scholarly journals The Importance of Basic Science and Research Training for the Next Generation of Physicians and Physician Scientists

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1919-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald B. DeFranco ◽  
Gwendolyn Sowa
2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Heidenreich ◽  
Andres J. Schrader ◽  
Zoltan Varga

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 67-67
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Freel ◽  
Katherine Barrett ◽  
Jillian Hurst ◽  
Rasheed Gbadegesin ◽  
Sallie Permar

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To ameliorate the leaky pipeline of physician-scientists, we must address the factors that cause medical trainees to disengage from research. Here we describe the development of standardized Physician-Scientist Training Program guidelines that may be implemented across disciplines to address these challenges. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Maintenance of a robust pool of physician-scientists is critical to meet the rapidly growing need for novel therapeutics. A variety of factors contribute to the decline of this pool. Key among these are a lengthy training period that segregates research from clinical training, thus impeding research progress and milestones that allow for a successful research career. Through engagement of residency program directors and Vice Chairs of Research, we have created a series of guidelines that promote residency research tracks and enable better integration of research and clinical training time. Guidelines have been piloted in the Departments of Pediatrics, Medicine and Surgery in the context of 2 new R38-supported programs. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our physician-Scientist Training Program (PSTP) guidelines were developed by our central Office of Physician-Scientist Development (OPSD) after a successful pilot of an integrated research residency program in the Department of Pediatrics [Duke Pediatric Research Scholars (DPRS); Hurst, et al, 2019], which has included 36 resident and fellow scholars over 3 years. To date, eight clinical departments have adopted our PSTP guidelines as part of their R38-supported or pending programs. The OPSD has recently created a tracking database for scholar metrics, which will further promote PSTP development by enabling centralized reporting on scholar success to individual programs. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: PSTP guidelines enable effective implementation of new programs by sharing best practices and lessons learned, standardizing expectations, and defining metrics of success. By promoting proven strategies for integrated clinical and research training, PSTP guidelines may aid in retaining trainees pursuing research careers.


Author(s):  
Michael Nentwich

This chapter deals with the future of scholarly publications as a key element of the knowledge production process of science and research. Publications are both at the input and the output side of knowledge creation and an important means of communication among scientists. In the age of cyberscience, or e-science, the publishing system is changing rapidly and we expect more fundamental changes to come as soon as most scholarly publishing has gone online and researchers have started to explore the new opportunities. A new kind of infrastructure is emerging that will add new actors to the traditional ones and potentially adds new functions and mechanisms. The chapter outlines the status quo and new technological as well as organizational options for scholarly publishing and develops a scenario of the next generation academic publishing system. It concludes with practical recommendations for designing the scholarly e-publishing cyberinfrastructure of the future.


2014 ◽  
Vol 165 (5) ◽  
pp. 882-884.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Cornfield ◽  
Robert Lane ◽  
Norman D. Rosenblum ◽  
Margaret Hostetter ◽  
Alan Jobe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document