Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with FOLFOX as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received D2 radical gastrectomy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16549-e16549
Author(s):  
Yuzhou Zhao ◽  
Guangsen Han ◽  
Jing Zhuang ◽  
Zhimeng Li ◽  
Gangcheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
D2 Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
The Mean

e16549 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) can improve the overall survival without increasing operation risk. Nowadays, immunotherapy has become a new promising neoadjuvant treatment. Therefore, we intended to evaluate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) combined with FOLFOX as the neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC who received D2 radical gastrectomy. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed as resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC received the neoadjuvant treatment of camrelizumab and FOLFOX every 2 weeks for 4 cycles. Imaging evaluation was performed in 2-4 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. Patients who had no progression disease (PD) were recruited. Eligible patients underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection through laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery. The primary end points were safety and R0 resection rate. Results: From July 24 2019 to January 31 2020, 15 patients were recruited. The mean age was 57 years. A total of 10(67%) were males and 5(33%) were females. According to AJCC 8th, cT3 and cT4 were confirmed in 7(47%) patients and 8(53%) patients, N1 and N2 in 7(47%) patients and 8(53%) patients, respectively. During operation, intraperitoneal metastases were found in 2 patients. Of the 13 surgeries, only 2 were laparoscopic and the others were laparotomy. The surgical procedures included Roux-en-Y (9, 69.2%), Billroth II (1, 7.7%) and jejunum interposition (3, 23.1%). Thirteen patients underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection and all of them were confirmed R0 resection by postoperative pathology results. The mean lymph node yield was 44.1±13.2 nodes, positive lymph node yield was 1.8±2.8 nodes. Duration time of surgery was 186.5±45.5 minutes, mean blood loss was 219.2±109 ml during the operation. Mean hospital stays were 13.2±2.4 days. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 pneumonia. Neither serious intraoperative complications nor immune-related adverse events both prior and post operation were observed. There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: Camrelizumab combined with FLOFOX as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC showed acceptable toxicity and promising efficacy with low complications and mortality. Clinical trial information: NCT03939962 .

Camrelizumab combined with FLOFOX as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Updated results of efficacy and safety.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
Ying Liu ◽  
Guangsen Han ◽  
Hongle Li ◽  
Yuzhou Zhao ◽  
Zhi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
D2 Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Therapy Strategy ◽  
Grade 3

4036 Background: Although anti-PD-1 antibody in combination with chemotherapy has shown promising antitumor activity in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC), the evidence of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced GC/GEJC is limited. Camrelizumab combined FOLFOX as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC was a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study we conducted. Here, we updated the results of efficacy and safety of this study. Methods: Patients confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and imaging with clinical stage≥T2 and/or positive lymph nodes were enrolled. They received 4 cycles of camrelizumab (200mg ivgtt on day1, q2w) plus FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 ivgtt, LV 200mg/m2 ivgtt, 5-Fu 400mg/m2 iv followed by 2.4mg/m2 CIV 46 hours on day 1, q2w) as neoadjuvant therapy. Then patients without disease progression evaluated by imaging underwent gastrectomy of D2 lymph node dissection. The primary endpoint was pCR, the secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate and safety. Results: Between Jul 24 2019 and Nov 30 2020, 49 patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (29-72 years). All patients completed 4 cycles treatment. Unfortunately, 2 of them were confirmed PD by imaging. In addition, two patients refused gastrectomy and withdrew from the study. Eventually, 45 patients underwent gastrectomy, of which 3 patients had intraperitoneal metastases during the operation. A total of 42 patients were evaluable, all of them gained R0 resection (100%), 4 patients (10%) achieved pCR and 10 patients (24%) reached TRG1. Among the patients experienced pCR, one of them was Her-2 positive, one was MSI-H, the rest two of them were PD-L1-positive (CPS≥10). The most common ≥grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (35%) and leukopenia (16%). Only 1 patient (2%) experienced grade 3 immune-related AEs of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase increase. No serious AEs resulted in termination of treatment or death. Conclusions: Camrelizumab combined with FOLFOX was an effective and safe neoadjuvant therapy strategy for patients with resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC. Furthermore, the analysis of biomarkers with clinical benefits is undergoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03939962. [Table: see text]

