Pattern formation along the anteroposterior axis of the chick wing: the increase in width following a polarizing region graft and the effect of X-irradiation

Development ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-144
Author(s):  
J. C. Smith ◽  
L. Wolpert
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Anteroposterior Axis ◽  
X Irradiation ◽  
Host Embryo

A study is made of the widening of the chick limb bud that occurs after a graft of an additional polarizing region. Such buds are about 50% wider than controls, after 36 h. By contrast, growth along the proximodistal axis is unaffected. This widening is reduced by treating the host embryo with 10 Gy X-irradiation and the altered pattern of digits is consistent with a diffusible morphogen model for the specification of positional information along the anteroposterior axis.

The effect of cell killing by X-irradiation on pattern formation in the chick limb

Development ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-198
Author(s):  
L. Wolpert ◽  
C. Tickle ◽  
M. Sampford ◽  
J. H. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Zone Model ◽  
Viable Cells ◽  
Dividing Cells ◽  
X Irradiation ◽  
Mesenchyme Cells ◽  
Number Of Cells

It has been suggested that positional information along the proximo-distal axis of the limb-bud is specified by time spent in the progress zone. Mesenchyme cells have been killed by X-irradiation, reducing the rate cells leave the zone. The time spent there by some cells is thus increased. When limbs, stage 18/19, stage 21, or tips of stage 24, are treated with increasing doses of X-irradiation, from 1000 rads to 2500 rads proximal structures are progressively lost, whereas distal ones— the digits—are relatively unaffected. There was no evidence for intercalation of missing parts. These effects are due to killing or damage of mesenchyme cells: the ectoderm is not affected at these doses. The results are consistent with a quantitative analysis based on the progress zone model, in which viable cells repopulate the progress zone and gradually restore it to normal as non-dividing cells are diluted out. It is suggested that any treatment causing damage to the mesenchyme at early stages will give similar results. The mesenchyme cells appear to be surprisingly resistant to radiation damage. The form of the limb-bud is not altered by damaging the mesenchyme. Differences in the development of structures at similar proximo-distal levels, following irradiation, is considered in terms of the requirement of a threshold number of cells.

Interaction between the proximo-distal and antero-posterior co-ordinates of positional value during the specification of positional information in the early development of the chick limb-bud

Development ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-237
Author(s):  
Dennis Summerbell
Keyword(s):  
Early Development ◽  
Anterior Margin ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Apical Ectodermal Ridge ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Anteroposterior Axis ◽  
Zone Of Polarizing Activity ◽  
Positional Value ◽  
Special Region

The experiments examine the extent of reduplication of skeletal parts across the anteroposterior axis, following the transplantation of a zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) to the anterior margin of the limb-bud at successively later stages. Previous studies have suggested that the function of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) is to maintain cells in a special region at the distal tip (the progress zone) labile, with respect to their positional value along the proximo-distal axis. Similarly, the results of these experiments demonstrate that cells in the progress zone are able to change their antero-posterior positional value under the influence of the grafted ZPA, while cells at more proximal levels remain unaffected. In turn, the ZPA may effect the activity of the AER and hence the progress zone.

The distribution of the polarizing zone (ZPA) in the legbud of the chick embryo.

Development ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-175
Author(s):  
J. Richard Hinchliffe ◽  
Anna Sansom
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Chick Embryo ◽  
High Activity ◽  
Posterior Margin ◽  
Posterior Part ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Limb Buds ◽  
Anteroposterior Axis ◽  
Low Activity

The stage-21 to 22 legbud polarizing zone (ZPA) was mapped by transplanting small blocks of posterior marginal mesenchyme preaxially into stage-20 to -22 chick wing buds and assessing the degree of duplication of the wing digital skeleton produced in the host. Blocks taken from the posterior flank, from the angle between posterior flank and the proximal base of the limb bud, and from the most anterior distal position chosen (under the AER), all had very low activity. Blocks taken from the posterior margin of the legbud, plus the next distal block under the posterior part of the AER, all had high activity. We consider that barrier and amputation results on wing and legbud, when interpreted in the light of maps of the ZPA in both limb buds, are consistent with the hypothesis that both leg and wing have their growth and anteroposterior axis of pattern formation controlled by the ZPA.

