Final results of a phase I “RadVax” trial of hypofractionated radiation combined with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2576-2576
Author(s):  
John Nicholas Lukens ◽  
Rosemarie Mick ◽  
Alexander Chan Chi Huang ◽  
Nicholas Han ◽  
Michael Farwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Grade 3

2576 Background: Many patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy do not show a clinical response. Preclinical studies suggest that adding hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) to anti-PD1 can increase the efficacy of immunotherapy through several mechanisms including increased antigen presentation. We conducted a prospective trial testing the combination of pembrolizumab and HFRT in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Methods: This prospective single-institution phase I trial tested pembrolizumab in combination with HFRT in patients with metastatic cancers (NSCLC, melanoma, pancreas, breast, others) and an ECOG performance status of 0-1. Melanoma and NSCLC patients were required to have progression of disease on anti-PD1, having received ≥ 2 doses of anti-PD1 and progression documented by RECIST v1.1. Patients were required to have an index lesion ≥1 cm that was amenable to HFRT and at least one other lesion that was not irradiated and could be followed for response using RECIST criteria. Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks was administered beginning 1 week prior to the first fraction of radiation. The HFRT dose was 8 Gy x 3 fractions or 17 Gy x 1 fraction, determined by randomization during the Expansion phase. The primary objective was the safety of HFRT combined with pembrolizumab, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as Grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicity related to the combination of Pembrolizumab and HFRT. The secondary objective was the radiographic response of metastatic lesions outside the radiation field as measured by RECIST. Results: 59 patients aged 27-90 years (median 60) were enrolled from March 2015 to December 2018 (24 in the Safety Phase and 35 in Expansion Phase). 40 patients (67.7%) had treatment-related AEs, of which 4 were grade 3 and none were grade 4. One patient experienced hepatitis, classified as DLT. While most patients did not have a radiologic response, in patients with metastatic melanoma, 7 of 16 (43.8%, exact 95% CI 19.8-70.1%) had an objective response to HFRT + pembrolizumab, including 3 complete and 4 partial responses. Responses are durable with 3/3 complete responders alive with no progression, and 3/4 partial responders alive with 2 having no evidence of progression. Among melanoma patients, only 2 of 7 (29%) responders received ipilimumab prior to enrollment, compared to 8 of 9 (89%) non-responders (p = 0.035). An increase in Ki67+ PD-1+ non-naïve CD8 T-cells was observed in the blood 2 weeks after HFRT, but the magnitude did not correlate with likelihood of response. Responses were observed after either 17 Gy x 1 fraction or 8 Gy x 3 fractions, with no difference in response rate by fractionation. Conclusions: This study suggests that HFRT administered with concurrent pembrolizumab is associated with acceptable toxicity and that in patients with metastatic melanoma progressing on anti-PD-1 therapy, this approach yields an ORR of 44%. Clinical trial information: NCT02303990.

The efficacy and safety analysis of PD-1 inhibitor combined with interferon-α1b: A real-world study in Chinese metastatic melanoma patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21507-e21507
Author(s):  
Guannan Zhu ◽  
Qiong Shi ◽  
Chunying Li ◽  
Tianwen Gao
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Grade 3

