scholarly journals Glucocorticoid Receptor Condensates Link DNA-Dependent Receptor Dimerization and Transcriptional Transactivation

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A809-A809
Author(s):  
Filipp Frank ◽  
Xu Liu ◽  
Eric Ortlund
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Recognition ◽  
Receptor Dimerization ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Recognition Elements

Abstract The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-regulated transcription factor (TF) that controls the tissue- and gene-specific transactivation and transrepression of thousands of target genes. Distinct GR DNA binding sequences with activating or repressive activities have been identified, but how they modulate transcription in opposite ways is not known. We show that GR forms phase-separated condensates that specifically concentrate known co-regulators via their intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in vitro. A combination of dynamic, multivalent (between IDRs) and specific, stable interactions (between LxxLL motifs and the GR ligand binding domain) control the degree of recruitment. Importantly, GR DNA-binding directs the selective partitioning of co-regulators within GR condensates such that activating DNAs cause enhanced recruitment of co-activators. Our work shows that condensation controls GR function by modulating co-regulator recruitment and provides a mechanism for the up- and down-regulation of GR target genes controlled by distinct DNA recognition elements.

scholarly journals Glucocorticoid receptor condensates link DNA-dependent receptor dimerization and transcriptional transactivation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipp Frank ◽  
Xu Liu ◽  
Eric A. Ortlund
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Recognition ◽  
Receptor Dimerization ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Recognition Elements

AbstractThe glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-regulated transcription factor (TF) that controls the tissue- and gene-specific transactivation and transrepression of thousands of target genes. Distinct GR DNA binding sequences with activating or repressive activities have been identified, but how they modulate transcription in opposite ways is not known. We show that GR forms phase-separated condensates that specifically concentrate known co-regulators via their intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in vitro. A combination of dynamic, multivalent (between IDRs) and specific, stable interactions (between LxxLL motifs and the GR ligand binding domain) control the degree of recruitment. Importantly, GR DNA-binding directs the selective partitioning of co-regulators within GR condensates such that activating DNAs cause enhanced recruitment of co-activators. Our work shows that condensation controls GR function by modulating co-regulator recruitment and provides a mechanism for the up- and down-regulation of GR target genes controlled by distinct DNA recognition elements.

scholarly journals Glucocorticoid receptor condensates link DNA-dependent receptor dimerization and transcriptional transactivation

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (30) ◽  
pp. e2024685118
Author(s):  
Filipp Frank ◽  
Xu Liu ◽  
Eric A. Ortlund
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Glucocorticoid Receptor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Recognition ◽  
Receptor Dimerization ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Recognition Elements

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-regulated transcription factor (TF) that controls the tissue- and gene-specific transactivation and transrepression of thousands of target genes. Distinct GR DNA-binding sequences with activating or repressive activities have been identified, but how they modulate transcription in opposite ways is not known. We show that GR forms phase-separated condensates that specifically concentrate known coregulators via their intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in vitro. A combination of dynamic, multivalent (between IDRs) and specific, stable interactions (between LxxLL motifs and the GR ligand-binding domain) control the degree of recruitment. Importantly, GR DNA binding directs the selective partitioning of coregulators within GR condensates such that activating DNAs cause enhanced recruitment of coactivators. Our work shows that condensation controls GR function by modulating coregulator recruitment and provides a mechanism for the up- and down-regulation of GR target genes controlled by distinct DNA recognition elements.

scholarly journals The Caenorhabditis elegans Heterochronic Regulator LIN-14 Is a Novel Transcription Factor That Controls the Developmental Timing of Transcription from the Insulin/Insulin-Like Growth Factor Gene ins-33 by Direct DNA Binding

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 11059-11072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Hristova ◽  
Darcy Birse ◽  
Yang Hong ◽  
Victor Ambros
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Consensus Binding Site