Developmental potential of neural crest-derived cells migrating from segments of developing quail bowel back-grafted into younger chick host embryos

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.P. Rothman ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin ◽  
J.C. Fontaine-Perus ◽  
M.D. Gershon
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Peripheral Nerves ◽  
Sympathetic Ganglia ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Pigment Cells ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Migratory Experience ◽  
Host Embryo

The technique of back-transplantation was used to investigate the developmental potential of neural crest-derived cells that have migrated to and colonized the avian bowel. Segments of quail bowel (removed at E4) were grafted between the somites and neural tube of younger (E2) chick host embryos. Grafts were placed at a truncal level, adjacent to somites 14–24. Initial experiments, done in vitro, confirmed that crest-derived cells are capable of migrating out of segments of foregut explanted at E4. The foregut, which at E4 has been colonized by cells derived from the vagal crest, served as the donor tissue. Comparative observations were made following grafts of control tissues, which included hindgut, lung primordia, mesonephros and limb bud. Additional experiments were done with chimeric bowel in which only the crest-derived cells were of quail origin. Targets in the host embryos colonized by crest-derived cells from the foregut grafts included the neural tube, spinal roots and ganglia, peripheral nerves, sympathetic ganglia and the adrenals, but not the gut. Donor cells in these target organs were immunostained by the monoclonal antibody, NC-1, indicating that they were crest-derived and developing along neural or glial lineages. Some of the crest-derived cells (NC-1-immunoreactive) that left the bowel and reached sympathetic ganglia, but not peripheral nerves or dorsal root ganglia, co-expressed tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity, a neural characteristic never expressed by crest-derived cells in the avian gut. None of the cells leaving enteric back-grafts produced pigment. Cells of mesodermal origin were also found to leave donor explants and aggregate in dermis and feather germs near the grafts. These observations indicate that crest-derived cells, having previously migrated to the bowel, retain the ability to migrate to distant sites in a younger embryo. The routes taken by these cells appear to reflect, not their previous migratory experience, but the level of the host embryo into which the graft is placed. Some of the population of crest-derived cells that leave the back-transplanted gut remain capable of expressing phenotypes that they do not express within the bowel in situ, but which are appropriate for the site in the host embryo to which they migrate.

The application of aqueous two-phase partition to the study of chick limb mesenchymal diversification

Development ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-275
Author(s):  
C. P. Cottrill ◽  
Paul T. Sharpe ◽  
Lewis Wolpert
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Proximal Region ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Partition ◽  
Surface Character ◽  
Two Phase Partition

A technique which identifies cells differing in surface character, aqueous two-phase partition using thin-layer countercurrent distribution (TLCCD), has been used to study differentiation and pattern formation in the developing chick limb bud. The TLCCD profiles of cell populations, derived from various regions of morphologically undifferentiated mesenchyme from three different stages of limb development, have been compared. At no stage, or location, has the population been found to be homogeneous. Cells from progress zones and more proximal regions could all be resolved into several populations. The populations from progress zones at three different developmental stages were qualitatively similar but differed in the proportions of cells in each. The most striking differences in cell populations were those obtained from the most proximal region of the limb, closest to the flank, which represents the developmentally most advanced region.

