A single-arm study on the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus sintilimab as salvage-line treatments in non-MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15560-e15560
Author(s):  
Rui Liu ◽  
Xia Wang ◽  
Zhi Ji ◽  
Ting Deng ◽  
Le Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Lymphocyte Activation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Best Response

e15560 Background: PD-1 blockade is particularly ineffective in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient colorectal cancer (CRC). Regorafenib (R) has been shown to modulate anti-tumor immunity through different mechanisms, including the reduction of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and lymphocyte activation or immunosuppressive cells, such as forkhead box P3 (Foxp3)+ CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). Synergy between R and anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies has been demonstrated in pre-clinical models compared to that of either treatment alone. Accordingly, this study attempted to evaluate the combined activity of regorafenib with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Methods: This trial was a prospective, open-label, monocentric, nonrandomized, single arm study. This study included patients with non MSI-H mCRC who received R (80 mg QD 3weeks/4) and sintilimab (S)(200 mg every 3 weeks).The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR).The secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS),overall survival (OS),disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: As of January 8, 2021, 24 patients (median age 59 years) with mCRC were enrolled and received treatment with R+S. RAS wild type was 50% of all patients. In addition, 83.3% of patients received two prior lines of treatment, while 58.3% had liver metastases at enrollment. Of the 24 patients, the best response was observed to be stable disease(SD) in six patients (25%) and progressive disease (PD)in four patients (16.7%). Another nine (37.5%) patients have yet to be evaluated. In the 15 evaluated patients, the ORR(RECIST version 1.1) was 33.3% , the DCR was 73.3%. Additionally, among the 10 evaluated patients with liver metastases, the ORR was 30% , the DCR was 80%. Among the nine evaluated patients with wild-type populations of k-ras, the ORR and DCR was found to be 44.4% and 66.7%, which was higher than the mutation patients. The median PFS was 4.2 (95% CI, 2.5, NA) months, the median OS was not reached. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were palmar-plantar erythro-dysesthesia syndrome (4.2%), erythra (4.2%). No death was related to the treatment. Moreover, four (16.7%) patients were subject to at least 1 dose modification or treatment interruption. Conclusions: In this study, the combination of R+S achieved a similar ORR with REGONIVO. Furthermore, this combination was well tolerated and had a manageable safety profile. However, due to the limited sample size, some biases may be present. As a result, we will continue to expand the sample size for future verification. Clinical trial information: NCT04745130.

NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610: Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) Study—A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS158-TPS158
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Samuel A. Jacobs ◽  
Hanna Kelly Sanoff ◽  
Deirdre Jill Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Pathway Inhibition

TPS158 Background: Despite activity of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibition in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, approximately one-third of patients demonstrate progressive disease as best response to anti-PD1 monotherapy. Preclinical models have demonstrated synergistic interactions between FOLFOX, anti-VEGF, and anti-PD-1. We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC subset may be more effectively targeted by the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Methods: Initially a three-arm study, the mFOLFOX6/bev arm was closed to new enrollment on 6-4-20 due to emerging data; the redesigned COMMIT is a prospective phase III open-label trial that will randomize (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H pts (N=211) to either atezo monotherapy or mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by site investigator. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, duration of response, and centrally-reviewed PFS. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, -180819, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

Phase Ib/II open-label, randomized evaluation of efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus isatuximab versus regorafenib in MORPHEUS-colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Jayesh Desai ◽  
Marwan Fakih ◽  
Katrina Sophia Pedersen ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Neil Howard Segal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Biologic Agent ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Randomized Evaluation ◽  
Best Response