e21507 Background: Clinical data on PD-1 inhibitor combined with interferon in metastatic melanoma treatment were still limited. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor/interferon-α1b combination therapy for Chinese metastatic melanoma patients in the real world. Methods: We reviewed patients diagnosed as metastatic melanoma and had received PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab, 2 mg/kg, every 3 weeks, intravenously or toripalimab 240mg every 2 weeks, intravenously) combined with interferon-α1b(10μg/kg, every other day, subcutaneously) in Xijing Hospital from Dec 2018 to Nov 2020. Efficacy and safety profiles were evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, respectively. Results: In total 65 patients were reviewed in this study, including 13 cases with ECOG performance status ≥2. Acral and mucosal cases accounted for 47.7% and 23.1% respectively. In 27(41.5%) patients, the combination therapy was used as the first line treatment, whereas in the rest 38 patients as second or subsequent lines. The median follow-up period was 8 months (1.5-21 months). Median OS was 15 months (95CI%: 10.62-19.38 months). Median PFS was 6 months (95CI%: 2.54-9.46 months). 6-month and 1-year PFS rate were 48.1% and 35.3%. 6-month and 1-year OS rate were 80.9% and 59.8%. Objective response was seen in 18.46% cases, with 12.31% of patients exhibiting ongoing response. The best confirmed disease control rate was 73.85%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that overall survival was significantly associated with ECOG performance status ≥2 (OR=3.32，95%CI=1.14-9.66 ), regardless of age(≥65), elevated LDH, PD-1 inhibitor type and the line of the combination therapy. Select treatment related AEs (TRAEs) of any grade were observed in 57(87.69%) patients. The leading 3 TRAEs were lymphopenia, fatigue and fever. Grade 3 to 4 TRAEs were recorded in 2 cases. Grade 4 hyponeutrophilia occurred in a patient with ECOG status 3 using interferon-α1b plus toripalimab and resulted in discontinuation of both PD-1 inhibitor and IFN-α1b. Grade 3 headache was reported by one patient using interferon-α1b plus pembrolizumab and was solved with celecoxib 200mg daily. No drug-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: PD-1 inhibitor combining interferon-α1b therapy shows promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in this real-world cohort of Chinese metastatic melanoma patients.[Table: see text]

Phase I trial of daily lenalidomide and docetaxel given every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3570-3570 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Sanborn ◽  
M. Cooney ◽  
J. Gibbons ◽  
J. Brell ◽  
P. Savvides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Grade 3

3570 Background: Lenalidomide is a potent anti-angiogenic and immune modulating agent. This phase I trial of docetaxel and lenalidomide was undertaken to evaluate the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and secondarily, any tumor response for this novel combination. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors with adequate organ function were eligible. Lenalidomide was given orally days 1–14, and docetaxel was administered intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. DLT was defined as grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 neutropenia with fever, and grade 4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. Results: Nineteen patients, 14 male and 5 female, with tumor types including prostate (7), sarcoma (3), head and neck (2), pancreatic, colon, melanoma, adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, gastric, bladder, and GIST have been enrolled. ECOG performance status was zero (10 patients) or one (9 patients). The median age was 59 years (range 35 to 86). Fourteen patients had zero or one prior treatment regimens (range 0 to 6). A total of 64 cycles have been administered (range 1 to 12). In the first nine evaluable patients, eight (89%) had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks with lenalidomide 5 mg on days 1–14 exceeded the MTD due to one grade 3 nausea/vomiting and one grade 4 neutropenia with fever. After the addition of pegfilgrastim on day 2, there has not been any neutropenia in the subsequent seven evaluable patients. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities included leukopenia (31%), lymphopenia (19%), as well as nausea, vomiting, fatigue, anemia, infection, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia (6% each). Seven patients (44%) have had stable disease (range 3 to 12 cycles). One prostate cancer patient experienced a >95% reduction of PSA. Enrollment is ongoing and the current dose level is docetaxel 75 mg/m2, lenalidomide 10 mg days 1–14, and pegfilgrastim on day 2. Conclusions: The toxicity evaluation is ongoing. This trial will provide the MTD of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks with lenalidomide on days 1–14 in combination with pegfilgrastim support to avoid neutropenia. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and activity of the pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor erdafitinib in phase 1 study patients (Pts) with molecularly selected advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4074-4074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Soria ◽  
John H. Strickler ◽  
Ramaswamy Govindan ◽  
Seungjean Chai ◽  
Nancy Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

