scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice

Hematology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Dobrozsi ◽  
Julie Panepinto
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Physician Communication ◽  
Valuable Data ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement plays an increasingly important role in health care and understanding health outcomes. PROs are any report of a patient's health status that comes directly from the patient, and can measure patient symptoms, patient function, and quality-of-life. PROs have been used successfully to assess impairment in a clinical setting. Use of PROs to systematically quantify the patient experience provides valuable data to assist with clinical care; however, initiating use of PROs in clinical practice can be daunting. Here we provide suggestions for implementation of PROs and examples of opportunities to use PROs to tailor individual patient therapy to improve patient outcomes, patient–physician communication, and the quality of care for hematology/oncology patients.

scholarly journals AO Patient Outcomes Center: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Software Application for the Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopedic Outpatient Clinics (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan E Rothrock ◽  
Michael Bass ◽  
Andrea Blumenthal ◽  
Richard C Gershon ◽  
Beate Hanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Software Application ◽  
Patient Reported

BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly utilized in routine orthopedic clinical care. Computer adaptive tests (CATs) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) offer a brief and precise assessment that is well suited for collection within busy clinical environments. However, software apps that support the administration and scoring of CATs, provide immediate access to patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, and minimize clinician burden are not widely available. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to design, implement, and test the feasibility and usability of a Web-based system for collecting CATs in orthopedic clinics. METHODS AO Patient Outcomes Center (AOPOC) was subjected to 2 rounds of testing. Alpha testing was conducted in 3 orthopedic clinics to evaluate ease of use and feasibility of integration in clinics. Patients completed an assessment of PROMIS CATs and a usability survey. Clinicians participated in a brief semistructured interview. Beta-phase testing evaluated system performance through load testing and usability of the updated version of AOPOC. In both rounds of testing, user satisfaction, bugs, change requests, and performance of PROMIS CATs were captured. RESULTS Patient feedback supported the ease of use in completing an assessment in AOPOC. Across both phases of testing, clinicians rated AOPOC as easy to use but noted difficulties in integrating a Web-based software application within their clinics. PROMIS CATs performed well; the default assessment of 2 CATs was completed quickly (mean 9.5 items) with a satisfactory range of measurement. CONCLUSION AOPOC was demonstrated to be an easy-to-learn and easy-to-use software application for patients and clinicians that can be integrated into orthopedic clinical care. The workflow disruption in integrating any type of PRO collection must be addressed if patients’ voices are to be better integrated in clinical care.

scholarly journals Scope and heterogeneity of outcomes reported in randomized trials in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karine E Manera ◽  
David W Johnson ◽  
Yeoungjee Cho ◽  
Benedicte Sautenet ◽  
Jenny Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Inform Decision Making ◽  
Solute Clearance

Abstract Background Randomized trials can provide evidence to inform decision-making but this may be limited if the outcomes of importance to patients and clinicians are omitted or reported inconsistently. We aimed to assess the scope and heterogeneity of outcomes reported in trials in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialized Register for randomized trials in PD. We extracted all reported outcome domains and measurements and analyzed their frequency and characteristics. Results From 128 reports of 120 included trials, 80 different outcome domains were reported. Overall, 39 (49%) domains were surrogate, 23 (29%) patient-reported and 18 (22%) clinical. The five most commonly reported domains were PD-related infection [59 (49%) trials], dialysis solute clearance [51 (42%)], kidney function [45 (38%)], protein metabolism [44 (37%)] and inflammatory markers/oxidative stress [42 (35%)]. Quality of life was reported infrequently (4% of trials). Only 14 (12%) trials included a patient-reported outcome as a primary outcome. The median number of outcome measures (defined as a different measurement, aggregation and metric) was 22 (interquartile range 13–37) per trial. PD-related infection was the most frequently reported clinical outcome as well as the most frequently stated primary outcome. A total of 383 different measures for infection were used, with 66 used more than once. Conclusions Trials in PD include important clinical outcomes such as infection, but these are measured and reported inconsistently. Patient-reported outcomes are infrequently reported and nearly half of the domains were surrogate. Standardized outcomes for PD trials are required to improve efficiency and relevance.

