Evaluating the prevalence and nature of sleep disturbances in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy using a combination of actigraphy and sleep questionnaires.

e17046 Background: Sleep disturbances and cancer related fatigue are commonly associated. Prostate cancer patients may suffer from disturbed sleep as a result of their diagnosis and following treatment, especially with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Wrist actigraphy is a non-invasive objective method of sleep data collection. This feasibility study compares sleep data obtained by actigraphy with subjective data from sleep questionnaires in order to determine the nature and severity of sleep disturbances in patients with and without ADT use. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional pilot study was conducted on 74 patients with prostate cancer attending a regional oncology clinic. Two validated subjective sleep questionnaires namely the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI] and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] were used. Patients wore actigraphy watches for a minimum of five consecutive days. The parameters of interest included: actual sleep time, sleep efficiency, fragmentation index, daytime napping frequency and duration. The questionnaire and actigraphy data were compared between 20 patients receiving ADT and 41 who were treatment-naive. Results: The compliance rate for completed actigraphy was 85%. Complete data sets with actigraphy and questionnaires were available from 61 patients. Those already receiving ADT were on LHRH analogues for a median duration of 2.35 years. Poor sleep quality as self-identified by patients from the PSQI (cut-off > 5) was 49% in the treatment-naive group which increased to 70% for those on ADT. For daytime sleepiness as assessed by ESS (cut-off > 10) this was 16% and 20% respectively. Actigraphy showed that patients on ADT reported longer sleep duration (7.4 vs 6.5 hours, p = 0.02), higher levels of nocturnal wakings (51.1% vs 36.7%, p = 0.002), with greater daytime napping duration (80.7mins vs 53.0mins, p = 0.04), and frequency (8.6 vs 5.6, p = 0.02) compared to treatment-naive patients. Conclusions: Self-reported poor sleep quality is common in prostate cancer patients, which appears worse for those receiving ADT. In patients receiving ADT, data derived from actigraphy suggests that although they were sleeping for longer at night, the quality of sleep was poor which, in turn, may be responsible for an increase in the frequency and duration of daytime napping. Based on the current findings, we recommend the use of actigraphy to characterise patients’ sleep patterns and to assess if sleep treatment is needed. Actigraphic data may allow for direct comparisons of different hormonal agents on sleep whilst identifying those with specific sleep disorders amenable to therapeutic intervention.