4074 Background: Erdafitinib (JNJ-42756493) is a potent, oral pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that demonstrated encouraging preliminary clinical activity and manageable adverse events (AEs) in its first-in-human phase 1 study in advanced solid tumors (NCT01703481). Here we report results from pts with CCA from this study. Methods: This 4-part study enrolled pts age ≥ 18 years (y) with advanced solid tumors. Dose escalation (part 1) followed a 3+3 design, with pts receiving ascending doses of erdafitinib continuously or intermittently (7 days on/7 days off). Subsequent parts required FGFR gene alterations in the tumor, including activating mutations and translocations or other FGFR-activating aberrations. Part 2 was a pharmacodynamics cohort. Parts 3 and 4 were dose-expansion cohorts for recommended phase 2 doses of 9 mg once daily (QD) and 10 mg intermittently, respectively. Results: Eleven pts with FGFR-aberrant CCA were treated at 9 mg QD (n = 1) or 10 mg intermittent (n = 10). Median age was 60 y; 7 of 11 pts were female (64%). 73% of pts had ECOG performance status 1. All had prior systemic therapy. Median treatment duration with erdafitinib was 5.3 months (mo). Systemic erdafitinib exposure, per Cmax and AUC, in CCA pts was similar to other indications. The most common AEs were stomatitis (82%), hyperphosphatemia (64%), dry mouth (55%), dysgeusia (45%), dry skin (45%), and asthenia (45%), mostly grade 1/2 severity. No drug-related grade ≥3 AEs were reported in > 1 pt except grade 3 stomatitis (n = 2; 18%). The objective response rate, all confirmed partial responses (PRs) per RECIST 1.1, was 27.3% (3/11; 95% CI 6, 61); an additional 27.3% (3/11) had stable disease as their best response. Overall disease control rate was 55%. All 3 PRs were at the 10 mg intermittent dosage, and the median duration of response was 12.9 mo. With a median follow-up of 5.1 mo, median progression-free survival was 5.1 mo (95% CI 1.6, 16.4). As of the cutoff date, 2 pts continue on study treatment. Conclusions: Erdafitinib showed encouraging clinical activity and minimal toxicity in pts with advanced CCA and FGFR alterations. These results warrant further study. Clinical trial information: NCT01703481.

First-line nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) plus two cycles of chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo alone (4 cycles) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Two-year update from CheckMate 9LA.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9000-9000
Author(s):  
Martin Reck ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Michael Schenker ◽  
Bogdan Zurawski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

9000 Background: In the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9LA trial (NCT03215706), first-line NIVO + IPI combined with 2 cycles of chemo significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) vs chemo alone (4 cycles). Clinical benefit was observed regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level and histology. Here we report data with 2 years’ minimum follow-up from this study. Methods: Adult patients (pts) with stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and no known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations were stratified by PD-L1 (< 1% vs ≥ 1%), sex, and histology (squamous vs non-squamous) and were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 360 mg Q3W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W + chemo (2 cycles; n = 361) or chemo alone (4 cycles; n = 358). Pts with non-squamous NSCLC in the chemo-alone arm could receive pemetrexed maintenance. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included PFS and ORR by blinded independent central review, and efficacy by different PD-L1 levels. Safety was exploratory. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 24.4 months for OS (database lock: Feb 18, 2021), pts treated with NIVO + IPI + chemo continued to derive OS benefit vs chemo, with a median OS of 15.8 months vs 11.0 months, respectively (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61–0.86]); 2-year OS rates were 38% vs 26%. Median PFS with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was 6.7 months vs 5.3 months (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56–0.79]); 8% and 37% of pts who had disease progression received subsequent immunotherapy, respectively. ORR was 38% with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs 25% with chemo. Similar clinical benefit with NIVO + IPI + chemo vs chemo was observed in all randomized pts and across the majority of subgroups, including by PD-L1 expression level (Table) or histology. Any grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 92% and 48% of pts in the NIVO + IPI + chemo arm vs 88% and 38% in the chemo arm, respectively. Conclusion: With 2 years’ minimum follow-up, first-line NIVO + IPI + chemo demonstrated durable survival and benefit versus chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03215706. [Table: see text]