Camrelizumab combined with FOLFOX as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4536-4536
Author(s):  
Ying Liu ◽  
Guangsen Han ◽  
Hongle Li ◽  
Yuzhou Zhao ◽  
Jing Zhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Radical Gastrectomy ◽  
Imaging Evaluation ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Ecog Ps

4536 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to improve the pathological complete response(pCR) and 5-year survival rate of patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). Immunotherapy has become a new promising treatment for advanced GC/GEJC. Therefore, we intended to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Camrelizumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) combined with FOLFOX as the neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC. Methods: Eligiblepatients were locally advanced GC/GEJC with clinical stage≥T2 and/or positive lymphoglandula confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and imaging. They received 4 cycles neoadjuvant therapy which including Camrelizumab(200mg ivgtt D1), FOLFOX(Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 ivgtt D1, 5-Fu 400mg/m2 iv D1, LV 200mg/m2 ivgtt D1, 5-Fu 2.4mg/m2 CIV 46 hours) every 14 days. Imaging evaluation was performed in 2-4 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. Patients without progression disease (PD) received D2 radical gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was pCR, the secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate and safety. Results: From July 24 2019 to January 31 2020, 16 patients were eligible. The median age was 57 years (29-72 years). A total of 11(69%) males and 5(31%) females, ECOG PS 0 (n=9, 56%), ECOG PS 1 (n=7, 44%). All the patients completed 4 cycles treatment and none of them was confirmed PD by image. One of the patients refused gastrectomy and withdraw from the study. The other 15 patients underwent operation. Unfortunately, intraperitoneal metastases were confirmed in 2 patients during operation. 13 patients received D2 radical gastrectomy and all of them experienced R0 resection. Among the 13 evaluable patients, 1 patient (8%) was observed pCR, 3 patients (23%) experienced TRG1, 10 patients (77%) achieved stage reduction. Notably, 8 patients (62%) had lymphonodus pCR. The grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (n=3, 19%), leukopenia (n=2, 13%) and anorexia (n=1, 6%). No serious AEs resulted in termination of treatment. Either severe immune-related AEs or treatment-related death was not observed. Conclusions: Camrelizumab combined with FOLFOX as neoadjuvant regimen in patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC showed promising pCR with good tolerance. Clinical trial information: NCT03939962 . [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with FLOT versus FLOT alone as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received D2 radical gastrectomy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16020-e16020
Author(s):  
Ning Liu ◽  
Zimin Liu ◽  
Yanbing Zhou ◽  
Zhaojian Niu ◽  
Haitao Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Tumour Regression ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Tumour Regression Grade ◽  
Ecog Ps

e16020 Background: Docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been suggested to be beneficial in patients with locally advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). And immunotherapy also show promising treatment efficacy for advanced GC/GEJC. Here we compared the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as the neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC. Methods: Eligible patients diagnosed as resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC were randomized to receive neoadjuvant treatment, in arm A, the patients received FLOT alone (docetaxel 50 mg/m²; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²; leucovorin 200 mg/m²; 5-FU 2600 mg/m², every 2 weeks), in arm B, the patients received FLOT combined with camrelizumab(camrelizumab 200mg intravenously every 3 weeks). Eligible patients underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. The primary end point of this trial was pCR rate and R0 resection rate, and the secondary end points were ORR,PFS, OS and safety profile. Results: From January 15 2020 to January 15 2021, 24 patients were recruited (11 patients in arm A and 13 patients in arm B). 19 patients had completed planned neoadjuvant treatment for 4 cycles (9 pts in the arm A, 10 ptsin the arm B). Two patients in the arm A were waiting for gastrectomy. This analysis was based on the 17 pts. In the arm A, the median age was 61 years (47-72 years) and a total of 5 males and 4 females, ECOG PS 0 (n = 1), ECOG PS 1 (n = 8). In the arm B, the median age was 63 years (57-71 years) and a total of 9 males and 1 females, all patients with ECOG PS 1. The R0 resection rate was high in arm B compared with arm A (10/10,100% vs. 5/7, 71.4%). No pCR were observed in the two arms. Tumour regression grade were as follows:TRG1 [arm A 0% (0/7), arm B 10% (1/10)], TRG2 [arm A 43% (3/7), arm B 60% (6/10)], TRG3 [arm A 29% (2/7), arm B 30% (3/10)].There was a significantly higher proportion of patients achieved a postoperative ypN0 in the arm B than arm A(60% vs 0%), which had preoperative clinical stage cT3-4N+M0. Postoperative pathologic staging was as follows: ypT1 [arm A 14% (1/7); armB 30% (3/10)]. ypT2 [armA 0% (0/7); armB 30% (3/10)]. ypT3 [arm A 29% (2/7); arm B 20% (2/10)]. ypT4 [armA 29% (2/7); armB 20% (2/10)]. Neither serious intraoperative complications nor immune-related adverse events were observed during perioperation. Treatment-related AEs neutropenia and leukopenia were manageable and there was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: Camrelizumab combined with FLOT showed promising efficacy as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, with low complications and acceptable toxicity. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000030610.

