Results of the ADRRAD Trial of pelvic IMRT plus radium-223 in men with mHSPC metastatic to bone.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 136-136
Author(s):  
Joe O'Sullivan ◽  
Philip Geoffrey Turner ◽  
Suneil Jain ◽  
Arthur Grey ◽  
Sandra Biggart ◽  
...  

136 Background: Radiotherapy to the Prostate in mHSPC improves overall survival (OS) and Progression free survival (PFS) for patients with low-volume-disease[1]. Radium-223 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) improves OS [2]. We conducted a prospective phase 1/2 clinical trial in mHSPC, testing the combination of with LHRHa, concurrent pelvic radiotherapy and radium-223. Methods: Thirty patients were recruited with mHSPC; they had a minimum of 3 bone metastases (majority had > 20 bone mets), nil visceral metastases, PS0-1. Patients were encouraged to receive up front docetaxel. They were treated with ongoing LHRHa, pelvic radiotherapy aiming for 74Gy in 37 fractions to prostate PTV with 60Gy concomitantly delivered to pelvic nodal PTV. Concurrently, patients received radium-223, 55kBq/kg for 6 cycles q28 days; fraction 1 radiotherapy was synchronous with cycle 1 day 1 radium-223. Results: Median age was 63 years and 28 (93%) received at least 4 cycles of docetaxel. One patient received prostate only radiotherapy due to bowel constraints. Three patients had cycle 6 radium-223 omitted. At a median follow-up of 28 months, there have been 415 Adverse events, (3% Grade >3), and 6 serious adverse events (SAEs) ( 2 episodes of UTI, 1 each of cystitis non-infective, cardiac chest pain, pyrexia and AKI). Commonest AEs by number were: leucopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhoea. Ten SSE’s have occurred including 8 courses of palliative radiotherapy for bone pain, 1 course of radiotherapy for impending MSCC and 1 pathological fracture. At median follow up 28.0 months, median biochemical PFS is 17.9 months, median OS not yet reached. Conclusions: This trial shows clear tolerability and promising early efficacy data requiring further exploration in a randomised phase 3 trial. Clinical trial information: 2014-000273-39.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 202-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Morris ◽  
Celestia S. Higano ◽  
Howard I. Scher ◽  
Christopher Sweeney ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
...  

202 Background: Ra-223 is an approved α-emitter prolonging survival in CRPC with symptomatic bone mets. We conducted a phase 1/2a study examining the safety and antitumor effects of Ra-223 + D vs D alone, and previously presented data showing that Ra-223 + D is safe and well tolerated (ESMO 2014). Here we report the effect of Ra-223 + D vs D on bALP and PSA dynamics. Methods: D-eligible pts with progressing CRPC and ≥ 2 bone mets were randomized 2:1 to Ra-223 (50 kBq/kg q 6 wk × 5) + D (60 mg/m2 q 3 wk × 10) vs D (75 mg/m2 q 3 wk with step-down option to 60 mg/m2). bALP and PSA were recorded q 3 wk during first 6-wk cycle, then q 6 wk and q 3 wk, respectively, and analyzed at a central laboratory. Changes in both markers are described by the % of pts who achieved ≥ 30%, > 50%, and > 80% declines between baseline and the safety follow-up visit (3 wk post last D injection) as their best response; pts with elevated baseline bALP (≥ 21 µg/L) levels were included for the bALP analysis. bALP to below the upper limit of normal (ULN) was also recorded, regardless of % decline. Results: 46 pts (33 Ra-223 + D vs 13 D alone) were enrolled. As of October 2014, 21 (Ra-223 + D) vs 5 (D) pts had received all planned study treatment. Median (range) baseline PSA was 99 µg/L (3-1000) for Ra-223 + D pts and 43 µg/L (4-1042) for D pts. Maximal changes in PSA and bALP levels between baseline and safety follow-up are shown in Table. No pt had a bALP increase. Conclusions: Ra-223 + D appears to favorably impact posttreatment PSA and bALP declines. Ra-223 + D appears particularly effective at normalizing bALP levels vs D alone. The clinical benefits of such changes in serum markers will require validation in larger prospective studies. Clinical trial information: NCT01106352. [Table: see text]


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253021
Author(s):  
Stephanie I. Kim ◽  
Andy H. Szeto ◽  
Katherine P. Morgan ◽  
Blaine Brower ◽  
Mary W. Dunn ◽  
...  