Preliminary results of a phase II study of alrizomadlin (APG-115), a novel, small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor, in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic melanoma or advanced solid tumors that have failed immuno-oncologic (I-O) drugs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2506-2506
Author(s):  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
James Andrew Reeves ◽  
Meredith McKean ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Nerve Sheath Tumor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Multiple Tumor

2506 Background: Alrizomadlin (APG-115) restores TP53 function, activating p53-mediated apoptosis in tumor cells with wild-type TP53 and/or MDM2 amplification. Alrizomadlin also functions as a host immunomodulator and hence may restore antitumor activity in pts with cancers failing PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Methods: This US multicenter trial assessed alrizomadlin combined with pembrolizumab in pts with unresectable/metastatic melanoma or advanced solid tumors that had failed I-O drugs; or pts with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), liposarcoma, or ATM mutant solid tumors that had failed any standard therapy. Eligible pts had ECOG performance status of 0-2 and no CNS metastases. The phase II study cohorts included pts with melanoma, NSCLC, solid tumor with ATM mutation, well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, urothelial carcinoma, and MPNST. Alrizomadlin was administered orally at 150 mg once every other day for 2 consecutive weeks with 1 week off and pembrolizumab at 200 mg via IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Results: As of December 25, 2020, 84 pts had been treated in 6 cohorts: melanoma (n = 26), NSCLC (n = 23), ATM mutation (n = 9), liposarcoma (n = 14), urothelial (n = 9), and MPNST (n = 3). In the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-failed melanoma cohort, there was 1 confirmed partial response (PR) out of 5 pts with uveal melanoma, 2 PR (1 confirmed and 1 unconfirmed) of 5 pts with mucosal melanoma, and 1 confirmed PR of 11 pts with cutaneous melanoma. ORR in the melanoma cohort was 17.4% (4/23 evaluable pts), and the disease control rate was 60.9% (14/23). In the MPNST cohort, 1 of 3 pts had an unconfirmed ongoing PR. In I-O drug-failed NSCLC (n = 14 evaluable) and urothelial (n = 5 evaluable) cohorts, each reported 1 confirmed PR. Common treatment (alrizomadlin or pembrolizumab)-related adverse events (TRAEs) (≥ 10%) were nausea (63.1%), thrombocytopenia (36.9%), vomiting (33.3%), fatigue (31.0%), decreased appetite (27.4%), diarrhea (21.4%), neutropenia (15.4%), and anemia (11.9%). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (≥ 5%) included thrombocytopenia (20.2%), neutropenia (14.2%), and anemia (8.3%). Eleven pts discontinued treatment due to AEs: 5 were treatment related, including 2 grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and 1 each of grade 2 vomiting, grade 2 fatigue, and grade 2 posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Three treatment-related SAEs were PRES, pyrexia, and asthenia. Conclusions: Alrizomadlin combined with pembrolizumab is well tolerated and may restore antitumor effects in pts with cancer resistant to or intolerant of I-O drugs, as suggested by preliminary antitumor activities in multiple tumor types. Internal study identifiers: APG-115-US-002; Keynote MK-3475-B66. Clinical trial information: NCT03611868.

scholarly journals Beneficial Treatment Management with Trifluridine/Tipiracil in a Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Pronounced Hematological Event History during Previous Treatments

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Kaechele ◽  
Jürgen Hess ◽  
Wolfgang Schneider-Kappus
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
Grade 3

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly improves overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The most common treatment-related event (grade ≥3) was hematological toxicity. We here report long-term disease-stabilizing FTD/TPI treatment of an mCRC patient (KRAS wild-type, ECOG performance status 1 at baseline and at the end of FTD/TPI therapy) with multifocal synchronous metastases and a longstanding history of extensive hematological events during previous treatments. Finally, this 62-year-old male patient was treated for 10 months with FTD/TPI by consecutive alteration of treatment parameters: (i) initial daily dose reduction to 80 mg (72% of the recommended dose), (ii) 20 days dose delay, (iii) a second and later third dose reduction to 70 mg and 60 mg (about 64% and 55%, respectively, of the recommended dose), and (iv) 30 µg per day of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration first for 3 days, and later for 5 days, for each treatment cycle.

