Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin for the treatment of acute, bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults

2003 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-M. Klossek ◽  
R. Siegert ◽  
P. Nikolaidis ◽  
P. Arvis ◽  
M.-A. Leberre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Therapy Assessment ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Oral Regimen ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Post Therapy

In this multicentre, multinational, comparative, double-blind clinical trial, out-patients with both symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute sinusitis were randomly assigned to receive either a seven-day, once daily (o.d.) oral regimen of moxifloxacin (400 mg) or a 10-day o.d. oral regimen of trovafloxacin (200 mg). Among 452 patients considered valid for clinical efficacy, moxifloxacin treatment was found to be statistically equivalent to trovafloxacin (96.9 per cent vs 92.1 per cent -95 per cent CI = 0.6 per cent; 8.9 per cent) at the seven to 10 days post-therapy assessment. At follow-up, the success rate in the moxifloxacin group was 94.9 per cent and that for the trovafloxacin group was 97.6 per cent (95 per cent CI = -4.9 per cent; 1.3 per cent). The predominant causative organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus followed by Enterobacteriaceae and Moraxella catarrhalis. The bacteriological success rate at the post-therapy evaluation was similar in both treatment groups: 94.4 per cent and 90.1 per cent in the moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin groups respectively (95 per cent CI = −3.0 per cent; 11.9 per cent). Only three of the 103 baseline isolated pathogens still persisted in the moxifloxacin group, whereas there were 10 of the 121 isolates that failed to respond in the trovafloxacin treatment group. At least one drug-related event was reported by 16.9 per cent of the moxifloxacin-treated patients and by 22.3 per cent of those who received trovafloxacin. CNS events such as dizziness and vertigo were reported more than five times more often in patients receiving trovafloxacin than in the moxifloxacin group. Trovafloxacin recipients were also more than twice as likely to discontinue treatment due to adverse events than moxifloxacin-treated patients. Overall, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically and bacteriologically as trovafloxacin and better tolerated.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Tolerability of Telithromycin for 5 or 10 Days vs Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid for 10 days in Acute Maxillary Sinusitis

2003 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 576-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maynard Luterman ◽  
Guy Tellier ◽  
Benjamin Lasko ◽  
Bruno Leroy
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Clavulanic Acid ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Similar Frequency ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanic Acid ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Post Therapy

Telithromycin (HMR 3647) is a new ketolide antimicrobial that was developed for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of oral telithromycin, at 800 mg once daily for 5 or 10 days, with that of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, at 500/125 mg three times daily for 10 days, in adults with acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS). A total of 754 patients with AMS of less than 28 days’ duration were randomized to receive either telithromycin for 5 days followed by placebo for 5 days, telithromycin for 10 days, or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid for 10 days. Clinical outcome was assessed at a test-of-cure (TOC) visit between days 17 and 24 and at a late post-therapy visit between days 31 and 45. Analysis of clinical outcome on a per-protocol basis (n = 434) demonstrated therapeutic equivalence among the three regimens at the TOC visit; in each treatment group, the clinical cure rate was approximately 75%. Only a few patients (3 to 5 in each group) had relapsed by the late post-therapy follow-up visit. Telithromycin was generally safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were mild or moderate gastrointestinal effects, which occurred with similar frequency in all three groups. We conclude that 5 or 10 days of telithromycin at 800 mg once daily is as effective clinically and as well tolerated as 10 days of treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Telithromycin, therefore, appears to be a valuable option for the treatment of AMS.

Sulphadiazine/Trimethoprim Once Daily in Maxillary Sinusitis: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison with Sulphamethoxazole/Trimethoprim B.I.D.

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 478-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Federspil ◽  
Peter Bamberg
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Favourable Result ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Cure Rates

In a randomized double-blind study fifty-four patients suffering from acute maxillary sinusitis were treated for 10 days with daily doses of sulphadiazine/trimethopim (1 g) and sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1.92 g), respectively. The efficacy was evaluated clinically at two follow-up visits. X-ray investigations were performed at admission and after the therapy. Of thirty-nine patients finally evaluated, thirty-seven showed a favourable result. After 6–8 days of therapy there was significant difference in cure rates in favour of sulphadiazine/trimethoprim (p < 0.05) while the outcome as evaluated after treatment was similar for both drugs.

Viscosupplementation in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee: six month follow-up of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 2273-2280 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Luiz Siqueira Campos ◽  
Rodrigo Satamini Pires e Albuquerque ◽  
Edmilson Barbosa da Silva ◽  
Sami Gobbi Fayad ◽  
Lucas Delunardo Acerbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial

scholarly journals Brief Intermittent Neuroleptic Prophylaxis for Selected Schizophrenic Out-patients

1989 ◽  
Vol 155 (05) ◽  
pp. 702-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. McClelland ◽  
G. Harrison ◽  
S. D. Soni
Keyword(s):  
Psychotic Symptoms ◽  
Intermittent Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Prodromal Symptoms ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Depot Neuroleptic ◽  
One Year ◽  
Depot Injections ◽  
To Receive