Association of total neoadjuvant therapy with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (LA-GEJ CA).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
Lauren Jurkowski ◽  
Aditya Varnam Shreenivas ◽  
Sakti Chakrabarti ◽  
Mandana Kamgar ◽  
James P. Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Metabolic Imaging ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Curative Intent

231 Background: Both peri-operative chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiation have been shown to improve outcomes in patients (pts) with LA-GEJ CA compared to surgery alone. Rates of post-operative chemotherapy delivery remain suboptimal. Total neo-adjuvant therapy (TNT) in LA-GEJ CA - induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) - may improve systematic delivery of neoadjuvant therapy and result in favorable clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 135 pts with LA-GEJ CA at our institution between 2/2007 and 11/2019; pertinent clinical data were abstracted with Institutional Review Board approval. Patients treated with IC and curative-intent CRT with ≥40 Gy dose of radiation for adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis (N = 59). Doublet or triplet IC regimens utilizing 5-Flurouracil(5-FU), Cisplatin/Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel were commonly administered while combinations of Carboplatin +Paclitaxel or 5-FU + Oxaliplatin were used in CRT. Clinical complete response (CCR) was defined as metabolic imaging and endoscopic biopsies negative for residual malignancy after completion of TNT. Patients were followed from diagnosis to recurrence and overall survival. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using a log-rank test. Results: Out of 59 evaluable pts, 69% were clinical stage T3, 71% were node positive. 37 pts (63%) underwent surgery, R0 resection rate was 89% (33/37), pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 19% (7/37). Among the pts who did not undergo surgery, 41% (9/22) opted to forego surgery since they attained a CCR. For the entire cohort, median Disease-Free Survival (mDFS), median Overall Survival (mOS), and 3-yr OS were 2.4 yrs, 4.7 yrs, and 67% respectively. Pts who did not undergo surgery had a mDFS, mOS, and 3-yr OS of 1.5 yrs, 4.2 yrs, and 59% respectively. Median DFS, mOS, and 3-yr OS of patients who underwent surgery were 3.5 yrs, 5.8 yrs and 72% respectively. Patients who achieved a CCR and opted to forego surgery (N = 9) had a 3 -yr DFS of 42% vs 83% for pts (N = 7) who demonstrated a pCR after curative intent tri-modality therapy. (P = 0.0099) Interestingly, the same group that achieved CCR and opted out of surgery had 3yr OS of 89% vs 83% of those who demonstrated a pCR (p = 0.0042). Conclusions: TNT for pts with LA-GEJ CA is associated with high rates of R0 resection as well as excellent DFS and OS compared to historical controls, warranting prospective evaluation. The remarkable DFS and OS in patients who opted to forego surgery due to achieving CCR is reflective of the local and systemic control rendered by this approach. Careful characterization and close longitudinal follow-up of patients who achieve CCR may help identify a subgroup of LA-GEJ CA pts who may benefit from surgery sparing approaches.

