Acute Response of Testosterone to Muscular Endurance Resistance Exercise in Obese vs. Lean Children

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 74-75
Author(s):  
Eric Adams ◽  
Daniela A. Rubin ◽  
Hoang Pham ◽  
Daniel A. Judelson
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 1349-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regis Radaelli ◽  
Steven J. Fleck ◽  
Thalita Leite ◽  
Richard D. Leite ◽  
Ronei S. Pinto ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 2444-2448
Author(s):  
Mark A. Austad ◽  
Chip R. Gay ◽  
Steven R. Murray ◽  
Robert W. Pettitt

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela A. Rubin ◽  
Diobel M. Castner ◽  
Hoang Pham ◽  
Jason Ng ◽  
Eric Adams ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1051-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Prestes ◽  
G. Pereira ◽  
R. Tibana ◽  
J. Navalta

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Blake G. Perry ◽  
Samuel J. E. Lucas

AbstractResistance exercise (RE) is a popular modality for the general population and athletes alike, due to the numerous benefits of regular participation. The acute response to dynamic RE is characterised by temporary and bidirectional physiological extremes, not typically seen in continuous aerobic exercise (e.g. cycling) and headlined by phasic perturbations in blood pressure that challenge cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation. Cerebral autoregulation has been heavily scrutinised over the last decade with new data challenging the effectiveness of this intrinsic flow regulating mechanism, particularly to abrupt changes in blood pressure over the course of seconds (i.e. dynamic cerebral autoregulation), like those observed during RE. Acutely, RE can challenge CBF regulation, resulting in adverse responses (e.g. syncope). Compared with aerobic exercise, RE is relatively understudied, particularly high-intensity dynamic RE with a concurrent Valsalva manoeuvre (VM). However, the VM alone challenges CBF regulation and generates additional complexity when trying to dissociate the mechanisms underpinning the circulatory response to RE. Given the disparate circulatory response between aerobic and RE, primarily the blood pressure profiles, regulation of CBF is ostensibly different. In this review, we summarise current literature and highlight the acute physiological responses to RE, with a focus on the cerebral circulation.


Author(s):  
Jozo Grgic ◽  
Pavle Mikulic

Several studies explored the effects of attentional focus on resistance exercise, but their analysed outcomes most commonly involved surface electromyography variables. Therefore, the effects of attentional focus on resistance exercise performance remain unclear. The aim of this review was to perform a meta-analysis examining the acute effects of external focus vs. internal focus vs. control on muscular endurance. Five databases were searched to find relevant studies. The data were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. In the analysis for external vs. internal focus of attention, there were seven comparisons with 14 study groups. In the analyses for external focus vs. control and internal focus vs. control, there were six comparisons with 12 study groups. An external focus of attention enhanced muscular endurance when compared with an internal focus (Cohen’s d: 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.34 and 0.82) and control (Cohen’s d: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.08 and 0.76). In the analysis for internal focus vs. control, there was no significant difference between the conditions (Cohen’s d: –0.19; 95% CI: –0.45 and 0.07). Generally, these results remained consistent in the subgroup analyses for upper-body vs. lower-body exercises. From a practical perspective, the results presented in this review suggest that individuals should use an external focus of attention for acute enhancement of muscular endurance.


2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S86 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S. Wooten ◽  
C P. Hook ◽  
C L. Henderson ◽  
A D. Groves ◽  
C Hartman ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Brandenburg ◽  
David Docherty

Purpose:To examine the acute response to 2 resistance-exercise protocols performed to repetition failure, but different in load configuration, and determine whether the acute response was related to strength increases after 8 weeks of training.Methods:Eighteen resistance-trained men completed a single session of 2 resistance-exercise protocols. The constant-load protocol (CL) required subjects to complete 3 sets of single-arm preacher curls (elbow flexion) to failure using a load of ~77% 1RM. The reduced-load protocol (RL) was similar, but training load was reduced for the second and third sets. Maximal isometric force (MVIC) and blood lactate were assessed preprotocol and postprotocol to determine the acute response. For the 8-week training phase, subjects (N = 12) were divided into 2 programs, each corresponsing to 1 of the protocols. Strength was measured before and after training.Results:MVIC decreased from 106.2 ± 13.8 to 84.3 ± 12.1 N · m and from 109.1 ± 14.7 to 82.5 ± 13 N · m after the CL and RL protocols, respectively. The decrements in MVIC were significant (P < .001), with the decline after RL tending to be greater (P = .051). Postprotocol blood lactate concentrations after CL and RL were 3.4 ± 1.1 and 4.1 ± 1.3 mmol/L, respectively, with greater increases after RL (P = .036). Similar and significant 1RM strength increases were observed after both programs (from 20.7 ± 2.7 to 23.3 ± 3.5 kg after CL and from 22.4 ± 2.9 to 25.5 ± 3.2 kg after RL; P < .001).Conclusion:The similar increases in strength suggest that either the greater acute response to RL was not related to the increases in strength or a minimal (threshold) response was achieved during both programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document