scholarly journals Review of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Systems Used in Cancer Clinical Care

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e215-e222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne E. Jensen ◽  
Claire F. Snyder ◽  
Amy P. Abernethy ◽  
Ethan Basch ◽  
Arnold L. Potosky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Routine Monitoring ◽  
Patient Reported

The number of electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) systems has increased; systems can be programmed to have numerous features that facilitate PRO assessment integration and routine monitoring in clinical care.

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice

Hematology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Dobrozsi ◽  
Julie Panepinto
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Physician Communication ◽  
Valuable Data ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement plays an increasingly important role in health care and understanding health outcomes. PROs are any report of a patient's health status that comes directly from the patient, and can measure patient symptoms, patient function, and quality-of-life. PROs have been used successfully to assess impairment in a clinical setting. Use of PROs to systematically quantify the patient experience provides valuable data to assist with clinical care; however, initiating use of PROs in clinical practice can be daunting. Here we provide suggestions for implementation of PROs and examples of opportunities to use PROs to tailor individual patient therapy to improve patient outcomes, patient–physician communication, and the quality of care for hematology/oncology patients.

scholarly journals AO Patient Outcomes Center: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Software Application for the Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopedic Outpatient Clinics (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan E Rothrock ◽  
Michael Bass ◽  
Andrea Blumenthal ◽  
Richard C Gershon ◽  
Beate Hanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Software Application ◽  
Patient Reported

BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly utilized in routine orthopedic clinical care. Computer adaptive tests (CATs) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) offer a brief and precise assessment that is well suited for collection within busy clinical environments. However, software apps that support the administration and scoring of CATs, provide immediate access to patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, and minimize clinician burden are not widely available. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to design, implement, and test the feasibility and usability of a Web-based system for collecting CATs in orthopedic clinics. METHODS AO Patient Outcomes Center (AOPOC) was subjected to 2 rounds of testing. Alpha testing was conducted in 3 orthopedic clinics to evaluate ease of use and feasibility of integration in clinics. Patients completed an assessment of PROMIS CATs and a usability survey. Clinicians participated in a brief semistructured interview. Beta-phase testing evaluated system performance through load testing and usability of the updated version of AOPOC. In both rounds of testing, user satisfaction, bugs, change requests, and performance of PROMIS CATs were captured. RESULTS Patient feedback supported the ease of use in completing an assessment in AOPOC. Across both phases of testing, clinicians rated AOPOC as easy to use but noted difficulties in integrating a Web-based software application within their clinics. PROMIS CATs performed well; the default assessment of 2 CATs was completed quickly (mean 9.5 items) with a satisfactory range of measurement. CONCLUSION AOPOC was demonstrated to be an easy-to-learn and easy-to-use software application for patients and clinicians that can be integrated into orthopedic clinical care. The workflow disruption in integrating any type of PRO collection must be addressed if patients’ voices are to be better integrated in clinical care.

scholarly journals Article Commentary: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. HSI.S11093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Weldring ◽  
Sheree M.S. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Health Care Service ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported

In recent years, there has been an increased focus on placing patients at the center of health care research and evaluating clinical care in order to improve their experience and ensure that research is both robust and of maximum value for the use of medicinal products, therapy, or health services. This paper provides an overview of patients’ involvement in clinical research and service evaluation along with its benefits and limitations. We describe and discuss patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the trends in current research. Both the patient-reported experiences measures (PREMs) and patient and public involvement (PPI) initiative for including patients in the research processes are also outlined. PROs provide reports from patients about their own health, quality of life, or functional status associated with the health care or treatment they have received. PROMs are tools and/or instruments used to report PROs. Patient report experiences through the use of PREMs, such as satisfaction scales, providing insight into the patients’ experience with their care or a health service. There is increasing international attention regarding the use of PREMS as a quality indicator of patient care and safety. This reflects the ongoing health service commitment of involving patients and the public within the wider context of the development and evaluation of health care service delivery and quality improvement.

