Phase Ib/II open-label, randomized evaluation of efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus isatuximab versus regorafenib in MORPHEUS-colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Jayesh Desai ◽  
Marwan Fakih ◽  
Katrina Sophia Pedersen ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Neil Howard Segal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Biologic Agent ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Randomized Evaluation ◽  
Best Response

82 Background: The MORPHEUS platform consists of multiple, global, open-label, randomized Phase Ib/II trials designed to identify early efficacy signals and safety of treatment (tx) combinations across tumor types. Isatuximab (isa; anti-CD38) targets CD38 receptors expressed on immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesized atezolizumab (atezo; anti–PD-L1) + isa would induce an anti-tumor response beyond that of regorafenib (rego), a multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients (pts) with tx-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: This randomized Phase Ib/II trial (NCT03555149) enrolled pts with microsatellite stable/mismatched repair proficient mCRC who had received ≤ 2 prior tx lines (fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing chemotherapy plus a biologic agent). Pts received atezo (1200 mg intravenously [IV] every 3 weeks [q3w]) + isa (10 mg/kg IV q3w) or control tx with rego (160 mg orally days 1–21; dose escalation to 160 mg during Cycle 1 allowed per institutional guidelines). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: Data cutoff date was March 3, 2020. Fifteen pts received atezo + isa and 13 pts received rego. Fourteen atezo + isa pts (93.3%) and 11 control arm pts (84.6%) had received 2 prior lines of tx; 9 atezo + isa pts (60.0%) and 9 control pts (69.2%) had liver metastases at enrollment. No responses were seen in either arm; 3 pts receiving atezo + isa (20.0%) and 8 control pts (61.5%) had stable disease as their best response. DCR (response and/or stable disease ≥ 12 weeks) was 6.7% with atezo + isa and 15.4% with control. One pt treated with atezo + isa beyond progression had prolonged disease stabilization. Median PFS was 1.4 mo (95% CI: 1.4, 1.8) with atezo + isa and 2.8 mo (95% CI: 1.6, 3.1) in the control arm; median OS was 5.1 mo (95% CI: 3.1, 7.8) with atezo + isa and 10.2 mo (95% CI: 4.8, not reached) with control. Tx-related adverse events (AEs, Grade 1-4) occurred in 13 atezo + isa pts (86.7%), and 12 control pts (92.3%). The most common tx-related AEs with atezo + isa were infusion-related reaction (73.3%), nausea (26.7%) and fatigue (20.0%). No Grade 5 AEs occurred in the atezo + isa arm, 1 (7.7%) was reported in the control arm (sepsis, considered unrelated to study tx). No atezo + isa pts and 1 control-arm pt (7.7%) withdrew from treatment due to a tx-related AE. Biomarker analyses did not identify any significant trends related to efficacy. Conclusions: In this trial, superior efficacy of atezo + isa vs rego was not shown. However, the atezo + isa combination was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03555149.

Phase Ib/II open-label, randomized evaluation of atezolizumab (atezo) + Imprime PGG (Imprime) + bevacizumab (bev) vs regorafenib (rego) in MORPHEUS: Microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3559-3559
Author(s):  
Marwan Fakih ◽  
James M. Cleary ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Tae-You Kim ◽  
Rachael A Safyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stable Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Macrophage Polarization ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
M1 Macrophage