Phase II study of perioperative toripalimab in combination with FLOT in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4050-4050
Author(s):  
Hongli Li ◽  
Jingyu Deng ◽  
Shaohua Ge ◽  
Fenglin Zang ◽  
Le Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Combination Regimen

4050 Background: FLOT is the standard perioperative treatment for resectable gastric /gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. However, patient’s outcome is still poor. Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1), has shown remarkable clinical efficacy in various cancers. This trial evaluates the addition of Toripalimab to FLOT for resectable patients. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm, investigator-initiated phase II trial. Patients with histologically confirmed, resectable, gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma (≥cT2 or cN+) were enrolled to receive 4 pre-and post-operative cycles of toripalimab (240mg, q2w) plus FLOT (docetaxel 50 mg/m2; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; leucovorin 200 mg/m2; 5-FU 2600 mg/m2, q2w). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response rate (pCR). The secondary endpoints included major pathological (complete and nearly complete) response (MPR), and R0-resection rate, 3-year disease-free survival rate, overall survival, and adverse events. Results: In total, of 36 patients were enrolled from June 2019 through Dec 2020. Male, 66.7%; median age, 60y; cT3 8.3%, T4, 83.3%; cN+ 88.9%; GEJ 47%; MSI-H, 5.6%, Her-2neu-positive, 5.6%, EBER-positive, 5.6%). Two patients refused surgery, six patients have not yet completely neoadjuvant treatment. 100% of patients completed the 4 pre-cycle. Patients who had received gastrectomy after neoadjuvant treatment (n=28) were included in this analysis. 6 (21%) patients had operations involving a thoracic approach (oesophagogastrectomy with two field lymphadenectomy), 21 (75%) gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. 8 (29%) evaluable patients had Clavien-Dindo grade II post-operative complications and 2 (7%) grade IIIA complications; one patient had an anastomotic leakage that was treated endoscopically. There were no emergency re-operations. All 28 patients achieved R0-resection and were discharged home after a median of 12 days (range:7-63) in hospital. 7 （25%）patients achieved pCR (TRG1a) and 12 (42.9%) patients achieved major pathologic response (MPR, TRG1a/b). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) to any drug were reported in 30 (94%) patients. Mostly TRAEs were grade 1-2, the grade 3 or 4 TRAEs included neutropenia (34%), neutropenia (25%), lymphopenia (3%), Alanine aminotransferase increased (3%), hypokalemia (3%) and anaemia (3%). Conclusions: Perioperative toripalimab in combination with FLOT showed promising efficacy with high pCR and MPR rate and well tolerated safety profile in patients with resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. This combination regimen might present a new option for patients with locally advanced, resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04354662.

Lymph node yield during surgery after neoadjuvant therapy compared to surgery without neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, or rectal carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Ronellenfitsch ◽  
Nika Maximov ◽  
Juliane Friedrichs ◽  
Jorg Kleeff
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Gastrointestinal Carcinomas ◽  
Node Yield

BACKGROUND The lymph node yield is an important surrogate parameter for assessing the oncological radicality of the resection of gastrointestinal carcinomas and a prognostic factor in these diseases. It remains unclear if and to what extent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, which have become established treatments for carcinoma of the esophagus, stomach, and rectum and are increasingly used in pancreatic carcinoma, affect the lymph node yield. OBJECTIVE This systematic review with meta-analysis is conducted with the aim of summarizing the available evidence regarding the oncological surrogate marker lymph node yield in patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant treatment compared to those operated without neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS Studies comparing oncological resection of esophageal, stomach, pancreatic and rectal carcinoma with and without prior neoadjuvant therapy are eligible for inclusion regardless of study design. Publications will be identified with a defined search strategy in the electronic databases PubMed and Cochrane Library. The primary endpoint of the analysis is the number of lymph nodes identified in the resected specimen. Secondary endpoints include number of harvested metastatic lymph nodes, operation time, postoperative complications, pTNM staging, and overall and recurrence-free survival time. Using suitable statistical methods, the endpoints between patients with and without neoadjuvant therapy as well as in defined subgroups (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and rectal cancer) will be compared. RESULTS As of October 2021, we started with the data collection. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review with meta-analysis is conducted with the aim of summarizing the available evidence regarding the oncological surrogate marker lymph node yield in patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant treatment compared to those operated without neoadjuvant therapy. CLINICALTRIAL This systematic review is registered at PROSPERO, ID: 218459.

