Success factors driving cost management practices through integrated project delivery

2021 ◽  
pp. 155-169
Author(s):  
Farzad Pour Rahimian ◽  
Jack Steven Goulding ◽  
Sepehr Abrishami ◽  
Saleh Seyedzadeh ◽  
Faris Elghaish
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (22) ◽  
pp. 9539
Author(s):  
Faris Elghaish ◽  
M. Reza Hosseini ◽  
Saeed Talebi ◽  
Sepehr Abrishami ◽  
Igor Martek ◽  
...  

Integrated project delivery (IPD) is a mode of project procurement recognised as facilitating superior project performance. However, this success is contingent on effective cost management practices that share cost data with all project stakeholders in an accurate, timely and transparent manner. Despite an extensive literature on aspects of cost management, none identifies the essential ingredients required of an effective cost management system, sufficiently robust to support successful IPD projects. Candidate cost management augmenting practices are drawn from the literature, and presented for scrutiny in questionnaire form, to fifty IPD experienced experts, based in the USA, UK and Australia. Findings reveal activity-based costing (ABC) to be effective at identifying overhead costs and creating accounting transparency. Similarly, earned value management (EVM), in combination with ABC, is effective at developing mathematical models for equitable risk-reward distribution. Moreover, web-based management systems, as supported by Building Information Modelling (BIM), are effective at generating trust and collaboration on which IPD success depends. A questionnaire survey using purposive sampling was conducted to assess the factors driving success of implementing IPD regarding cost management process. The contribution to knowledge made by this paper is in identifying requisite support mechanisms essential to elevate traditional cost management practices to the higher standard needed to ensure IPD delivery success.


Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Jowett ◽  
Malak Al Hattab ◽  
Mohamad Kassem

Building information modelling (BIM) tools and workflows, new procurements methods, and emerging management practices are being adopted on projects to overcome collaboration barriers and improve project performance within the architecture, engineering, construction, and operation (AECO) sector. Academic literature and industry reports recommend the use of collaborative procurement methods such as design and build (DB) procurement and integrated project delivery (IPD) when adopting BIM workflows. However, to date there are little operationalization and empirical evidence of the value realization potential when using BIM in conjunction to these procurement methods. This chapter draws upon five case studies of BIM-based DB projects to analyze and quantify the potential of value realization using clash detection as a use value. The results reveal potential hurdles inhibiting BIM from reaching its full potential. Accordingly, recommended changes to the current processes are suggested to facilitate BIM in enhancing value on DB projects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-345
Author(s):  
Jung Ho Yu ◽  
Seung Eun Yoo ◽  
Jung In Kim ◽  
Tae Wan Kim

This study aims to explore the relationship between the critical success factors (CSFs) and the performance of integrated project delivery (IPD) projects based on empirical data from IPD projects. Data from 16 projects, in relation to 25 success factors and four performance areas (schedule performance, cost performance, defects, and change orders), were gathered and analyzed according to the qualitative comparative analysis method. As a result, this study identifies 17 factors as conditions that frequently occurred in successful IPD projects. This study also derives combinations of factors that led to IPD project success regarding each of the four performance areas.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 2432-2446
Author(s):  
Seoung-Wook Whang ◽  
Kenneth Sungho Park ◽  
Sangyong Kim

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the critical success factors (CSFs) to implement integrated project delivery (IPD) systems in the Korean construction industry. Design/methodology/approach This study categorized potential CSFs and analyzed them using factor analysis and multiple regression analysis to choose the best ones based on responses from Korean construction experts. Findings In total, 29 potential factors were selected and categorized into 7 CSFs using factor analysis. Originality/value The outcomes of the study are useful as a reference for applying the IPD system in different developing countries and mid-sized construction industries.


2013 ◽  
Vol 457-458 ◽  
pp. 1181-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Ge Xu ◽  
Peng Lv

Integrated project delivery as a new mode of project management, its ideas of integration guides the future development direction for the construction, but its theory and practice of development is not mature either. There is still a lot of uncertainty in the process of practical application, need to identify and analyze various of risk factors, which provide theoretical basis for that the IPD model are fully used to project management practices.


2018 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiliang Ma ◽  
Dongdong Zhang ◽  
Jiulin Li

Author(s):  
James Harty ◽  
Richard Laing

Building information modelling (BIM) is not only an authoring tool for architects and engineers, but also for all stakeholders in the building programme procurement process. Analysis tools like code checking of building regulations and environmental simulations that can report on heating loads, daylighting and carbon use will push the adoption of intelligent modelling faster and further than previously thought. The benefits for clients should not be underestimated either and some are already reaping them where project certainty is to the fore. However, the professional language that architects and engineers espouse is a latent force that can run counter to fostering collaboration. An emerging professional, the Architectural Technologist, can bridge that divide and adopt the adjunct role of manager in the integrated project delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document