A phase 1b multicenter study of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in combination with irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with metastatic or unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEC) after at least one line of treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum (FP) containing regimen.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16006-e16006
Author(s):  
Farshid Dayyani ◽  
Kit Wah Tam ◽  
Edward Jae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Samuel Ejadi ◽  
Fa Chyi Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B

e16006 Background: FTD/TPI, an antimetabolite, is approved for treatment of refractory mGEC. This study sought to determine whether the combination of FTD/TPI with IRI (“TASIRI”) was safe and effective in mGEC previously treated with FP. Methods: This investigator‐initiated, multicenter, open‐label, single-dose level, single‐arm phase 1b study enrolled pts with mGEC previously treated with at least one line of FP containing regimen. FTD/TPI was given at 25 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 5 with 180 mg/m2 IRI on day 1 of a 14‐day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at six months (mo) (PFS-6). The aim was to show an improvement of PFS-6 from 15% to at least 30% based on historical controls. Results: At the time of data-cutoff (03Feb2021), 23 pts were screened and ultimately 20 pts were treated. The study met its primary endpoint. With a median follow-up of 9.8 mo (range 0.7 – 17), 8 pts are still on treatment and 4 pts have died. PFS-6 is 53.9% (lower limit of 95% CI: 28%). Median PFS and overall survival are 6.9 mo and not reached, respectively. At the time of data-cutoff, data were available for 13 pts with measurable disease by RECIST criteria and at least 1 on-treatment scan. Of those, 11 had stable disease and 2 had progressive disease as best response (5 pts had tumor shrinkage < 30%), therefore the disease control rate was 84.6%. The most common any grade (G) treatment related adverse events (TRAE) were nausea (n = 14, 70%), diarrhea (n = 9, 45%), and fatigue (n = 8, 40%). G3-4 TRAE in > 5% of pts were anemia (17%) and neutropenia (9%). 2 serious TRAE were reported: G4 febrile neutropenia (n = 1) and G3 hypotension (n = 1). There was no G5 TRAE. Conclusions: The combination of TASIRI showed encouraging clinical activity with a meaningful improvement in PFS-6 compared to historic controls. TASIRI was well tolerated and no new safety signals were seen. TASIRI warrants further investigation for patients with refractory mGEC and limited treatment options. Updated results with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04074343.

Avelumab in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Pooled results from two cohorts of the phase 1b JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 330-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
John Allan Ellerton ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Manish Agrawal ◽  
Michael S. Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

330 Background: Avelumab is a fully human anti‒PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with promising efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). To further characterize the clinical activity of avelumab in mUC, we report a planned interim pooled analysis of 2 cohorts from a large phase 1b trial (NCT01772004). Methods: Pts with mUC progressed after platinum-based therapy or cisplatin-ineligible, and unselected for tumor PD-L1 expression, received avelumab 10 mg/kg (1 h IV) Q2W. Response was assessed every 6 wks by independent review per RECIST v1.1. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety (NCI CTCAE v4.0), and tumor PD-L1 expression (clone 73-10). Results: As of Mar 19, 2016, 241 pts received avelumab for a median of 8 wks (range 2-80); median follow-up was 7.3 mos (range 0-18.2). Primary tumor sites were upper tract (renal pelvis/ureter [23.7%]) and lower tract (bladder/urethra [76.3%]). 95.4% of pts had progressed on prior platinum therapy, and 63.4% had received ≥ 2 prior lines for advanced disease (range 0-6). In 153 pts with ≥ 6 mos follow-up, confirmed ORR was 17.6% (95% CI 12.0-24.6) with 9 complete responses and 18 partial responses; 24/27 (88.9%) were ongoing. Median DOR was not reached, and the 24-wk DOR rate was 92.0% (95% CI 71.6, 97.9). 36 pts had stable disease as best response (disease control rate 41.2%). Median PFS was 6.4 wks (95% CI 6.1-11.4), and median OS was 7.0 mos (95% CI 5.6-11.1). Based on a ≥ 5% PD-L1 staining cutoff in evaluable pts with PD-L1+ (n = 56) and PD-L1– (n = 75) tumors, ORR was 25.0% (95% CI 14.4-38.4) vs 14.7% (95% CI 7.6-24.7; p = 0.178). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) of any grade occurring in ≥ 10% of pts were infusion-related reaction (22.8%) and fatigue (12.0%). 7.5% had a grade ≥ 3 TRAE; fatigue (1.2%)/asthenia (0.8%) occurred in > 1 pt. 28 pts (11.6%) had an immune-related TRAE (grade ≥ 3 in 2.5%). There was 1 treatment-related death (pneumonitis). Conclusions: Avelumab is well tolerated and shows promising clinical activity, including durable responses, in pts with mUC, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression status. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated mesothelioma: Updated phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 166-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffit Hassan ◽  
Anish Thomas ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

