Trial in progress: a phase II, multicenter, single-arm study of zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma intolerant of prior treatment with ibrutinib.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8066-TPS8066
Author(s):  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Mazyar Shadman ◽  
Benjamin Bruce Freeman ◽  
Dih-Yih Chen ◽  
Xiaoping Zhang ◽  
...  

TPS8066 Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), was shown to improve patient outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL); however, adverse events (AEs) were the most common reason for discontinuing ibr (50% and 63% of discontinuations in relapse/refractory (R/R) and frontline patients, respectively; Haematologica. 2018:103:874). Zanubrutinib, an approved BTKi for mantle cell lymphoma, was specifically engineered to optimize selectivity. Pooled clinical data from 6 zanubrutinib monotherapy trials in B-cell malignancies (N=682 patients; R/R CLL/SLL [n=91]) suggested that zanubrutinib monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated a low rate of treatment discontinuation from AEs (9%; Tam, EHA 2019). Presented here is a trial-in-progress that will evaluate whether zanubrutinib monotherapy may serve as a therapeutic option for patients with CLL/SLL who have become ibr intolerant. Methods: The ongoing phase II, multicenter, US, single-arm, open-label study (NCT04116437, BGB-3111-215) will evaluate zanubrutinib monotherapy (160mg twice daily) as a treatment option for patients with CLL/SLL intolerant to prior ibr treatment. Approximately 60 patients will be enrolled from ~30 community medical centers. Key inclusion criteria include CLL/SLL requiring treatment per International Workshop on CLL criteria ( Blood. 2018;131:2745) before ibr therapy, intolerance to ibr (defined as an unacceptable AE for which, per investigator’s opinion, ibr treatment should be discontinued despite optimal supportive therapy), resolution of ibr-related AEs to grade ≤1 or baseline, and an ECOG PS 0-2. Key exclusion criteria include having an intervening cancer therapy between ibr and zanubrutinib, a documented disease progression during ibr treatment up to the time of enrollment, and a history of central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage. The primary endpoint is frequency and severity of protocol-specified treatment-emergent AEs (diarrhea, myalgia, muscle spasm, arthralgia, hypertension, fatigue, rash, atrial fibrillation, and hemorrhage excluding CNS hemorrhage). The secondary endpoints include overall response rate, progression-free survival, and patient-reported outcomes. An exploratory endpoint was added to evaluate clinical effects (physical activity, treatment-related symptoms, and quality of life) using a smartphone app. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04116437 .

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3900-3900
Author(s):  
Eric Eldering ◽  
Christian R Geest ◽  
Martin FM de Rooij ◽  
Nora Liu ◽  
Bogdan I Florea ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3900 In the lymph node (LN) microenvironment, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells are protected from apoptosis by upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins. In vitro, this can be mimicked via CD40-stimulation of CLL cells, which also provides resistance to various chemotherapeutics. Novel drugs that target kinases involved in B cell signalling, including the broad spectrum kinase inhibitor dasatinib, are currently in clinical development for CLL. We have shown previously that dasatinib prevents CD40-mediated anti-apoptotic changes in CLL (Hallaert et Blood 2008). However, the kinase(s) involved remain unidentified. Here, we coupled dasatinib to an affinity matrix and pulled down its targets from CD40-stimulated CLL cells. By mass-spectrometry and Western blotting, Abl and Btk were identified as dominant targets of dasatinib. Functional analysis revealed that CD40-mediated anti-apoptotic signals and drug-resistance could be overcome both by dasatinib and the Abl inhibitor imatinib, but not by the novel Btk inhibitor PCI-32765 (ibrutinib), whereas BCR- and chemokine-controlled adhesion could be abolished by dasatinib and ibrutinib, but not by imatinib. Thus, dasatinib combines two key aspects that are clinically relevant: inhibition of Abl overrides chemoprotective survival signals, whereas inhibition of Btk impairs integrin-mediated adhesion of CLL cells in the microenvironmental niche. This combined inhibition of Abl and Btk was put to an initial test in an open-label phase 2 trial of dasatinib combined with fludarabine in twenty refractory CLL patients. As might be expected based on the in vitro data, reductions in lymph node size were observed in most patients. A LN reduction of ≥20% provided a significant improved PFS (256 days) and OS (510 days) as compared to non-responders (80 days and 158 days respectively). Details of the clinical study will be presented separately. In conclusion, in agreement with in vitro molecular studies, dasatinib seems to have clinical efficacy in heavily pretreated refractory CLL patients. Combined, these data encourage further studies on a broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor like dasatinib in combination with other classes of drugs in relapsed and refractory CLL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Haematologica ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Moreno ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
Fatih Demirkan ◽  
Alessandra Tedeschi ◽  
Bertrand Anz ◽  
...  