Provincial development of a patient-reported outcome initiative to guide patient care, quality improvement, and research

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Olson ◽  
Fuchsia Howard ◽  
Vincent Lapointe ◽  
Devin Schellenberg ◽  
Alan Nichol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cancer Agency ◽  
Accrual Rate ◽  
Patient Care Quality

The BC Cancer Agency Radiotherapy (RT) program started the Prospective Outcomes and Support Initiative (POSI) at all six centres to utilize patient-reported outcomes for immediate clinical care, quality improvement, and research. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at time of computed tomography simulation via tablet and 2 to 4 weeks post-RT via either tablet or over the phone by a registered nurse. From 2013 to 2016, patients were approached on 20,150 attempts by POSI for patients treated with RT for bone metastases (52%), brain metastases (11%), lung cancer (17%), gynecological cancer (16%), head and neck cancer (2%), and other pilots (2%). The accrual rate for all encounters was 85% (n = 17,101), with the accrual rate varying between the lowest and the highest accruing centre from 78% to 89% ( P < .001) and varying by tumour site ( P < .001). Using the POSI database, we have performed research and quality improvement initiatives that have changed practice.

scholarly journals Scope and heterogeneity of outcomes reported in randomized trials in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karine E Manera ◽  
David W Johnson ◽  
Yeoungjee Cho ◽  
Benedicte Sautenet ◽  
Jenny Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Inform Decision Making ◽  
Solute Clearance

Abstract Background Randomized trials can provide evidence to inform decision-making but this may be limited if the outcomes of importance to patients and clinicians are omitted or reported inconsistently. We aimed to assess the scope and heterogeneity of outcomes reported in trials in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialized Register for randomized trials in PD. We extracted all reported outcome domains and measurements and analyzed their frequency and characteristics. Results From 128 reports of 120 included trials, 80 different outcome domains were reported. Overall, 39 (49%) domains were surrogate, 23 (29%) patient-reported and 18 (22%) clinical. The five most commonly reported domains were PD-related infection [59 (49%) trials], dialysis solute clearance [51 (42%)], kidney function [45 (38%)], protein metabolism [44 (37%)] and inflammatory markers/oxidative stress [42 (35%)]. Quality of life was reported infrequently (4% of trials). Only 14 (12%) trials included a patient-reported outcome as a primary outcome. The median number of outcome measures (defined as a different measurement, aggregation and metric) was 22 (interquartile range 13–37) per trial. PD-related infection was the most frequently reported clinical outcome as well as the most frequently stated primary outcome. A total of 383 different measures for infection were used, with 66 used more than once. Conclusions Trials in PD include important clinical outcomes such as infection, but these are measured and reported inconsistently. Patient-reported outcomes are infrequently reported and nearly half of the domains were surrogate. Standardized outcomes for PD trials are required to improve efficiency and relevance.

scholarly journals Strain Elastography and Tendon Response to an Exercise Program in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: An Exploratory Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096518
Author(s):  
Karen Brage ◽  
Birgit Juul-Kristensen ◽  
John Hjarbaek ◽  
Eleanor Boyle ◽  
Per Kjaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Supraspinatus Tendon ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Tendon Stiffness ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Tendon Thickness

Background: Shoulder pain is common, with a lifetime prevalence of up to 67%. Evidence is conflicting in relation to imaging findings and pain in the shoulder. Sonoelastography can be used to estimate tissue stiffness and may be a clinically relevant technique for diagnosing and monitoring tendon healing. Purpose: To evaluate changes in supraspinatus tendon stiffness using strain elastography (SEL) and associations with changes in patient-reported outcomes, supraspinatus tendon thickness, and grade of tendinopathy after 12 weeks of unilateral shoulder exercises in patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 23 patients with unilateral clinical supraspinatus tendinopathy performed 12 weeks of “standard care” exercises. At baseline and follow-up, supraspinatus tendon stiffness was measured bilaterally using SEL and compared with tendinopathy grading on magnetic resonance imaging scans and tendon thickness measured using conventional ultrasound. Patient-reported outcome measures included physical function and symptoms from the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and pain rating (visual analog scale). Results: No significant changes in SEL within or between groups (asymptomatic vs symptomatic tendon) were seen. All patient-reported outcomes showed significant improvement from baseline to follow-up, but with no change in tendinopathy grading and tendon thickness. No significant differences in the proportion of patients changing above the minimal detectable change in SEL and PROM were seen, except for discomfort while sleeping. Conclusion: Despite no significant within-group or between-group changes in SEL, significant improvements were found in patient-reported outcomes. An acceptable agreement between patients changing above the minimal detectable change in SEL and patient-reported outcome measure was seen. Further studies should explore the use of SEL to detect changes after tendon repair and long-term training potentially in subgroups of different tendinopathy phases. Clinical Relevance: In the short term, structural changes in supraspinatus tendons could not be visualized using SEL, indicating that a longer time span should be expected in order to observe structural changes, which should be considered before return to sports. Subgrouping based on stage of tendinopathy may also be important in order to evaluate changes over time with SEL among patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy. Registration: NCT03425357 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

scholarly journals Acceptability of no-test medical abortion provided via telemedicine: analysis of patient-reported outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2020-200954
Author(s):  
Chelsey Porter Erlank ◽  
Jonathan Lord ◽  
Kathryn Church
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Post Procedure ◽  
High Satisfaction ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
At Home