166 Background: Avelumab, a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (US and EU) and advanced urothelial carcinoma progressed on platinum therapy (US). Here, we report updated phase 1b data for avelumab in patients (pts) with previously treated mesothelioma. Methods: Pts with unresectable pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma whose disease had progressed after platinum and pemetrexed therapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Tumors were assessed every 6 wks (RECIST 1.1). Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: As of Dec 31, 2016, 53 pts were treated and followed for a median of 24.8 mos (range 16.8–27.8). Median age was 67 y (range 32–84). Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1–8). Confirmed ORR was 9.4% (95% CI 3.1–20.7; complete response in 1.9%, partial response in 7.5%). In pts with 1 (n = 18), 2 (n = 15) or ≥3 (n = 20) prior lines of therapy, ORR was 5.6%, 13.3% and 10.0% respectively. Median duration of response was 15.2 mos (95% CI 11.1–not estimable). 26 pts (49.1%) had stable disease as best response and the disease control rate was 58.5%. Median PFS was 4.1 mos (95% CI 1.4–6.2) and the 6-mo PFS rate was 38.0% (95% CI 24.2–51.7). Median OS was 10.9 mos (95% CI 7.5–21.0) and the 12-mo OS rate was 45.9% (95% CI 31.9–58.8). In evaluable pts with PD-L1+ (n = 16) and PD-L1− (n = 27) tumors (≥5% tumor cell cutoff), ORR was 18.8% (95% CI 4.0–45.6) and 7.4% (95% CI 0.9–24.3), and the 6-mo PFS rate was 37.5% (95% CI 14.1–61.2) and 42.0% (95% CI 23.1–59.8). 43 pts (81.1%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly ( > 10%) infusion-related reaction (35.8%; all grade 1/2), chills (15.1%), fatigue (15.1%) and pyrexia (11.3%). 5 pts (9.4%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 14 pts (26.4%) had an immune-related AE, which was grade ≥3 in 3 pts (5.7%; pneumonitis, colitis, and type 1 diabetes mellitus). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Avelumab showed clinical activity and acceptable safety in pts with previously treated mesothelioma. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

Total Therapy 6: Initial Results of Dose-Dense Strategy for Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3081-3081
Author(s):  
Saad Usmani ◽  
Alan Mitchell ◽  
Bijay Nair ◽  
Sarah Waheed ◽  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Total Therapy ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Initial Results

Abstract Abstract 3081 Background: We have reported extensively on applying dose-intense total therapy approach in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), yielding long CR durations in ∼80% GEP-defined low-risk myeloma patients. Herein, we present for the first time the initial results of a phase II trial employing a dose-dense approach in previously treated MM. Patients & Methods: Patients received 5 cycles of combination chemotherapy (Figure 1) followed by maintenance with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone until relapse or disease progression by IMWG 2006 criteria. Overall survival and progression free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival distributions were compared using the log-rank test. Results: 63 patients with previously treated MM were enrolled. The median follow-up from enrollment was 15.6 months. Baseline characteristics included age >=65yr in 37%, ISS stage II/III was seen in 41%/19% of patients, cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) in 37%, and GEP-70 high risk-MM (HRMM) in 26% of patients with available gene expression data. 11 patients (17%) had >2 prior lines of therapy including regimens that contained bortezomib (91%), thalidomide(45%), lenalidomide(81%), melphalan(27%) and steroids(100%). 14 patients (22%) discontinued therapy primarily due to progression, death or toxicity. Cumulative incidence of PR/VGPR/CR at 18 months was 69.4%, 54.8% and 37.0% respectively. Of the 60 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up, 33% had stable disease as the best overall response. The time to achieving PR or better at 6 months was more rapid in HR-MM vs LRMM (63.6% vs. 50%, p=0.008). Hematologic toxicities occurred in all patients (100%), whereas the most common non-hematologic toxicities counting all toxicities (>grades 3) included metabolic/electrolyte disturbances (95%) followed by infections (31%), hepatobiliary (20%) and gastrointestinal (16%) toxicities. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) at 12 months was 90% and 87%, respectively (Figure 2). The OS (96% vs 60%, p=0.0002) and PFS (92% vs 53%, p<0.0001) at 12 months was markedly superior in GEP-70 defined low-risk MM (LRMM) compared with high-risk MM (HRMM). ISS staging and GEP-defined p53 deletion did not impact OS/PFS at 12 months. Conclusions: Dose-dense strategy is highly effective in previously treated LRMM. Even though time to achieving best response was quicker in HRMM, response duration was shorter thus augmenting the significance of sustaining best response rather than depth of response in HR-MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Proof-of-concept study of Sym004, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) mixture, in patients (pts) with anti-EGFR mab-refractory KRAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3551-3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Dienstmann ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Andres Cervantes-Ruiperez ◽  
Susana Rosello Keranen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Tumor Shrinkage ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Open Label