82 Background: The MORPHEUS platform consists of multiple, global, open-label, randomized Phase Ib/II trials designed to identify early efficacy signals and safety of treatment (tx) combinations across tumor types. Isatuximab (isa; anti-CD38) targets CD38 receptors expressed on immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesized atezolizumab (atezo; anti–PD-L1) + isa would induce an anti-tumor response beyond that of regorafenib (rego), a multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients (pts) with tx-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: This randomized Phase Ib/II trial (NCT03555149) enrolled pts with microsatellite stable/mismatched repair proficient mCRC who had received ≤ 2 prior tx lines (fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing chemotherapy plus a biologic agent). Pts received atezo (1200 mg intravenously [IV] every 3 weeks [q3w]) + isa (10 mg/kg IV q3w) or control tx with rego (160 mg orally days 1–21; dose escalation to 160 mg during Cycle 1 allowed per institutional guidelines). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: Data cutoff date was March 3, 2020. Fifteen pts received atezo + isa and 13 pts received rego. Fourteen atezo + isa pts (93.3%) and 11 control arm pts (84.6%) had received 2 prior lines of tx; 9 atezo + isa pts (60.0%) and 9 control pts (69.2%) had liver metastases at enrollment. No responses were seen in either arm; 3 pts receiving atezo + isa (20.0%) and 8 control pts (61.5%) had stable disease as their best response. DCR (response and/or stable disease ≥ 12 weeks) was 6.7% with atezo + isa and 15.4% with control. One pt treated with atezo + isa beyond progression had prolonged disease stabilization. Median PFS was 1.4 mo (95% CI: 1.4, 1.8) with atezo + isa and 2.8 mo (95% CI: 1.6, 3.1) in the control arm; median OS was 5.1 mo (95% CI: 3.1, 7.8) with atezo + isa and 10.2 mo (95% CI: 4.8, not reached) with control. Tx-related adverse events (AEs, Grade 1-4) occurred in 13 atezo + isa pts (86.7%), and 12 control pts (92.3%). The most common tx-related AEs with atezo + isa were infusion-related reaction (73.3%), nausea (26.7%) and fatigue (20.0%). No Grade 5 AEs occurred in the atezo + isa arm, 1 (7.7%) was reported in the control arm (sepsis, considered unrelated to study tx). No atezo + isa pts and 1 control-arm pt (7.7%) withdrew from treatment due to a tx-related AE. Biomarker analyses did not identify any significant trends related to efficacy. Conclusions: In this trial, superior efficacy of atezo + isa vs rego was not shown. However, the atezo + isa combination was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03555149.

Folfoxiri with or without cetuximab as first-line treatment of patients with non-resectable liver, only metastatic colorectal cancer and KRAS/NRAS wild type (FOCULM study).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS798-TPS798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Guanjian Liu ◽  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Yue Cai
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Unresectable Liver Metastases

TPS798 Background: For liver limited metastatic colorectal cancers, complete resection of liver metastases is the only potentially curative treatment and can significantly improve overall survival. The current goal of medical treatment for colorectal cancer with initially unresectable liver metastases is to maximize the rate of secondary resection. This phase II study is to explore whether cetuximab in combination with FOLFOXIRI as first treatment could improve radical resectability in patients with KRAS/NRAS wild-type, unresectable liver - only metastases of colorectal cancer. Methods: The primary aim is to evaluate the percentage of patients who had a curative liver treatment following protocol treatment, i.e., liver metastases that can be completely resected and/or ablated with no evidence of residual malignant disease. Secondary aims include safty, objective response rate, overall survival, progression free survival, quality of life and an assessment of predictive molecular markers of response. 138 cases of patients met inclusion criteria and enrolled in the trial will be randomized to two therapy groups: experimental arm A (Chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI + Cetuximab) or standard arm B (Chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI). All patients will receive the study treatment regimen every 2 weeks, and a total of the maximum of 8 cycles. CT scan or MRI of the abdomen will be performed after 2 or 3 cycles of therapy to assess clinical response and resectability of liver metastases by multidisciplinary team including hepatic surgeon. If liver metastases are not deemed to be resectable at this assessment, but tumor assessment demonstrates stable disease or partial response, therapy will continue with re-assessment for clinical response and resectability after the next cycle. Clinical trial information: NCT02063529.