“A study was conducted to investigate a novel approach to the prophylaxis of schizophrenic relapse. The treatment strategy comprised brief intermittent courses of neuroleptic agents begun as soon as non-psychotic symptoms believed to be early signs of relapse appeared. Fifty four stable, remitted outpatients meeting the American Psychiatric Association's DSM–III criteria for schizophrenia were randomised double blind to receive brief intermittent treatment with either active or placebo depot neuroleptic injections. Only three patients given placebo injections and two controls were admitted to hospital during one year of follow up. Eight (30%) of the patients given placebo injections and only 2 (7%) of the controls, however, had a recurrence of schizophrenic symptoms. Patients given placebo injections experienced fewer extrapyramidal side effects and showed a trend towards a reduction in tardive dyskinesia. Dysphoric and neurotic symptoms were identified before eight out of 11 relapses, and these symptoms were more frequent in patients given placebo depot injections. These results suggest a viable but not necessarily better alternative to continuous oral or depot treatment for less ill, chronic, stabilised schizophrenics based on the early treatment of putative prodromal symptoms of relapse.”

Extraoral Photobiomodulation for Prevention of Oral and Oropharyngeal Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Interim Analysis of A Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Kauark-Fontes ◽  
Cesar Augusto Migliorati ◽  
Joel B Epstein ◽  
Nathaniel Simon Treister ◽  
Carolina Guimarães Bonfim Alves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
First Occurrence ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
One Year ◽  
Oropharyngeal Mucositis

Abstract PurposeTo assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic extraoral photobiomodulation (PBM) for the prevention of oral and oropharyngeal mucositis (OM) on clinical outcomes and survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOPSCC).MethodsOOPSCC patients who received radiotherapy (RT) were prospectively randomized to two groups: prophylactic extraoral PBM and placebo. OM grade (NCI), pain (VAS), analgesia, and anti-inflammatory prescriptions were assessed weekly. Quality of life questionnaires (QoL) were performed at the first and last day of RT. Following RT, participants were evaluated quarterly for oncological outcomes follow-up.Results55 patients met the inclusion criteria. The first occurrence of OM was observed at week 1, for the placebo group (p = 0.014). Later OM onset and severity was observed for the PBM group, with first occurrence at week 2 (p = 0.009). No difference in severe OM incidence was observed (p > 0.05). Lower mean pain score was noted at week 7 for the PBM group (2.1) compared to placebo group (4.5) (p = 0.009). Less analgesics (week 3; p = 0.009/week 7; p = 0.02) and anti-inflammatory prescription (week 5; p = 0.0346) were observed for the PBM group. Better QoL scores were observed for the PBM group at last day of RT (p = 0.0034). No difference in overall survival among groups, was observed in one year of follow-up (p = 0.889).ConclusionProphylactic extraoral PBM can delay OM onset, reduce pain, as well as reduced analgesic and anti-inflammatory prescription requirements. Extraoral PBM was associated with better QoL. There was no evidence of PBM impact on oncological outcomes. TRN:RBR-4w4swx (date of registration: 01/20/2020)

Comparative Effectiveness of Amoxicillin and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Potassium in Acute Paranasal Sinus Infections in Children: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 795-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen R. Wald ◽  
Darleen Chiponis ◽  
Jocyline Ledesma-Medina
Keyword(s):  
Group A Streptococcus ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Nasal Discharge ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate ◽  
Group A ◽  
To Receive

This study compared the relative effectiveness of two antimicrobial preparations, amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium (Augmentin), in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis in children 2 to 16 years of age. Of 171 children with persistent (ten to 30 days' duration) nasal discharge or daytime cough or both, 136 (80%) had abnormal maxillary sinus radiographs. These children were stratified by age and severity of symptoms and randomly assigned to receive either amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium, or placebo. After the exclusion of 28 children with throat cultures positive for group A Streptococcus and 15 who did not complete their medication, the remaining 93 children were evaluated: 30 received amoxicillin, 28 received amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium, and 35 received placebo. Clinical assessment was performed at three and ten days. On each occasion, children treated with an antibiotic were more likely to be cured than children receiving placebo (P &lt; .01 at three days, P &lt; .05 at ten days). The overall cure rate was 67% for amoxicillin, 64% for amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium, and 43% for placebo.

Prospective Randomized Trial of the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Using Chemotherapy With Cisplatin, Dacarbazine, and Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination With Interleukin-2 and Interferon Alfa-2b