3551 Background: KRAS wt mCRC pts progressing on chemotherapy and anti-EGFR mAbs have limited treatment options. Sym004 is a first-in-class drug mixture of two mAbs targeting non-overlapping epitopes on the EGFR, causing its internalization and degradation. With this unique mechanism of action, Sym004 overcomes acquired resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs in preclinical studies. Methods: Open-label, multicenter trial assessing safety (primary endpoint) and efficacy of 2 dose levels of Sym004 in KRAS wt mCRC pts with prior clinical benefit to anti-EGFR mAbs and subsequent progression during or within 6 months after treatment cessation. Sym004 was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor responses were evaluated centrally according to RECIST criteria. Paired skin and tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline and week 4. Results: In total, 42 pts were enrolled at 9 mg/kg (13) and 12 mg/kg (29). Median age was 66 years and median number of prior treatment lines 3. Central radiology review was performed in 12/13 (92%) pts at 9 mg/kg and 27/29 (93%) pts at 12 mg/kg. Tumor shrinkage > 10% was documented in 4/12 (33%) pts at 9 mg/kg, with partial response (PR) in 1/12 (8%) and stable disease (SD) in 9/12 (75%). At 12 mg/kg, 7/27 (26%) pts had > 10% tumor shrinkage, with PR in 3/27 (11%) and SD in 15/27 (56%). Median progression-free survival was 13.6 weeks (95% CI: 5.3-23) and 13.7 weeks (95% CI: 5.9-18.6), respectively. Duration of response for pts with PR was 5.6-17.6 weeks. Grade 3 or higher toxicity included skin rash in 26/42 (62%), hypomagnesemia in 16/42 (38%) and diarrhea in 2/42 (8%). Adverse events were manageable with dose reduction and supportive medication. There were no indications of immunogenicity. Pharmacodynamic analysis in serial tumor samples showed profound down-regulation of EGFR and reduction in proliferation marker Ki67. Conclusions: Sym004 at weekly doses of 9 and 12 mg/kg showed significant clinical activity in anti-EGFR treatment-refractory KRAS wt mCRC pts, clearly demonstrating proof-of-concept. Serial biopsies confirmed its mechanism of action. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Clinical trial information: NCT01117428.

Overall survival results for durvalumab and savolitinib in metastatic papillary renal cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 619-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Suarez Rodriguez ◽  
James M. G. Larkin ◽  
Poulam Patel ◽  
Begona Pérez Valderrama ◽  
Alejo Rodriguez-Vida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Treatment Safety

619 Background: There is a strong rationale for investigating MET and PD-L1 inhibition in metastatic papillary renal cancer (PRC). We previously reported response rates (RR) and progression free survival (PFS) for savolitinib (MET inhibitor) and durvalumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) together. Here we report overall survival (OS) data available 12 months after the last patient was enrolled. Methods: This single arm phase I/II trial explores durvalumab (1500mg Q4W) and savolitinib (600mg OD) together in PRC, with a 4wk savolitinib run in. Treatment naïve or previously treated patients with metastatic PRC were included. Confirmed RR (RECIST v1.1), PFS, tolerability (CTCAE v4.03) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. MET and PD-L1 biomarkers were explored (NCT02819596). Results: 42 patients were enrolled with 41 receiving at least one dose of study treatment. Safety and efficacy analyses were performed on these 41 patients. The median follow up was 14.3 months. IMDC good, intermediate and poor risk disease occurred in 29%, 63%, and 7% of patients respectively. Overall confirmed RR was 27% while median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 2.5 – 12.0 months). Median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI: 5.8 – 21.3 months). Confirmed RR and median OS in the previously untreated cohort (N=27) were 33% and 12.3 months (95% CI: 4.7 – not reached (NR) months) respectively. Treatment related Grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 34% of patients. No new safety signals were seen. PD-L1 and MET expression were not associated with higher RR (25% and 40% respectively) or longer OS. Conclusions: The combination of savolitinib and durvalumab has clinical activity in PRC and outcomes were not enhanced in biomarker positive cancers. Clinical trial information: NCT02819596.

