Soil Organic Matter and Nutrient Availability

2021 ◽  
pp. 103-136
Author(s):  
Sjoerd W. Duiker
2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (08) ◽  
pp. 743-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Daniela Chavez ◽  
Paulus Bernardus Maria Berentsen ◽  
Oene Oenema ◽  
Alfons Gerard Joseph Maria Oude Lansink

Ecology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 2516-2527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin H. Kelly ◽  
Ingrid C. Burke ◽  
William K. Lauenroth

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marijke Struijk ◽  
Andrew P. Whitmore ◽  
Simon R. Mortimer ◽  
Tom Sizmur

Abstract. Crop residues are valuable soil amendments in terms of the carbon and other nutrients they contain, but incorporation of residues does not always translate into increases in nutrient availability, soil organic matter (SOM), soil structure, and overall soil fertility. Studies have demonstrated accelerated decomposition rates of chemically heterogeneous litter mixtures, compared to the decomposition of individual litters, in forest and grassland systems. Mixing high C : N ratio with low C : N ratio amendments may result in greater carbon use efficiency and non-additive benefits in soil properties (i.e. mixture ≠ sum of the parts). We hypothesised that non-additive benefits would accrue from mixtures of low-quality (straw or woodchips) and high-quality (vegetable-waste compost) residues applied before lettuce planting in a full-factorial field experiment. Properties indicative of soil structure and nutrient cycling were used to assess benefits from residue mixtures, including soil respiration, aggregate stability, bulk density, SOM, available and potentially mineralisable N, available P, K and Mg, and crop yield. Soil organic matter and mineral nitrogen levels were significantly and non-additively greater in the straw-compost mixture compared to individual residues, which mitigated the N immobilisation occurring with straw-only applications. Addition of compost significantly increased soil available N, K and Mg levels. Together, these observations suggest that greater nutrient availability improved the ability of decomposer organisms to degrade straw in the straw-compost mixture. We demonstrate that mixtures of crop residues can influence soil properties non-additively. Thus, greater benefits may be achieved by removing, mixing, and re-applying crop residues, than by simply returning them to the soils in situ.


SOIL ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-481
Author(s):  
Marijke Struijk ◽  
Andrew P. Whitmore ◽  
Simon R. Mortimer ◽  
Tom Sizmur

Abstract. Crop residues are valuable soil amendments in terms of the carbon and other nutrients they contain, but the incorporation of residues does not always translate into increases in nutrient availability, soil organic matter (SOM), soil structure, and overall soil fertility. Studies have demonstrated accelerated decomposition rates of chemically heterogeneous litter mixtures, compared to the decomposition of individual litters, in forest and grassland systems. Mixing high C:N ratio with low C:N ratio amendments may result in greater carbon use efficiency (CUE) and nonadditive benefits in soil properties. We hypothesised that nonadditive benefits would accrue from mixtures of low-quality (straw or woodchips) and high-quality (vegetable waste compost) residues applied before lettuce planting in a full factorial field experiment. Properties indicative of soil structure and nutrient cycling were used to assess the benefits from residue mixtures, including soil respiration, aggregate stability, bulk density, SOM, available N, potentially mineralisable N, available P, K, and Mg, and crop yield. Soil organic matter and mineral N levels were significantly and nonadditively greater in the straw–compost mixture compared to individual residues, which mitigated the N immobilisation occurring with straw-only applications. The addition of compost significantly increased available N, K, and Mg levels. Together, these observations suggest that greater nutrient availability improved the ability of decomposer organisms to degrade straw in the straw–compost mixture. We demonstrate that mixtures of crop residues can influence soil properties nonadditively. Thus, greater benefits may be achieved by removing, mixing, and reapplying crop residues than by simply returning them to the soils in situ.


2015 ◽  
Vol 395 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 215-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Bonifacio ◽  
Marta Petrillo ◽  
Fabio Petrella ◽  
Fulvia Tambone ◽  
Luisella Celi

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 921-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Kargar ◽  
Pierre Jutras ◽  
O. Grant Clark ◽  
William H. Hendershot ◽  
Shiv O. Prasher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document