3559 Background: The MORPHEUS platform consists of multiple, global, open-label, randomized Phase Ib/II trials designed to identify early efficacy and safety signals of treatment (tx) combinations across cancers. Here, atezo (anti-PD-L1) was tested with Imprime and bev (anti-VEGF) for MSS mCRC, a poorly immunogenic cancer generally resistant to checkpoint inhibitors. Imprime acts as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern that, when bound to anti-β glucan antibodies (ABA), activates the innate immune system with the potential to 1) promote priming and expansion of tumor-specific T cells, 2) promote M2-M1 macrophage polarization and 3) enhance the immunomodulatory effects of atezo and bev. Therefore, we hypothesized that atezo + Imprime + bev would induce an antitumor response beyond that of rego, a standard-of-care multikinase inhibitor, in patients (pts) with MSS mCRC. Methods: Pts with MSS mCRC unselected for the Imprime-specific biomarker (ABA) and refractory to 1-2 prior lines of standard therapy received atezo (1200 mg IV every 3 weeks [q3w]) + Imprime (4 mg/kg IV on Days 1, 8, 15) + bev (7.5 mg/kg IV q3w) or control tx with rego (160 mg orally days 1-21; dose escalation to 160 mg during Cycle 1 allowed per institutional guidelines). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR; response or stable disease ≥ 12 weeks), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Pts were followed-up for ≥18 wk. 15 pts received atezo + Imprime + bev and 13 received rego. Grade (Gr) 3/4 tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) were seen in 13% of atezo + Imprime + bev and 62% of rego pts. No Gr 5 AEs occurred in atezo + Imprime + bev pts and 1 (8%) was reported in a rego pt. One pt in each arm (7% vs 8%, respectively) withdrew from tx due to a TRAE. No radiological responses were seen in either arm. Five pts (33%) receiving atezo + Imprime + bev and 8 (62%) receiving rego had stable disease as best response. DCR was 13% with atezo + Imprime + bev and 23% with rego. Median PFS was 1.5 mo (95% CI: 1.4, 2.8) and 2.8 mo (95% CI: 1.6, 3.1), and median OS was 5.7 mo (95% CI: 4.4, 10.5) and 10.2 mo (95% CI: 4.8, NE) with atezo + Imprime + bev and rego, respectively. There was no apparent correlation between baseline PD-L1 expression or CD8+ lymphocyte tumor infiltration and clinical benefit. Further, the systemic exposure of atezo, Imprime and bev and immunogenicity of atezo and bev are in line with previous clinical experience. Additional biomarker, pharmacokinetics and anti-drug antibody data will be shown. Conclusions: Atezo + Imprime + bev was well tolerated; toxicities were consistent with the safety profiles of the individual agents. No efficacy signal was identified with atezo + Imprime + bev in pts with MSS refractory mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03555149.

A phase II study of sunitinib in recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma: A trial of the PMH Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576
Author(s):  
S. Welch ◽  
H. J. Mackay ◽  
H. Hirte ◽  
G. F. Fleming ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

5576 Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) overexpression in EC correlates with poor outcome, thus targeting VEGF is a rational therapeutic approach. We have conducted a two-stage open-label phase II study in advanced EC with sunitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple VEGF receptors. Methods: Eligible pts have recurrent or metastatic EC and have received up to 1 prior chemotherapy (CT) regimen for metastatic disease. Sunitinib is given at 50 mg daily (OD) for 4 consecutive weeks (wks) followed by 2 wks off. Dose could be reduced to 37.5 mg OD and then 25 mg OD in the setting of toxicity. Imaging is repeated every 12 wks. Primary objectives are objective response rate (ORR by RECIST) and rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). If 1 or more responses occur in the first 15 evaluable pts, the study would continue to a second stage (total = 30 pts). Secondary objectives are time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We report the results of the first stage of this study. Sixteen pts have been treated (median age: 63; range 41–74) with 37 cycles of sunitinib (median 2; range: 1–7). Baseline ECOG PS was 0 (7 pts), 1 (8 pts), or 2 (1 pt). Histology was endometrioid (7 pts), serous (5 pts), clear cell (1 pt), or mixed/other (3 pts). Most pts had high-grade histology (G3: 8; G2: 4; G1: 2; GX: 2). Nine pts had prior adjuvant CT, 8 pts had 1 prior CT for advanced EC, 4 pts had prior hormones and 7 pts had prior radiotherapy. Partial response was achieved by 2 pts (ORR = 12.5%), and 2 other pts had a best response of stable disease; 3 of these pts remained progression-free > 6 months. Median TTP = 2.5 months (95% CI: 2.47-NR), and median OS = 6.2 months (95% CI: 5.1-NR). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in >10% of pts were fatigue (7 pts, 44%) and hypertension (5 pts, 31%). Dose reduction was required for 11 of 16 pts (69%). Two pts were inevaluable after receiving <2 cycles due to AE (grade 4 hyponatremia; grade 3 fatigue) and 1 other pt has yet to complete 2 cycles. Conclusions: Sunitinib shows preliminary activity in EC. This trial will proceed to a second stage of accrual to further explore the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in advanced EC. [Table: see text]