Glioma patient-reported outcomes: patients and clinicians

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002699
Author(s):  
Marthe Peeters ◽  
Germaine Ottenheijm ◽  
Paul Bienfait ◽  
Daniëlle Eekers ◽  
Anja Gijtenbeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
Routine Assessment

IntroductionRoutine assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology has shown to improve the quality of the delivered care and to prolong survival. However, for successful implementation of routine assessment of PROs, more knowledge on their usability in clinical practice is needed.ObjectiveThis study aimed to cross-sectionally assess the perspective of patients and clinicians on the practicality of routinely measuring PROs in clinical practice for glioma patients.MethodsSemistructured interviews were conducted evaluating the role of healthcare professionals (HCP) in discussing results of PRO measures (PROMs), and the preferred topics, methods and frequency of PRO assessment. Glioma patients, their proxies and HCPs involved in the treatment of glioma patients from eight centres in the Netherlands were included.ResultsTwenty-four patients, 16 proxies and 35 HCPs were interviewed. The majority of patients, proxies and HCPs (92%, 81% and 80%, respectively) were willing to discuss PRO results during consultations. Although HCPs prefer that results are discussed with the nurse specialist, only one-third of patients/proxies agreed. Functioning of daily life was considered important in all three groups. Most participants indicated that discussion of PROM results should take place during standard follow-up visits, and completed at home about 1 week in advance. On group level, there was no preference for administration of questionnaires on paper or digitally. Lastly, all centres had staff available to send questionnaires on paper.ConclusionThis study shows that routine assessment of PROs is desired by patients, proxies and HCP’s in neuro-oncological care in Dutch hospitals.

A Novel Electronic Application of Patient-reported Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis – Meeting the Necessary Challenge of Assessing Quality of Life and Outcomes in Daily Clinical Practice

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Exell ◽  
Mark Thristan ◽  
Fernando Dangond ◽  
Kurt Marhardt ◽  
Meaghan St Charles Krohe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Software Application ◽  
Wireless Data Transmission ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Auto Injector

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has a substantial negative impact on health-related quality of life. Clinical assessments often do not include standardised, routine assessment of MS impact from the patient perspective, and communication between healthcare practitioners (HCPs) and patients can be lacking. Thus, there is a need for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures to encourage patient–HCP communication, to help inform HCPs of matters important to patients and to aid both patients and HCPs in managing the disease. MSdialog is a web- and mobile-based software application that works with auto-injector devices and electronic autoinjectors, including the RebiSmart® 2.0 device (a handheld electronic Rebif® auto-injector with wireless data transmission capabilities, CE marked and available worldwide [excluding the US]) to collect and store real-time, point-of-administration adherence, clinician-reported outcomes and PRO data. MSdialog may provide a practical solution to support patient-proactive engagements and self-management, patient-centred care and participatory decision-making in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Patient Reported Outcome Measure in Atopic Dermatitis Patients Treated with Dupilumab: 52-Weeks Results

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Servando E. Marron ◽  
Lucia Tomas-Aragones ◽  
Carlos A. Moncin-Torres ◽  
Manuel Gomez-Barrera ◽  
Francisco Javier Garcia-Latasa de Aranibar
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Stressful Life Events ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Severe Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Patient Reported

Dupilumab is used to treat atopic dermatitis patients who have proven to be refractory to previous treatments. The aim of this study was to assess evolution and patient reported outcome measures in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated with Dupilumab in routine clinical practice. The outcomes were evaluated and registered at baseline and weeks-16, 40 and 52. The variables evaluated were: diseases severity, pruritus, stressful life events, difficulty to sleep, anxiety and depression, quality of life, satisfaction, adherence to the treatment, efficacy and safety. Eleven patients were recruited between Nov 14th 2017 and Jan 16th 2018. Demographic variables: 90% Caucasian, 82% women. Clinical variables: Mean duration of AD =17.7 (±12.8), 91% had severe disease severity. At baseline, SCORAD mean score = 61.7 (±15.5); itch was reported by 100% of patients; itch Visual Analogue Scale mean range of 8 (6-10); HADS mean total score =13.9 (±5.5); DLQI mean score =13.3 (±8.3): EQ-5D-3L mean range = 57 (30-99). At week-52 there is a significant reduction of SCORAD scores, HADS total score and improved quality of life. ¡This study confirms that Dupilumab, used for 52-weeks under routine clinical practice, maintains the improved atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms obtained at week-16, with a good safety profile.

