scholarly journals Leveraging Electronic Health Record Systems to Create and Provide Electronic Cancer Survivorship Care Plans: A Pilot Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e150-e159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amye J. Tevaarwerk ◽  
Kari B. Wisinski ◽  
Kevin A. Buhr ◽  
Ucheanna O. Njiaju ◽  
May Tun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Survivorship Care Plans ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
The Impact

Rapid care plan creation and delivery within an EHR is possible. Further research is required to explore the barriers to automating importation into plans as well as the impact of EHR-integrated plans.

scholarly journals CANCER SURVIVORSHIP CARE PLAN COMPLETION WITHIN AN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 417-418
Author(s):  
S L Spoelstra ◽  
K Kloosterman ◽  
M VanderKooi ◽  
S L Spoelstra
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Survivorship Care Plan ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Potential of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient Portal for Improving Care Plan Concordance during Acute Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 358-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuj K. Dalal ◽  
Patricia Dykes ◽  
Lipika Samal ◽  
Kelly McNally ◽  
Eli Mlaver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Treat Analysis

Background Care plan concordance among patients and clinicians during hospitalization is suboptimal. Objective This article determines whether an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated patient portal was associated with increased understanding of the care plan, including the key recovery goal, among patients and clinicians in acute care setting. Methods The intervention included (1) a patient portal configured to solicit a single patient-designated recovery goal and display the care plan from the EHR for participating patients; and (2) an electronic care plan for all unit-based nurses that displays patient-inputted information, accessible to all clinicians via the EHR. Patients admitted to an oncology unit, including their nurses and physicians, were enrolled before and after implementation. Main outcomes included mean concordance scores for the overall care plan and individual care plan elements. Results Of 457 and 283 eligible patients approached during pre- and postintervention periods, 55 and 46 participated in interviews, respectively, including their clinicians. Of 46 postintervention patients, 27 (58.7%) enrolled in the patient portal. The intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated a nonsignificant increase in the mean concordance score for the overall care plan (62.0–67.1, adjusted p = 0.13), and significant increases in mean concordance scores for the recovery goal (30.3–57.7, adjusted p < 0.01) and main reason for hospitalization (58.6–79.2, adjusted p < 0.01). The on-treatment analysis of patient portal enrollees demonstrated significant increases in mean concordance scores for the overall care plan (61.9–70.0, adjusted p < 0.01), the recovery goal (30.4–66.8, adjusted p < 0.01), and main reason for hospitalization (58.3–81.7, adjusted p < 0.01), comparable to the intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusion Implementation of an EHR-integrated patient portal was associated with increased concordance for key care plan components. Future efforts should be directed at improving concordance for other care plan components and conducting larger, randomized studies to evaluate the impact on key outcomes during transitions of care. Clinical Trials Identifier NCT02258594.

scholarly journals Evaluating Primary Care Providers' Views on Survivorship Care Plans Generated by an Electronic Health Record System

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e329-e335 ◽  
Author(s):  
SarahMaria Donohue ◽  
Mary E. Sesto ◽  
David L. Hahn ◽  
Kevin A. Buhr ◽  
Elizabeth A. Jacobs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Survivorship Care Plans ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Record System ◽  
Care Plans

Survivorship care plans were viewed as useful for coordinating care and making clinical decisions. However primary care physicians desired shorter, clinician-oriented plans that were accessible via EHR and located in a standardized manner.

Providing cancer survivorship care plans for Spanish language speakers: Overall use and satisfaction patterns.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20671-e20671
Author(s):  
Christine Hill-Kayser ◽  
Carolyn Vachani ◽  
Margaret K. Hampshire ◽  
Gloria A. Di Lullo ◽  
James M. Metz
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Spanish Version ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Cancer Information ◽  
Survivorship Care Plans ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Spanish Speaking ◽  
The Us

e20671 Background: Cancer survivorship care plans may be communication aides to assist healthcare providers and empower survivors. A paucity of information exists regarding the provision of survivorship care plans to the Spanish speaking population. Methods: The LIVESTRONG Care Plan is an Internet-based tool for creation of survivorship care plans, originally launched in 5/07. It is available at www.livestrongcareplan.org, and via OncoLink, a cancer information website based at the University of Pennsylvania, serving over 3.9 million pages/ month to 185,000 unique IP addresses. A direct link on the homepage directs users to the Spanish version. All information is provided and translated by oncology nurses and physicians. Results: Since launch of the tool, 293 Spanish care plans have been created (1% of total care plans). Care plans in Spanish have been created by survivors in 78% of cases, and healthcare providers in 22%. This differs from the entire user population, in which use by HCP approaches 50% (p=< 0.001). Spanish-speaking users are 52% female, and 82% Latino/a, and less likely from the US (60% vs 87% , p=0.02), also being from Mexico (15%), Spain (10%), Chile (9%), Puerto Rico (5%) and Venezuela (3%). Spanish users were most often survivors of breast (20%) GU (33%) and GI (20%) cancers (vs general population 50%, p = 0.03; 10%, p = 0.04; 11%, p = 0.03, respectively). Only 8% of Spanish-speaking users report having received previous survivorship information vs 13% in the overall group (p=0.07). All users (100%) of the Spanish version rate experience and satisfaction with the care plan as “very good” or “excellent.” Average time for completion of Spanish plans was 9:28 min. Conclusions: Most users of the Spanish plan are survivors who have not received this information before, from the US and several Central/South American countries. They are highly satisfied with the information provided. Healthcare providers are proportionally less likely to use the Spanish version of the plan than survivors are.

Perceived value of cancer survivorship care among Asians and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22522-e22522
Author(s):  
Jared David Acoba ◽  
Sharon Tamashiro ◽  
Marci Chock
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Native Hawaiian ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Survivorship Care Plan ◽  
Survivorship Care Plans ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Plans

e22522 Background: Numerous studies have evaluated the impact of cancer survivorship care. However, no study to date has focused on Asian or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NH/PI) cancer survivors. It has been well documented that Asian and NH/PI patients often suffer from inferior cancer outcomes compared to White patients, and differences in their experience with cancer survivorship care could contribute to this disparity. Methods: Surveys were sent to 1410 cancer survivors who were treated at a community cancer center with curative intent and who had received survivorship care plans between Jan 2014 and June 2018. The 26-item questionnaire evaluated patients’ perception of various aspects of their survivorship care plan and follow-up physician visits. All responses were anonymous. Results: Of the 360 patients who responded, 24% were White, 54% Asian, and 13% NH/PI. Compared to Whites, Asian and NH/PI patients were younger (p = 0.004), less educated (p = 0.004), and reported a lower income (p < 0.0005). Among all patients, 62% reported that the survivorship care plan was “very helpful” and 86% rated their satisfaction with physician follow-up visits as “very good” to “excellent.” There were no racial differences in satisfaction with either survivorship care plan or physician follow-up. In a multivariate binary logistic regression, Asians and NH/PI patients were significantly more likely to rate ongoing survivorship care as helpful compared to Whites, OR 4.08 (95%CI, 2.13-7.82). Conclusions: There were no racial differences in patient satisfaction with their survivorship care plans and follow-up care. However, Asian and NH/PI patients valued ongoing cancer survivorship care follow-up significantly more than White patients. Whether more extensive survivorship care would lead to improved outcomes among Asian and NH/PI cancer patients should be investigated further.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document