scholarly journals Pharmacological inactivation of the endothelin type A receptor in the early chick embryo: a model of mispatterning of the branchial arch derivatives

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (24) ◽  
pp. 4931-4941 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kempf ◽  
C. Linares ◽  
P. Corvol ◽  
J.M. Gasc
Keyword(s):  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Type A ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
In Ovo ◽  
Time Of Application ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Eta Receptor ◽  
Temporal Expression Pattern ◽  
High Level

In the present study, we have applied an antagonist treatment to the chick embryo in ovo in order to demonstrate and dissect the essential roles of the endothelin type A (ETA) receptor in the embryonic development. We have cloned, sequenced and expressed the cDNA of the chick ETA receptor and shown that its affinity for endothelin antagonists is very similar to that shown by its mammalian counterparts. We have studied the spatio-temporal expression pattern of this receptor by in situ hybridization and shown that there is a high level of its mRNA within the mesenchyme of the branchial arches at E3-E5, in keeping with the direct effect of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on the fate of this region of the embryo. Unlike the endothelin type B (ETB) receptor mRNA, ETA mRNA is not expressed in neural crest cells during emigration from the neural tube, but is detected in neural crest-derived ectomesenchyme of the branchial arches. Finally, the functional involvement of this receptor in craniofacial and cardiovascular organogenesis was assessed by selectively inactivating the ETA receptor with specific antagonists applied during the time period corresponding to the expression of the ETA receptor and colonisation of the branchial arches. Embryos treated by these antagonists show a severe reduction and dysmorphogenesis of the hypobranchial skeleton, as well as heart and aortic arch derivative defects. This phenotype is very similar to that obtained in mice by gene inactivations of ET-1 and ETA. These results are observed with ETA antagonists but not with an ETB antagonist, and are dependent on the dose of the antagonists used and on the time of application to the embryo. Altogether, these data strongly show that the ET-1/ETA pathway, in chicken as in mammals, is a major factor involved directly and functionally in morphogenesis of the face and heart. This experimental model of pharmacological inactivation of a gene product described in this study offers a simple and rapid alternative to gene inactivation in mouse. This strategy can be applied to other ligand-receptor systems and extended to compounds of various chemical and functional natures.

Jaw and branchial arch mutants in zebrafish I: branchial arches

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 329-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
T. Piotrowski ◽  
H. Grandel ◽  
M. Brand ◽  
C.P. Heisenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Zebrafish Embryo ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Pigment Cells ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Pectoral Fins ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Group Members ◽  
The Brain

Jaws and branchial arches together are a basic, segmented feature of the vertebrate head. Seven arches develop in the zebrafish embryo (Danio rerio), derived largely from neural crest cells that form the cartilaginous skeleton. In this and the following paper we describe the phenotypes of 109 arch mutants, focusing here on three classes that affect the posterior pharyngeal arches, including the hyoid and five gill-bearing arches. In lockjaw, the hyoid arch is strongly reduced and subsets of branchial arches do not develop. Mutants of a large second class, designated the flathead group, lack several adjacent branchial arches and their associated cartilages. Five alleles at the flathead locus all lead to larvae that lack arches 4–6. Among 34 other flathead group members complementation tests are incomplete, but at least six unique phenotypes can be distinguished. These all delete continuous stretches of adjacent branchial arches and unpaired cartilages in the ventral midline. Many show cell death in the midbrain, from which some neural crest precursors of the arches originate. lockjaw and a few mutants in the flathead group, including pistachio, affect both jaw cartilage and pigmentation, reflecting essential functions of these genes in at least two neural crest lineages. Mutants of a third class, including boxer, dackel and pincher, affect pectoral fins and axonal trajectories in the brain, as well as the arches. Their skeletal phenotypes suggest that they disrupt cartilage morphogenesis in all arches. Our results suggest that there are sets of genes that: (1) specify neural crest cells in groups of adjacent head segments, and (2) function in common genetic pathways in a variety of tissues including the brain, pectoral fins and pigment cells as well as pharyngeal arches.

scholarly journals Transcriptome profiling of the branchial arches reveals cell type composition and a conserved signature of neural crest cell invasion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A Morrison ◽  
Rebecca McLennan ◽  
Jessica M Teddy ◽  
Allison R Scott ◽  
Jennifer C Kasemeier-Kulesa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Invasion ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Tissue Growth ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Label Free ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Mesoderm Cell ◽  
Branchial Arches