Continuous daily administration of sunitinib in patients (pts) with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Updated results

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5040-5040 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Srinivas ◽  
J. Roigas ◽  
S. Gillessen ◽  
U. Harmenberg ◽  
P. H. De Mulder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

5040 Background: Sunitinib malate, an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors, showed significant efficacy in 168 pts with cytokine refractory mRCC, with a 42% objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.2 months at 50 mg/day (4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off) per investigator assessment (Motzer et al. JAMA 2006;295:2516–24). This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of single-agent sunitinib when administered in a continuous 37.5 mg/day regimen. Methods: Pts with histologically proven mRCC, refractory to a cytokine-based regimen, were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, phase II study. Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, ECOG PS 0/1, and adequate organ function. Pts were randomized to receive sunitinib in the morning (AM) or in the evening (PM) at a dose of 37.5 mg/day, with individual doses subsequently titrated based on tolerability. The primary endpoint was RECIST-defined ORR. Secondary endpoints included PFS, adverse events (AEs) and quality of life measures. Results: 107 pts were randomized to AM (54) or PM (53) dosing and have been on study a median of 6.8 months (0.4 to 13.3). As of October 2006, 55 pts have discontinued due to progression (37 pts [35%]), AEs (17 pts [16%]), and 1 consent withdrawal (1%); 47 pts (44%) were dose reduced to 25 mg/day due to grade 2/3 AEs, the most frequent being: asthenia (12%), hand-foot syndrome (8%), and diarrhea (5%). The most commonly reported (=5% of pts) grade 3/4 AEs were hypertension (10%), asthenia (9%), hand-foot syndrome (9%), anorexia (8%), and diarrhea (6%). 31 pts (29%) were maintained on continuous sunitinib at 37.5 mg/day, and 29 (27%) were escalated to 50 mg/day. There were no significant differences between pts who received AM or PM dosing. Quality of life results will be presented. The best response by RECIST per investigator assessment shows an ORR of 19% with 43 pts (40%) with =6 months of stable disease. The median PFS is 8.3 months. Conclusions: Sunitinib 37.5 mg/day continuous dosing has a manageable safety profile and demonstrates promising clinical benefit as second-line therapy in mRCC. This regimen provides alternative sunitinib dosing that can be explored in combination studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610: Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) Study—A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS158-TPS158
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Samuel A. Jacobs ◽  
Hanna Kelly Sanoff ◽  
Deirdre Jill Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Pathway Inhibition

TPS158 Background: Despite activity of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibition in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, approximately one-third of patients demonstrate progressive disease as best response to anti-PD1 monotherapy. Preclinical models have demonstrated synergistic interactions between FOLFOX, anti-VEGF, and anti-PD-1. We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC subset may be more effectively targeted by the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Methods: Initially a three-arm study, the mFOLFOX6/bev arm was closed to new enrollment on 6-4-20 due to emerging data; the redesigned COMMIT is a prospective phase III open-label trial that will randomize (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H pts (N=211) to either atezo monotherapy or mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by site investigator. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, duration of response, and centrally-reviewed PFS. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, -180819, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