Introduction Radium-223, abiraterone, and enzalutamide have each been shown to significantly improve survival as monotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, effects of combination radium-223 plus abiraterone or enzalutamide on survival and safety remain unclear. Patients and methods This single-center retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases who were treated with radium-223 between April 1, 2014 and February 19, 2019. Patients who received radium-223 monotherapy were compared to patients who received a combination of radium-223 plus either abiraterone or enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, time to symptomatic skeletal event, symptomatic skeletal event-free survival, and incidence of drug-related adverse events. Time-to-event analyses were estimated by log rank tests using Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived from Cox proportional hazards models. Chi-square tests evaluated difference in serious adverse events between the two arms. Results A total of 60 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 41 in the monotherapy arm, n = 19 in the combination arm). Differences in median overall survival were not observed (12.7 vs. 12.8 months; HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.59–2.23; P = 0.68), but median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the combination arm (7.6 vs. 4.9 months; HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.11–3.40; P = 0.02). Significant differences were not observed in time to first SSE (P = 0.97), SSE-free survival (P = 0.16), or in the overall incidence of serious adverse events (P = 0.45). Conclusion Combination radium-223 plus abiraterone or enzalutamide did not improve overall survival, but prolonged progression-free survival without increasing the incidence of serious adverse events in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. However, these results are limited by small numbers and patient selection inherent in retrospective analysis.


The Prostate ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (14) ◽  
pp. 1683-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Sartor ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Neil Mariados ◽  
Maria José Méndez Vidal ◽  
Daniel Keizman ◽  
...  

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 746
Author(s):  
Luca Tudor Giurgea ◽  
Matthew James Memoli

Vaccines against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Originated-19) have been developed with unprecedented rapidity, many utilizing novel strategies. As of November 2020, a series of publications have outlined the results of phase 1/2 studies of nine different vaccines planned to move forward to phase 3 trials. The results are encouraging, demonstrating a paucity of severe or serious adverse events and robust induction of antibody titers. Determination of the vaccine candidates with the highest protective efficacy and best adverse event profiles will be essential in refining public health strategies. However, differences in study design and reporting of data make comparisons of existing phase 1/2 studies difficult. With respect to safety, studies have variable follow-up times and may use different definitions for adverse events. Immunogenicity outcomes are even more inconsistent, with variations in timepoints and critical differences in the types of antibodies studied as well as methodological differences in assays. Furthermore, the correlates of protection in COVID-19 are not known. Harmonization of phase 3 trial designs and use of objective and meaningful clinical outcomes will be crucial in streamlining future global responses to the pandemic.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Ryan Heery ◽  
Ravi Amrit Madan ◽  
Marijo Bilusic ◽  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Nishith K. Singh ◽  
...  

102 Background: A prior randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center phase 2 trial of PSA-TRICOM demonstrated survival benefit. Sm-153 is a radiopharmaceutical that targets osteoblastic lesions. Preclinical data indicated that Sm-153 could alter tumor phenotype, causing upregulation of Fas, MHC Class I, and tumor-associated antigens, making tumor cells more amenable to immune-mediated killing. This trial was intended to examine the safety and efficacy of the Sm-153 with PSA-TRICOM vs. Sm-153 alone. Methods: This phase 2 multi-center trial was designed to randomize 68 pts to Sm-153 with or without PSA-TRICOM. Eligibility included mCRPC, bone metastases, no visceral disease, prior docetaxel, ECOG ≤2, and normal organ function. Sm-153 was given at 1mCi/kg IV on day 8 and then every 12 weeks. PSA-TRICOM was given on days 1, 15, 29, then every 4 weeks. The 1° endpoint was comparison of progression-free survival at 4 months (mo) utilizing PCCWG, but not PSA criteria. A Fisher’s exact test, assuming a one-tailed alpha = 0.10, was used to compare these fractions. 2° endpoints were OS, ORR, PSA changes, immunologic, and toxicity. Results: 44 pts were enrolled, 5 were not evaluable for the 1° endpoint due to withdrawal prior to 4 mos (4 on Arm A, 1 on Arm B). PFS and PSA findings are provided below. Hematologic toxicities were most common, and were well matched. Conclusions: This final analysis suggests the combination of PSA-TRICOM and Sm-153 has a similar toxicity profile to Sm-153 alone. Despite early closure of this trial due to poor accrual, which may be related to recent approval of multiple agents for mCRPC, this analysis appears to demonstrate improvement in PFS with the combination. This may indicate synergy between PSA-TRICOM and bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals. Based on the data presented here, we are exploring the potential to combine PSA-TRICOM with alpharadin (radium-223), a next generation bone-seeking radiopharmaceutical. Clinical trial information: NCT00450619. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 126-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark N. Stein ◽  
Lawrence Fong ◽  
Anthony E. Mega ◽  
Elaine Tat Lam ◽  
John W. Heyburn ◽  
...  

