Complications of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Trauma Patients

Neurosurgery ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig W. Clark ◽  
Michael S. Muhlbauer ◽  
Robbie Lowrey ◽  
Michael Hartman ◽  
Morris W. Ray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Concurrent Infection ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Related Literature

Abstract A retrospective review of 175 intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors placed in 140 trauma patients over a recent 3-year period showed a 10.3% infection rate. Factors that were related to the development of an ICP monitor-related infection included: 1) duration of monitoring; 2) requirement for serial monitors; and 3) concurrent infection at other sites. These findings are discussed in light of the related literature concerning ICP monitoring and recommendations made to decrease the incidence of infection-related complications.

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring

1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-160
Author(s):  
Therese S. Richmond
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Evaluation Of Care ◽  
Planning Intervention

Intracranial pressure monitoring (ICP) is a technology that assists critical care nurses in the assessment, planning, intervention, and evaluation of care. The physiologic basis of intracranial hypertension (ICH) and ICP monitoring are reviewed. Types of monitors arc described. Advantages, disadvantages, and complications of fluid-filled versus fiberoptic systems are explored. Priorities in nursing care of the patient with an ICP monitor are examined

scholarly journals Study of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring In Traumatic Brain Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Nilam Khadka ◽  
Rajan Kumar Sharma ◽  
Rajiv Jha ◽  
Prakash Bista
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Fiber Optic ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Monitoring Modality

Intracranial pressure monitoring is considered the standard of care for severe traumatic brain injury and is used frequently. However, the efficacy of treatment based on monitoring in improving the outcome has not been rigorously assessed. We conducted a trial in which we included 26 patients of all types of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and they were monitored for intracranial pressure by Conventional fluid filled system with a manometer (Group 1) and compared with the Fiber optic transducer-tipped intracranial pressure monitoring system (Group 2).The main aim of this study was to examine the relationship between Intracranial Pressure (ICP) monitoring and in-hospital mortality. The median length of stay in the ICU was similar in the two groups (12 days in the conventional pressure-monitoring group and 9 days in the new fiber optic group; P=0.25), the number of days of brain-specific treatments (e.g., administration of hyperosmolar fluids and the use of hyperventilation) in the ICU was similar in both groups. The distribution of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. We concluded that ICP monitoring (as is any monitoring modality) is a useful guide for management. The outcomes are decided by the differences in management protocols that the knowledge of the said parameter brings about. ICP monitoring is recommended for the better management of traumatic brain injury and fiber optic ICP monitoring seems to be beneficial than using the conventional methods of ICP monitoring with manometer.Nepal Journal of Neuroscience, Volume 15, Number 2, 2018, page: 23-29

scholarly journals Impact of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring on Mortality in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A K Ali ◽  
A E Abdelbar ◽  
A R Farghaly ◽  
M K A Uthman
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity

Abstract Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is among the most important public health problems associated with high healthcare and social burden and significant mortality and morbidity. Overall low income countries have the highest TBI associated mortality and morbidity. Aim of the Work Some studies have demonstrated that intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring reduces the mortality of traumatic brain injury (TBI). But other studies have shown that ICP monitoring is associated with increased mortality. Patients and Methods Systematic review of Published English literature from 2000 to 2017. Using appropriate combinations of MeSH terms and key words, including intracranial pressure, intracranial hypertension, ICP monitor, intracranial pressure monitoring, TBI traumatic brain injury, and craniocerebral trauma. Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, mortality. We performed this relatively wide search to include the maximum number of relevant patients. Results In total, 2552 studies were identified and screened for retrieval using the strategy described above. After careening the title and abstract, 1968 studies were excluded and 554 were retrieved and subjected to detailed evaluations. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 527 of those studies were excluded, and thus 27 studies were included in the systematic review. All included studies were published, peer-previewed papers. Conclusion ICP monitoring may play a role in decreasing the rate of electrolyte disturbances, rate of renal failure, and increasing favorable functional outcome. However, there was no significant effect for reducing the risk of hospital mortality, lowering occurrence rate of pulmonary infection, use of mechanical ventilation and duration of hospital stays. RCTs with larger sample size are necessary to further support the current results.

scholarly journals Highlighting intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe acute brain trauma

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 (3a) ◽  
pp. 390-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio L. E Falcão ◽  
Venâncio P. Dantas Filho ◽  
Luiz A. C. Sardinha ◽  
Elizabeth M. A. B. Quagliato ◽  
Desanka Dragosavac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Glasgow Coma Scale ◽  
Brain Trauma ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Focal Lesions ◽  
Coma Scale

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring was carried out in 100 patients with severe acute brain trauma, primarily by means of a subarachnoid catheter. Statistical associations were evaluated between maximum ICP values and: 1) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores; 2) findings on computed tomography (CT) scans of the head; and 3) mortality. A significant association was found between low GCS scores (3 to 5) and high ICP levels, as well as between focal lesions on CT scans and elevated ICP. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with ICP > 40 mm Hg than in those with ICP < 20 mm Hg.