Randomized phase II study of erlotinib alone and in combination with bortezomib in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7680-7680 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Lynch ◽  
D. W. Fenton ◽  
V. Hirsh ◽  
D. J. Bodkin ◽  
E. Middleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Egf Receptor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

7680 Background: Treatment options for previously treated NSCLC are limited, warranting consideration of novel combinations. This study evaluated the activity and toxicity of erlotinib with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor. Dosing was based on the approved indication for erlotinib and on phase I data for the combination. Methods: Patients (pts) with Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who progressed following one prior line of chemotherapy, with no prior exposure to an EGF-receptor inhibitor and ECOG performance status 0 or 1 were randomly assigned to erlotinib 150 mg po daily alone (arm A) or in combination with bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 8 (arm B) of a 21-day cycle. Response was evaluated by RECIST and toxicity was graded using NCI CTCAE 3.0. A Simon optimal two-stage design was used to evaluate anti-tumor activity in response-evaluable pts. Results: Fifty pts were treated at 17 sites (January-June 2006); baseline characteristics and treatment intensity were comparable in both arms. Among 24 response-evaluable pts in each arm, there were 3 partial responses (PR) and 1 complete response in arm A and 2 PR in arm B. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 and 1.4 months in arms A and B, respectively. The study was halted as required at the planned interim analysis due to insufficient clinical activity in arm B. Activity and toxicity in arm A were consistent with published reports for erlotinib alone. Adverse-event profiles were as expected in both arms, with no significant additivity. In arm B, one pt died of pneumonia. The most common grade 3 treatment-related toxicity was skin rash (12% arm A and 8% arm B), and rash severity correlated with PFS: grades 2/3, 2.8 months PFS (20 pts); grades 0/1, 1.4 months PFS (28 pts), p=0.032. In arm B, one pt each had grade 3 anorexia, hypokalemia, and worsened peripheral sensory neuropathy compared with baseline. There were no grade 4 treatment related toxicities in either arm. Conclusions: The combination of erlotinib and bortezomib in the doses and schedules used in this trial was well tolerated but did not show sufficient activity at this dose and schedule to warrant further development. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

An open-label, multicohort, phase I/II study of nivolumab in patients with virus-associated tumors (CheckMate 358): Efficacy and safety in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5504-5504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Tim Meyer ◽  
Kathleen N. Moore ◽  
Jean-Pascal H. Machiels ◽  
Jacques De Greve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Hpv Status ◽  
Ecog Ps

5504 Background: Treatment options for cervical, vaginal, and vulvar (GYN) cancers are limited after first-line therapy. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is associated with squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix (≥90%) and vulva/vagina (40–70%), and may elicit an immune reaction. Programmed death (PD)-1 and its major ligand PD-L1 are expressed in GYN cancers and inhibit immune responses. Nivolumab disrupts PD-1–mediated signaling, restoring antitumor immunity. Methods: In CheckMate 358 (NCT02488759), an ongoing multicohort study of 5 virus-associated cancers, PD-L1–unselected adults with R/M GYN cancers, ECOG PS 0–1, and ≤2 prior systemic therapies for R/M disease were eligible to receive nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety; secondary endpoints were duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 24 treated patients (pts), 19 had cervical and 5 had vaginal or vulvar cancer; median age was 51 y. At a median follow-up of 31 wks (range: 6–38), ORR was 20.8% (Table), and disease control rate (ORR + SD) was 70.8%. All responses were in pts with cervical cancer (ORR, 26.3%) and were observed regardless of PD-L1 or HPV status or number of prior R/M therapies. Median PFS was 5.5 mo (95% CI: 3.5, NR); median OS was NR. Conclusions: Nivolumab demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in pts with cervical cancer and a manageable safety profile in virus-associated GYN cancers, supporting further evaluation in these pts. Updated clinical and biomarker data to be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02488759. [Table: see text]

