Conflicting Data on the Incidence of Leukopenia and Neutropenia After Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Mitomycin C

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 3831-3836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yael Feferman ◽  
Shanel Bhagwandin ◽  
Joseph Kim ◽  
Samantha N. Aycart ◽  
Daniela Feingold ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 179 (1) ◽  
pp. e133-e139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Votanopoulos ◽  
Chukwuemeka Ihemelandu ◽  
Perry Shen ◽  
John Stewart ◽  
Gregory Russell ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3114
Author(s):  
Wim Ceelen ◽  
Jesse Demuytere ◽  
Ignace de Hingh

With increasing awareness amongst physicians and improved radiological imaging techniques, the peritoneal cavity is increasingly recognized as an important metastatic site in various malignancies. Prognosis of these patients is usually poor as traditional treatment including surgical resection or systemic treatment is relatively ineffective. Intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapeutic agents is thought to be an attractive alternative as this results in high tumor tissue concentrations with limited systemic exposure. The addition of hyperthermia aims to potentiate the anti-tumor effects of chemotherapy, resulting in the concept of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal metastases as it was developed about 3 decades ago. With increasing experience, HIPEC has become a safe and accepted treatment offered in many centers around the world. However, standardization of the technique has been poor and results from clinical trials have been equivocal. As a result, the true value of HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal metastases remains a matter of debate. The current review aims to provide a critical overview of the theoretical concept and preclinical and clinical study results, to outline areas of persisting uncertainty, and to propose a framework to better define the role of HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal malignancies.


2008 ◽  
Vol 196 (6) ◽  
pp. 909-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel P. Reuter ◽  
Jay M. MacGregor ◽  
Charles E. Woodall ◽  
Robert P. Sticca ◽  
C. William ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1575-1579
Author(s):  
Blake Babcock ◽  
Brice Jabo ◽  
Matthew Selleck ◽  
Mark Reeves ◽  
Carlos Garberoglio ◽  
...  

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC), although considered an acceptable treatment option in the management of selected patients with colon and appendiceal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), concerns about morbidity have limited its acceptance. Our objective was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of CRS/HIPEC for appendix and colon PC performed at our institution and to elucidate factors predictive of patient outcomes. All patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for appendix or colon PC from 2011 to 2017 were identified from our institution's prospective database. Postoperative outcomes, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival were assessed. Of 125 patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC during the study period, 45 patients were eligible (appendix n = 26; colon n = 19). The median postoperative length of stay was nine days (5–28 days). Grade III/IV complications occurred in 4/45 (8.8%) patients. There were no postoperative mortalities. Median DFS and overall survival have not yet been reached, in both the colon and appendix groups. As of the study conclusion date, 37/45 (82.2%) patients were alive with or without disease. Lymph node status was predictive of recurrence in appendix PC. In our experience, CRS/HIPEC can be safely performed with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Lymph node status is an important predictor of recurrence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document