ABSTRACTThe vertebrate branchial arches that give rise to structures of the head, neck, and heart form with very dynamic tissue growth and well-choreographed neural crest, ectoderm, and mesoderm cell dynamics. Although this morphogenesis has been studied by marker expression and fate-mapping, the mechanisms that control the collective migration and diversity of the neural crest and surrounding tissues remain unclear, in part due to the effects of averaging and need for cell isolation in conventional transcriptome analysis experiments of multiple cell populations. We used label free single cell RNA sequencing on 95,000 individual cells at 2 developmental stages encompassing formation of the first four chick branchial arches to measure the transcriptional states that define the cellular hierarchy and invasion signature of the migrating neural crest. The results confirmed basic features of cell type diversity and led to the discovery of many novel markers that discriminate between axial level and distal-to-proximal cell populations within the branchial arches and neural crest streams. We identified the transcriptional signature of the most invasive neural crest that is conserved within each branchial arch stream and elucidated a set of genes common to other cell invasion signatures in types in cancer, wound healing and development. These data robustly delineate molecularly distinct cell types within the branchial arches and identify important molecular transitions within the migrating neural crest during development.

scholarly journals In ovo time-lapse analysis of chick hindbrain neural crest cell migration shows cell interactions during migration to the branchial arches

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 1161-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.M. Kulesa ◽  
S.E. Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Otic Vesicle ◽  
In Ovo ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Neural Crest Cell Migration ◽  
Crest Cell ◽  
Cell Cell

Hindbrain neural crest cells were labeled with DiI and followed in ovo using a new approach for long-term time-lapse confocal microscopy. In ovo imaging allowed us to visualize neural crest cell migration 2–3 times longer than in whole embryo explant cultures, providing a more complete picture of the dynamics of cell migration from emergence at the dorsal midline to entry into the branchial arches. There were aspects of the in ovo neural crest cell migration patterning which were new and different. Surprisingly, there was contact between neural crest cell migration streams bound for different branchial arches. This cell-cell contact occurred in the region lateral to the otic vesicle, where neural crest cells within the distinct streams diverted from their migration pathways into the branchial arches and instead migrated around the otic vesicle to establish a contact between streams. Some individual neural crest cells did appear to cross between the streams, but there was no widespread mixing. Analysis of individual cell trajectories showed that neural crest cells emerge from all rhombomeres (r) and sort into distinct exiting streams adjacent to the even-numbered rhombomeres. Neural crest cell migration behaviors resembled the wide diversity seen in whole embryo chick explants, including chain-like cell arrangements; however, average in ovo cell speeds are as much as 70% faster. To test to what extent neural crest cells from adjoining rhombomeres mix along migration routes and within the branchial arches, separate groups of premigratory neural crest cells were labeled with DiI or DiD. Results showed that r6 and r7 neural crest cells migrated to the same spatial location within the fourth branchial arch. The diversity of migration behaviors suggests that no single mechanism guides in ovo hindbrain neural crest cell migration into the branchial arches. The cell-cell contact between migration streams and the co-localization of neural crest cells from adjoining rhombomeres within a single branchial arch support the notion that the pattern of hindbrain neural crest cell migration emerges dynamically with cell-cell communication playing an important guidance role.

A signaling cascade involving endothelin-1, dHAND and msx1 regulates development of neural-crest-derived branchial arch mesenchyme

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (16) ◽  
pp. 3005-3014 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Thomas ◽  
H. Kurihara ◽  
H. Yamagishi ◽  
Y. Kurihara ◽  
Y. Yazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Abnormal Development ◽  
Cardiac Defects ◽  
Endothelin 1 ◽  
The Third ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Catch 22

Numerous human syndromes are the result of abnormal cranial neural crest development. One group of such defects, referred to as CATCH-22 (cardiac defects, abnormal facies, thymic hypoplasia, cleft palate, hypocalcemia, associated with chromosome 22 microdeletion) syndrome, exhibit craniofacial and cardiac defects resulting from abnormal development of the third and fourth neural crest-derived branchial arches and branchial arch arteries. Mice harboring a null mutation of the endothelin-1 gene (Edn1), which is expressed in the epithelial layer of the branchial arches and encodes for the endothelin-1 (ET-1) signaling peptide, have a phenotype similar to CATCH-22 syndrome with aortic arch defects and craniofacial abnormalities. Here we show that the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, dHAND, is expressed in the mesenchyme underlying the branchial arch epithelium. Further, dHAND and the related gene, eHAND, are downregulated in the branchial and aortic arches of Edn1-null embryos. In mice homozygous null for the dHAND gene, the first and second arches are hypoplastic secondary to programmed cell death and the third and fourth arches fail to form. Molecular analysis revealed that most markers of the neural-crest-derived components of the branchial arch are expressed in dHAND-null embryos, suggesting normal migration of neural crest cells. However, expression of the homeobox gene, Msx1, was undetectable in the mesenchyme of dHAND-null branchial arches but unaffected in the limb bud, consistent with the separable regulatory elements of Msx1 previously described. Together, these data suggest a model in which epithelial secretion of ET-1 stimulates mesenchymal expression of dHAND, which regulates Msx1 expression in the growing, distal branchial arch. Complete disruption of this molecular pathway results in growth failure of the branchial arches from apoptosis, while partial disruption leads to defects of branchial arch derivatives, similar to those seen in CATCH-22 syndrome.

