scholarly journals Dose escalation in extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (DESTROY-1): A multiarm Phase I trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1094) ◽  
pp. 20180422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Deodato ◽  
Gabriella Macchia ◽  
Savino Cilla ◽  
Anna Ianiro ◽  
Giuseppina Sallustio ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Henrique de Paula ◽  
Bristi Basu ◽  
Adrian Mander ◽  
Josephine Khan ◽  
Purity Bundi ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 2169-2180 ◽  
Author(s):  
A L Yu ◽  
M M Uttenreuther-Fischer ◽  
C S Huang ◽  
C C Tsui ◽  
S D Gillies ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate the toxicity, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics of a human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) ch 14.18 directed against disialoganglioside (GD2) and to obtain preliminary information on its clinical efficacy, we conducted a phase I trial in 10 patients with refractory neuroblastoma and one patient with osteosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eleven patients were entered onto this phase I trial. They received 20 courses of mAb ch 14.18 at dose levels of 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 mg/m2. Dose escalation was performed in cohorts of three patients; intrapatient dose escalation was also permitted. RESULTS The most prevalent toxicities were pain, tachycardia, hypertension, fever, and urticaria. Most of these toxicities were dose-dependent and rarely noted at dosages of 20 mg/m2 and less. Although the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached in this study, clinical responses were observed. These included one partial (PR) and four mixed responses (MRs) and one stable disease (SD) among 10 assessable patients. Biologic activity of ch 14.18 in vivo was shown by binding of ch 14.18 to tumor cells and complement-dependent cytotoxicity of posttreatment sera against tumor target cells. An anti-ch 14.18 immune response was detectable in seven of 10 patients studied. CONCLUSION In summary, with the dose schedule used, ch 14.18 appears to be clinically safe and effective, and repeated mAb administration was not associated with increased toxicities. Further clinical trials of mAb ch 14.18 in patients with neuroblastoma are warranted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21567-e21567
Author(s):  
Mark Thomas Corkum ◽  
Hatim Fakir ◽  
David A. Palma ◽  
Timothy K. Nguyen ◽  
Glenn Bauman

e21567 Background: Phase II randomized trials suggest that stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) improves progression-free and overall survival in patients with oligometastatic cancer, with phase III trials currently testing SABR in up to 10 metastases. Whether SABR could provide similar benefits in polymetastatic disease ( > 10 metastases) is unknown. A critical first step is to determine the feasibility of planning SABR for a large number of metastases throughout the body while maintaining acceptable organ at risk (OAR) doses. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the dosimetric feasibility of using SABR in polymetastatic disease ( > 10 sites) while adhering to OAR constraints to be used in a phase I trial (ARREST). Methods: Five craniospinal CT simulations were utilized to retrospectively contour 24 (n = 2), 30 (n = 2) and 50 (n = 1) tumour targets not present on the initial scan. Standard PTV margins were added based on institutional immobilization practices. OAR constraints from published clinical trial protocols were used. Radiotherapy plans for the highest dose level in our planned phase I trial (30Gy in 5 fractions) were created utilizing a minimum number of isocentres. Plans were created using Raystation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden) for delivery on linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Results: The gross tumour volumes (GTVs) ranged from 134.8– 184.2cm3 in our five test cases. The first two cases with 24 GTVs have been planned and were deemed to be clinically acceptable. PTV volumes were 483.0cm3 and 417.4cm3, utilizing five and six isocentres for treatment respectively. Median PTV D95 was 29.7Gy and 29.0Gy, whole body V10 was 21.2% and 17.4%, and V5 was 41.8% and 44.8%. All OAR goals were met, though low-dose conformality was less than traditional SABR treatment plans (R100 of 1.04 and 0.93; R50 of 9.90 and 6.98, respectively). The remainder of the test cases will be presented. Conclusions: In our test cases, planning SABR in polymetastatic disease appears dosimetrically feasible. Our phase I clinical trial (ARREST) is under development, which will evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of delivering SABR in polymetastatic disease in a 3+3 dose escalation study. The starting dose level will be 12Gy in 2 weekly fractions, escalating the dose by adding 6Gy weekly until our target dose of 30Gy in 5 weekly fractions. Our study population will include > 10 sites of disease, all tumour types, and patients must have exhausted standard lines of systemic therapy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Alrwas ◽  
Nicholas E. Papadopoulos ◽  
Suzanne Cain ◽  
Sapna P. Patel ◽  
Kevin B. Kim ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5293-5293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G Jurcic ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Jae H Park ◽  
