Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in patients (pts) with advanced prostate cancer treated with apalutamide: Results from the TITAN and SPARTAN studies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5541-5541
Author(s):  
Kim N. Chi ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Julie N Graff ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Psa Kinetics ◽  
Psa Nadir ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Baseline Psa

5541 Background: The phase III TITAN and SPARTAN studies demonstrated improved outcomes with the addition of apalutamide (APA) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); outcomes included prolonging overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in TITAN, and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in nonmetastatic castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC) in SPARTAN. A post hoc analysis of PSA kinetics in pts from both studies is reported. Methods: Baseline PSA at randomization, time to PSA nadir, and proportion of pts achieving a PSA decline of ≥ 90% (PSA90) and of pts achieving a PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at 3 and 12 months and at any time after treatment in the APA arms of the TITAN and SPARTAN studies were evaluated. Within each study, rPFS/MFS were compared between pts achieving a PSA90 or PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL response vs not. Results: 525 TITAN pts and 806 SPARTAN pts treated with APA were included in the analysis. Median baseline PSA, time to PSA nadir, median PSA nadir, and maximum percentage changes from baseline PSA are shown in the table. PSA90 and confirmed PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL were evident as early as 3 months in both TITAN and SPARTAN, and percentage of confirmed response continued to increase at 12 months. Pts treated with APA who achieved PSA90 were at lower risk of rPFS events in TITAN and of MFS events in SPARTAN, with a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.46 (0.321-0.653) and 0.36 (0.271-0.489) in each respective study (both p < 0.0001), compared with APA pts who did not achieve PSA90. Pts with confirmed PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL had similar rPFS and MFS benefits. Conclusions: Pts with advanced PC, whether mCSPC or nmCRPC, treated with APA + ADT demonstrated rapid PSA declines that continued over time. There was a high rate of pts with PSA90 and with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL responses, with a majority of pts reaching PSA90 by 12 months. Pts achieving PSA90 and/or PSA nadir of ≤ 0.2 ng/mL had a prolonged rPFS and MFS in TITAN and SPARTAN, respectively. Clinical trial information: NCT02489318; NCT01946204 . [Table: see text]

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS): A comparison of degarelix versus leuprolide in patients with prostate cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. D. Shore ◽  
J. W. Moul ◽  
E. Crawford ◽  
E. van der Meulen ◽  
T. Olesen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
First Year ◽  
Death Time ◽  
Psa Failure ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Baseline Psa

12 Background: Comparative effectiveness of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) blocker, degarelix, vs the GnRH agonist, leuprolide, was evaluated during a 1-year phase III trial (CS21); data have been presented. We now report long-term data from an ongoing 5-year extension study (CS21A). Methods: In CS21, patients with prostate cancer (all stages) were randomized to degarelix (240 mg for 1 month, then monthly maintenance doses of 80 mg [n=207] or 160 mg [n=202]), or leuprolide 7.5 mg/month (n=201). Leuprolide patients could receive bicalutamide. Of the 504 patients who completed the 1-year trial, 384 chose to continue in an extension study; those on leuprolide were re-randomized to degarelix 240/80 mg or 240/160 mg. PSA PFS was defined as time to first PSA failure (two consecutive increases in PSA of 50% and ≥5 ng/mL above nadir) or death. Time for 25% of patients to experience PSA PFS (TTP25%) was analyzed using Weibull estimates. Results: Up to 1 year, the risk of PSA PFS was significantly lower with degarelix 240/80 mg vs leuprolide (p=0.05, log-rank). At 27.5 months' median follow-up, hazard rate of PSA PFS significantly decreased in leuprolide patients switched to degarelix compared with before the switch (0.20 vs 0.08; p=0.003). Similar improvements occurred in patients with baseline PSA >20 ng/mL. During the first year, TTP25% for patients with baseline PSA >20 ng/mL was numerically longer with degarelix vs leuprolide (407 vs 303 days; p=0.085); the difference was even greater when degarelix data were analyzed beyond 1 year (514 vs 303 days; p=0.01). Conclusions: Patients receiving degarelix had a significantly lower risk of PSA failure or death vs leuprolide during the first year of treatment. After switching to degarelix, patients who initially received leuprolide experienced a significantly lower rate of PSA failure or death. In patients with baseline PSA >20 ng/mL, TTP25% was significantly longer for degarelix patients. These data support the durability of the significant PSA PFS benefit of degarelix vs monthly leuprolide observed during the first year and the use of degarelix as first-line androgen deprivation therapy. [Table: see text]