scholarly journals Characteristics and patient-reported outcomes associated to dropout in severely affected oncological patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pimrapat Gebert ◽  
Daniel Schindel ◽  
Johann Frick ◽  
Liane Schenk ◽  
Ulrike Grittner
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used and are surrogates for clinical outcomes in cancer research. In the research setting of very severe diseases such as cancer, it is difficult to avoid the problem of incomplete questionnaires from drop-out or missing data due to patients who deceased during observation period. We aimed to explore patient characteristics and patient-reported outcomes associated with the time-to-dropout. MethodsIn the Oncological Social Care Project (OSCAR) study the condition of participants was assessed four times within 12 months (t0: baseline, t1: 3 months, t2: 6 months, and t3: 12 months) by validated PROMs. We performed competing-risks regression based on Fine and Gray’s proportional sub-distribution hazards model for exploring factors associated with time-to-dropout. Death was considered as competing risk. ResultsThree hundred sixty-two participants were analyzed in the study. 193 (53.3%) completed follow-up at 12 months, 67 (18.5%) patients dropped out, and 102 patients (28.2%) died during the study period. Poor subjective social support was related to higher risk for drop-out (SHR=2.10; 95%CI: 1.01 – 4.35). Lower values in health-related quality of life were related to drop-out and death. The subscales global health status/QoL, role functioning, physical functioning, and fatigue symptom in the EORTC QLQ-C30 were key characteristics associated with early drop-out.ConclusionSeverely affected cancer patients with poor social support and poor quality of life seem more likely to drop out of studies compared to patients with higher levels of social support and quality of life. This should be considered when planning studies assessing cancer patients. Methods to monitor drop-outs timely and handle missing outcomes might be used. Results of such studies have to be interpreted with caution in light of the particular drop-out mechanisms.

scholarly journals Validation of novel patient-centred juvenile idiopathic arthritis-specific patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E Lunt ◽  
Stephanie Shoop-Worrall ◽  
Nicola Smith ◽  
Gavin Cleary ◽  
Janet McDonagh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Paediatric Rheumatology ◽  
Major Step ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background: Measuring the outcomes that matter to children and young people (CYP) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), is a necessary precursor to patient-centred improvements in quality of clinical care. We present a two-centre validation of novel JIA patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) developed as part of the CAPTURE-JIA project. Methods: CYP with JIA were recruited from paediatric rheumatology clinics, completing the CAPTURE-JIA PROM and PREM, CHAQ and CHU 9D. A subset participated in face-to-face interviews and completed the PROM/PREM one week later. The OMERACT filter was applied and the three domains of validation assessed. Truth assessments included cognitive interviewing, sensitivity analysis and Spearman’s correlations. Discrimination assessments included specificity and reliability testing. Feasibility was assessed using time to form completion and proportion of missing data. Results: Eighty-two CYP and their families were recruited; ten cognitive interviews and fifteen PROM/PREM test/retests were conducted. Truth: CYP and parents understood the PROM/PREM and felt important areas were covered. PROM criteria had high sensitivities (> 70%) against similar items on the CHU 9D, with the exception of fatigue (58%). Correlations between similar PROM and CHU 9D criteria were moderate to very strong (coefficients 0.40–0.82.) Discrimination: high specificities (> 70%) on corresponding PROM and CHU 9D domains. Feasibility: median completion times for PROM sixty seconds (IQR 38–75) and PREM forty-nine seconds (IQR 30–60) respectively. Conclusion: The CAPTURE-JIA PROM and PREM are valid and feasible in UK paediatric rheumatology clinics. Embedding routine collection into clinical care would be a major step towards improving quality of care.