scholarly journals Rhombomere rotation reveals that multiple mechanisms contribute to the segmental pattern of hindbrain neural crest migration

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (7) ◽  
pp. 1777-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sechrist ◽  
T. Scherson ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Otic Vesicle ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Migratory Pattern ◽  
Neural Crest Migration ◽  
Surgical Manipulation ◽  
Otic Vesicles

Hindbrain neural crest cells adjacent to rhombomeres 2 (r2), r4 and r6 migrate in a segmental pattern, toward the first, second and third branchial arches, respectively. Although all rhombomeres generate neural crest cells, those arising from r3 and r5 deviate rostrally and caudally (J. Sechrist, G. Serbedzija, T. Scherson, S. Fraser and M. Bronner-Fraser (1993) Development 118, 691–703). We have altered the rostrocaudal positions of the cranial neural tube, adjacent ectoderm/mesoderm or presumptive otic vesicle to examine tissue influences on this segmental migratory pattern. After neural tube rotation, labeled neural crest cells follow pathways generally appropriate for their new position after grafting. For example, when r3 and r4 were transposed, labeled r3 cells migrated laterally to the second branchial arch whereas labeled r4 cells primarily deviated caudally toward the second arch, with some cells moving rostrally toward the first. In contrast to r4 neural crest cells, transposed r3 cells leave the neural tube surface in a polarized manner, near the r3/4 border. Surprisingly, some labeled neural crest cells moved directionally toward small ectopic otic vesicles that often formed in the ectoderm adjacent to grafted r4. Similarly, they moved toward grafted or displaced otic vesicles. In contrast, surgical manipulation of the mesoderm adjacent to r3 and r4 had no apparent effects. Our results offer evidence that neural crest cells migrate directionally toward the otic vesicle, either by selective attraction or pathway-derived cues.

Homeotic transformation of branchial arch identity after Hoxa2 overexpression

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (24) ◽  
pp. 5355-5365 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Grammatopoulos ◽  
E. Bell ◽  
L. Toole ◽  
A. Lumsden ◽  
A.S. Tucker
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Reverse Transformation ◽  
Surrounding Tissue ◽  
Homeotic Transformation ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Arch Neural

Overexpression of Hoxa2 in the chick first branchial arch leads to a transformation of first arch cartilages, such as Meckel's and the quadrate, into second arch elements, such as the tongue skeleton. These duplicated elements are fused to the original in a similar manner to that seen in the Hoxa2 knockout, where the reverse transformation of second to first arch morphology is observed. This confirms the role of Hoxa2 as a selector gene specifying second arch fate. When first arch neural crest alone is targeted, first arch elements are lost, but the Hoxa2-expressing crest is unable to develop into second arch elements. This is not due to Hoxa2 preventing differentiation of cartilages. Upregulation of a second arch marker in the first arch, and homeotic transformation of cartilage elements is only produced after global Hoxa2 overexpression in the crest and the surrounding tissue. Thus, although the neural crest appears to contain some patterning information, it needs to read cues from the environment to form a coordinated pattern. Hoxa2 appears to exert its effect during differentiation of the cartilage elements in the branchial arches, rather than during crest migration, implying that pattern is determined quite late in development.

scholarly journals Analysis of cranial neural crest migratory pathways in axolotl using cell markers and transplantation

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (12) ◽  
pp. 2751-2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Epperlein ◽  
D. Meulemans ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser ◽  
H. Steinbeisser ◽  
M.A. Selleck
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Trunk Neural Crest ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Random Nature

We have examined the ability of normal and heterotopically transplanted neural crest cells to migrate along cranial neural crest pathways in the axolotl using focal DiI injections and in situ hybridization with the neural crest marker, AP-2. DiI labeling demonstrates that cranial neural crest cells migrate as distinct streams along prescribed pathways to populate the maxillary and mandibular processes of the first branchial arch, the hyoid arch and gill arches 1–4, following migratory pathways similar to those observed in other vertebrates. Another neural crest marker, the transcription factor AP-2, is expressed by premigratory neural crest cells within the neural folds and migrating neural crest cells en route to and within the branchial arches. Rotations of the cranial neural folds suggest that premigratory neural crest cells are not committed to a specific branchial arch fate, but can compensate when displaced short distances from their targets by migrating to a new target arch. In contrast, when cells are displaced far from their original location, they appear unable to respond appropriately to their new milieu such that they fail to migrate or appear to migrate randomly. When trunk neural folds are grafted heterotopically into the head, trunk neural crest cells migrate in a highly disorganized fashion and fail to follow normal cranial neural crest pathways. Importantly, we find incorporation of some trunk cells into branchial arch cartilage despite the random nature of their migration. This is the first demonstration that trunk neural crest cells can form cartilage when transplanted to the head. Our results indicate that, although cranial and trunk neural crest cells have inherent differences in ability to recognize migratory pathways, trunk neural crest can differentiate into cranial cartilage when given proper instructive cues.