B. Douglas Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Lintuzumab, a humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells but has only modest activity in AML. To increase the antibody’s potency yet avoid nonspecific cytotoxicity of β-emitting isotopes, 225Ac (t½=10 d), a radiometal that yields 4 α-particles, was conjugated to lintuzumab. A phase I trial showed that 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses ≤ 3 µCi/kg and has anti-leukemic activity across all dose levels studied (Jurcic et al. ASH, 2011). We are conducting a multicenter, phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and biological activity of fractionated-dose 225Ac-lintuzumab in combination with LDAC. Patients and Methods: Patients ≥ 60 yrs who had untreated AML with poor prognostic factors, e.g., an antecedent hematologic disorder, unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, and significant comorbidities, were eligible. Patients received LDAC 20 mg twice daily for 10 d every 4-6 wks for up to 12 cycles. During Cycle 1, beginning 4-7 days after completion of LDAC, two doses of 225Ac-lintuzumab were given approximately one week apart. To prevent radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, patients were given furosemide while receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab and spironolactone for one year afterward. Results: Nine patients (median age, 76 yrs; range, 73-81 yrs) were treated. Seven patients (78%) had a history of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), for which five (56%) received prior therapy with hypomethylating agents (n=4) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=1). One patient (11%) had chronic myeloid leukemia in a molecularly undetectable state at the time of AML diagnosis. Six patients (67%) had intermediate-risk cytogenetics, and three (33%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. The median CD33 expression was 76% (range, 45-100%). Patients received 225Ac-lintuzumab at doses of 0.5 (n=3) or 1 (n=6) μCi/kg/fraction. Total administered activity ranged from 68-199 μCi. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range, 1-4). Dose-limiting toxicity was seen in one patient receiving 1 µCi/kg/fraction who had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with bone marrow aplasia persisting > 6 wks after receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (n=1) and thrombocytopenia (n=3). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia (n=6), pneumonia (n=2), bacteremia (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), transient increase in creatinine (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), and generalized weakness (n=1). Bone marrow blast reductions were seen in 5 of 7 patients (71%) evaluated after Cycle 1. Mean blast reduction was 61% (range, 34-100%). Three of the 7 patients (43%) had marrow blast reductions of ≥ 50%; however, no remissions were observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.5 mos (range, 1.7-15.7+ mos). Median overall survival (OS) from study entry was 5.4 mos (range, 2.2-24 mos). For the 7 patients with prior MDS, median OS was 9.1 mos (range 2.3-24 mos). Conclusions: Fractionated-dose 225Ac-linutuzmab in combination with LDAC is feasible, safe, and has anti-leukemic activity. Dose escalation continues to define the MTD, with planned doses up to 2 µCi/kg/fraction. Additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase II portion of this trial to determine response rate, PFS, and OS. Disclosures Ravandi: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pagel:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Park:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wahl:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Earle:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16047-e16047
Author(s):  
L. Barlow ◽  
M. Laudano ◽  
M. Mann ◽  
M. Desai ◽  
D. Petrylak ◽  
...  

e16047 Background: Up to 50% of patients treated with intravesical agents for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer will recur. Response rates to current second line intravesical therapies average less than 20%. For these high risk patients, novel agents are necessary. Our previously completed phase I trial showed docetaxel to be a safe and efficacious agent for intravesical therapy. Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab-) paclitaxel has been shown to have increased solubility and lower toxicity compared to docetaxel in systemic therapy and is therefore an appropriate candidate for further investigation as an intravesical agent. Methods: The ongoing phase I component of this combined phase I/II trial began enrollment on 1/1/08 and has reached 72% accrual as of 1/1/09. Inclusion criteria include recurrent high grade (HG) Ta, T1 and Tis transitional cell carcinoma failing at least one prior regimen with any intravesical agent. In phase I, 6 weekly instillations of nab-paclitaxel were administered beginning at a dose of 150 mg with a dose escalation model used until a maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved. The primary endpoints were dose- limiting toxicity (DLT) and MTD; the secondary endpoint was response rate. Efficacy was evaluated by cystoscopy with biopsy, cytology, and CT imaging. Results: 13/18 patients have enrolled in this phase I trial to date, and the distribution of stages included 5 patients with Tis, 4 patients with HGTa, and 4 patients with HGT1. No patient has had any systemic absorption of nab-paclitaxel as measured by HPLC assays, and no grade 3 or 4 DLT has been encountered. Fifty-four percent (7/13) patients were noted to experience grade 1 toxicities, with dysuria being the most common. Forty-two percent (5/12) of completed patients had no evidence of disease at their post-treatment cystoscopy. None of the patients who developed recurrent disease have had disease progression. Conclusions: Intravesical nab-paclitaxel has exhibited minimal toxicity and no systemic absorption in the first ever human intravesical dose escalation trial. Upon completion of this ongoing phase I trial, we plan to evaluate this agent in a larger phase II efficacy study. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document