Nuclear beta-catenin and the development of bilateral symmetry in normal and LiCl-exposed chick embryos

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (13) ◽  
pp. 2955-2965 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Roeser ◽  
S. Stein ◽  
M. Kessel

Studies in Xenopus laevis and zebrafish suggest a key role for beta-catenin in the specification of the axis of bilateral symmetry. In these organisms, nuclear beta-catenin demarcates the dorsalizing centers. We have asked whether beta-catenin plays a comparable role in the chick embryo and how it is adapted to the particular developmental constraints of chick development. The first nuclear localization of beta-catenin is observed in late intrauterine stages of development in the periphery of the blastoderm, the developing area opaca and marginal zone. Obviously, this early, radially symmetric domain does not predict the future organizing center of the embryo. During further development, cells containing nuclear beta-catenin spread under the epiblast and form the secondary hypoblast. The onset of hypoblast formation thus demarcates the first bilateral symmetry in nuclear beta-catenin distribution. Lithium chloride exposure also causes ectopic nuclear localization of beta-catenin in cells of the epiblast in the area pellucida. Embryos treated before primitive streak formation become completely radialized, as shown by the expression of molecular markers, CMIX and GSC. Lithium treatments performed during early or medium streak stages cause excessive development of the anterior primitive streak, node and notochord, and lead to a degeneration of prospective ventral and posterior structures, as shown by the expression of the molecular markers GSC, CNOT1, BMP2 and Ch-Tbx6L. In summary, we found that in spite of remarkable spatiotemporal differences, beta-catenin acts in the chick in a manner similar to that in fish and amphibia.

1999 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1237-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Orsulic ◽  
O. Huber ◽  
H. Aberle ◽  
S. Arnold ◽  
R. Kemler

Beta-catenin is a multifunctional protein found in three cell compartments: the plasma membrane, the cytoplasm and the nucleus. The cell has developed elaborate ways of regulating the level and localization of beta-catenin to assure its specific function in each compartment. One aspect of this regulation is inherent in the structural organization of beta-catenin itself; most of its protein-interacting motifs overlap so that interaction with one partner can block binding of another at the same time. Using recombinant proteins, we found that E-cadherin and lymphocyte-enhancer factor-1 (LEF-1) form mutually exclusive complexes with beta-catenin; the association of beta-catenin with LEF-1 was competed out by the E-cadherin cytoplasmic domain. Similarly, LEF-1 and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) formed separate, mutually exclusive complexes with beta-catenin. In Wnt-1-transfected C57MG cells, free beta-catenin accumulated and was able to associate with LEF-1. The absence of E-cadherin in E-cadherin-/- embryonic stem (ES) cells also led to an accumulation of free beta-catenin and its association with LEF-1, thereby mimicking Wnt signaling. beta-catenin/LEF-1-mediated transactivation in these cells was antagonized by transient expression of wild-type E-cadherin, but not of E-cadherin lacking the beta-catenin binding site. The potent ability of E-cadherin to recruit beta-catenin to the cell membrane and prevent its nuclear localization and transactivation was also demonstrated using SW480 colon carcinoma cells.


2004 ◽  
Vol 229 (3) ◽  
pp. 422-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Mikawa ◽  
Alisa M. Poh ◽  
Kristine A. Kelly ◽  
Yasuo Ishii ◽  
David E. Reese

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Ohishi ◽  
Yoshinao Oda ◽  
Shuichi Kurihara ◽  
Tsunehisa Kaku ◽  
Hiroaki Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Julia A. Henkels ◽  
Evan A. Zamir

Before the explosion of genetics research in the last century, embryonic development was largely studied from a mechanical perspective. Paired with genetic advances in understanding developmental signaling pathways and induction mechanisms, an important goal for understanding morphogenesis is to discover how the genome codes for changes in the mechanical movements of the embryonic cells. After formation of the zygote, a phase of rapid mitotic cell division is followed by epithelialization resulting in a cohesive sheet of cells termed the epiblast. During the next major phase of triploblastic development called gastrulation, a group of undifferentiated cells in the epiblast moves collectively to the embryonic midline and eventually gives rise to the three primary germ layers: endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm. At the primitive streak—the “organizing center” in amniotes (reptiles, birds, and mammals) which delineates anterior-posterior polarity—prospective endodermal and mesodermal precursors undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), internalization, and eventually organogenesis. “It is not birth, marriage, or death, but gastrulation which is truly the most important time in your life” (Lewis Wolpert, 1986).


Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (17) ◽  
pp. 3839-3854 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.C. Foley ◽  
I. Skromne ◽  
C.D. Stern

Several models have been proposed for the generation of the rostral nervous system. Among them, Nieuwkoop's activation/transformation hypothesis and Spemann's idea of separate head and trunk/tail organizers have been particularly favoured recently. In the mouse, the finding that the visceral endoderm (VE) is required for forebrain development has been interpreted as support for the latter model. Here we argue that the chick hypoblast is equivalent to the mouse VE, based on fate, expression of molecular markers and characteristic anterior movements around the time of gastrulation. We show that the hypoblast does not fit the criteria for a head organizer because it does not induce neural tissue from naive epiblast, nor can it change the regional identity of neural tissue. However, the hypoblast does induce transient expression of the early markers Sox3 and Otx2. The spreading of the hypoblast also directs cell movements in the adjacent epiblast, such that the prospective forebrain is kept at a distance from the organizer at the tip of the primitive streak. We propose that this movement is important to protect the forebrain from the caudalizing influence of the organizer. This dual role of the hypoblast is more consistent with the Nieuwkoop model than with the notion of separate organizers, and accommodates the available data from mouse and other vertebrates.


1999 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
Charles G. Eberhart ◽  
Tarik Tihan ◽  
Peter C. Burger

2003 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Saegusa ◽  
Mieko Hamano ◽  
Takeshi Kuwata ◽  
Tsutomu Yoshida ◽  
Miki Hashimura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document