scholarly journals What Explains the Gender Gap in College Track Dropout? Experimental and Administrative Evidence

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingvild Almås ◽  
Alexander W. Cappelen ◽  
Kjell G. Salvanes ◽  
Erik Ø. Sørensen ◽  
Bertil Tungodden

We exploit a unique data set, combining rich experimental data with high-quality administrative data, to study dropout from the college track in Norway, and why boys are more likely to drop out. The paper provides three main findings. First, we show that family background and personal characteristics contribute to explain dropout. Second, we show that the gender difference in dropout rates appears both when the adolescents select into the college track and after they have started. Third, we show that different processes guide the choices of the boys and the girls of whether to drop out from the college track.

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (S330) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Gerard Gilmore

AbstractIn this concluding article I recall the early history of the Gaia mission, showing that the original science case and expectations of wide community interest in Gaia data have been met. The quarter-century long partnership involving some 1,000 scientists, engineers and managers in industry and academia is delivering a large, high-quality and unique data set which will underpin astrophysics across many sub-fields for years to come.


Author(s):  
Afsoun Afsahi

Abstract This article examines the gender gap in deliberation, focusing on three facets: willingness to deliberate, capacity for deliberation, and facilitation techniques aimed at reducing the gender gap. It hypothesizes that women will be less willing to deliberate but more likely to engage in strictly defined desired deliberative behaviors. Relying on original survey and experimental data, this paper finds women to be more willing to deliberate. However, men’s negative deliberative behaviors—particularly cutting others off or dominating speech––undermine women’s efforts to be effective deliberators. Finally, the two innovative facilitation methods outlined in the article eliminate the gender gap.


1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 257-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akimi Serizawa ◽  
Isao Kataoka ◽  
Itaru Michiyoshi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document