Methods: Eligible patients had metastatic BCVH, ECOG performance status of 0-2 and were either untreated or had received any number of lines of prior therapy excluding prior immunotherapy. Patients underwent a baseline biopsy and blood collection for correlative studies and received treatment with nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles with continued maintenance of nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Results: 19 BCVH patients were enrolled at 4 institutions between 4/2018 and 1/2019: squamous cell (n = 6), small cell (n = 3), adenocarcinoma (n = 3), urachal (n = 5), plasmacytoid (n = 1), and spindle cell (n = 1). 13 (68%) patients had received prior systemic therapy including platinum-based chemotherapy in 92% patients. Median number of cycles of ipilimumab plus nivolumab received was 3 (range 1-8) and median follow-up was 3.6 (0.3-8.8) months. 13 patients had undergone at least one scan; ORR was 31% (4/13, 80%CI: 14-52%), with partial responses seen in small cell carcinoma (n = 2), urachal (n = 1) and a complete response in 1 patient with plasmacytoid carcinoma. 3 patients (16%) developed treatment-related grade 3 toxicities with 1 (5%) grade 4 toxicity. Conclusions: Nivolumab and ipilmumab resulted in objective responses in a subset of patients with BCVH with manageable toxicities. Updated clinical and correlative data will be presented. This combination may warrant further investigation in patients with BCVH, which has substantial unmet needs. Clinical trial information: NCT 03333616.

Phase II study of nivolumab and ipilimumab for advanced rare genitourinary cancers.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5018-5018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
Matthew T Campbell ◽  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Subrina Farah ◽  
Mehmet Asim Bilen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Differentiation ◽  
Adrenal Tumors ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Genitourinary Cancers

5018 Background: Patients with rare genitourinary malignancies (Bladder cancer of variant histologies (BCVH), adrenal tumors, chemotherapy refractory germ cell tumors (CRGCT), penile carcinoma and prostate cancer of variant histology (PCVH)) have poor outcomes. Nivolumab and ipilimumab has demonstrated safety and efficacy in genitourinary malignancies. In this multicenter, single arm, multi-cohort phase II trial we evaluated the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab in pts with advanced rare genitourinary cancers (NCT 03333616). Herein, we report the results of the fully accrued BCVH, adrenal and other cohorts. Methods: Eligible pts had a metastatic rare genitourinary malignancy, ECOG performance status of 0-2 and no prior immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure; aside from CRGCT pts could be treatment naïve. Eligible pts received nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses with continued nivolumab 480 mg IV every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Results: 56 pts were enrolled at 6 institutions between 4/2018 and 7/2019 in 3 cohorts: BCVH (N = 19), adrenal tumors (n = 18) and other tumors (n = 19). Median follow-up was 9.9 (range < 1~21) months. 28(50%) pts received all 4 doses of nivolumab and ipilimumab. 25 pts received nivolumab maintenance at a median of 4 (range 1-18) cycles. ORR in entire cohort was 16% (n = 9: 2 CR 7 PR, Table); 67% of responders (6/9) maintained response greater than 9 months. Median PFS was 2.8 (2.7-5.2) months. 22 pts (39%) developed treatment-related ≥ grade 3 toxicity; 23% required high dose steroids (≥40 mg prednisone or equivalent) and 15 (27%) pts discontinued treatment due to an AE. Grade 5 toxicity occurred in 3 pts; 1 death was treatment related. Conclusions: Nivolumab and ipilimumab resulted in objective responses in a subset of pts with rare GU malignancies, especially in BCVH. Biomarkers are being evaluated and an additional cohort exploring the activity in genitourinary tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation is ongoing. This combination warrants further investigation in these pts with substantial unmet needs. Clinical trial information: NCT 03333616 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Multi-Institutional Phase II Study of High-Dose Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy in Patients With Localized, Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 460-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore S. Hong ◽  
Jennifer Y. Wo ◽  
Beow Y. Yeap ◽  
Edgar Ben-Josef ◽  
Erin I. McDonnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Proton Beam ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Proton Beam Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose, hypofractionated proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Materials and Methods In this single-arm, phase II, multi-institutional study, 92 patients with biopsy-confirmed HCC or ICC, determined to be unresectable by multidisciplinary review, with a Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (CTP) of A or B, ECOG performance status of 0 to 2, no extrahepatic disease, and no prior radiation received 15 fractions of proton therapy to a maximum total dose of 67.5 Gy equivalent. Sample size was calculated to demonstrate > 80% local control (LC) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 criteria at 2 years for HCC patients, with the parallel goal of obtaining acceptable precision for estimating outcomes for ICC. Results Eighty-three patients were evaluable: 44 with HCC, 37 with ICC, and two with mixed HCC/ICC. The CTP score was A for 79.5% of patients and B for 15.7%; 4.8% of patients had no cirrhosis. Prior treatment had been given to 31.8% of HCC patients and 61.5% of ICC patients. The median maximum dimension was 5.0 cm (range, 1.9 to 12.0 cm) for HCC patients and 6.0 cm (range, 2.2 to 10.9 cm) for ICC patients. Multiple tumors were present in 27.3% of HCC patients and in 12.8% of ICC patients. Tumor vascular thrombosis was present in 29.5% of HCC patients and in 28.2% of ICC patients. The median dose delivered to both HCC and ICC patients was 58.0 Gy. With a median follow-up among survivors of 19.5 months, the LC rate at 2 years was 94.8% for HCC and 94.1% for ICC. The overall survival rate at 2 years was 63.2% for HCC and 46.5% ICC. Conclusion High-dose hypofractionated proton therapy demonstrated high LC rates for HCC and ICC safely, supporting ongoing phase III trials of radiation in HCC and ICC.

A phase II trial of high-dose cetuximab (cmab) plus irinotecan in patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) who progressed on standard-dose cmab plus irinotecan.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 598-598
Author(s):  
A. M. Patta ◽  
J. A. McMahon ◽  
C. Samborski ◽  
M. Fakih
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Higher Doses

598 Background: Prior clinical data suggest a dose-related response to cmab when combined with irinotecan in pts with KRAS WT tumors who do not develop grade 2 and above rash with standard cmab dosing. However, the investigation of higher doses of cmab in the setting of acquired or innate resistance to standard dose cmab has not been previously investigated. We conducted a phase II clinical trial of high-dose cmab plus irinotecan in KRAS WT pts with standard-dose cmab plus irinotecan – refractory disease to address this question. Methods: Pts with KRAS WT MCRC progressing on standard dose of cmab with irinotecan were eligible for study. Pts should have received a minimum of 6 weeks of prior standard dose cmab plus irinotecan and progressed within 4 weeks from the last dose. Cmab was administered at 500 mg/m2/week and irinotecan was administered at the same dose/schedule on which the patient previously progressed. 12-week PFS rate was the primary endpoint. Results: 8 pts were treated on study: median age 68 yrs (45-85), 5 pts were males, ECOG performance status was 1 in all 8 pts. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities consisted of hypomagnesaemia (4 pts), anemia (1 pt), leucopenia (1 pt), fatigue (1 pt), and diarrhea (1 pt). 6 pts achieved stable disease (with regression in target lesions noted in 3 pts). 12 week PFS rate is 5/8 and 18 week PFS is 4/8. 3 pts remain on study at 4.5, 5, and 8 months from enrollment. Conclusions: High-dose cmab/irinotecan is well tolerated except for hypomagnesemia. Encouraging prolonged disease stabilizations warrant further investigation of this approach in pts in KRAS WT population. Accrual is ongoing. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document