LM02-trial perioperative treatment with panitumumab and FOLFIRI in patients with wild-type RAS, potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16046-e16046
Author(s):  
Gudrun Piringer ◽  
Thomas Gruenberger ◽  
Irene Kuehrer ◽  
Dietmar Oefner ◽  
Klaus Kaczirek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Preoperative Therapy ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

e16046 Background: Nearly half of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases and only 20% are initially resectable. Surgical resection of liver metastases results in five-year survival rates of 24-48%. Perioperative FOLFOX therapy increases progression free survival. In advanced disease the addition of targeting therapies to chemotherapy results in an overall survival advantage. In this study the efficacy and safety of perioperative panitumumab and FOLFIRI therapy were investigated. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, wild-type RAS, potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases were included. Chemotherapy consisted of irinotecan 180mg/m2 intravenously over 120 minutes and fluorouracil bolus 400mg/m2 intravenously, followed by a 46 h infusion of fluorouracil 2400mg/m2 repeated every 2 weeks. Panitumumab was given as an intravenous dose of 6mg/kg every 2 weeks. Preoperative 4 cycles and postoperative 8 cycles were administered. Primary objectives were the evaluation of efficacy and safety. Results: We enrolled 36 patients in 7 centers in Austria. ITT-analyses included 35 patients. There were 28 men and 7 women, the median age was 66 years. 91.4% completed the planned 4 cycles of preoperative therapy and 82.9% underwent liver resection. R0 resection rate was 82.7%. 20 patients started postoperative chemotherapy and 12 patients completed the planned 8 cycles. Objective response rate after preoperative therapy was 65.7% with one radiological complete remission and 22 partial remissions. In 20% and 5.7% of patients stable disease and progressive disease were documented, respectively. Three patients discontinued preoperative treatment due to adverse events without response evaluation. The most common grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (n = 4), rash (n = 3) and leukopenia (n = 3) during preoperative therapy. One patient died due to sepsis and one had a pulmonary embolism grade 4. After surgery two patients died due to hepatic failure and one patient had a suture related complication grade 3. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events during postoperative therapy were rash (n = 2), stroke (n = 1) and intestinal obstruction (n = 1). Conclusions: Panitumumab in combination with FOLFIRI as preoperative therapy for operable colorectal liver metastases in RAS wild-type patients results in a radiological objective response rate in 65.7% of patients with a manageable grade 3 diarrhea rate of 14.3%. Progression-free survival and overall survival are still monitored. Clinical trial information: 2012_000265-20 .

Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) Study: A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)—NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3618-TPS3618
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Samuel A. Jacobs ◽  
Hanna Kelly Sanoff ◽  
Deirdre Jill Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Best Response

TPS3618 Background: The superiority of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H over chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti- epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC has been demonstrated in a phase III trial (N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2207). However, more patients had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% vs. 12.3%) with mean progression-free survival (PFS) of 13.7 months. Preclinical models have demonstrated synergistic interactions between FOLFOX, anti-VEGF, and anti-PD-1. We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients may be more effectively treated by the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-L1 therapy (atezo) alone. Methods: Initially a three-arm study, the mFOLFOX6/bev arm was closed to new enrollment on 6-4-20 due to emerging data; the redesigned COMMIT trial was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a prospective phase III open-label trial that randomizes (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H pts (N=211) to either atezo monotherapy or mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Primary endpoint is PFS as assessed by site investigator. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), objective response rate (RECIST v1.1), safety profile, disease control rate, duration of response, and centrally-reviewed PFS. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Clinical trial: NCT02997228. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, -180819, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

FOLFOX plus panitumumab or FOLFOX alone as additive therapy following R0/1 resection of RAS wild-type colorectal cancer liver metastases: The PARLIM trial (AIO KRK 0314).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3553-3553
Author(s):  
Dominik Paul Modest ◽  
Meinolf Karthaus ◽  
Stefan Kasper ◽  
Nicolas Moosmann ◽  
Verena Keitel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

