scholarly journals Comparison of panoramic radiography and CBCT to identify maxillary posterior roots invading the maxillary sinus

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 20160043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana J Lopes ◽  
Thiago O Gamba ◽  
João V J Bertinato ◽  
Deborah Q Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography

scholarly journals Panoramic radiography is of limited value in the evaluation of maxillary sinus disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Constantine ◽  
Bruce Clark ◽  
Andreas Kiermeier ◽  
Professor Peter Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Sinus Disease

scholarly journals Accuracy of panoramic radiography in diagnosing maxillary sinus-root relationship: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wentian Sun ◽  
Kai Xia ◽  
Li Tang ◽  
Chenlu Liu ◽  
Ling Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Display Type ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Root Tips ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Good Ability

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the accuracy of panoramic radiography (PR) in diagnosing maxillary sinus-root relationships (SRRs). Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, CBM, Baidu Scholar, and SIGLE were searched. The studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of PR and computed tomography/cone-beam computed tomography (CT/CBCT) for SRR were included. Results: Eleven studies were included. Meta-analyses showed that, for type I SRR, PR had the highest specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC), with a high sensitivity and a low negative LR (−LR). For type IV, PR had a high DOR and AUC, with the highest sensitivity but a low +LR, the lowest –LR, and the lowest specificity. For type II, PR had the lowest AUC, with a low sensitivity, +LR, and DOR and a high −LR. For type III, PR had the lowest sensitivity, +LR, and DOR and the highest −LR. The distance from root tips to the maxillary sinus floor on PR was significantly longer (mean difference: −1.88 mm; 95% confidence interval: −2.19 to −1.57; P < .0001) than that on CT/CBCT. Conclusions: Currently available evidence suggests PR could be reliable for detecting type I SRR. PR has a good ability to confirm true type IV SRR but a poor ability to rule out false type IV SRR. For type II and III SRR, PR shows poor accuracy and tends to overestimate the extent of protrusion of the roots into the maxillary sinus. When PRs display type II, III, or IV SRR and related treatment is needed, CBCT should be used for further examinations.

scholarly journals Evaluation of symptomatic maxillary sinus pathologies using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography—influence of professional training

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Dau ◽  
Paul Marciak ◽  
Bial Al-Nawas ◽  
Henning Staedt ◽  
Abdulmonem Alshiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Cone Beam

Contributions of reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the localization of third molars relative to the maxillary sinus

2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annabelle Bouquet ◽  
Jean-Loup Coudert ◽  
Denis Bourgeois ◽  
Jean-François Mazoyer ◽  
Denis Bossard
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Third Molars

scholarly journals Depression of the maxillary sinus anterior wall and its influence on panoramic radiography appearance

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 20170126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhito Yoshida ◽  
Motoki Fukuda ◽  
Kenichi Gotoh ◽  
Eiichiro Ariji
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Anterior Wall

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Accuracy of Panoramic Radiograph in the Definition of Maxillary Sinus Septa

2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Kasabah ◽  
Radovan Slezák ◽  
Antonín Šimůnek ◽  
Jiří Krug ◽  
Miguel Cevallos Lecaro
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Panoramic Radiograph ◽  
The Other ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Septa ◽  
False Diagnosis ◽  
Definition Of

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of panoramic radiography in identification of maxillary sinus septa. Out of 68 sinuses were radiographically examined using both panoramic and computerized tomographic radiographs (CT scan). Using CT scan, 24 (35.9 %) out of 68 cases maxillae showed at least one septum, 22 sinuses (32.3 %) showed one septum, whereas two sinuses (2.9 %) exhibited two septa. Panoramic radiograph led to a false diagnosis regarding the presence or absence of sinus septa in 18 of 68 sinuses (26.5 %). On the other hand, they gave negative diagnosis of sinus septa in 12 of 24 septa (50 %). There was fully agreement between the two methods (positive septa) only in 12 of 24 septa (50 %). We cannot depend on panoramic radiograph for the detection of sinus septa because it can lead to false or negative results.

scholarly journals Panoramic radiography in dentistry

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Różyło-Kalinowska
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Patient Positioning ◽  
Tomographic Imaging ◽  
Tomographic Image ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Valuable Adjunct ◽  
Temporomandibular Joints

AbstractPanoramic radiography is an extraoral radiography modality that provides two-dimensional information about the teeth and the maxillofacial skeleton. It is a valuable adjunct for diagnosis and treatment planning as it facilitates one-time imaging of all teeth, the mandible, parts of maxilla including a large part of the maxillary sinus, hard palate and temporomandibular joints (TMJs). As a tomographic image is prone to errors and artefacts, a good quality radiograph in most patients can be achieved by following the standard rules and through proper patient positioning. In this article, we will discuss indications for panoramic radiography imaging, steps in taking the radiograph, as well as limitations, pitfalls and complications of the procedure. Tomographic imaging of temporomandibular joint is also discussed.

The posterior wall of the maxillary sinus as seen in panoramic radiography

1991 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Ohba ◽  
Felix Cordero ◽  
John W. Preece ◽  
Olaf E. Langland
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Posterior Wall

Limitations of panoramic radiography in the detection of bone defects in the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus: an experimental study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Ohba ◽  
Y Ogawa ◽  
Y Shinohara ◽  
T Hiromatsu ◽  
A Uchida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Bone Defects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document