Lymph node yield is an independent predictor of survival in rectal cancer regardless of receipt of neoadjuvant therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 584-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaomin Xu ◽  
Mariana E Berho ◽  
Adan Z Becerra ◽  
Christopher T Aquina ◽  
Bradley J Hensley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Mixed Effects ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Node Yield

AimsLymph node yield (LNY) is used as a marker of adequate oncological resection. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) currently recommends that at least 12 nodes are necessary to confirm node-negative disease for rectal cancer. A LNY of 12 is not always achieved, particularly in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant treatment. This study attempts to examine factors associated with LNY and its prognostic impact following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer.MethodsThe 2006–2011 National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with clinical stage I–III rectal cancer who underwent a proctectomy. Suboptimal LNY was defined as <12 lymph nodes examined. A mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model was used to identify independent factors associated with LNY. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted effect of LNY on 5-year overall survival.Results25 447 patients met inclusion criteria. Overall, 62% of the cohort received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and 32% had suboptimal LNY. The median LNY for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy was 13 (IQR: 9–18) and for patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy was 15 (IQR: 12–21). After risk adjustment, there was a 3.5-fold difference in the rate of suboptimal LNY among individual hospitals (27%–95%). Suboptimal LNY was independently associated with an 18% increased hazard of death among patients who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment and a 20% increased hazard of death among those who did receive neoadjuvant treatment when controlled for adjuvant treatment, staging, proximal/distal margins and other patient factors.ConclusionsSuboptimal LNY is independently associated with worse overall survival regardless of neoadjuvant therapy, pathological staging and patient factors in rectal cancer. This finding underlies the importance and challenge of an optimal lymph node evaluation for prognostication, especially for patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (camrelizumab plus albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin) in resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer (NICE study): Interim results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4060-4060
Author(s):  
Zhigang Li ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Ming Zhang ◽  
Jinchen Shao ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Initial Results

4060 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of preoperative chemotherapy with albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin combined with camrelizumab (NICE regimen), in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with multiple lymph nodes metastasis. Initial results were analyzed to assess the efficacy and safety of this strategy. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, open, single arm, phase II trial. Eligible patients were histologically confirmed thoracic ESCC, staged as T1b-4a, N2-3 (≥ 3 stations), and M0 or M1 lymph node metastasis (confined to the supraclavicular lymph nodes) according to the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer. Patients received neoadjuvant treatment (NICE regimen) with intravenous camrelizumab (200 mg, day 1) plus albumin paclitaxel (100 mg/m2, day 1, 8, 15) and carboplatin (area under curve 5, day 1) of each 21-day cycle, for two cycles before surgery. The primary endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the per-protocol population, which included all patients who had tumor resection and received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant treatment. Secondary endpoints include R0 resection rate, adverse events and disease-free survival. Safety was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Results: Of the planned 60 patients enrolled, 55 (91.7%) patients have received the full two-cycles NICE regimen successfully, 4 patients didn’t receive the complete neoadjuvant therapy due to intolerance (3 patients) and drop out (1 patient), 1 patient died due to pneumonia on the second cycle of neoadjuvant therapy. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) rate was 53.3% and TRAEs resulting in discontinuation rate was 6.7%. The common grade 3-5 TRAEs included lymphopenia (50%), thrombocytopenia (10%), pneumonia (5%) and thyroid dysfunction (3.3%). At the time of writing, 47 patients underwent surgery within 27-85 days (median 36 days) after NICE treatment, in which 7 patients had delays to surgery due to TRAEs. All patients achieved radical (R0) resection. There was no in-hospital and postoperative 30-day mortality. pCR (ypT0N0) was identified in 20 (42.5%) of 47 patients and 5 (10.6%) patients had complete pathological response of the primary tumor but residual disease in lymph nodes alone (ypT0N+). Conclusions: Preoperative NICE regimen has achieved satisfatory initial results of disease response in locally advanced thoracic ESCC. A phase III randomized controlled trial is required to demonstarate the possible survival improvement. Trial registration: ChiCTR1900026240 Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900026240.