Activity and safety of cabozantinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: EORTC phase II trial 1317 CaboGIST.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11006-11006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Schoffski ◽  
Olivier Mir ◽  
Bernd Kasper ◽  
Zsuzsanna Papai ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumor ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Interruptions ◽  
Best Response

11006 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Advanced GIST is treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Most patients (pts) develop resistance over time. We reported in 2013 (Van Looy CTOS) that cabozantinib (cabo), a TKI targeting KIT/MET/AXL/VEGFR, showed activity in GIST xenograft models through inhibition of tumor growth, proliferation and angiogenesis, both in imatinib-sensitive and -resistant tumors (Gebreyohannes Mol Cancer Ther 2016;15:2845-28). Cohen (Cancer Res 2015;75:2061-70) found that cabo can overcome compensatory MET signaling in GIST in vitro. EORTC 1317 assessed the safety and activity of cabo in pts who had progressed on imatinib and sunitinib. Methods: In this multi-center, open label, single arm Phase 2 study eligible metastatic GIST pts received 60 mg (freebase weight) cabo p.o./d. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at wk 12, assessed by local investigator per RECIST 1.1. If at least 21 of 41 eligible and evaluable pts were progression-free at wk 12, the activity of cabo was sufficient to warrant further exploration (A’Hern one-stage design). Results: A total of 50 consenting pts were eligible and started treatment between 02/2017 and 08/2018, with 16 (32%) still continuing cabo at the database cut-off in 01/2019. The number of 3 wk treatment cycles ranges from 2-28+. Among the first 41 eligible and evaluable pts, 24 were progression-free at wk 12, satisfying the study decision rule. Among all 50 pts, 30 were progression-free at wk 12 (60%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 45-74%). A total of 7 pts achieved a confirmed partial response (PR) (14%, 95%CI 6-27%) and 33 had stable disease (SD) (66%, 95%CI 51-79%). Progression as best response was seen in 9 pts (18%, 95%CI 9-31%), one was not evaluable. Disease control (PR+SD) was achieved in 40 pts (80%, 95%CI 66-90%). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 mo (95%CI 3.6-7.7). The most common cabo-related grade ≥3 adverse events were diarrhea (74%), hand-foot syndrome (58%), fatigue (46%), hypertension (46%), weight loss (38%) and oral mucositis (28%), with 33 (66%) pts requiring dose reductions, 25 (50%) treatment interruptions and no cabo-related deaths. Conclusions: EORTC 1317 met its primary endpoint, with 24/41 pts (58.5%) being progression-free at wk 12. Results of this trial confirm preclinical data and warrant further exploration of cabo in GIST. Clinical trial information: NCT02216578.

Phase (Ph) I/II study of pembrolizumab (P) with gemcitabine (G) in patients (pts) with previously-treated advanced (Adv) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20652-e20652
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Sanborn ◽  
Regan M. Duffy ◽  
Brenda K Fisher ◽  
Kelly Shea Perlewitz ◽  
Herschel D. Wallen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hemorrhage ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cross Presentation ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Alternate Source ◽  
Immune Profiling