iLLUMINATE is a randomized, open-label phase 3 study of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (n=113) versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (n=116) as first-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥65 years, or


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1789-1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Farooqui ◽  
Jay Nelson Lozier ◽  
Janet Valdez ◽  
Nakhle Saba ◽  
Ajunae Wells ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1789 INTRODUCTION: Ibrutinib (PCI 32765) is an orally administered covalent inhibitor of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK). Ibrutinib has significant activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and is typically well tolerated (Byrd ASCO 2011, O'Brien ASH 2011). Rarely serious bleeding in patients concurrently on oral anticoagulation has been reported but was not related to thrombocytopenia (O'Brien ASH 2011). However, grade 1 or 2 ecchymosis/contusion is a frequent adverse event in patients on ibrutinib. In addition to being essential for B cell receptor signaling BTK is also involved in the signaling of the glycoprotein (GP)VI and GPIV von Willebrand (vW) receptors (Liu, Blood 2006). Thus, it is possible that ibrutinib could increase the bleeding risk by interfering with thrombus formation. In addition, lymphoproliferative disorders and some drugs have been associated with acquired vW-disease (AvWD). METHODS AND PATIENTS: In an ongoing single center, open label phase II trial we treat CLL/SLL patients with ibrutinib 420 mg daily on 28 day cycles (NCT01500733). We measured platelet (PLT) function on the PFA-100 instrument, vW-factor (vWF) antigen levels and activity (vWF-Ag/vWF-Act), and factor VIII (FVIII) on baseline, days 2 and 28. Here we report on effects of ibrutinib on platelet counts and function in 25 patients who completed >2 cycles. RESULTS: PLT counts prior to treatment ranged from 36 k/μl to 256 k/μl with a median of 102 k/μl. Twelve (48%) patients had a pre-treatment PLT count <100 k/μl. Median PLT counts for days 14, 28, and 56 increased to 140, 137, and 135 k/μl, respectively (P<.01). 76% of patients showed an increase after only 2 weeks on drug (median increase 25 k/μl (range 4–183 k/μl) that was sustained at subsequent timepoints. On day 14, 6 patients (24%) had a decrease in PLT count by a median of 13 k/μl from baseline; of these, 3 had a pre-treatment PLT count of <100 k/ul and 1 developed grade III thrombocytopenia (42 k/μl) that resolved to >100 k/μl by day 56. 20% (5 of 25) of patients reported grade 1 spontaneous ecchymosis with no correlation to platelet count, PFA testing, or vWF measurements. Of note we performed lymph node core biopsies in 35 patients taking ibrutinib with minimal bruising. Only 2 patients had more extensive local bruising/ecchymosis at the biopsy site. In 19 patients PFA-100 measurements of epinephrine (EPI) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulated platelet aggregation times were available (test requires PLT count >100 k/μl). Median changes in closure times with EPI and ADP on treatment were not significantly different from baseline (See table). Four (21%) patients started with abnormally prolonged EPI closure times (one on aspirin, one on ibuprofen; discontinued with the start of ibrutinib) which resolved by day 28 in 3 and decreased in 1. Three (16%) patients had a prolongation of EPI closure times on day 2 that resolved by day 28 in 2 and decreased in 1. All closure times on ADP were low or normal. No patients with abnormal PFA testing demonstrated spontaneous ecchymosis. From baseline to day 28 vWF-Act, vWF-Ag and FVIII decreased (P<0.05; n=24). All 3 values were high normal to elevated prior to treatment and decreased to normal on treatment. CONCLUSION: This preliminary report does not identify any significant ibrutinib effect on platelet function. PLT counts improved rapidly in the majority of patients and when seen transient decreases have been minimal. Three patients (16%) developed an abnormal reading in PLT function tests on treatment but none developed spontaneous echymosis or bleeding. The observed normalization of mildly elevated baseline levels of vWF and FVIII seems most consistent with a reduction in acute phase reactants and there was no evidence for AvWD on ibrutinib. The apparent functional tolerance of BTK inhibition in platelets is likely attributable to redundancy in the affected signaling pathways. This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of NHLBI, NIH. We thank our patients for participating in these research studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 1236-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
John G. Gribben ◽  
George A. Follows ◽  
Donald Milligan ◽  
Hazem A. Sayala ◽  
...  

