scholarly journals Tgf  signaling acts on a Hox response element to confer specificity and diversity to Hox protein function

Development ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 130 (22) ◽  
pp. 5445-5455 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grienenberger
PLoS Genetics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e1002302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Merabet ◽  
Isma Litim-Mecheri ◽  
Daniel Karlsson ◽  
Richa Dixit ◽  
Mehdi Saadaoui ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 316
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Saurin ◽  
Marie Claire Delfini ◽  
Corinne Maurel-Zaffran ◽  
Yacine Graba
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 7509-7522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-fang Shen ◽  
Keerthi Krishnan ◽  
H. J. Lawrence ◽  
Corey Largman

ABSTRACT Despite the identification of PBC proteins as cofactors that provide DNA affinity and binding specificity for the HOX homeodomain proteins, HOX proteins do not demonstrate robust activity in transient-transcription assays and few authentic downstream targets have been identified for these putative transcription factors. During a search for additional cofactors, we established that each of the 14 HOX proteins tested, from 11 separate paralog groups, binds to CBP or p300. All six isolated homeodomain fragments tested bind to CBP, suggesting that the homeodomain is a common site of interaction. Surprisingly, CBP-p300 does not form DNA binding complexes with the HOX proteins but instead prevents their binding to DNA. The HOX proteins are not substrates for CBP histone acetyltransferase (HAT) but instead inhibit the activity of CBP in both in vitro and in vivo systems. These mutually inhibitory interactions are reflected by the inability of CBP to potentiate the low levels of gene activation induced by HOX proteins in a range of reporter assays. We propose two models for HOX protein function: (i) HOX proteins may function without CBP HAT to regulate transcription as cooperative DNA binding molecules with PBX, MEIS, or other cofactors, and (ii) the HOX proteins may inhibit CBP HAT activity and thus function as repressors of gene transcription.


BioEssays ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 500-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Merabet ◽  
Bruno Hudry ◽  
Mehdi Saadaoui ◽  
Yacine Graba

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (15) ◽  
pp. 3303-3312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Ch'ng ◽  
C. Kenyon

Hox genes pattern the fates of the ventral ectodermal Pn.p cells that lie along the anteroposterior (A/P) body axis of C. elegans. In these cells, the Hox genes are expressed in sequential overlapping domains where they control the ability of each Pn.p cell to fuse with the surrounding syncytial epidermis. The activities of Hox proteins are sex-specific in this tissue, resulting in sex-specific patterns of cell fusion: in hermaphrodites, the mid-body cells remain unfused, whereas in males, alternating domains of syncytial and unfused cells develop. We have found that the gene egl-27, which encodes a C. elegans homologue of a chromatin regulatory factor, specifies these patterns by regulating both Hox gene expression and Hox protein function. In egl-27 mutants, the expression domains of Hox genes in these cells are shifted posteriorly, suggesting that egl-27 influences A/P positional information. In addition, egl-27 controls Hox protein function in the Pn.p cells in two ways: in hermaphrodites it inhibits MAB-5 activity, whereas in males it permits a combinatorial interaction between LIN-39 and MAB-5. Thus, by selectively modifying the activities of Hox proteins, egl-27 elaborates a simple Hox expression pattern into complex patterns of cell fates. Taken together, these results implicate egl-27 in the diversification of cell fates along the A/P axis and suggest that chromatin reorganization is necessary for controlling Hox gene expression and Hox protein function.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. ii27-ii27
Author(s):  
T. Brend ◽  
Z. Kelly ◽  
M. Ajaz ◽  
R. Morgan ◽  
H. Pandha ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gabriela Poliacikova ◽  
Corinne Maurel-Zaffran ◽  
Yacine Graba ◽  
Andrew J. Saurin

Hox genes encode evolutionary conserved transcription factors that specify the anterior–posterior axis in all bilaterians. Being well known for their role in patterning ectoderm-derivatives, such as CNS and spinal cord, Hox protein function is also crucial in mesodermal patterning. While well described in the case of the vertebrate skeleton, much less is known about Hox functions in the development of different muscle types. In contrast to vertebrates however, studies in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, have provided precious insights into the requirement of Hox at multiple stages of the myogenic process. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of Hox protein function in Drosophila and vertebrate muscle development, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms underlying target gene regulation in this process. Emphasizing a tight ectoderm/mesoderm cross talk for proper locomotion, we discuss shared principles between CNS and muscle lineage specification and the emerging role of Hox in neuromuscular circuit establishment.


2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 2237-2245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda F. Mower ◽  
David S. Liao ◽  
Eric J. Nestler ◽  
Rachael L. Neve ◽  
Ary S. Ramoa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document