scholarly journals Validation of novel patient-centred juvenile idiopathic arthritis-specific patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs)

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Lunt ◽  
Stephanie Shoop-Worrall ◽  
Nicola Smith ◽  
Gavin Cleary ◽  
Janet McDonagh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Paediatric Rheumatology ◽  
Major Step ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Children And Young People ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Measuring the outcomes that matter to children and young people (CYP) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), is a necessary precursor to patient-centred improvements in quality of clinical care. We present a two-centre validation of novel JIA patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROM and PREM) developed as part of the CAPTURE-JIA project. Methods CYP with JIA were recruited from paediatric rheumatology clinics, completing the CAPTURE-JIA PROM and PREM, CHAQ and CHU 9D. A subset participated in face-to-face interviews and completed the PROM/PREM 1 week later. The OMERACT filter was applied and the three domains of validation assessed. Truth assessments included cognitive interviewing, sensitivity analysis and Spearman’s correlations. Discrimination assessments included specificity and reliability testing. Feasibility was assessed using time to form completion and proportion of missing data. Results Eighty-two CYP and their families were recruited; ten cognitive interviews and fifteen PROM/PREM test/retests were conducted. Truth: CYP and parents understood the PROM/PREM and felt important areas were covered. PROM criteria had high sensitivities (> 70%) against similar items on the CHU 9D, with the exception of fatigue (58%). Correlations between similar PROM and CHU 9D criteria were moderate to very strong (coefficients 0.40–0.82.) Discrimination: high specificities (> 70%) on corresponding PROM and CHU 9D domains. Feasibility: median completion times for PROM 60 s (IQR 38–75) and PREM 49 s (IQR 30–60) respectively. Conclusion The CAPTURE-JIA PROM and PREM are valid and feasible in UK paediatric rheumatology clinics. Embedding routine collection into clinical care would be a major step towards improving quality of care.

Real-world use of epic for clinical practice (EPIC-CP) to assess patient-reported prostate cancer quality of life in the clinical setting.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Chang ◽  
Arie Carneiro ◽  
Ostap Dovirak ◽  
Kimberly Taylor ◽  
Catrina Crociani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Routine Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Domain Scores

18 Background: Prostate cancer practitioners tend to underestimate patients’ treatment-related side effects. We developed the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) to facilitate patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment at the point-of-care (Chang P et al, J Urol Sep 2011). We sought to demonstrate the feasibility of EPIC-CP use in routine clinical care, and to compare longitudinal patient-reported and practitioner-reported prostate cancer outcomes. Methods: We reviewed practitioner- and patient-reported HRQOL outcomes in 482 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution from 2010 to 2014. All EPIC-CP questionnaires were administered and interpreted without research personnel. Practitioner-reported outcomes were assessed using chart review. We used the paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare pre- and post-treatment EPIC-CP domain scores, and Fisher’s exact test to compare patient-reported and practitioner-reported outcomes. We considered p-values < 0.05 statistically significant. Results: 708 total EPIC-CP questionnaires were completed. Mean urinary incontinence domain scores increased (worsened) significantly from baseline (0.6±0.2) to 3 (3.1±2.3) and 6 months (2.2±2.1) post-treatment, but were not statistically changed from baseline at 12 months (1.6±1.7). Patient-reported incontinence pad-free rates using EPIC-CP at 3, 6, and 12 months were 47%, 76%, and 78%, respectively, which were consistent with practitioner-reported rates. Mean sexual domain scores were significantly worse at 12 months (5.9±3.3) compared to baseline (2.4±2.8). Practitioners significantly overestimated the rate of functional erections compared to patients’ EPIC-CP-reported rates at 3 months (18% vs 12%, p < 0.05) and 12 months (45% vs 23%, p < 0.05). Bowel and vitality/hormonal scores were unchanged, and urinary irritation/obstruction scores improved after surgery. Conclusions: EPIC-CP is feasible to use in the routine clinical care of prostate cancer patients, and can help practitioners more accurately assess patients’ post-treatment symptom severity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document