Nanoedible Coatings for Dairy Food Matrices

Author(s):  
Sourav Garg ◽  
Anurita Hemrom ◽  
Irshaan Syed ◽  
S. Sivapratha ◽  
Shubham Subrot Panigrahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 4177-4188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tugba Oksuz ◽  
Zeynep Tacer-Caba ◽  
Dilara Nilufer-Erdil ◽  
Dilek Boyacioglu

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Bernard ◽  
Stéphane Hazebrouck ◽  
Nicolas Gaiani ◽  
Karine Adel-Patient

Despite a high level of sequence identity between cow's, goat's, and sheep's milk (CM, GM, and SM, respectively) proteins, some patients tolerant to CM are allergic to GM and SM. In most cases, this specificity is due to the presence of IgE antibodies that bind only to caprine and ovine caseins. The patients may then develop severe allergic reactions after ingestion of CM products contaminated with low amounts of GM or SM. We thus aimed to develop an assay able to detect traces of caprine/ovine β-caseins in different food matrices, irrespective of the presence of the bovine homolog. We produced monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific to caprine caseins in mice tolerized to the bovine whole casein then sensitized to the caprine whole casein. In order to develop a two-site immunometric assay, we selected mAbs that could discriminate the caprine β-casein from its bovine homolog. Characteristics and performances of two tests were determined with various dairy products. Results were analyzed in relation with the IgE-immunoreactivity of the food matrices, thanks to sera from CM, GM/SM allergic patients. Our two-site immunometric assays demonstrated a high sensitivity with a detection limit of 1.6–3.2 ng/mL of caprine and ovine β-caseins. The tests were able to detect contaminations of GM in CM at the ppm level. Heat-treatment, ripening and coagulation processes, usually applied to dairy products that exhibit a very high IgE-immunoreactivity, did not impair the test sensitivity. These quantitative assays could then be useful for the risk assessment of food products potentially contaminated with GM and SM in order to prevent adverse reactions in patients specifically allergic to these milks.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Min ◽  
Craig Bunt ◽  
Susan Mason ◽  
Grant Bennett ◽  
Malik Hussain

2012 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Patterson ◽  
Susanna C. Larsson ◽  
Alicja Wolk ◽  
Agneta Åkesson

Author(s):  
Josiane B. Vera ◽  
Márcia C. Bisinoti ◽  
Clarice D.B. Amaral ◽  
Mario H. Gonzalez

Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 599
Author(s):  
D. M. D. Rasika ◽  
Janak K. Vidanarachchi ◽  
Selma F. Luiz ◽  
Denise Rosane Perdomo Azeredo ◽  
Adriano G. Cruz ◽  
...  

Probiotics are live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. Traditionally, dairy products are the major and most popular probiotic carriers. At present, there is a growing demand for non-dairy probiotic products. Both fermented and non-fermented non-dairy plant-based food products are becoming highly appealing to both dairy and non-dairy consumers worldwide. Non-dairy plant-based food matrices such as fruits, vegetables, plant-based milk, cereals, and legumes have been used successfully in producing probiotic products with the minimum recommended viable probiotic numbers at the time of consumption. However, due to the exclusion of dairy, whether these food matrices can enhance the functional properties of probiotics such as gastrointestinal survival and immune-enhancing effects needs a thorough investigation. Hence, this review focuses on some of the popular non-dairy plant-based probiotic food products and their microbiological quality characteristics in terms of maintaining probiotic viability during product storage. Their gastrointestinal tolerance in these products, other functional properties, and product qualities have also been briefly discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 359 ◽  
pp. 129932
Author(s):  
Saida Belarbi ◽  
Martin Vivier ◽  
Wafa Zaghouani ◽  
Aude De Sloovere ◽  
Valérie Agasse-Peulon ◽  
...  

Metabolites ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 395
Author(s):  
Katherine J. Li ◽  
Kathryn J. Burton-Pimentel ◽  
Elske M. Brouwer-Brolsma ◽  
Edith J. M. Feskens ◽  
Carola Blaser ◽  
...  

Studies examining associations between self-reported dairy intake and health are inconclusive, but biomarkers hold promise for elucidating such relationships by offering objective measures of dietary intake. Previous human intervention studies identified several biomarkers for dairy foods in blood and urine using non-targeted metabolomics. We evaluated the robustness of these biomarkers in a free-living cohort in the Netherlands using both single- and multi-marker approaches. Plasma and urine from 246 participants (54 ± 13 years) who completed a food frequency questionnaire were analyzed using liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The targeted metabolite panel included 37 previously-identified candidate biomarkers of milk, cheese, and/or yoghurt consumption. Associations between biomarkers and energy-adjusted dairy food intakes were assessed by a ‘single-marker’ generalized linear model, and stepwise regression was used to select the best ‘multi-marker’ panel. Multi-marker models that also accounted for common covariates better captured the subtle differences for milk (urinary galactose, galactitol; sex, body mass index, age) and cheese (plasma pentadecanoic acid, isoleucine, glutamic acid) over single-marker models. No significant associations were observed for yogurt. Further examination of other facets of validity of these biomarkers may improve estimates of dairy food intake in conjunction with self-reported methods, and help reach a clearer consensus on their health impacts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document