A phase I clinical study of biweekly carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12024-12024
Author(s):  
P. Kumar ◽  
M. Keshtgarpour ◽  
H. Kumar ◽  
A. Dudek
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

12024 Background: Carboplatin (CBDCA) and gemcitabine (GEM) in combination is used commonly in lung cancer and is administered on a 21 day cycle. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CBDCA and GEM administered on a biweekly schedule and to assess safety and efficacy of this schedule. Methods: GEM was given intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes followed by CBDCA also given IV over 30 minutes. This combination was given on day 1 every 2 weeks. The dose levels examined are shown in the Table . A total of 26 patients were studied (18 male, 8 female) with median age of 56 (range 41–83 years); ECOG performance status of 24 patients were 0 (5), 1 (16), 2 (2), 3 (1); prior chemotherapy ranged from 0 to 4 regimens; median number of cycles administered per patient was 3 (range 1–9) with a total of 81 cycles. The primary tumors were lung (11), melanoma (4), head and neck (3), squamous cell penile/toe (2), bladder (2), kidney (1), gastric (1), esophageal (1) and ovary (1). Results: No DLTs were seen in any of these patients and the MTD was not reached. Delay in treatment was seen in total of 6 cycles due to myelosuppression and 1 cycle due to nausea and anorexia. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity rates: anemia - 3/81 cycles (3.7%), neutropenia - 20/81 cycles (25%), and thrombocytopenia - 4/81 cycles (5%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild. The median time to progression was 40 days (range 4–133) and of 18 evaluable patients partial response or stable disease was seen in 7 (38.8%). Conclusions: Even at maximum tested dose of GEM at 2000 mg/m2 and CBDCA at AUC of 3.0, this schedule is well tolerated. Hematological toxicity such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was minimal. We plan to study this schedule of GEM and CBDCA in appropriate tumor types in combination with biologic agents. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Final results from a phase I trial of ixabepilone in patients with advanced malignancies and lymphoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
O. O’Connor ◽  
M. Cohen ◽  
R. Peck ◽  
H. Burris
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

2039 Background: Ixabepilone is the first analog in a new class of antineoplastic agents, the epothilones, which stabilizes microtubules and induces apoptosis. Ixabepilone has shown clinical activity in a broad range of tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ixabepilone when administered as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed non-hematologic cancer, or a pathologic diagnosis of relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) or relapsed/primary refractory mantle cell lymphoma, with ≤CTC Grade 1 neuropathy. Ixabepilone doses ranged from 7.5–65 mg/m2. Response was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST. DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, ≥Grade 3 nausea/vomiting and non-hematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of >2 weeks due to delayed recovery. Results: Of 61 patients (median age 58, range 18–81), 75% had solid tumors; 25% had lymphoma. 98% and 67% of patients had received one or ≥ two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively. The MTD of ixabepilone as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks was established as 50 mg/m2. The most common DLTs were neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia and stomatitis/pharyngitis. A total of eight patients (13%) achieved a durable objective response. Complete responses were achieved in two patients with primary peritoneal cancer and NHL. A partial response was seen in six patients. The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (only observed at doses ≥40 mg/m2) were sensory neuropathy (13%), fatigue (13%), myalgia (10%), arthralgia (7%), nausea (5%), febrile neutropenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Recovery to baseline or ≤Grade 1 neuropathy occurred in some patients. Conclusions: The recommended dose of ixabepilone for the initiation of Phase II studies based on this study is 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone demonstrates promising safety in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma who have failed standard therapy. Encouraging activity was reported in several tumor types. [Table: see text]