ABSTRACT A temporal gradient of the novel nuclear protein LIN-14 specifies the timing and sequence of stage-specific developmental events in Caenorhabditis elegans. The profound effects of lin-14 mutations on worm development suggest that LIN-14 directly or indirectly regulates stage-specific gene expression. We show that LIN-14 can associate with chromatin in vivo and has in vitro DNA binding activity. A bacterially expressed C-terminal domain of LIN-14 was used to select DNA sequences that contain a putative consensus binding site from a pool of randomized double-stranded oligonucleotides. To identify candidates for genes directly regulated by lin-14, we employed DNA microarray hybridization to compare the mRNA abundance of C. elegans genes in wild-type animals to that in mutants with reduced or elevated lin-14 activity. Five of the candidate LIN-14 target genes identified by microarrays, including the insulin/insulin-like growth factor family gene ins-33, contain putative LIN-14 consensus sites in their upstream DNA sequences. Genetic analysis indicates that the developmental regulation of ins-33 mRNA involves the stage-specific repression of ins-33 transcription by LIN-14 via sequence-specific DNA binding. These results reinforce the conclusion that lin-14 encodes a novel class of transcription factor.

scholarly journals Long-range regulation of p53 DNA binding by its intrinsically disordered N-terminal transactivation domain

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (48) ◽  
pp. E11302-E11310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander S. Krois ◽  
H. Jane Dyson ◽  
Peter E. Wright
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Structural Characteristics ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Disordered Regions

Atomic resolution characterization of the full-length p53 tetramer has been hampered by its size and the presence of extensive intrinsically disordered regions at both the N and C termini. As a consequence, the structural characteristics and dynamics of the disordered regions are poorly understood within the context of the intact p53 tetramer. Here we apply trans-intein splicing to generate segmentally 15N-labeled full-length p53 constructs in which only the resonances of the N-terminal transactivation domain (NTAD) are visible in NMR spectra, allowing us to observe this region of p53 with unprecedented detail within the tetramer. The N-terminal region is dynamically disordered in the full-length p53 tetramer, fluctuating between states in which it is free and fully exposed to solvent and states in which it makes transient contacts with the DNA-binding domain (DBD). Chemical-shift changes and paramagnetic spin-labeling experiments reveal that the amphipathic AD1 and AD2 motifs of the NTAD interact with the DNA-binding surface of the DBD through primarily electrostatic interactions. Importantly, this interaction inhibits binding of nonspecific DNA to the DBD while having no effect on binding to a specific p53 recognition element. We conclude that the NTAD:DBD interaction functions to enhance selectivity toward target genes by inhibiting binding to nonspecific sites in genomic DNA. This work provides some of the highest-resolution data on the disordered N terminus of the nearly 180-kDa full-length p53 tetramer and demonstrates a regulatory mechanism by which the N terminus of p53 transiently interacts with the DBD to enhance target site discrimination.

scholarly journals Max is acetylated by p300 at several nuclear localization residues

2007 ◽  
Vol 403 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Faiola ◽  
Yi-Ting Wu ◽  
Songqin Pan ◽  
Kangling Zhang ◽  
Anthony Farina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Apoptotic Cell ◽  
Central Component ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
E Box

Max is a ubiquitous transcription factor with a bHLHZip [basic HLH (helix–loop–helix) leucine zipper] DNA-binding/dimerization domain and the central component of the Myc/Max/Mad transcription factor network that controls cell growth, proliferation, differentiation and apoptotic cell death in metazoans. Max is the obligatory DNA-binding and dimerization partner for all the bHLHZip regulators of the Myc/Max/Mad network, including the Myc family of oncoproteins and the Mad family of Myc antagonists, which recognize E-box DNA elements in the regulatory regions of target genes. Max lacks a transcription regulatory domain and is the only member of the network that efficiently homodimerizes. Binding of Max homodimers to E-box elements suppresses the transcription regulatory functions of its network partners and of other non-network E-box-binding regulators. In contrast with its highly regulated partners, Max is a constitutively expressed and phosphorylated protein. Phosphorylation is, however, the only Max post-translational modification identified so far. In the present study, we have analysed Max posttranslational modifications by MS. We have found that Max is acetylated at several lysine residues (Lys-57, Lys-144 and Lys-145) in mammalian cells. Max acetylation is stimulated by inhibitors of histone deacetylases and by overexpression of the p300 co-activator/HAT (histone acetyltransferase). The p300 HAT also directly acetylates Max in vitro at these three residues. Interestingly, the three Max residues acetylated in vivo and in vitro by p300 are important for Max nuclear localization and Max-mediated suppression of Myc transactivation. These results uncover novel post-translational modifications of Max and suggest the potential regulation of specific Max complexes by p300 and reversible acetylation.

