Canadian Association of Research Libraries

Author(s):  
Timothy Mark
2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 560-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selinda Adelle Berg ◽  
Heidi LM Jacobs ◽  
Dayna Cornwall

Within the literature exploring the role of research in academic librarianship, very little attention has been paid to the perspectives of upper library administrators. This perspective is critical because library administrators play a key role in hiring, evaluating, supporting, promoting, and tenuring professional librarians. As a way of bringing the administrative perspective to these discussions, our study examines how library administrators within the Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL) view the role of research in their own libraries and within academic librarianship, as well as how they perceive the current and future climate for librarians’ research. Our study reveals key areas in need of further research and identifies several issues that librarians and upper administrators would benefit from exploring together to advance discussions about research.


2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Pamela Haley

A review of: Fox, David. “Finding Time for Scholarship: A Survey of Canadian Research University Librarians.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 7.4 (2007): 451-62. Objective – To provide comparative data from Canadian research universities regarding the time spent on scholarly activities by research librarians. Design – Qualitative study employing a bilingual survey consisting of thirty-nine questions. Setting – Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL) located at the twenty-seven CARL universities during the spring and fall of 2006. Subjects – CARL university librarians for whom e-mail addresses could be retrieved. Methods – The survey was distributed to 1052 CARL librarians during the spring and fall of 2006 via e-mail. Problems with the clarity of two questions became evident during the receipt of responses. The questions were revised and resubmitted to the same population. Main Results – Five hundred and twenty responses (49.4%) were received, with 441 (84.8%) in English and 15.2% in French. A total of 53 surveys were unusable, leaving 467 (44.4%) cases as the basis for data analysis. Responses to the survey revealed that 51.4% of participants were required or encouraged to undertake scholarship. Of these, 35% were expected, in addition to sabbatical and study leaves, to make scholarship an integral and ongoing part of their professional responsibilities. Due to the individualized and subjective nature of the responses, no clear data emerged on the balance between scholarship and other professional activities. The majority of research librarians, on average, spent less than five hours per week on scholarship activities. For the 290 full-time librarians surveyed, the average time spent per week on all activities (professional and scholarly) was 47.4 hours. Almost one third of the full time librarians worked fifty hours or more per week – the equivalent to the time commitment of the average university professor. Participants indicated that in an ideal world they would like to spend 10% less time on assigned duties. Francophone respondents spent 5% more of their time on professional responsibilities and 5% less time on scholarship. Participation rates in scholarship related leaves are low, with less than 25% of those surveyed engaging in these opportunities. Conclusion – Based on the study’s findings, research librarians are not participating in scholarship to any great degree due to the perceived lack of time.


Author(s):  
Marc Richard ◽  
Eun G. Park.

The goals of this project are: 1) to analyze metadata element sets used by CARL (Canadian Association of Research Libraries) institutional repositories to describe electronic dissertations and theses; and, 2) based on the analysis, to suggest a prototype for metadata schemes to serve as a standard model for further implementation.Les buts de ce projet sont : 1) analyser les éléments de métadonnées utilisés par les dépôts institutionnels de l’ABRC (Association des bibliothèques de recherche du Canada) pour décrire les mémoires et thèses électroniques ; et 2) d’après cette analyse, suggérer un prototype de schéma de métadonnées pouvant servir de modèle normalisé et être éventuellement mis en œuvre.


Author(s):  
Mary Cavanagh ◽  
Tony Horava ◽  
Dominique Maurel ◽  
Heidi L.M. Jacobs ◽  
Selinda Berg ◽  
...  

On behalf of the conference co-chairs, I am pleased to welcome you to the 43rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Association of Information Science (CAIS) and the second Librarians' Research Institute (LRI) Symposium of the Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL).Au nom des coprésidents du congrès, je suis heureuse de vous accueillir au 43e congrès annuel de l’Association canadienne des sciences de l’information (ACSI) et au second symposium annuel de l’Institut de recherche des bibliothécaires (IRB), lancé par l’Association des bibliothèques de recherche du Canada (ABRC).