The dominant hemimelia mutation uncouples epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and disrupts anterior mesenchyme formation in mouse hindlimbs

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (21) ◽  
pp. 4729-4736
Author(s):  
L. Lettice ◽  
J. Hecksher-Sorensen ◽  
R.E. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Mouse Mutation ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Limb Outgrowth ◽  
Gene Functions ◽  
Regulatory Loop ◽  
Limb Initiation

Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are essential for both limb outgrowth and pattern formation in the limb. Molecules capable of communication between these two tissues are known and include the signaling molecules SHH and FGF4, FGF8 and FGF10. Evidence suggests that the pattern and maintenance of expression of these genes are dependent on a number of factors including regulatory loops between genes expressed in the AER and those in the underlying mesenchyme. We show here that the mouse mutation dominant hemimelia (Dh) alters the pattern of gene expression in the AER such that Fgf4, which is normally expressed in a posterior domain, and Fgf8, which is expressed throughout are expressed in anterior patterns. We show that maintenance of Shh expression in the posterior mesenchyme is not dependent on either expression of Fgf4 or normal levels of Fgf8 in the overlying AER. Conversely, AER expression of Fgf4 is not directly dependent on Shh expression. Also the reciprocal regulatory loop proposed for Fgf8 in the AER and Fgf10 in the underlying mesenchyme is also uncoupled by this mutation. Early during the process of limb initiation, Dh is involved in regulating the width of the limb bud, the mutation resulting in selective loss of anterior mesenchyme. The Dh gene functions in the initial stages of limb development and we suggest that these initial roles are linked to mechanisms that pattern gene expression in the AER.

Mesoderm-inducing factors and Spemann's organiser phenomenon in amphibian development

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Cooke
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Marginal Zone ◽  
Natural Control ◽  
Graft Size ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Inducing Factors ◽  
Mesoderm Inducing Factors ◽  
Host Embryo ◽  
Factor Concentration

Certain proteins from ‘growth factor’ families can initiate mesodermal development in animal cap cells of the amphibian blastula. Cells that are in early stages of their response to one such factor, XTC-MIF (Smith et al. 1988), initiate the formation of a new axial body plan when grafted to the ventral marginal zone of a similarly aged host embryo (Cooke et al. 1987). This replicates the natural control of this phase of development by the dorsal blastoporal lip when similarly grafted; the classical ‘organiser’ phenomenon. I have explored systematically the effect, upon the outcome of this pattern formation using defined inducing factors, of varying graft size, XTC-MIF concentration to which graft cells were exposed, length of exposure before grafting, and host age. The ‘mesodermal organiser’ status, evoked by the factor, appears to be stable, and the variables most influencing the degree of completeness and orderliness of second patterns are graft size and factor concentration. Inappropriately large grafts are not effective. A Xenopus basic fibroblast growth factor homologue, present in the embryo and known to be a strong inducer but of mesoderm with a different character from that induced by XTC-MIF, produced no episode of pattern formation at all when tested in the procedure described in this paper. Organiser status of grafts that have been exposed to mixtures of the two factors is set entirely by the supplied XTC-MIF concentration. Lineage labelling of these grafts, and of classical dorsal lip grafts, reveals closely similar though not identical patterns of contribution to the new structure within the host. Implications of the results for the normal mechanism of body pattern formation are discussed.

Stripes of positional homologies across the wing blade of Drosophila melanogaster

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Simpson ◽  
M. El Messal ◽  
J. Moscoso del Prado ◽  
P. Ripoll
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Pattern Formation ◽  
Epidermal Cell ◽  
Correct Decision ◽  
Dorsoventral Axis ◽  
Anteroposterior Axis ◽  
Different Types

Clones of cells mutant for shaggy transform all hairs into bristles on the wing blade of Drosophila. Different types of bristles are formed at different locations. It is shown that, although shaggy cells are unable to make a correct decision between an epidermal cell pathway and that of a sensory bristle, they are nevertheless able to respond correctly to positional cues. A compilation of many clones led to the construction of a map of positional homologies in which all of the cells in any one area will produce the same kind of bristle. The result is a series of stripes oriented perpendicular to the anteroposterior axis of the wing and parallel to the dorsoventral axis. The significance of these stripes in relation to mechanisms of pattern formation is discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document