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz M. Beer ◽  
Eugene D. Kwon ◽  
Charles G. Drake ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Christopher Logothetis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Ipilimumab increases antitumor T-cell responses by binding to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. We evaluated treatment with ipilimumab in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without visceral metastases. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo maintenance therapy was administered to nonprogressing patients every 3 months. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to ipilimumab and 202 to placebo; 399 were treated with ipilimumab and 199 with placebo. Median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.5 to 32.5 months) in the ipilimumab arm versus 29.7 months (95% CI, 26.1 to 34.2 months) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95.87% CI, 0.88 to 1.39; P = .3667). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the ipilimumab arm versus 3.8 with placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95.87% CI, 0.55 to 0.81). Exploratory analyses showed a higher prostate-specific antigen response rate with ipilimumab (23%) than with placebo (8%). Diarrhea (15%) was the only grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event (AE) reported in ≥ 10% of ipilimumab-treated patients. Nine (2%) deaths occurred in the ipilimumab arm due to treatment-related AEs; no deaths occurred in the placebo arm. Immune-related grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 31% and 2% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Ipilimumab did not improve OS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The observed increases in progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen response rates suggest antitumor activity in a patient subset.

scholarly journals ARCHES: A Randomized, Phase III Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Enzalutamide or Placebo in Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (32) ◽  
pp. 2974-2986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Russell Z. Szmulewitz ◽  
Daniel P. Petrylak ◽  
Jeffrey Holzbeierlein ◽  
Arnauld Villers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
Over Time

PURPOSE Enzalutamide, a potent androgen-receptor inhibitor, has demonstrated significant benefits in metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). METHODS ARCHES (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02677896 ) is a multinational, double-blind, phase III trial, wherein 1,150 men with mHSPC were randomly assigned 1:1 to enzalutamide (160 mg/day) or placebo, plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), stratified by disease volume and prior docetaxel chemotherapy. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival. RESULTS As of October 14, 2018, the risk of radiographic progression or death was significantly reduced with enzalutamide plus ADT versus placebo plus ADT (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50; P < .001; median not reached v 19.0 months). Similar significant improvements in radiographic progression-free survival were reported in prespecified subgroups on the basis of disease volume and prior docetaxel therapy. Enzalutamide plus ADT significantly reduced the risk of prostate-specific antigen progression, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy, first symptomatic skeletal event, castration resistance, and reduced risk of pain progression. More men achieved an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level and/or an objective response with enzalutamide plus ADT ( P < .001). Patients in both treatment groups reported a high baseline level of quality of life, which was maintained over time. Grade 3 or greater adverse events were reported in 24.3% of patients who received enzalutamide plus ADT versus 25.6% of patients who received placebo plus ADT, with no unexpected adverse events. CONCLUSION Enzalutamide with ADT significantly reduced the risk of metastatic progression or death over time versus placebo plus ADT in men with mHSPC, including those with low-volume disease and/or prior docetaxel, with a safety analysis that seems consistent with the safety profile of enzalutamide in previous clinical trials in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Phase III Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Radical Prostatectomy Alone in pT3 Prostate Cancer With Postoperative Undetectable Prostate-Specific Antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 2924-2930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Wiegel ◽  
Dirk Bottke ◽  
Ursula Steiner ◽  
Alessandra Siegmann ◽  
Reinhard Golz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Wait And See ◽  
Biochemical Progression