scholarly journals GnRH Neuronal Migration and Olfactory Bulb Neurite Outgrowth Are Dependent on FGF Receptor 1 Signaling, Specifically via the PI3K p110α Isoform in Chick Embryo

Endocrinology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 388-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youli Hu ◽  
Subathra Poopalasundaram ◽  
Anthony Graham ◽  
Pierre-Marc Bouloux
Keyword(s):  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Olfactory Bulb ◽  
Neurite Outgrowth ◽  
Neuronal Migration ◽  
Glycogen Synthase ◽  
Kallmann Syndrome ◽  
Pi3k Inhibitor ◽  
Fgf Signaling ◽  
In Ovo ◽  
Fgf Receptor

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling is essential for both olfactory bulb (OB) morphogenesis and the specification, migration, and maturation of the GnRH-secreting neurons. Disruption of FGF signaling contributes to Kallmann syndrome characterized by both anosmia and sexual immaturity. However, several unanswered questions remain as to which specific FGF receptor (FGFR)-1 signaling pathways are necessary for OB and GnRH neuronal development. Here, using pharmacological phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) isoform-specific inhibitors, we demonstrate a central role for the PI3K p110α isoform as a downstream effector of FGFR1 signaling for both GnRH neuronal migration and OB development. We show that signaling via the PI3K p110α isoform is required for GnRH neuronal migration in explant cultures of embryonic day (E) 4 chick olfactory placodes. We also show that in ovo administration of LY294002, a global PI3K inhibitor as well as an inhibitor to the PI3K p110α isoform into the olfactory placode of E3 chick embryo impairs GnRH neuronal migration toward the forebrain. In contrast, in ovo PI3K inhibitor treatment produced no obvious defects on primary olfactory sensory neuron axonal targeting and bundle formation. We also demonstrate that anosmin-1 and FGF2 induced neuronal migration of immortalized human embryonic GnRH neuroblast cells (FNC-B4-hTERT) is mediated by modulating FGFR1 signaling via the PI3K p110α isoform, specifically through phosphorylation of the PI3K downstream effectors, Akt and glycogen synthase kinase-3β. Finally, we show that neurite outgrowth and elongation of OB neurons in E10 chick OB explants are also dependent on the PI3K p110α isoform downstream of FGFR1. This study provides mechanistic insight into the etiology of Kallmann syndrome.

MyoD and Myf-5 define the specification of musculature of distinct embryonic origin

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Kablar ◽  
Atsushi Asakura ◽  
Kirsten Krastel ◽  
Chuyan Ying ◽  
Linda L May ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Mouse Development ◽  
Unique Role ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Embryonic Origin ◽  
Body Wall Muscles ◽  
Myogenic Precursor

Mounting evidence supports the notion that Myf-5 and MyoD play unique roles in the development of epaxial (originating in the dorso-medial half of the somite, e.g. back muscles) and hypaxial (originating in the ventro-lateral half of the somite, e.g. limb and body wall muscles) musculature. To further understand how Myf-5 and MyoD genes co-operate during skeletal muscle specification, we examined and compared the expression pattern of MyoD-lacZ (258/-2.5lacZ and MD6.0-lacZ) transgenes in wild-type, Myf-5, and MyoD mutant embryos. We found that the delayed onset of muscle differentiation in the branchial arches, tongue, limbs, and diaphragm of MyoD-/- embryos was a consequence of a reduced ability of myogenic precursor cells to progress through their normal developmental program and not because of a defect in migration of muscle progenitor cells into these regions. We also found that myogenic precursor cells for back, intercostal, and abdominal wall musculature in Myf-5-/-embryos failed to undergo normal translocation or differentiation. By contrast, the myogenic precursors of intercostal and abdominal wall musculature in MyoD-/- embryos underwent normal translocation but failed to undergo timely differentiation. In conclusion, these observations strongly support the hypothesis that Myf-5 plays a unique role in the development of muscles arising after translocation of epithelial dermamyotome cells along the medial edge of the somite to the subjacent myotome (e.g., back or epaxial muscle) and that MyoD plays a unique role in the development of muscles arising from migratory precursor cells (e.g., limb and branchial arch muscles, tongue, and diaphragm). In addition, the expression pattern of MyoD-lacZ transgenes in the intercostal and abdominal wall muscles of Myf-5-/- and MyoD-/- embryos suggests that appropriate development of these muscles is dependent on both genes and, therefore, these muscles have a dual embryonic origin (epaxial and hypaxial).Key words: epaxial and hypaxial muscle, Myf-5, MyoD, mouse development, somite.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document