Nintedanib in metastatic appendiceal carcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS723-TPS723
Author(s):  
Birendra Kc ◽  
Mufti Naeem Ahmad ◽  
Kunal C. Kadakia ◽  
Reza Nazemzadeh ◽  
Mohamed E. Salem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Appendiceal Cancer ◽  
Open Label

TPS723 Background: Appendiceal carcinomas are rare with an incidence of about 0.12 cases per 1,000,000 people per year. There is limited, mostly retrospective data in the treatment of metastatic appendiceal carcinomas. Generally, fluoropyrimidine-based therapy is used in the first line, adapting regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, beyond progression, no treatments have shown clear activity. In appendiceal cancer, high vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)2 expression has been correlated with poor survival. Moreover, malignant ascites has been demonstrated to have elevated levels of VEGF. Nintedanib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR which demonstrated activity in lung and ovarian cancer in clinical trials, and has undergone investigation in heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Given the analogies between appendiceal and colorectal cancer and potentially ovarian cancer, and the limited information about the optimal treatment of metastatic appendiceal carcinomas, further investigation with nintedanib is warranted. Methods: This is a single arm, open label, investigator initiated, two-stage phase II trial (NCT 03287947) in metastatic appendiceal cancer patients after failure (defined as progression on or within 6 months or intolerance) of initial fluoropyrimidine-based therapy and at least one measurable site of disease. The trial started enrolling patients in June 2018, and up to 39 subjects will be enrolled. They will be treated with 200 mg of oral nintedanib twice daily and undergo disease evaluation every two months. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the disease control rate (DCR), the composite of objective response and stable disease per RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety and toxicity, objective response rate (ORR), 6-month progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). DCR, ORR & 6-month PFS will be estimated with the corresponding 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval. PFS & OS will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier techniques. Exploratory objectives include evaluation of serum VEGF, ascites VEGF, hypertension and paracentesis frequency in subjects with ascites at study entry. Clinical trial information: NCT 03287947.

Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) Study: A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)—NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3618-TPS3618
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Samuel A. Jacobs ◽  
Hanna Kelly Sanoff ◽  
Deirdre Jill Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Best Response

TPS3618 Background: The superiority of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H over chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti- epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC has been demonstrated in a phase III trial (N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2207). However, more patients had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% vs. 12.3%) with mean progression-free survival (PFS) of 13.7 months. Preclinical models have demonstrated synergistic interactions between FOLFOX, anti-VEGF, and anti-PD-1. We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients may be more effectively treated by the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-L1 therapy (atezo) alone. Methods: Initially a three-arm study, the mFOLFOX6/bev arm was closed to new enrollment on 6-4-20 due to emerging data; the redesigned COMMIT trial was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a prospective phase III open-label trial that randomizes (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H pts (N=211) to either atezo monotherapy or mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Primary endpoint is PFS as assessed by site investigator. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), objective response rate (RECIST v1.1), safety profile, disease control rate, duration of response, and centrally-reviewed PFS. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Clinical trial: NCT02997228. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, -180819, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

A single-arm study on the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus sintilimab as salvage-line treatments in non-MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15560-e15560
Author(s):  
Rui Liu ◽  
Xia Wang ◽  
Zhi Ji ◽  
Ting Deng ◽  
Le Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Lymphocyte Activation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Best Response