A phase I trial of TAS-102 administered on a three times a day schedule in patients with solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2053-2053 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Wolff ◽  
P. M. Hoff ◽  
A. Mita ◽  
M. Fukushima ◽  
J. C. Blais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Xenograft ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Performance

2053 Background: TAS-102 consists of trifluorothymidine (FTD) and an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). FTD, like 5-fluorouracil, is an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. However, when orally administered, FTD is rapidly degraded to an inactive form, primarily by TP. Co-administration of FTD with an inhibitor of TP elevates FTD concentrations. Since tumor xenograft models demonstrated greater anti-tumor activity with divided daily dosing of TAS-102, and a phase I trial of once-daily TAS-102 showed a short FTD half-life, this trial was designed to explore a three times a day dosing schedule. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors having received prior therapy, with adequate organ function, and performance status Zubrod 0–2, were eligible. TAS-102 was administered orally three times a day for 5 days a week for two weeks, followed by two weeks off. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 15 patients (8 female, age 37–72 years) were enrolled into the study; three at 60 mg/m2/day, 6 each at 70 mg/m2/day and 80 mg/m2/day. Nine patients had colorectal cancer, 2 carcinoma of unknown primary, 2 pancreatic cancer, one each medullary thyroid cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Toxicity was assessed throughout all courses of therapy. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities were the most common, including 3 episodes of grade 3 neutropenia at 60 mg/m2/day, 5 at 70 mg/m2/day, 5 at 80 mg/m2/day with only 1 instance of grade 3 thrombocytopenia at 80 mg/m2/day. Non-hematological grade 3 toxicities included nausea/vomiting (1 at 70 mg/m2/day), colitis, gout, and hematuria (1 each at 70 mg/m2/day), and fatigue (1 at 70 mg/m2/day and 2 at 80 mg/m2/day) Two episodes of dose-limiting toxicity were observed at 80 mg/m2/day: grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 neutropenia. Although there were no objective responses, nine patients (60%) maintained stable disease with a median duration of disease stabilization of 4.3 months (range, 1.9 to 8.6 months). Conclusions: TAS-102 is well tolerated with manageable hematologic toxicity and few non-hematological toxicities. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia. The suggested phase II dose of TAS-102 is 70 mg/m2/day when administered orally three times a day for 5 days a week for two weeks followed by two weeks off every 4 weeks. [Table: see text]

A phase II trial of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14599-14599
Author(s):  
N. Lee ◽  
S. Bae ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

14599 Background: We prospectively conducted a phase II trial to test the efficacy and safety of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) regimens for the first-line treatment of previously untreated patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced CRC. Methods: Thirty-four previously untreated patients with advanced CRC were enrolled in this study from June 2001 to December 2006. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic therapy in palliative setting, ECOG PS = 2, adequate organ function, written informed consent and at least one measurable disease. The patients received either irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 with a LV bolus of 200 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and this was followed by a FU continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 2 (the classic FOLFIRI regimen), or they were treated with a LV bolus of 400 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2 followed by a FU continuous infusion of 2,400 mg/m2 for 46 hours (the simplified FOLFIRI regimen), and these treatments were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression. Results: There were 13 females and 21 males with median age of 54 years (range: 41–79). The most common metastatic sites were lung and liver. A total of 262 cycles were administrated with median 6 cycles per patient (range: 1–22). All pts were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 pts for response to the treatment. The objective response rate was 26.4% with 2 complete responses respectively. Sixteen (47%) pts had stable disease and 7 (20.5%) had a progression. The tumor control rate was 73.4%. The median TTP was 5.3 months, and the overall survival was 10.1 months. The prognostic factor for longer TTP and survival was the ECOG performance status (PS). The type of regimens was not affected on response rate, TTP and survival. The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea. The non- hematological toxicities were similar for both treatment groups, with more frequent grade =3 neutropenia being noted for the simplified FOLFIRI regimen. Conclusions: The FOLFIRI regimen was demonstrated to have a moderate antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, and tend to show more favorable outcome for patients with good ECOG PS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document