Accuracy of clinical staging with EUS for early stage esophageal cancer: Are we denying patients beneficial neoadjuvant chemo-radiation?

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 163-163
Author(s):  
Carrie Luu ◽  
Norbert Garcia-Henriquez ◽  
Jason Klapman ◽  
Cynthia L. Harris ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Surgical Pathology ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Cancer Center

163 Background: Esophagectomy alone has been considered the standard of care for early stage esophageal cancer (EC) while neoadjuvant therapy is now standard for locally advanced disease. The choice of treatment therefore hinges on accurate locoregional staging by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Our objective is to evaluate the accuracy of EUS performed in a high-volume tertiary cancer center in clinical stage T1N0 (cT1N0) and T2N0 (cT2N0) esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: A retrospective review of the esophageal cancer database at a single institution was performed. Patients with cT1N0 and cT2N0 esophageal cancer based on EUS undergoing esophagectomy without neoadjuvant treatment were evaluated. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment were reviewed. Surgical pathology was compared to EUS staging. Results: Between 2000 and 2015, 139 patients were identified. There were 25 (18%) female and 114 (82%) male patients. The tumor location included the middle 1/3 of the esophagus in 11 (8%) and lower 1/3 and gastroesophageal junction in 128 (92%) patients. Eighty-one percent of patients had adenocarcinoma, 9% had squamous cell carcinoma, 9% had Barrett’s dysplasia, and 1% had mixed histology. Clinical staging were as follows: 110 (79%) patients had cT1N0 and 29 (21%) patients had cT2N0 tumors. For the entire cohort, preoperative EUS matched the final surgical pathology in 76/139 patients for an accuracy rate of 53%. Twenty-nine patients (21%) were under-staged by EUS; of those, 19 (14%) had unrecognized nodal disease. This included 12/109 (11%) of cT1N0 and 7/29 (24%) of cT2N0 patients. Conclusions: The accuracy of preoperative EUS staging in early esophageal cancer remains sub-optimal. Interestingly, a significant proportion (24%) of cT2N0 EC patients were found to have positive lymph nodes on surgical pathology, and perhaps these patients could have benefitted from neoadjuvant therapy. In light of these findings, the current management of cT2N0 esophageal cancer should be reconsidered.

scholarly journals A comparison of formalin and GEWF in fixation of colorectal carcinoma specimens: rates of lymph node retrieval and effect on TNM staging

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Horne ◽  
Norman J Carr ◽  
Adrian C Bateman ◽  
Ngianga Kandala ◽  
Jody Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Lymph Node Retrieval ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mean Size ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Long Course

AimsThe Royal College of Pathologists recommend that a median of at least 12 lymph nodes should be harvested during pathological staging of colorectal cancer. It is not always easy to harvest the required number, especially in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Lymph node revealing solutions, for example, GEWF, may improve nodal yield. GEWF is safe, cheap and easy to use.MethodsIn a controlled trial, lymph node yields were compared after secondary specimen dissection following either 24 h of further fixation in formalin (n=101) or GEWF immersion (n=99). The number, size and tumour status of additional lymph nodes identified were compared between groups. Twenty-seven cases that received long-course neoadjuvant therapy were also assessed.ResultsMedian lymph node yield at primary dissection met national standards overall (19) but also in the long-course neoadjuvant therapy group (13). Lymph nodes were smaller in neoadjuvant cases compared with non-neoadjuvant cases (mean size range 1.3–5.6 mm vs 1.5–8.9 mm). The use of further fixation and GEWF detected more nodes at secondary dissection. The mean number of additional nodes harvested was greater with formalin (8.3) than GEWF (7.3). There was no significant difference in the mean size of the additional lymph nodes detected between groups (point estimate 1.02; 95% CI −0.58 to 2.63; p=0.211). Upstaging triggering adjunct chemotherapy occurred in 1% (2/200) of cases.ConclusionsThe routine use of adjunct techniques to identify additional lymph nodes is unnecessary with underlying high-quality dissection practice. Emphasis should be placed upon education and training, spending appropriate time dissecting and ensuring specimens are sufficiently fixed beforehand.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document