e20652 Background: P has demonstrated improved survival alone or with chemotherapy in untreated adv NSCLC. G may increase antigen cross-presentation and prime CD8 T cell response via tumor apoptosis. This study evaluated P + G in pts with previously-treated adv NSCLC naïve to anti-PD1. Methods: The study included ph 1 (previously reported), then single arm ph II, 1-3 prior therapies, regardless of PD-L1 status. Treatment: G, 1250 mg/m2, Days (D) 1 & 8 + P 200 mg D 1; 21-day cycles. G given max 6 cycles, P max 2 years. Tumor tissue was collected for PD-L1 (22C3). Immune response via whole blood immunophenotyping and ProtoArray was conducted. Results: 16 pts enrolled. Male/Female: 8/8; Age 53-75 (Median 64.5); ECOG 0/1: 2/14 pts, respectively. Median prior therapies: 1 (Range (R) 1-3). Median cycles: 4 (R 1-24). Primary reason for discontinuation: progression. Toxicity was primarily attributed to G, including Gr 3: neutropenia (5), leukopenia (3), anemia (2); lymphopenia, URI, hyponatremia (1 each). Gr 4: 1 hypoxia attributed to intrapulmonary hemorrhage from G. Other toxicities attributed to both G and P included dyspnea (2), pneumonitis (2) (Gr 3). Progression free survival (PFS): 3.2 months (m) (R 0.6-18.5 m). Overall survival (OS) is not yet mature (4 pts in follow up). 14/16 pts were evaluable for response. Stable disease (SD): 9 (56%); partial response (PR): 2 (13%); progression (PD): 3 (19%). 2 pts discontinued prior to first evaluation (1 pulmonary hemorrhage; 1 clinical progression). 1 pt had SD as best response for 18.5 m before PD. Disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + SD): 56%. 12 pts were PD-L1 evaluable (central). 2 pts had PD-L1 testing through alternate source (22C3). Of the 14 pts with PD-L1 result: PD-L1 0%: 8 (50%); PD-L1 10-40%: 3; ≥50%: 3 (19% each) PFS of 0% PD-L1: 3.75 m (1 PR, 6 SD; DCR 88%). PFS ≥50% PD-L1: 3 m (1 SD, 0 PR). Exploratory immune profiling showed late peripheral immune activation in 3 of 6 pts with Cycle 6 samples (all SD; PFS 5.8 m). ProtoArray analysis is pending. Conclusions: P+G was a feasible combination, without unexpected toxicity. The majority of pts had 0% PD-L1 expression. PFS was not associated with PD-L1 level. PFS did not differ from G or P alone. OS pending. Clinical trial information: NCT02422381.

Selinexor containing regimens in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (αCD38 mAbs).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20020-e20020
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Brea Lipe ◽  
Sascha Tuchman ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Functional Inactivation ◽  
Dose Modifications

e20020 Background: Exportin 1 (XPO1) mediates the nuclear export and functional inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins, is required for MM growth, is associated with poor prognosis in MM and mediates resistance to standard MM therapies. Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound approved in combination with dexamethasone (dex) ± bortezomib for patients (pts) with previously treated MM. Once MM becomes refractory to αCD38 mAb, pts have limited effective treatment options and poor prognosis. Overall response rate (ORR) to the first regimen after refractoriness to an αCD38 mAb is 31%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) is 3.4 months (m), and median overall survival (mOS) is 8.6 m. The doublet SEL-dex (Xd) has shown ORR ̃26% in triple-class (IMID, PI, αCD38 mAb) refractory MM; SEL-based triplets could be more effective in this population. Methods: STOMP (Selinexor and Backbone Treatments of Multiple Myeloma Patients) is a multi-arm, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluating SEL in various triplet combinations. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of SEL-containing triplets in pts previously treated with αCD38 mAbs. Pts received SEL-dex (Xd) plus pomalidomide (XPd, n = 19), bortezomib (XVd, n = 4), lenalidomide (XRd, n = 4), daratumumab (XDd, n = 2) or carfilzomib (XKd, n = 18). ORR, mOS, mPFS and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Results: Among the 47 pts, median age 64 yrs, female 53%, median time from diagnosis 5.1 yrs, median number of prior regimens 5 (range, 2–11). Prior daratumumab (96%), isatuximab (4%); 96% had MM refractory to aCD38 mAb, 81% had triple-class refractory MM, 74% and 47% were quad- and penta-exposed, 43% and 15% had quad- and penta-refractory MM. αCD38 mAb was included in the immediate prior regimen of 57% of pts and median duration from end of most recent aCD38 mAb therapy to first dose of study treatment was 6.9 weeks (range, 2.6-114.9). ORR was 51% among the 45 evaluable pts, 59% in the XPd arm (n = 17; 2 pts were not efficacy evaluable) and 67% in the XKd arm. ORR was 47% (9/19) among pts with quad-refractory MM and evaluable efficacy. Among all evaluable pts mPFS was 8.8 m (95% CI: 4.9, NE) and mOS was 20.4 m (95% CI: 9.6, NE). Among the 25 pts with αCD38 mAb in their immediate prior regimen, efficacy was similar to that regimen: ORR 52% vs. 45%, mPFS 8.8 vs. 9.3 m. The most common treatment emergent AEs were nausea (72%), anemia (64%), thrombocytopenia (60%), fatigue (57%), which were managed with standard supportive care and dose modifications. Conclusions: SEL-containing triplets in pts with MM previously treated with αCD38 mAbs, most of whom had triple-class refractory MM, exhibit tolerability and comparable effectiveness to their most recent αCD38 mAb-containing regimens. Compared to historical control, mOS was much higher among these patients. Further investigation is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02343042.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document