Pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5522-5522
Author(s):  
Judith Michels ◽  
François Ghiringhelli ◽  
Jean-Sebastien Frenel ◽  
Caroline Brard ◽  
Benoit You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Flat Dose

5522 Background: There is a medical unmet need for effective treatments in platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients. We assessed the safety and efficacy of a combination of pembrolizumab with bevacizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Methods: This is an open-label phase 1b trial in patients ECOG 0 or 1 with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. The safety of the dual combinations of pembrolizumab with bevacizumab or with PLD were previously evaluated in 6 patients respectively. In the absence of dose limiting toxicities (DLT) the triple combination was evaluated at a maximum tolerated dose (MTD)-1 for PLD in 3 patients and in the absence of DLT at MTD. The sample size was calculated according to the modified toxicity probability interval design. The primary evaluation criteria was the safety, the secondary endpoint was the outcome. Pharmacokinetics of the flat dose of bevacizumab will be evaluated. Results: 22 patients were enrolled from September 2019 until June 2020 in six French centers. 3 initial patients have been treated at 20mg/m2 of PLD (MTD-1) and 19 patients were treated at the dose of 30mg/m2 of PLD (MTD) combined with 200mg of pembrolizumab until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent and 400mg of bevacizumab for a total of six cycles. The patients’ characteristics are reported in the table. No DLT occurred. Grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were reported in 4 patients. The recommended phase II dose of PLD was 30mg/m2 in combination with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab. For patients treated at MTD, the overall response rate was 32% (6 partial responses) with 74% of clinical benefit with a durable response in 10 patients (53%). Median number of cycles was 7.5 (2 to not reached). Two patients are still on treatment. Correlative studies are ongoing. Conclusions: The combination was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit in 74% platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients with durable response (>6 months) in 53% of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03596281. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals 355 Pembrolizumab and bevacizumab in platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A382-A382
Author(s):  
Judith Michels ◽  
Jean-Sebastien Frenel ◽  
Catherine Genestie ◽  
François Ghiringhelli ◽  
Caroline Brard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
List Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Flat Dose

BackgroundThere is a medical need in platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) is 3.4 months with chemotherapy and 6.7 months with chemotherapy-bevacizumab combination regimens.1 RECIST overall response rate (ORR) is 11.8% and 27.3%, respectively. The ORR is 15.9% for bevacizumab as a monotherapy with a median PFS of 4.4 months.2MethodsNCT03596281 An open-label phase 1b trial with a modified toxicity probability interval design to evaluate the combination of a flat dose of 400mg bevacizumab for 6 cycles and 200mg pembrolizumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or completed 24 months of treatment in patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer. The primary evaluation criteria is safety, the secondary endpoint is the efficacy.Results19 patients have been enrolled between January 2019 and February 2021 in 6 French centers. Patients‘ characteristics are reported (table 1). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Grade 3 treatment related adverse events occurred in 3 patients (i.e. arterial thromboembolism, bowel perforation, proteinuria and sepsis). No grade 4/5 toxicities were induced. A median of 7 cycles (range 3–14) were administered. Median follow-up of patients was 4.1 months (1.8–23). The RECIST ORR was 26.3% (1 complete response and 4 partial responses) (table 2). The disease control rate was 78.9%. The time to progression was not yet reached in 6 patients. The ORR was equivalent whether patients have been pretreated or not with bevacizumab (27.3 and 25% respectively) (table 3). The ORR according to the combined positive score (CPS) for the evaluation of PD-L1 was 50.0% for CPS≥10% (n=4), 30.0% for a CPS≥1% (n=10) and 25.0% for CPS<1 (n=8) (table 4).ConclusionsA chemotherapy-free regimen combining pembrolizumab and bevacizumab was well tolerated and showed encouraging results in heavily pretreated platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients independent of their previous challenge with antiangiogenic agents.AcknowledgementsFunding for this research was provided by Fondation Cancer du Luxembourg and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.Trial RegistrationNCT03596281ReferencesPujade-Lauraine E, et al. Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: The AURELIA open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Onco Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 32,1302–1308 (2014).Cannistra SA, et al. Phase II study of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or peritoneal serous cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 33,5180–5186 (2007).Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by CPP Sud Méditerranée V institution’s Ethics Board; approval number 18.020 (EudraCT number 2017-004197-34).ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

scholarly journals Nivolumab Versus Gemcitabine or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Open-Label, Randomized Trial in Japan (NINJA)

