Brain Metastasis

Neurosurgery ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 617-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry Black

Abstract An overview of brain metastasis with respect to the pathological, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects is presented. Management is almost always palliative, with cure being a rare exception. Evaluation of various therapeutic modalities—radiation, chemotherapy, or surgery—has been confounded by a lack of controlled, randomized studies whereby the relative benefit of the respective modalities can be assessed objectively. Despite these limitations, some progress is being made in the identification of those patients for whom therapy is likely to be of benefit. Apart from the use of steroids to control cerebral edema, radiotherapy is currently the most commonly employed therapeutic modality for cerebral metastasis. It is the treatment of choice for multiple intracranial metastases and it affords temporary improvement in neurological symptoms in about 60% of patients. For solitary metastases, combined therapy—surgical excision followed by whole brain radiotherapy—has been shown to result in a better quality and longer duration of survival than either modality alone. Except for patients who are terminally ill, aggressive treatment seems warranted, inasmuch as therapeutic results have been improving steadily over the years. Neither chemotherapy nor immunotherapy has been shown to be of benefit in the management of cerebral metastasis. An exception is choriocarcinoma, which responds well to a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Although the prognosis for meningeal carcinomatosis is poor, improved survival may be achieved by a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. These are recommended guidelines for surgical intervention, usually followed by radiotherapy: (a) In general, surgical excision is recommended only for patients with relatively superficial, solitary lesions. It is reasonable, however, to consider the excision of a metastatic lesion that is immediately life-threatening or incapacitating, even though one or more other metastatic brain lesions may be present. This may be extended to the removal of multiple metastatic brain tumors if they are surgically accessible. (b) The second consideration is whether the primary tumor can or has been treated or if the primary tumor will permit reasonably long survival. (c) There should not be metastases elsewhere in the body, although their presence should not categorically exclude the patient as a surgical candidate. (d) The patient's general condition should be satisfactory. (e) Operation is recommended if the diagnosis of the intracranial lesion is uncertain. (f) A shunt should be considered for treatment of hydrocephalus secondary to obstruction of the cerebrospinal fluid pathway by tumor or edema.

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ettie Piura ◽  
Benjamin Piura

This paper will focus on knowledge related to brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma. To date, 115 cases were documented in the literature with an incidence of 0.6% among endometrial carcinoma patients. The endometrial carcinoma was usually an advanced-stage and high-grade tumor. In most patients (~90%), brain metastasis was detected after diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma with a median interval from diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma to diagnosis of brain metastases of 17 months. Brain metastasis from endometrial carcinoma was either an isolated disease limited to the brain only (~50%) or part of a disseminated disease involving also other parts of the body (~50%). Most often, brain metastasis from endometrial carcinoma affected the cerebrum (~75%) and was solitary (~60%). The median survival after diagnosis of brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma was 5 months; however, a significantly better survival was achieved with multimodal therapy including surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and/or chemotherapy compared to WBRT alone. It is suggested that brain imaging studies should be considered in the routine follow up of patients with endometrial carcinoma and that the search for a primary source in females with brain metastases of unknown primary should include endometrial biopsy.


Author(s):  
YEOH RUDIYO ◽  
JAPARDI ISKANDAR ◽  
LELO AZNAN ◽  
SUSWORO SUSWORO ◽  
PANDELAKI JACUB ◽  
...  

Objective: Breast cancer is the second most frequent cancer worldwide. The main therapeutic modality for breast cancer with brain metastasis is radiation. Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) is a regional treatment that provides moderate doses of radiotherapy to all brain tissue. Capecitabine was found to be effective for the treatment of breast cancer with metastasis. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of WBRT on the response of breast cancer brain metastatic lesions combined with capecitabine administration. Methods: This study uses a prospective, randomized-blind cohort analytic study approach. Subjects were randomized into two groups by giving different fraction of WBRT and capecitabine. Subjects were evaluated 4 w post-radiation. Data on differences in patient responses in the two treatment groups were analyzed. Results: A total of 23 breast cancer patients with brain metastasis participated in this study. Group I (WBRT 10x3Gy + capecitabine 1000 mg/m2/b.i.d) obtained results of 5 (45.5%) out of 11 are responding to therapy. Whereas in group II (WBRT 20x2Gy + capecitabine1000 mg/m2/b.i.d) found 11 (91.7%) out of 12 patients responded to therapy. The results of statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences between the two groups with a value of P = 0.027. Conclusion: Giving capecitabine and WBRT with 20x2Gy gives a better response both clinically and statistically


Author(s):  
Yukinori Okada ◽  
Mariko Kobayashi ◽  
Mio Shinozaki ◽  
Tatsuyuki Abe ◽  
Naoki Nakamura

Abstract Aim: To identify prognostic factors and investigate patient survival after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for initial brain metastases arising from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 1 January 2010 and 30 September 2019, and who received WBRT upon first developing a brain metastasis, were investigated. Overall survival was determined as related to age, sex, duration between initial examination and brain metastasis detection, stage at the first examination, presence of metastases outside the brain, blood analysis findings, brain metastasis symptoms, radiotherapy dose and completion, imaging findings, therapeutic course of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, histological type, and gene mutation status. Results: Thirty-one consecutive patients (20 men and 11 women) with a mean age of 63·8 years and median survival of 129 days were included. Multivariate analysis with stepwise testing was performed to investigate differences in survival according to gene mutation status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, irradiation dose, WBRT completion and Stage status. Of these, a statistically significant difference in survival was observed in patients with gene mutation status (hazard ratio: 0·31, 95% CI: 0·11–0·86, p = 0·025), LDH levels <230 vs. ≥230 IU/L (hazard ratio: 4·08, 95% CI: 1·45–11·5, p < 0·01) received 30 Gy, 30 Gy/10 fractions to 35 Gy/14 fractions, and 37·5 Gy/15 fractions (hazard ratio: 0·26, 95% CI: 0·09–0·71, p < 0·01), and stage IV versus non-stage IV (hazard ratio: 0·13, 95 CI:0·02–0·64, p < 0·01) Findings: Gene mutation, LDH, radiation dose and Stage are prognostic factors for patients with initial brain metastases who are treated with WBRT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document