e15560 Background: PD-1 blockade is particularly ineffective in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient colorectal cancer (CRC). Regorafenib (R) has been shown to modulate anti-tumor immunity through different mechanisms, including the reduction of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and lymphocyte activation or immunosuppressive cells, such as forkhead box P3 (Foxp3)+ CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). Synergy between R and anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies has been demonstrated in pre-clinical models compared to that of either treatment alone. Accordingly, this study attempted to evaluate the combined activity of regorafenib with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Methods: This trial was a prospective, open-label, monocentric, nonrandomized, single arm study. This study included patients with non MSI-H mCRC who received R (80 mg QD 3weeks/4) and sintilimab (S)(200 mg every 3 weeks).The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR).The secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS),overall survival (OS),disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: As of January 8, 2021, 24 patients (median age 59 years) with mCRC were enrolled and received treatment with R+S. RAS wild type was 50% of all patients. In addition, 83.3% of patients received two prior lines of treatment, while 58.3% had liver metastases at enrollment. Of the 24 patients, the best response was observed to be stable disease(SD) in six patients (25%) and progressive disease (PD)in four patients (16.7%). Another nine (37.5%) patients have yet to be evaluated. In the 15 evaluated patients, the ORR(RECIST version 1.1) was 33.3% , the DCR was 73.3%. Additionally, among the 10 evaluated patients with liver metastases, the ORR was 30% , the DCR was 80%. Among the nine evaluated patients with wild-type populations of k-ras, the ORR and DCR was found to be 44.4% and 66.7%, which was higher than the mutation patients. The median PFS was 4.2 (95% CI, 2.5, NA) months, the median OS was not reached. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were palmar-plantar erythro-dysesthesia syndrome (4.2%), erythra (4.2%). No death was related to the treatment. Moreover, four (16.7%) patients were subject to at least 1 dose modification or treatment interruption. Conclusions: In this study, the combination of R+S achieved a similar ORR with REGONIVO. Furthermore, this combination was well tolerated and had a manageable safety profile. However, due to the limited sample size, some biases may be present. As a result, we will continue to expand the sample size for future verification. Clinical trial information: NCT04745130.

A phase 2 study of defactinib (VS-6063) in patients with NF2 altered tumors: Results from NCI-match (EAY131) subprotocol U.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3087-3087
Author(s):  
David Michael Jackman ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Marjorie Glass Zauderer ◽  
Edith P. Mitchell ◽  
James Zwiebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Match Trial ◽  
Best Response

3087 Background: The NCI-MATCH trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on genetic alterations identified in tumor biopsies. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-inactivated tumors demonstrate increased sensitivity to FAK inhibition in preclinical models. Arm U evaluated the FAK inhibitor defactinib in pts with NF2 altered tumors. Methods: Patients found to harbor an inactivating NF2 mutation on NGS were assigned to the ARM U substudy MATCH. Defactinib 400 mg was given by mouth twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and 6-month PFS. Results: Of 5,548 cases with sufficient tissue for genomic analysis, 51 pts were found to have NF2 alterations (< 1% of the total analyzed). While NF2 alterations are known to occur more commonly in meningiomas and mesotheliomas, alterations were also detected in an array of other tumor types, including renal cell carcinomas and ovarian cancers. Thirty-five pts were ultimately enrolled; 33 patients were started on therapy, with 2 of those determined to be ineligible for outcome analysis. All pts had received at least one prior therapy, with 52% (16/31) having received 3 or more prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up was 35.9 months. ORR [90% CI] was 3% (1/31, [0.16, 14.86]), with the one partial response in a pt with choroid meningioma. Of the twelve pts whose best response was stable disease (39%, 12/31), 8 demonstrated some degree of tumor shrinkage (Table) with a disease control rate of 42% (13/31). Median PFS was 1.9 months for the 31 eligible pts who received study treatment, with median PFS of 9.3 months for the 9 patients who had a best response of stable disease or better. Six pts achieved a PFS of greater than 5.5 months. Among all treated pts (n=33), the most common treatment-related toxicities were fatigue (36%), nausea (33%), and hyperbilirubinemia (27%). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities; 27% of pts had grade 3 toxicities. No correlation could be made between clinical outcomes and tumor histology or specific NF2 genotype. Conclusions: Defactinib monotherapy had limited clinical activity in this cohort of previously treated patients with solid tumors exhibiting NF2 loss. Clinical trial information: NCT04439331. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase Ib Study of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (26) ◽  
pp. 2960-2970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Finn ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Max W. Sung ◽  
Ari D. Baron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Safety Signals