126 Background: ADXS-PSA, an attenuated Listeria monocytogenes-based immunotherapy targeting prostate-specific antigen (PSA), is currently being evaluated in combination with pembrolizumab as a treatment for progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-046 trial (Part B). Methods: A total of 37 patients received 1x109 CFU + 200 mg pembro IV every 3 wks, for up to 2 yrs or until progression/toxicity. Results: At entry, patients were ~70 yrs with median a Gleason score of 9, and bone predominant disease (70%). MSI-High was negative in 36 pts who were able to be tested. Eighteen (48.6%) patients had received prior docetaxel, 15 pts of whom (83.3%) had also received 1-2 next generation hormonal agents (NGHAs). Nineteen (51.3%) had not received prior docetaxel and 16 of these pts (84.2%) had received 1-2 NGHAs. Overall, 16 out of 37 pts (43%) had a decreased PSA post-BL with 6/37 (16%) pts achieving a confirmed PSA reduction ≥50% from baseline. The median OS (months) for the whole group (37 pts) was 33.6 m (95% CI, range 15.4-33.6 months). The mOS for pts with and without prior exposure to docetaxel was 16 m (5.9 -33.6) and NR at 30 months of follow-up (15.4-NR), respectively. Prolonged survival was observed in pts regardless of prior therapies, microsatellite stable (MSS) status or PSA delta <50% or ≥50%. Conclusions: Results with ADXS-PSA in combination with pembrolizumab in mCRPC, with or without prior docetaxel, show promising clinical activity to be further assessed in randomized studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02325557.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5022-5022
Author(s):  
A. Oliver Sartor ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Neil Mariados ◽  
María José Méndez-Vidal ◽  
Daniel Keizman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS396-TPS396
Author(s):  
Vincenza Conteduca ◽  
Stefano Severi ◽  
Stefania Gori ◽  
Luca Galli ◽  
Michele Aieta ◽  
...  

TPS396 Background: Currently, the challenge is to reach a consensus on the best way to sequence different therapies for mCRPC patients (pts) in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Radium223 is a novel survival-prolonging targeted-α-therapy, but timing of its use in the treatment sequence of mCRPC remains an unanswered question, given the wide availability of therapeutic options Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase II study in symptomatic bone-only mCRPC pts who progressed after any androgen deprivation therapy, abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive radium223 initially followed by docetaxel+prednisone at the time of progression, or docetaxel+prednisone initially followed by radium223 at progression. In both treatment arms, the second step will be optional according to clinical evolution of disease (clinical deterioration and/or development of visceral metastases); however, each patient that will not enter in the second step will be still evaluable for the objectives of the study. No stratification factor will be used for randomization. Primary endpoint is to determine the better tolerated sequencing between radium223 and docetaxel in terms of health-related quality of life after completing the sequence and separately after each treatment. Based on primary endpoint, considering a type I error 0.1, type II error 0.2, proportion of responder pts in the standard arm 0.1 and in the experimental arm of 0.4, and assuming 10% loss to follow-up, a total of 70pts (35 for each arm) will be enrolled in the study. The study duration will be 36months; 15months of accrual, and 1 year of follow-up on the last participant enrolled. Secondary endpoints are to compare overall/progression-free/total progression free survival in pts treated with sequential therapy between radium223 and docetaxel. Additional secondary objective is to identify predictive factors for radium223 therapy, including potential circulating biomarkers through the plasma collection from all enrolled pts at different timepoints and the early prognostic role of functional imaging, such as PET with choline and/or PSMA. Clinical trial information: NCT03230734.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi52-vi52
Author(s):  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Laura Aguilar ◽  
Xiaobu Ye ◽  
David Reardon ◽  
Wenya Linda Bi ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND CAN-2409 is a replication-deficient adenovirus that delivers HSV thymidine kinase to cancer cells, resulting in local conversion of orally administered valacyclovir into a toxic metabolite. Previously, a phase 1b/2 clinical trial of CAN-2409 combined with standard-of-care (SOC) demonstrated safety and improved survival in HGG patients. Addition of CAN-2409 to nivolumab has the potential to activate locally recruited lymphocytes and teach them to recognize tumor neoantigens, changing the ‘cold’ immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and synergizing with the activity mediated by immune checkpoint inhibitors. This notion is supported by preclinical experiments showing that the combination of CAN-2409 with anti-PD1 therapy was more effective than either treatment alone. METHODS This ongoing phase 1 clinical trial evaluates safety and initial efficacy of CAN-2409 combined with nivolumab and SOC in newly diagnosed HGG. CAN-2409 is injected during neurosurgery into the tumor bed, followed by 14-days of valacyclovir. Radiation starts within 8 (+/-4) days of surgery. Temozolomide is administered to MGMT-methylation positive patients only. Nivolumab is given every 2 weeks, up to 52-weeks. Deep immune profiling studies are ongoing and initial results will be available shortly. RESULTS From February 2019 to March 2021, 41 patients were enrolled and 35 were evaluable for safety from the combination of CAN-2409, nivolumab and SOC: 24 male and 11 female; 34 glioblastoma, 1 diffuse astrocytoma; 33 IDH-wildtype, 2 IDH-mutant; 15 MGMT-methylated, 20 unmethylated. Median age was 62-years (range 28-79), median KPS 90 (range 80-100). With 13 months median follow-up, no unexpected serious adverse events were observed, and 23 patients are still alive. The most frequent possibly related adverse events (&gt;10%) were nausea, fatigue, fever, headache, and increased ALT. CONCLUSIONS The combination of CAN-2409 + nivolumab + SOC was well tolerated. Clinical follow-up and extensive biomarker analyses will provide a better understanding of the therapeutic potential of this approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document