scholarly journals Nivolumab Versus Gemcitabine or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Open-Label, Randomized Trial in Japan (NINJA)

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.00334
Author(s):  
Junzo Hamanishi ◽  
Nobuhiro Takeshima ◽  
Noriyuki Katsumata ◽  
Kimio Ushijima ◽  
Tadashi Kimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Duration Of Response

PURPOSE This phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine [GEM] or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD]) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients had platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, received ≤ 1 regimen after diagnosis of resistance, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≤ 1. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks [as one cycle]) or chemotherapy (GEM 1000 mg/m2 for 30 minutes [once on days 1, 8, and 15] followed by a week's rest [as one cycle], or PLD 50 mg/m2 once every 4 weeks [as one cycle]). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Patients (n = 316) were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 157) or GEM or PLD (n = 159) between October 2015 and December 2017. Median OS was 10.1 (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.1) and 12.1 (95% CI, 9.3 to 15.3) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = .808). Median PFS was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.2) and 3.8 (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.2) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9; P = .002). There was no statistical difference in overall response rate between groups (7.6% v 13.2%; odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3; P = .191). Median duration of response was numerically longer with nivolumab than GEM or PLD (18.7 v 7.4 months). Fewer treatment-related adverse events were observed with nivolumab versus GEM or PLD (61.5% v 98.1%), with no additional or new safety risks. CONCLUSION Although well-tolerated, nivolumab did not improve OS and showed worse PFS compared with GEM or PLD in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

scholarly journals Phase II trial of cisplatin, gemcitabine and pembrolizumab for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252665
Author(s):  
Christine S. Walsh ◽  
Mitchell Kamrava ◽  
Andre Rogatko ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
Andrew Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Duration Of Response

Objective To evaluate the combination of pembrolizumab, cisplatin and gemcitabine in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods Patients received six cycles of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin on day 1 and day 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle. Pembrolizumab was administered on day 1 of cycles 3–6 and as maintenance monotherapy in cycles 7–34. Palliative radiation to a non-target symptomatic lesion was allowed. The primary objective was overall response rate by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival, time to progression, duration of response and overall survival. Results An interim analysis for futility was performed at 18 evaluable patients. Overall response rate was 60%, duration of response was 4.9 months and time to progression was 5.2 months. Progression-free survival at 6 and 12 months was 43% and 5%. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months and median overall survival was 11.3 months. In all patients, CA125 levels reflected response and progression. There were no pseudoprogression events. After receiving palliative radiation during pembrolizumab maintenance, a patient with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma had an exceptional and durable response that is ongoing for greater than 2 years. After consultation with the sponsor, based on the modest duration of response observed at the interim analysis for futility, the decision was made to close the trial to further accrual. Conclusions The addition of pembrolizumab to cisplatin and gemcitabine did not appear to provide benefit beyond chemotherapy alone in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Carboplatin plus ifosfamide as salvage treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: a pilot study.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1952-1956 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Lorusso ◽  
A Catino ◽  
B Leone ◽  
M Rabinovich ◽  
G Gargano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Previous Response ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Platinum Resistant

PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of carboplatin (PPL) and ifosfamide (IFO) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin (CDDP)-containing regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS From July 1989 to December 1991, 35 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer relapsed or refractory to CDDP as first-line chemotherapy were treated. PPL was administered at a dose of 300 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and IFO at a dose of 1,500 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 3 every 3 to 4 weeks. Criteria for evaluating previous response to CDDP were strictly defined. RESULTS The overall response rate was 43% (complete response [CR], 6%; partial response [PR], 37%) and the median duration of response was 7 months (range, 3 to 16). In potentially platinum-sensitive (PPS; relapsed) patients, the overall response rate was 56%. None of the primary platinum-resistant (PPR) patients obtained a clinical response to PPL plus IFO, whereas one of five secondary platinum-resistant (SPR) patients obtained a PR. The regimen was easily manageable. CONCLUSION PPL plus IFO is useful and well-tolerated combination in salvage treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. However, clear synergism between PPL and IFO that could overcome intrinsic or acquired CDDP resistance was not observed. The advantage of PPL plus IFO as compared with CDDP-containing regimens is represented by the increased tolerability and the reduced neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and ototoxicity as compared with CDDP-containing regimens. It is essential that the patient population be defined according to their previous response to platinum therapy in trials involving second-line therapy of ovarian cancer.

Panitumumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer with KRAS wild-type: The PaLiDo study, a phase II nonrandomized multicenter study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5052-5052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Dahl Steffensen ◽  
Marianne Waldstrøm ◽  
Niels Pallisgaard ◽  
Bente Lund ◽  
Kjell Bergfeldt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Dermatologic Toxicity

5052 Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) patients with platinum-resistant recurrent disease have few therapeutic options and the response rates are only 10-20% using non-cross-resistant chemotherapeutic agents. The increasing number of negative trials for OC treatment has prompted an evaluation of new biologic agents, which in combination with chemotherapy may result in improvement in survival. Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody specific to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). No previous studies have evaluated the effect of panitumumab in OC based on KRAS mutation status. The main purpose was to investigate the response rate in platinum-resistant, KRAS wild-type OC patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) supplemented with panitumumab. Methods: Major eligibility criteria were confirmed stage I-IV primary epithelial ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer patients with progression either during or within 6 months after end of first or second line platinum-based chemotherapy. Only patients with measurable disease by CA125 criteria and with KRAS wild type were eligible. Patients were treated with panitumumab 6 mg/kg day 1 and day 15 and with PLD 40 mg/m² day 1, every 4 weeks. Tumor assessment was performed at baseline and at every third cycle according to CA-125 criteria. Results: A total of 46 patients were enrolled by 6 study sites in this multi-institutional phase II trial. Within the population evaluable for response (N=33), there was 8 CA125 responders for an overall response rate of 24.3 %. Progression-free and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population (N=43) was 2.7 months (2.5-3.2 months, 95%CI) and 8.1 months (5.6-11.7 months, 95%CI), respectively. The most common treatment related grade 3 toxicities included skin toxicity (42%), fatigue (19%) and vomiting (12%). Conclusions: The combination of PLD and panitumumab demonstrates efficacy in platinum refractory/resistant patients although the dermatologic toxicity was considerable.

Pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5522-5522
Author(s):  
Judith Michels ◽  
François Ghiringhelli ◽  
Jean-Sebastien Frenel ◽  
Caroline Brard ◽  
Benoit You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Flat Dose

5522 Background: There is a medical unmet need for effective treatments in platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients. We assessed the safety and efficacy of a combination of pembrolizumab with bevacizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Methods: This is an open-label phase 1b trial in patients ECOG 0 or 1 with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. The safety of the dual combinations of pembrolizumab with bevacizumab or with PLD were previously evaluated in 6 patients respectively. In the absence of dose limiting toxicities (DLT) the triple combination was evaluated at a maximum tolerated dose (MTD)-1 for PLD in 3 patients and in the absence of DLT at MTD. The sample size was calculated according to the modified toxicity probability interval design. The primary evaluation criteria was the safety, the secondary endpoint was the outcome. Pharmacokinetics of the flat dose of bevacizumab will be evaluated. Results: 22 patients were enrolled from September 2019 until June 2020 in six French centers. 3 initial patients have been treated at 20mg/m2 of PLD (MTD-1) and 19 patients were treated at the dose of 30mg/m2 of PLD (MTD) combined with 200mg of pembrolizumab until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent and 400mg of bevacizumab for a total of six cycles. The patients’ characteristics are reported in the table. No DLT occurred. Grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were reported in 4 patients. The recommended phase II dose of PLD was 30mg/m2 in combination with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab. For patients treated at MTD, the overall response rate was 32% (6 partial responses) with 74% of clinical benefit with a durable response in 10 patients (53%). Median number of cycles was 7.5 (2 to not reached). Two patients are still on treatment. Correlative studies are ongoing. Conclusions: The combination was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical benefit in 74% platinum resistant ovarian cancer patients with durable response (>6 months) in 53% of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03596281. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin oxaliplatin and cyclophosphamide as second-line treatment in relapsed ovarian carcinoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Valerio ◽  
P. Tagliaferri ◽  
F. Raspagliesi ◽  
F. Fulfaro ◽  
G. Badalamenti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

We carried out a phase II nonrandomized study to examine the level of activity of oxaliplatin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in a patient population with relapsed ovarian cancer pretreated with platinum derivatives and paclitaxel. Patients received oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2). A total of 49 patients (39 assessable for toxicity and response) were enrolled in this trial. Neutropenia grade 3 was observed in six patients (15%) and anemia grade 3 in one patient (0.2%). Fatigue grade 1–2 occurred in 26 patients (66%), nausea/vomiting grade 1 in 23 patients (58%), and alopecia grade 1–2 in 19 patients (48%). Twenty-one (53%) patients experienced grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy. The overall response rate was 46% (95% CI 23.6–68.7). Median progression-free survival was 28 weeks (range 12–52 weeks) and median survival was 45 weeks (range 26–136+ weeks). The mean duration of response was 34 weeks (range 16–52 weeks). In platinum-resistant and -refractory ovarian cancer patients, the overall response rate was 37% (CI 95% 14.4–60.8) with a progression-free survival of 28 weeks (range 12–52 weeks) and a median survival of 42 weeks (range 28–84 weeks). This combination chemotherapy is generally well tolerated and is an active second-line regimen against ovarian cancer.

Panitumumab and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer With KRAS Wild-Type: The PaLiDo Study, a Phase II Nonrandomized Multicenter Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Dahl Steffensen ◽  
Marianne Waldstrøm ◽  
Niels Pallisgård ◽  
Bente Lund ◽  
Kjell Bergfeldt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Treat Population

ObjectiveThe increasing number of negative trials for ovarian cancer treatment has prompted an evaluation of new biologic agents, which in combination with chemotherapy may improve survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the response rate in platinum-resistant, KRAS wild-type ovarian cancer patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) supplemented with panitumumab.Patients and MethodsMajor eligibility criteria were relapsed ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer patients with platinum-resistant disease, measurable disease by GCIG CA125 criteria and KRAS wild-type. Patients were treated with panitumumab 6 mg/kg day 1 and day 15 and with PLD 40 mg/m2day 1, every 4 weeks.ResultsForty-six patients were enrolled by 6 study sites in this multi-institutional phase II trial. The response rate in the intention-to-treat population (n = 43) was 18.6%. Progression-free and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population was 2.7 months (2.5–3.2 months, 95% confidence interval) and 8.1 months (5.6–11.7 months, 95% confidence interval), respectively. The most common treatment-related grade 3 toxicities included skin toxicity (42%), fatigue (19%), and vomiting (12%).ConclusionsThe combination of PLD and panitumumab demonstrates efficacy in platinum refractory/resistant patients but the skin toxicity was considerable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document