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.00334
Author(s):  
Junzo Hamanishi ◽  
Nobuhiro Takeshima ◽  
Noriyuki Katsumata ◽  
Kimio Ushijima ◽  
Tadashi Kimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Duration Of Response

PURPOSE This phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine [GEM] or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD]) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients had platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, received ≤ 1 regimen after diagnosis of resistance, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≤ 1. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks [as one cycle]) or chemotherapy (GEM 1000 mg/m2 for 30 minutes [once on days 1, 8, and 15] followed by a week's rest [as one cycle], or PLD 50 mg/m2 once every 4 weeks [as one cycle]). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Patients (n = 316) were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 157) or GEM or PLD (n = 159) between October 2015 and December 2017. Median OS was 10.1 (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.1) and 12.1 (95% CI, 9.3 to 15.3) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = .808). Median PFS was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.2) and 3.8 (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.2) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9; P = .002). There was no statistical difference in overall response rate between groups (7.6% v 13.2%; odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3; P = .191). Median duration of response was numerically longer with nivolumab than GEM or PLD (18.7 v 7.4 months). Fewer treatment-related adverse events were observed with nivolumab versus GEM or PLD (61.5% v 98.1%), with no additional or new safety risks. CONCLUSION Although well-tolerated, nivolumab did not improve OS and showed worse PFS compared with GEM or PLD in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2811-2818 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Mutch ◽  
Mauro Orlando ◽  
Tiana Goss ◽  
Michael G. Teneriello ◽  
Alan N. Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
End Points ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose Ovarian cancer (OC) patients experiencing progressive disease (PD) within 6 months of platinum-based therapy in the primary setting are considered platinum resistant (Pt-R). Currently, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is a standard of care for treatment of recurrent Pt-R disease. On the basis of promising phase II results, gemcitabine was compared with PLD for efficacy and safety in taxane-pretreated Pt-R OC patients. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 195) with Pt-R OC were randomly assigned to either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8; every 21 days) or PLD 50 mg/m2 (day 1; every 28 days) until PD or undue toxicity. Optional cross-over therapy was allowed at PD or at withdrawal because of toxicity. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional end points included tumor response, time to treatment failure, survival, and quality of life. Results In the gemcitabine and PLD groups, median PFS was 3.6 v 3.1 months; median overall survival was 12.7 v 13.5 months; overall response rate (ORR) was 6.1% v 8.3%; and in the subset of patients with measurable disease, ORR was 9.2% v 11.7%, respectively. None of the efficacy end points showed a statistically significant difference between treatment groups. The PLD group experienced significantly more hand-foot syndrome and mucositis; the gemcitabine group experienced significantly more constipation, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and neutropenia but not febrile neutropenia. Conclusion Although this was not designed as an equivalency study, gemcitabine and PLD seem to have a comparable therapeutic index in this population of Pt-R taxane-pretreated OC patients. Single-agent gemcitabine may be an acceptable alternative to PLD for patients with Pt-R OC.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin re-challenge in patients with ovarian cancer relapse: a multicenter retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Tripodi ◽  
Gennaro Cormio ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Giorgio Valabrega ◽  
Daniela Rubino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Cancer Relapse ◽  
Platinum Agent

BackgroundPegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an active and well-tolerable treatment in ovarian cancer relapse, either alone or in combination with other drugs. No data are available on the possibility to rechallenge PLD treatment in long survivor patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, as evaluated for platinum agent, paclitaxel and gemcitabine. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the anti-tumor activity and the toxicity profile of re-challenge of PLD in recurrent ovarian cancer patients.MethodsData on 27 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated in the last ten years (2007-2017) with palliative PLD rechallenge were included in this multicenter retrospective Italian study.ResultsThe objective response rate to PLD re-treatment were complete response in 19%, partial response in 30% and stable disease in 37%. Only 1 case of G4 hematological toxicity was reported. No patient experienced severe cardiac impairment (G2-4).ConclusionPLD rechallenge represents an active and safe possibility of treatment for long survivor ovarian cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document