IntroductionThe English government approved both stages of early medical abortion (EMA), using mifepristone and misoprostol under 10 weeks’ gestation, for at-home use on 30 March 2020. MSI Reproductive Choices UK (MSUK), one of the largest providers of abortion services in England, launched a no-test telemedicine EMA pathway on 6 April 2020. The objectives of this study were to report key patient-reported outcome measures and to assess whether our sample was representative of the whole population receiving no-test telemedicine EMA.MethodsA sample of all MSUK’s telemedicine EMA patients between April and August 2020 were invited to opt in to a follow-up call to answer clinical and satisfaction questions. A total of 1243 (13.7% of all telemedicine EMAs) were successfully followed-up, on average within 5 days post-procedure.ResultsPatients reported high confidence in telemedicine EMA and high satisfaction with the convenience, privacy and ease of managing their abortion at home. The sample responding were broadly equivalent to the whole population receiving telemedicine. No patient reported that they were unable to consult privately. The majority (1035, 83%) of patients reported preferring the telemedicine pathway, with 824 (66%) indicating that they would choose telemedicine again if COVID-19 were no longer an issue.ConclusionsTelemedicine EMA is a valued, private, convenient and more accessible option that is highly acceptable for patients seeking an abortion, especially those for whom in-clinic visits are logistically or emotionally challenging. Evidence that this pathway would be a first choice again in future for most patients supports the case to make telemedicine EMA permanent.

PROsetta: An R Package for Linking Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

2021 ◽  
pp. 014662162110131
Author(s):  
S. W. Choi ◽  
S. Lim ◽  
B. D. Schalet ◽  
A. J. Kaat ◽  
D. Cella
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
R Package ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Short History ◽  
Rosetta Stone ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
R Packages ◽  
Measurement Information System

A common problem when using a variety of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for diverse populations and subgroups is establishing a harmonized scale for the incommensurate outcomes. The lack of comparability in metrics (e.g., raw summed scores vs. scaled scores) among different PROs poses practical challenges in studies comparing effects across studies and samples. Linking has long been used for practical benefit in educational testing. Applying various linking techniques to PRO data has a relatively short history; however, in recent years, there has been a surge of published studies on linking PROs and other health outcomes, owing in part to concerted efforts such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) project and the PRO Rosetta Stone (PROsetta Stone®) project ( www.prosettastone.org ). Many R packages have been developed for linking in educational settings; however, they are not tailored for linking PROs where harmonization of data across clinical studies or settings serves as the main objective. We created the PROsetta package to fill this gap and disseminate a protocol that has been established as a standard practice for linking PROs.

scholarly journals Adaptação transcultural dos Bancos de Itens de Ansiedade e Depressão do Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) para língua portuguesa

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 879-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natália Fontes Caputo de Castro ◽  
Carlos Henrique Alves de Rezende ◽  
Tânia Maria da Silva Mendonça ◽  
Carlos Henrique Martins da Silva ◽  
Rogério de Melo Costa Pinto
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System

O Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), estruturado em domínios físicos e psicossociais, superou lacunas ao propor nova ferramenta de avaliação de resultados aplicáveis às doenças crônicas com base em técnicas avançadas de estatística (TRI) e testes adaptativos computadorizados (CAT). O objetivo do estudo foi adaptar culturalmente os Bancos de Itens de Ansiedade e Depressão do PROMIS para a língua portuguesa. O processo seguiu rigorosas recomendações do FACIT por meio da tradução avançada, reconciliação, retrotradução, revisão do FACIT, revisores independentes, finalização das etapas pelo FACIT, pré-teste e incorporação dos resultados do pré- teste. A versão traduzida foi pré-testada em dez pacientes, sendo necessária a modificação nos itens 3, 46 e 53 de Ansiedade e no item 46 de Depressão. As alterações alcançaram a equivalência de significado e a versão final foi compatível com as habilidades linguísticas e culturais da população brasileira. Concluiu-se que a versão traduzida é semântica e conceitualmente equivalente aos originais.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document