PURPOSE The immunomodulatory effect of lenvatinib (a multikinase inhibitor) on tumor microenvironments may contribute to antitumor activity when combined with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) signaling inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We report results from a phase Ib study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (an anti–PD-1 antibody) in unresectable HCC (uHCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label multicenter study, patients with uHCC received lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥ 60 kg, 12 mg; < 60 kg, 8 mg) orally daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The study included a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) phase and an expansion phase (first-line patients). Primary objectives were safety/tolerability (DLT phase), and objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by modified RECIST (mRECIST) and RECIST version 1.1 (v1.1) per independent imaging review (IIR; expansion phase). RESULTS A total of 104 patients were enrolled. No DLTs were reported (n = 6) in the DLT phase; 100 patients (expansion phase; included n = 2 from DLT phase) had received no prior systemic therapy and had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (n = 29) or C disease (n = 71). At data cutoff, 37% of patients remained on treatment. Median duration of follow-up was 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.5 months). Confirmed ORRs by IIR were 46.0% (95% CI, 36.0% to 56.3%) per mRECIST and 36.0% (95% CI, 26.6% to 46.2%) per RECIST v1.1. Median DORs by IIR were 8.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 months to not estimable [NE]) per mRECIST and 12.6 months (95% CI, 6.9 months to NE) per RECIST v1.1. Median progression-free survival by IIR was 9.3 months per mRECIST and 8.6 months per RECIST v1.1. Median overall survival was 22 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 67% (grade 5, 3%) of patients. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab has promising antitumor activity in uHCC. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals.

Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of patients with recurrent high grade gliomas expressing PDGF-R

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1526-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Marosi ◽  
M. Vedadinejad ◽  
C. Haberler ◽  
J. A. Hainfellner ◽  
K. Dieckmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Major Response ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Patients Experience

1526 Background: Despite noticeable progress in the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG), most patients experience tumor recurrence after standard treatment consisting of surgery, radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy. Imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of PDGFR-α, -β, c-kit, abl and arg, has been shown to produce tumor response in patients with recurrent gliomas (Raymond ProcASCO 2004, Dresemann ProcASCO 2004&2005, Reardon Proc ASCO 2005). We treated 34 patients with recurrent HGGs showing immunohistochemical expression of “imatinib targets” in the tumor tissue with imatinib. Methods: 34 patients, 16 women, 18 men, aged from 27 to 72 years, in median 49 years with recurrent HGG (GBM n= 23, AA n=11) were treated with imatinib 400 mg/day as continuous daily oral dosing. MRI was performed every three months or at clinical suspicion of progression. The median interval from diagnosis to the start of imatinib was 12.6 months (range 4.3 to 143 months). Imatinib was the 2nd line therapy in 15 patients, 3rd line in 13 and 4th line in 6 patients. ECOG performance score at start of imatinib was 1 in 9, 2 in 21 and 3 in 4 patients, respectively.Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tumor tissue with antibodies against PDGFR-α, and -β. Results: The median treatment period with imatinib was 4 months (3 weeks to 17 months). The best response achieved was major response in 2 patients, partial remission in 6, stable disease in 12 and progressive disease in 14 patients. Eleven patients were free from tumor progression after 6 months (PFS-6 32,4%). The two patients with major response improved clinically and showed no more evidence of increased metabolism as well in MRI spectroscopy as in C11-methionine PET for 13 and 17 months, respectively. One of them showed widespread PDGF-R-α expression in the tumor tissue. In all patients with objective response to imatinib, a clinical benefit was noted within the first month of treatment. Conclusions: Compared to the results of Raymond et al, we observed a higher percentage of patients with progression free survival at 6 months. Detailed analysis of imatinib targets in tumor tissue of patients treated with imatinib will be helpful to explore the potential of imatinib as treatment option for patients with HGG. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document