First Monday ◽  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Struik ◽  
Hilde Coldenbrander ◽  
Stephen Warren ◽  
Halina de Maurivez ◽  
Heather Joseph ◽  
...  

This paper presents a summary of three presentations: Heather Joseph of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) on key advocacy strategies, the Canadian Association of Research Libraries’s (CARL) Kathleen Shearer on the CARL Institutional Repository program and forthcoming CARL Author’s Addendum, and Heather Morrison on the Canadian Library Association’s (CLA) Task Force on Open Access. The presentations were followed by a one–hour workshop, with about 50 participants including librarians from Canada and elsewhere, publishers, and others. Workshop exercises, designed for the expert audience anticipated at the First International PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference, were developed to elicit a broad overview of open access initiatives underway, issues and barriers to open access, and solutions to overcome them. Participants reported being engaged in a wide variety of open access initiatives, from OA publishing and institutional repositories to a recent commitment to devote a percentage of a university budget to OA. Two solutions the workshop participants saw as key for open access were finding a funding solution (possibly re–deploying collections and acquisitions budgets or earmarking grants funds for knowledge transfer), and branding repositories as containing trustable material. The workshop portion could have been expanded considerably, to a half or full day. Results of the workshop will help to inform the work of the CLA Task Force on Open Access.


Author(s):  
K. Jane Burpee ◽  
Bobby Glushko ◽  
Lisa Goddard ◽  
Inba Kehoe ◽  
Patricia Moore

Traditional outputs of scholarly communication, such as monographs and journal articles are being supplemented by new forms of scholarship, particularly in fields such as digital humanities. Canadian university libraries have long played a role supporting the creation, distribution, and preservation of scholarly objects. That support must be extended to include new formats and modes of scholarly work, such as digital portfolios, non-linear narratives, social media, scholarly video journals, etc. As the means of production and forms of scholarly output diversify, libraries will need to understand the impact of these digital shifts and identify areas where library efforts can have the most influence. This article examines developing areas of non-traditional scholarly communication and discusses implications for members of the Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL).


2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-70
Author(s):  
Joan Leergaard

Indhold: Bøger og bibliotek; Sponsoraftale; Montanasalen; Montana Møbler A/S,; Korttyveri opklaret; Netadadgang med egen bærbare pc på Amager; BogForum 2004: Bevar bogen; H.C. Andersen-brevbiografi på nettet; Peder Laales Ordsprog online; Lucretius i ny udgave; Niels Schiørrings verdslige samlinger nu Online; Udstillinger; HOLCK - Politikens bladtegner gennem 40 år; UNSETTLED - 8 sydafrikanske fotografer; Oktogonen; Foredrag; Musikarrangementer; Berliner-Symfonier – CPHrDOX; Nordic Music Days; Debutkoncert: Nishiki Sano¸ Canadian Association of Research Libraries; Erhvervelser;


Publications ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Clara Turp ◽  
Lee Wilson ◽  
Julienne Pascoe ◽  
Alex Garnett

The Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR), developed through a partnership between the Canadian Association of Research Libraries’ Portage initiative and the Compute Canada Federation, improves research data discovery in Canada by providing a single search portal for research data stored across Canadian governmental, institutional, and discipline-specific data repositories. While this national discovery layer helps to de-silo Canadian research data, challenges in data discovery remain due to a lack of standardized metadata practices across repositories. In recognition of this challenge, a Portage task group, drawn from a national network of experts, has engaged in a project to map subject keywords to the Online Computer Library Center’s (OCLC) Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) using the open source OpenRefine software. This paper will describe the task group’s project, discuss the various approaches undertaken by the group, and explore how this work improves data discovery and may be adopted by other repositories and metadata aggregators to support metadata standardization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document