Empowering Women as Leaders in Pediatric Anesthesiology: Methodology, Lessons, and Early Outcomes of a National Initiative

2021 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 1497-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie McElrath Schwartz ◽  
Scott D. Markowitz ◽  
Samuel D. Yanofsky ◽  
Sean Tackett ◽  
Laura K. Berenstain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
National Initiative

scholarly journals An innovative intervention to improve respectful maternity care in three Districts in Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Birkety Mengistu ◽  
Haregeweyni Alemu ◽  
Munir Kassa ◽  
Meseret Zelalem ◽  
Mehiret Abate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Maternity Care ◽  
Regression Coefficient ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
The Other ◽  
Respectful Maternity Care ◽  
Experience Of Care ◽  
National Initiative ◽  
Care Training

Abstract Background Mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth is a major violation of human rights and often deters women from attending skilled birth. In Ethiopia, mistreatment occurs in up to 49.4% of mothers giving birth in health facilities. This study describes the development, implementation and results of interventions to improve respectful maternity care. As part of a national initiative to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in Ethiopia, we developed respectful maternity care training module with three core components: testimonial videos developed from key themes identified by staff as experiences of mothers, skills-building sessions on communication and onsite coaching. Respectful maternity care training was conducted in February 2017 in three districts within three regions. Methods Facility level solutions applied to enhance the experience of care were documented. Safe Childbirth Checklist data measuring privacy and birth companion offered during labor and childbirth were collected over 27 months from 17 health centers and three hospitals. Interrupted time series and regression analysis were conducted to assess significance of improvement using secondary routinely collected programmatic data. Results Significant improvement in the percentage of births with two elements of respectful maternal care—privacy and birth companionship offered— was noted in one district (with short and long-term regression coefficient of 18 and 27% respectively), while in the other two districts, results were mixed. The short-term regression coefficient in one of the districts was 26% which was not sustained in the long-term while in the other district the long-term coefficient was 77%. Testimonial videos helped providers to see their care from their clients’ perspectives, while quality improvement training and coaching helped them reflect on potential root causes for this type of treatment and develop effective solutions. This includes organizing tour to the birthing ward and allowing cultural celebrations. Conclusion This study demonstrated effective way of improving respectful maternity care. Use of a multipronged approach, where the respectful maternity care intervention was embedded in quality improvement approach helped in enhancing respectful maternity care in a comprehensive manner.

Are Communities Willing to Transition Into Learning Health Care Communities? A Community-Based Participatory Evaluation of Stakeholders’ Receptivity

2021 ◽  
pp. 104973232199864
Author(s):  
Nabil Natafgi ◽  
Olayinka Ladeji ◽  
Yoon Duk Hong ◽  
Jacqueline Caldwell ◽  
C. Daniel Mullins
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Community Members ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Care Experience ◽  
National Initiative

This article aims to determine receptivity for advancing the Learning Healthcare System (LHS) model to a novel evidence-based health care delivery framework—Learning Health Care Community (LHCC)—in Baltimore, as a model for a national initiative. Using community-based participatory, qualitative approach, we conducted 16 in-depth interviews and 15 focus groups with 94 participants. Two independent coders thematically analyzed the transcripts. Participants included community members (38%), health care professionals (29%), patients (26%), and other stakeholders (7%). The majority considered LHCC to be a viable model for improving the health care experience, outlining certain parameters for success such as the inclusion of home visits, presentation of research evidence, and incorporation of social determinants and patients’ input. Lessons learned and challenges discussed by participants can help health systems and communities explore the LHCC aspiration to align health care delivery with an engaged, empowered, and informed community.

TRUU-Lab: Methods for Optimizing Test Names for Understanding and Utilization

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S120-S121
Author(s):  
J Wang ◽  
E Garnett ◽  
I Singh ◽  
C Bierl ◽  
B Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Identity Development ◽  
Laboratory Test ◽  
Guideline Development ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Current Test ◽  
Adoption And Implementation ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
National Initiative

Abstract Introduction/Objective Poor understandability of laboratory test names increases the risk for inappropriate test utilization and medical errors. Yet, human understandability has not been a major consideration in existing laboratory test names or naming guidelines. TRUU-Lab (Test Renaming for Understanding and Utilization for Laboratory Test Names) is a national initiative that now has more than 45 members representing more than 20 academic and industry organizations, the CDC, and the FDA. The goals of the initiative include: 1) Identify root causes and challenges in understanding and using laboratory test names; 2) Share resources related to potential solutions; 3) Develop consensus guidelines for laboratory test naming; 4) Establish consensus names for existing laboratory tests; and 5) Promote the adoption and implementation of consensus laboratory test names. Methods We previously addressed the first two goals of this initiative by identifying problematic test names and features of test names that contribute to misutilization. We also identified the advantages and limitations of current test naming guidelines and previous standardization efforts. This current study addresses goals 3 and 4. We developed an iterative process of guideline development. This process includes collecting feedback on consensus names to improve guidelines, which then informs the improvement of the consensus names. Results By analyzing test name characteristics, we found that the requirements for understandability vary with respect to the clinical scenario and provider background. We have used these results to design a 30-min long survey to test candidate names. The survey will be distributed through the Brand Institute, which offers expertise in pharmaceutical name and brand identity development. This pilot survey will be sent to primary care providers to assesses intuitive name preferences given a short and specific prompt. The second phase will take place in a simulated electronic medical record environment to present clinical scenarios where physicians will select an appropriate test. Conclusion We expect that results from survey studies will directly inform the development of TRUU-Lab naming guidelines, in turn permitting development of better-optimized laboratory test names. This process represents a new strategy for the intentional design of laboratory test names that are understandable and promote correct provider utilization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document