Purpose Local failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) is common in patients with cancer extending beyond the capsule. Two randomized trials demonstrated an advantage for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) compared with a wait-and-see policy. We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare RP followed by immediate RT with RP alone for patients with pT3 prostate cancer and an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after RP. Methods After RP, 192 men were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see policy, and 193 men were assigned to immediate postoperative RT. Eligible patients had pT3 pN0 tumors. Patients who did not achieve an undetectable PSA after RP were excluded from treatment according to random assignment (n = 78; 20%). Of the remaining 307 patients, 34 patients on the RT arm did not receive RT and five patients on the wait-and-see arm received RT. Therefore, 114 patients underwent RT and 154 patients were treated with a wait-and-see policy. The primary end point was biochemical progression-free survival. Results Biochemical progression-free survival after 5 years in patients with undetectable PSA after RP was significantly improved in the RT group (72%; 95% CI, 65% to 81%; v 54%, 95% CI, 45% to 63%; hazard ratio = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79; P = .0015). On univariate analysis, Gleason score more than 6 and less than 7, PSA before RP, tumor stage, and positive surgical margins were predictors of outcome. The rate of grade 3 to 4 late adverse effects was 0.3%. Conclusion Adjuvant RT for pT3 prostate cancer with postoperatively undetectable PSA significantly reduces the risk of biochemical progression. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect on metastases-free and overall survival.

Overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) by depth of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline in the phase III PROSPER trial of men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with enzalutamide (ENZA).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Maha H. A. Hussain ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
Eleni Efstathiou ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Qi Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Psa Nadir ◽  
Post Hoc

94 Background: The PROSPER trial demonstrated prolonged MFS and OS for men with nmCRPC and rapidly rising PSA treated with ENZA vs placebo, both in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The final survival analysis of PROSPER (Sternberg et al. NEJM 2020) recently reported a median OS of 67.0 months (95% CI, 64.0 to not reached) with ENZA and 56.3 months (95% CI, 54.4 to 63.0) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.89; P = .001). Post hoc analyses of PROSPER evaluating PSA dynamics have demonstrated longer MFS with greater PSA decline (Hussain et al. ESMO Sept 19-21, 2020. Poster 685P) and increased risk of metastases in patients with even modest PSA progression vs those without (Saad et al. Eur Urol 2020). Here we further explored the relationship between PSA dynamics and outcomes in PROSPER using uniquely defined PSA subgroups of decline. Methods: Eligible men in PROSPER had nmCRPC, a PSA level ≥ 2 ng/mL at baseline, and a PSA doubling time ≤ 10 months. Men continued ADT, were randomized 2:1 to ENZA 160 mg once daily vs placebo, and had PSA evaluation at week 17 and every 16 weeks thereafter. This post hoc analysis evaluated OS and MFS for 4 mutually exclusive subgroups defined by PSA nadir using men with PSA reduction < 50% as the reference group. The HR is based on an unstratified Cox proportional hazards analysis model. Results: 1401 men were enrolled in PROSPER; 933 were treated with ENZA and PSA data were available for 905. Measured at nadir, 38% of these men achieved PSA reduction ≥ 90% (actual nadir < 0.2 ng/mL), and another 27% achieved PSA reduction ≥ 90% (actual nadir ≥ 0.2 ng/mL). Among men in the placebo arm of PROSPER only 3/457 reported PSA reduction ≥ 90%. Median OS and MFS increased with increasing depth of PSA decline (Table). Conclusions: In men with nmCRPC and rapidly rising PSA treated with ADT plus ENZA, there was a close relationship between the degree of PSA decline and survival outcomes. Defining PSA by both percent decline and actual decline below 0.2 ng/mL revealed a previously under-appreciated relationship between these PSA metrics and highlights the importance of PSA nadir as an intermediate biomarker in nmCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02003924. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document