scholarly journals Mechanisms Governing Target Search and Binding Dynamics of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Chen ◽  
Claudia Cattoglio ◽  
Gina Dailey ◽  
Qiulin Zhu ◽  
Robert Tjian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Specific Inhibitor ◽  
Single Particle Tracking ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factors ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions

Transcription factors (TFs) are classically attributed a modular construction, containing well-structured sequence specific DNA-binding domains (DBDs) paired with disordered activation domains (ADs) responsible for protein-protein interactions targeting cofactors or the core transcription initiation machinery. However, this simple division of labor model struggles to explain why TFs with identical DNA binding sequence specificity determined in vitro exhibit distinct non-overlapping binding profiles in vivo. The family of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) offer a stark example: aberrantly expressed in several cancer types, HIF-1α and HIF-2α subunit isoforms recognize the same DNA motif in vitro — the hypoxia response element (HRE) — but only share a subset of their target genes in vivo, while eliciting contrasting effects on cancer development and progression under certain circumstances. To probe the mechanisms mediating isoform-specific gene regulation, we used live cell single particle tracking (SPT) to investigate HIF nuclear dynamics and how they change upon genetic perturbation or drug treatment. We found that HIF-α subunits and their dimerization partner HIF-1β exhibit distinct diffusion and binding characteristics that are exquisitely sensitive to concentration and subunit stoichiometry. Using domain-swap variants, mutations, and a HIF-2α specific inhibitor, we found that although the DBD and dimerization domains are important, a major determinant of chromatin binding and diffusion behavior is dictated by the AD-containing intrinsically disordered regions. These findings reveal a previously unappreciated role of IDRs in regulating the TF search process that may play a role in selective functional target site binding on chromatin.

scholarly journals Cavin1 intrinsically disordered domains are essential for fuzzy electrostatic interactions and caveola formation

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas A. Tillu ◽  
James Rae ◽  
Ya Gao ◽  
Nicholas Ariotti ◽  
Matthias Floetenmeyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrostatic Interactions ◽  
Membrane Lipid ◽  
Membrane Curvature ◽  
Caveolin 1 ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Regions ◽  
Solution Generation ◽  
Endosomal System ◽  
Disordered Regions

AbstractCaveolae are spherically shaped nanodomains of the plasma membrane, generated by cooperative assembly of caveolin and cavin proteins. Cavins are cytosolic peripheral membrane proteins with negatively charged intrinsically disordered regions that flank positively charged α-helical regions. Here, we show that the three disordered domains of Cavin1 are essential for caveola formation and dynamic trafficking of caveolae. Electrostatic interactions between disordered regions and α-helical regions promote liquid-liquid phase separation behaviour of Cavin1 in vitro, assembly of Cavin1 oligomers in solution, generation of membrane curvature, association with caveolin-1, and Cavin1 recruitment to caveolae in cells. Removal of the first disordered region causes irreversible gel formation in vitro and results in aberrant caveola trafficking through the endosomal system. We propose a model for caveola assembly whereby fuzzy electrostatic interactions between Cavin1 and caveolin-1 proteins, combined with membrane lipid interactions, are required to generate membrane curvature and a metastable caveola coat.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document