Purpose Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are elderly and/or have comorbidities that may make them ineligible for fludarabine-based treatment. For this population, chlorambucil monotherapy is an appropriate therapeutic option; however, response rates with chlorambucil are low, and more effective treatments are needed. This trial was designed to assess how the addition of rituximab to chlorambucil (R-chlorambucil) would affect safety and efficacy in patients with CLL. Patients and Methods Patients with first-line CLL were treated with rituximab (375 mg/m2 on day 1, cycle one, and 500 mg/m2 thereafter) plus chlorambucil (10 mg/m2/d all cycles; day 1 through 7) for six 28-day cycles. For patients not achieving complete response (CR), six additional cycles of chlorambucil alone could be administered. The primary end point of the study was safety. Results A total of 100 patients were treated with R-chlorambucil, with a median follow-up of 30 months. Median age of patients was 70 years (range, 43 to 86 years), with patients having a median of seven comorbidities. Hematologic toxicities accounted for most grade 3/4 adverse events reported, with neutropenia and lymphopenia both occurring in 41% of patients and leukopenia in 23%. Overall response rates were 84%, with CR achieved in 10% of patients. Median progression-free survival was 23.5 months; median overall survival was not reached. Conclusion These results compare favorably with previously published results for chlorambucil monotherapy, suggesting that the addition of rituximab to chlorambucil may improve efficacy with no unexpected adverse events. R-chlorambucil may improve outcome for patients who are ineligible for fludarabine-based treatments.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (19) ◽  
pp. 2915-2922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Brown ◽  
Jacqueline C. Barrientos ◽  
Paul M. Barr ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
...  

Key Points Ibrutinib was well tolerated when administered with BR CIT in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Ibrutinib added to CIT was associated with a high degree of clinical activity that compares favorably to historical reports of CIT alone.


Haematologica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. e192-e195 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Spaner ◽  
G. Wang ◽  
L. McCaw ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
P. Disperati ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3732-3732
Author(s):  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Caroline Dartigeas ◽  
Marta Coscia ◽  
Peter S. Ganly ◽  
Ghassan Al-Jazayrly ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Covalent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKi) have transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), but these treatments are not curative and the majority of patients will require additional treatment. Covalent BTKi share pharmacologic liabilities (e.g. low oral bioavailability, short half-life) that collectively may lead to suboptimal BTK target coverage, for example in rapidly proliferating tumors with high BTK protein turnover such as accelerating CLL/SLL, ultimately manifesting as acquired resistance in some patients. To address these limitations, pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, non-covalent BTKi that inhibits both wild type (WT) and C481-mutated BTK with equal low nM potency was developed. In a phase 1/2 BRUIN study, pirtobrutinib achieved pharmacokinetic exposures that exceeded its BTK IC96 at trough, was well tolerated, and demonstrated promising efficacy in CLL/SLL patients regardless of prior therapy, number of prior lines of therapy, or BTK C481 mutation status (Mato et al. Lancet 2021;397, 10277:892-901). Study Design and Methods: BRUIN CLL-313 is a randomized, open-label, global phase 3 study comparing pirtobrutinib monotherapy versus bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in treatment naïve CLL/SLL patients with retained 17p. Approximately 250 patients will be randomized 1:1. Randomization will be stratified by IGHV mutation status (mutated vs unmutated), and Rai stage (low/intermediate vs high). Patients in the BR arm are eligible to crossover to pirtobrutinib monotherapy if they experience progressive disease per iwCLL 2018 and confirmed by an independent review committee (IRC). Eligible patients are adults with confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL and who require therapy per iwCLL 2018 criteria. Key exclusion criteria include CNS involvement by CLL/SLL, Richter transformation to DLBCL, prolymphocytic leukemia or Hodgkin lymphoma any time pre-enrollment, presence of 17p deletion, prior systemic therapy for CLL/SLL, and significant cardiovascular disease. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) per iwCLL assessed by an IRC. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), safety and tolerability, and patient reported outcomes. The global study is currently enrolling patients. Disclosures Jurczak: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celtrion, Celgene, Debbiopharm, Epizyme, Incyte, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mei Pharma, Morphosys, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Sandoz, Roche,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Coscia: Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other; Janssen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Wang: Eli Lilly and Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bao: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment; Genentech: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Leow: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shahda: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zinzani: Eusapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celtrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document