3553 Background: This trial investigates the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy with fluorouracil/ folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in a 2:1 randomized, controlled, open label, phase II trial in RAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients with R0/1-resected liver metastases. Methods: The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) two years after randomisation. The experimental arm (12 wks of biweekly mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab followed by 12 wks of panitumumab alone) was considered active if the 2-year-PFS rate was ≥65%. Based on historical data, a 2-year-PFS rate of 50% was estimated in the control arm (12 wks of biweekly FOLFOX). The trial was performed with a power of 80% and an alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01384994. Results: The full analysis set consists of 70 patients (pts) in the experimental arm and 36 pts in the control arm. The 2-year-PFS rate was 34.3% with FOLFOX plus panitumumab and failed to meet the primary endpoint. The 2-year-PFS rate in the control arm was 25%. In the experimental arm, a more favourable outcome was observed with regard to PFS (HR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.45-1.17; P = 0.18) and OS (HR: 0.76 (95% CI 0.34-1.71, P = 0.51) which did, however, not reach the level of significance. Updated data including toxicity and subgroup analyses might be presented at the meeting Conclusions: The PARLIM trial clearly failed to demonstrate a PFS rate of 65% after resection of colorectal liver metastases 2 years after randomisation, potentially indicating that the generally high frequency of recurrence and the choice of primary endpoint did not correspond in this study population. However, a trend for improved PFS and OS by the addition of panitumumab to 12 wks of FOLFOX followed by 12 wks panitumumab maintenance therapy may support future trials with ant-EGFR antibodies in this specific treatment setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01384994.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of panitumumab in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil for pre-treated patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type RAS: The phase 1/2 APOLLON study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Kato ◽  
Yoshinori Kagawa ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Makio Gamoh ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Multicentre Phase

Abstract Background We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were refractory/intolerant to standard therapies other than anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Methods APOLLON was an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 trial. In the phase 1 part, 3 + 3 de-escalation design was used to investigate the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D); all patients in the phase 2 part received the RP2D. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and safety. Results Fifty-six patients were enrolled (phase 1, n = 7; phase 2, n = 49) at 25 Japanese centres. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in patients receiving panitumumab (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily; days 1–5 and 8–12 in a 28-day cycle), which became RP2D. PFS rate at 6 months was 33.3% (90% confidence interval [CI] 22.8–45.3). Median PFS, OS, ORR, DCR, and TTF were 5.8 months (95% CI 4.5–6.5), 14.1 months (95% CI 12.2–19.3), 37.0% (95% CI 24.3–51.3), 81.5% (95% CI 68.6–90.8), and 5.8 months (95% CI 4.29–6.21), respectively. Neutrophil count decreased (47.3%) was the most common Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion Panitumumab plus FTD/TPI exhibited favourable anti-tumour activity with a manageable safety profile and may be a therapeutic option for pre-treated mCRC patients.

Regomune: A phase II study of regorafenib + avelumab in solid tumors—Results of the biliary tract cancer (BTC) cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4096-4096
Author(s):  
Sophie Cousin ◽  
Carine A. Bellera ◽  
Jean Philippe Guégan ◽  
Thibault Mazard ◽  
Carlos A. Gomez-Roca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Adaptive Design ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label

4096 Background: Regorafenib (R) has shown promising efficacy in patients (pts) with BTC refractory to standard chemotherapy. Anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies have only limited clinical activity. Synergy between R and anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies has been shown in pre-clinical solid tumor models. Methods: This is a single-arm open-label multicentric phase II trial (Bayesian adaptive design) assessing the efficacy and safety of R (160 mg QD 3weeks/4) + avelumab (A) (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) combination in BTC pts. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate under treatment, based on central review according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included: 1-year progression free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival (OS), and Safety using NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Correlative studies were planned from pts tumor samples obtained at baseline. Results: Between Nov. 2018 and Nov. 2019, 34 BTC pts were enrolled in 4 centers. Median age was 63 (range 36 – 80). Median follow-up was 9.8 months. Median number of previous treatment lines for metastatic or locally advanced disease was: 2 (range 1 – 4). Twenty-nine (85.3%) pts experienced at least 1 dose modification or treatment interruption of R or A due to an adverse event (AE) related to the treatment. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were : Hypertension (17.6%), Fatigue (14.7%), and maculo-papular rash (11.8%). No death was related to the treatment. Among the 29 pts with at least one imaging tumor assessment, 4 (13.8%) achieved a partial response, and 11 (37.9%) demonstrated stable disease including 10 (34.5%) pts with tumor shrinkage. Fourteen pts (48.3%) had progressive disease. The median PFS and OS were 2.5 months (95%CI 1.9 – 5.5) and 11.9 months (95%CI 6.2 – NA) respectively. Baseline tumor samples were available for 27 pts. High IDO and PD-L1 expression at baseline was associated with better outcome. Conclusions: The R+A combination is associated with significant anti-tumor activity with promising survival rates in this heavily pre-treated population. Full Biomarkers analyses will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03475953.