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2018 ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Thomas Peponis ◽  
David R. King
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Neuropsychological Status

The study “A Trial of Intracranial-Pressure Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury” published by Chesnut et al. aimed to resolve the debatable issue of the benefit of intracranial-pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The authors designed a randomized controlled trial that was conducted in Latin America. A total of 324 patients admitted with severe TBI were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group (n = 157) was managed with ICP monitoring, using an intraparenchymal monitor. The goal was to keep the ICP below 20 mm Hg. Management of patients comprising the second group (n = 167) was based solely on serial clinical examinations and imaging tests. It was hypothesized that ICP-monitoring would result in increased survival rates, plus improved functional and neuropsychological status at 6-months after the injury. Additionally, the authors hypothesized that complication rates would be decreased and the ICU length of stay shorter.

scholarly journals Non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and lumbar puncture in pediatric patient: Case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 493
Author(s):  
Thomas Markus Dhaese ◽  
Leonardo C. Welling ◽  
Alice Magro Kosciasnki ◽  
Gustavo Frigeri ◽  
Judy Auada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Lumbar Puncture ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Non Invasive

Background: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has been variously explored as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in many pathological conditions leading neurological injury. This monitoring standardly depends on an invasive procedure such as cranial or lumbar catheterization. The gold standard for ICP monitoring is through an intraventricular catheter, but this invasive technique is associated with certain risks such as haemorrhage and infection. (1) Also, it is a high-cost procedure and consequently not available in a variety of underprivileged places and clinical situations in which intracranial hypertension is prevalent (3). An accurate non-invasive and low-priced method to measure elevated ICP would therefore be desirable. Under these circumstances, Brazilian scientists developed a non-invasive method for intracranial pressure monitoring (ICP-NI), which uses an electric resistance extensometer that measures micro deformations of the skull and transforms it into an electrical signal. In this case report, the authors describe a pediatrician patient with the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension who was successfully submitted to a lumbar puncture under monitorization with this device. Case description: 7 year old girl with progressive symptoms that lead to the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. The patient was submitted to a lumbar punction with continuous non-invasive ICP monitoring. Conclusion: Estimating ICP (non-invasive) from LP monitoring (invasive) often reflect inaccurate ICP results, and affects negatively on IIH diagnosis and a non-invasive diagnostic method could reduce the requirement for invasive approaches, improving patient health outcomes.

Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in trauma patients

Neurosurgery ◽  
1989 ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
W C Clark ◽  
M S Muhlbauer ◽  
R Lowrey ◽  
M Hartman ◽  
M W Ray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Pressure Monitoring

Correlation Between Computed Tomography and Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Acute Head Trauma Patients

Radiology ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 507-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay K. Sadhu ◽  
Jerry Sampson ◽  
Floyd L. Haar ◽  
Richard S. Pinto ◽  
Stanley F. Handel
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Head Trauma ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Pressure Monitoring

scholarly journals Prognostic significance of intracranial pressure monitoring and intracranial hypertension in severe brain trauma patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 461-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Kostic ◽  
Ivan Stefanovic ◽  
Vesna Novak ◽  
Dragan Veselinovic ◽  
Goran Ivanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Brain Trauma ◽  
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Significant Difference

Since without prospective randomized studies it is not possible to have a clear attitude towards the importance of intracranial pressure monitoring, this study was aimed at examining the prognostic effect of the intracranial pressure monitoring and intracranial pressure oriented therapy in severe brain trauma patients, and at defining optimal intracranial pressure values for starting the treatment. Two groups of patients were treated in the study, one consisted of 32 patients undergoing intracranial pressure monitoring and the second group of 29 patients without intracranial pressure monitoring in the control group. The study was prospective with groups randomized. There were 53% survivals in the intracranial pressure monitored patients and 34% in the control group, with no significant difference in the survival rate between the two groups (?2=2.11; p=0.15; p>0.05). The average intracranial pressure in the patients with intracranial hypertension who died was 27 mm Hg, while in the patients who survived the average intracranial pressure was significantly lower (Student?s t test: t=2.91; p=0.008; p<0.01) and it was 18 mm Hg. We recommend starting intracranial pressure oriented therapy when the patient?s intracranial pressure exceeds 18 mmHg during 2 hours of monitoring.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document