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 968-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Rosenberg ◽  
James C. Yang ◽  
Douglas J. Schwartzentruber ◽  
Patrick Hwu ◽  
Francesco M. Marincola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Randomized Protocols ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE: The combination of chemotherapy with immunotherapeutic agents such as interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2b has been reported to provide improved treatment results in patients with metastatic melanoma, compared with the use of chemotherapy alone. We have performed a prospective randomized trial in patients with metastatic melanoma, comparing treatment with chemotherapy to treatment with chemoimmunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred two patients with metastatic melanoma were prospectively randomized to receive chemotherapy composed of tamoxifen, cisplatin, and dacarbazine or this same chemotherapy followed by interferon alfa-2b and interleukin-2. Objective responses, survival, and toxicity in the two groups were evaluated at a median potential follow-up of 42 months. RESULTS: In 52 patients randomized to receive chemotherapy, there were 14 objective responses (27%), including four complete responses. In 50 patients randomized to receive chemoimmunotherapy, there were 22 objective responses (44%) (P2 = .071), including three complete responses. In both treatment groups, the duration of partial responses was often short, and there was a trend toward a survival advantage for patients receiving chemotherapy alone (P2 = .052; median survival of 15.8 months compared with 10.7 months). Treatment-related toxicities were greater in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy. CONCLUSION: With the treatment regimens used in this study, the addition of immunotherapy to combination chemotherapy increased toxicity but did not increase survival. The use of combination chemoimmunotherapy regimens is not recommended in the absence of well-designed, prospective, randomized protocols showing the benefit of this treatment strategy.

scholarly journals Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy after switching from reference infliximab to biosimilar SB2 compared with continuing reference infliximab and SB2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, phase III transition study

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef S Smolen ◽  
Jung-Yoon Choe ◽  
Nenad Prodanovic ◽  
Jaroslaw Niebrzydowski ◽  
Ivan Staykov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Transition Period ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Transition Study ◽  
To Receive

ObjectivesEfficacy, safety and immunogenicity results from the phase III study of SB2, a biosimilar of reference infliximab (INF), were previously reported through 54 weeks. This transition period compared results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from INF to SB2 with those in patients who maintained treatment with INF or SB2.MethodsPatients with moderate to severe RA despite methotrexate treatment were randomised (1:1) to receive SB2 or INF at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 46. At week 54, patients previously receiving INF were rerandomised (1:1) to switch to SB2 (INF/SB2 (n=94)) or to continue on INF (INF/INF (n=101)) up to week 70. Patients previously receiving SB2 continued on SB2 (SB2/SB2 (n=201)) up to week 70. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to week 78.ResultsEfficacy was sustained and comparable across treatment groups. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responses between weeks 54 and 78 ranged from 63.5% to 72.3% with INF/SB2, 66.3%%–69.4% with INF/INF and 65.6%–68.3% with SB2/SB2. Treatment-emergent adverse events during this time occurred in 36.2%, 35.6% and 40.3%, respectively, and infusion-related reactions in 3.2%, 2.0% and 3.5%. Among patients who were negative for antidrug antibodies (ADA) up to week 54, newly developed ADAs were reported in 14.6%, 14.9% and 14.1% of the INF/SB2, INF/INF and SB2/SB2 groups, respectively.ConclusionsThe efficacy, safety and immunogenicity profiles remained comparable among the INF/SB2, INF/INF and SB2/SB2 groups up to week 78, with no treatment-emergent issues or clinically relevant immunogenicity after switching from INF to SB2.Trial registration numberNCT01936181; EudraCT number: 2012-005733-37.

Randomized, Controlled Trial of Transdermal Clonidine for Smoking Cessation

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1025-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Hilleman ◽  
Syed M. Mohiuddin ◽  
Michael G. Delcore ◽  
B. Daniel Lucas
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Behavior Modification ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cancer Society ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Women Smokers

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of clonidine versus placebo in smoking cessation. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design comparison of transdermal clonidine with behavior modification, transdermal clonidine without behavior modification, placebo with behavior modification, and placebo without behavior modification. SETTING: Outpatient, university-based ambulatory care facility. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty generally healthy, highly nicotine-dependent cigarette smokers. INTERVENTION: Clonidine was given as the transdermal patch initiated 72 hours prior to smoking-cessation attempts and continued for six weeks thereafter. Clonidine was given at a dose of 0.2 mg/d for patients weighing more than 150 pounds (>67.5 kg) and at a dose of 0.1 mg/d for patients weighing less than 150 pounds (<67.5 kg). Behavior modification consisted of a total of 12 one-hour structured group training sessions. Patients not receiving behavior modification received printed material, which included the “Help Quit Kit” and the “I Quit Kit” from the American Cancer Society. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Smoking-cessation rates were assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks of follow-up. In addition, adverse reactions to clonidine or placebo were evaluated. RESULTS: Clonidine with behavior modification was statistically superior to the other three treatment groups but only at 6 weeks of follow-up. There were no differences in smoking-cessation rates among any of the treatment groups at any other follow-up intervals. Patients receiving behavior modification, regardless of whether they received clonidine, had better quit rates than patients not receiving behavior modification at all follow-up times except 52 weeks. Women receiving clonidine had significantly better quit rates than men receiving clonidine at all follow-up visits. Clonidine was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse effects than placebo (52 vs. 11 percent). However, the number of smokers withdrawing from the study was not greater with clonidine compared with placebo (9 vs. 7 percent, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine is probably not effective as a pharmacologic adjunct to behavior modification in smoking cessation. It may have a potential role in women smokers who do-not respond to or cannot tolerate more traditional smoking-cessation therapies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document