scholarly journals Randomized Phase II Study of SOX+B-mab Versus SOX+C-mab in Patients With Previously Untreated Recurrent Advanced Colorectal Cancer With Wild-Type KRAS (MCSGO-1107 Study)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujiro Nishizawa ◽  
Naotsugu Haraguchi ◽  
Hirotoshi Kim ◽  
Yoshihito Ide ◽  
Ken Nakata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Early Tumor ◽  
Patient Prognosis ◽  
Clinical Trials Registry

Abstract Background: Although chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved, the standard chemotherapy regimens for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC remain debated.Methods: This randomized phase II, open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX)+bevacizumab (B-mab) with SOX+cetuximab (C-mab) in patients with previously untreated recurrent advanced CRC with wild-type KRAS. Between February 2012 and October 2016, 45 patients were enrolled.Results: Overall response rates were 59.1% and 43.5% (p=0.29) and disease control rates were 90.9% and 91.3% (p=0.96) in the SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab groups, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 25.3 and 15.5 months (HR=0.607, p=0.167) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.7 and 5.5 months (HR=0.558, p=0.077) in the SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab groups, respectively. The OS and PFS of patients with early tumor shrinkage (ETS) were not significantly different in the SOX+B-mab group. However, they were significantly better when ETS was ≥20 in the SOX+C-mab group (p=0.032 and p=0.003, respectively).Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of SOX+B-mab and SOX+C-mab for wild-type KRAS recurrent advanced CRC as first-line chemotherapy were almost the same. Consideration of the treatment strategy based on ETS may improve patient prognosis, especially in patients receiving the SOX+C-mab regimen.Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000006706)Date of registration: NOV/11/2011URL of trial registry record:https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000007920

PULSE: A randomized phase II open label study of panitumumab rechallenge versus standard therapy after progression on anti-EGFR therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS143-TPS143
Author(s):  
John H. Strickler ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab ◽  
Christine Megerdichian Parseghian ◽  
Andrea Cercek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Genomic Alterations ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

TPS143 Background: Patients with KRAS and NRAS ( RAS) wild-type mCRC benefit from the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (Abs) panitumumab and cetuximab, but nearly all patients experience resistance. Blood-based profiling of cell free DNA (cfDNA) can identify genomic alterations that drive acquired EGFR Ab resistance. After discontinuation of anti-EGFR Abs, acquired genomic alterations decay over time to undetectable levels. Some studies have suggested clinical benefit from EGFR Ab rechallenge, but there is limited evidence that EGFR Ab rechallenge improves survival compared to standard of care (SOC) therapies. We hypothesize that cfDNA profiling will identify patients appropriate for panitumumab rechallenge, and that these molecularly selected patients will have improved survival compared to current SOC therapies. Methods: This is a randomized phase II, open label study designed to compare the overall survival (OS) of panitumumab rechallenge versus SOC (investigator choice TAS-102 or regorafenib). Secondary objectives include comparisons of progression free survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and quality of life as measured by the linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) questionnaire. Eligible patients have radiographically measurable KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF codon 600 wild-type mCRC based on tumor tissue testing, and must have experienced progression or intolerance to treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, an anti-VEGF Ab, and an anti-PD-1 Ab if the tumor has mismatch repair deficiency or is MSI-H. Progression after at least 4 months treatment with an anti-EGFR Ab is required. All patients must be enrolled in the COLOMATE cfDNA screening protocol (NCT03765736) and meet molecular eligibility based on Guardant360 cfDNA profiling (absence of amplification of ERBB2, KRAS, NRAS, and MET; absence of mutations of BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, NRAS, and MET [mutant allele frequency > 0.5%]). Greater than 90 days must have elapsed between the most recent treatment with an anti-EGFR Ab and cfDNA profiling. Dosing for all study drugs is according to clinical SOC. 120 patients will be randomized 1:1 to panitumumab rechallenge or SOC. With 83 OS events, this study will have 80% power to detect an improvement in median OS from 6.5 to 10 months (HR=0.65; 1-sided α= 0.15). This study began enrollment in 6/2020. Recruitment is ongoing at 16 sites in the Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) network (ACCRU-GI-1623). Clinical trial information: NCT03992456.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document