The value of ancient Greek and Roman medical schools for the development of medical knowledge

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Софья Беляева ◽  
Sof'ya Belyaeva
2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodora Daniela Sechel

This article analyses the politics of medical translation and shows the complexity of knowledge production and circulation in the intercultural and multiethnic contexts of the Habsburg Monarchy. It argues that medical translations, including books, manuals, and brochures, were one of the important tools that contributed to the standardization of medical knowledge and practices in this region. Most of these books were authored by physicians and professors at medical schools in Vienna. They had a great influence upon medical knowledge and practices, thus Vienna was the authority approving what was taught and published. The usage of the same manuals and books implies that more or less the same medical knowledge was shared by the medical practitioners in the Habsburg Monarchy. The medical theories and practices transmitted reflect also the games of influence and power exercised by protomedici and professors at the Vienna University. It was a process of authorization and dissemination of knowledge from the “center” to the provinces.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samal Nauhria ◽  
Irene Derksen ◽  
Shreya Nauhria ◽  
Amitabha Basu

Abstract Background: Community service provides avenues for social learning in medical education. Partnerships between medical schools and local healthcare agencies has paved the path for an active participation of a medical student in the community. This seems to have a positive impact on the medical knowledge and skills of students and also leads to a betterment of healthcare services for the community. National accreditation agencies and medical boards have emphasized that medical schools should provide opportunities for such learning to occur in the medical school curriculum. Various medical schools around the globe have adopted this active learning pedagogy and thus we wanted to explore how we can establish such a learning framework at out university.Methods: This was a qualitative study based on feedback from volunteer students who attended the annual health fare conducted in collaboration with local healthcare agencies. Two focus group interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded for thematic analyses.Results: Overall, the students enjoyed learning various clinical procedural skills. This activity was an opportunity to apply the medical knowledge learnt in classrooms. The students developed various competencies like communication skills, professionalism, team work and social responsibility. Prevalent health conditions discovered by the students included diabetes mellitus, hypertension and nutritional imbalance.Conclusions: This study explores how serving the community can bring about an educational change for a medical student. The community service framework promotes social learning, interprofessional education, peer learning and active learning amongst medical students.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 295-316
Author(s):  
William A. McGrath

Abstract The three excerpts translated below were selected from two of the earliest sources depicting the origins of medicine in Tibet. Despite their differences in terms of detail, style, and genre, each narrative emphasizes the Buddhist origins of either the Tibetan medical tradition itself, the tradition of canonical Buddhist medicine that was transmitted from India to Tibet, or even the entire field of healing knowledge. Read separately, each narrative promotes a distinct account of the origin and transmission of medical knowledge among mythical, legendary, and historical figures in India and Tibet. Read together, however, these three accounts depict attempts at the reconciliation of several competing narratives that were developing in the medical schools of twelfth- and thirteenth-century Tibet and that continue to affect the representation of the Tibetan medical tradition today.


2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marquis Berrey

ArgumentThe sect of ancient Greek physicians who believed that medical knowledge came from personal experience also read the Hippocratic Corpus intensively. While previous scholarship has concentrated on the contributions of individual physicians to ancient scholarship on Hippocrates, this article seeks to identify those characteristics of Empiricist reading methodology that drove an entire medical community to credit Hippocrates with medical authority. To explain why these physicians appealed to Hippocrates’ authority, I deploy surviving testimonia and fragments to describe the skills, practices, and ideologies of the reading community of ancient Empiricist physicians over the one-hundred year period 175 to 75 BCE. The Empiricist conception of testimony taken on trust operative within that reading community elided the modern distinction between personal and institutional targets of trust by treating Hippocratic writings as revelatory of the moral character of Hippocrates as an author. Hippocrates’ moral character as an honest witness who accurately observed empirical phenomena aligned with the epistemic virtues of an empirical medical community who believed that medical knowledge came from personal experience. So I argue that Empiricist reading culture constructed a moral authority of honesty and accuracy from Hippocratic writings, enlarged the personal authority of Hippocrates among medical readers, and contributed to the development of Hippocratism.


Author(s):  
William G. Rothstein

The expansion of the functions of medical schools since mid-century has had many unanticipated and adverse consequences for medical education. As a result, medical schools have lost some of their societal support. In the years since 1900, medical schools have made major changes in their structure in order to solve specific educational problems. University hospitals were built to provide clinical training in hospitals that emphasized education and research rather than patient care. Full-time clinical faculty members were employed in order to professionalize a role previously occupied by part-time practitioner-educators. Biomedical research was undertaken to enable faculty members to advance medical knowledge and enhance their skills as educators. Internships and residencies became restricted to hospitals affiliated with medical schools to replace the poorly supervised practical experience provided in community hospitals with a more structured education administered by professional educators. Each of these changes assumed that medical schools could be removed from the hurly-burly of professional life and made to fit the model of the liberal arts college. This assumption failed to recognize the fundamental differences between the two types of institutions. In liberal arts education, the body of knowledge taught to students need not be suitable for practical application in the community. In many fields, like most of the humanities, it has rarely been used outside of institutions of higher education. In others, like the social sciences, the knowledge has been sufficiently tentative that its direct application has been problematic. In still others, like most natural sciences, the knowledge has been so highly specialized that it could not provide a basis for viable careers. As a result, most faculty members in the liberal arts and sciences have spent their careers in teaching and research without the option of nonacademic employment in their disciplines. Medical schools, on the other hand, have continually influenced and been influenced by the practice of medicine in the community. The knowledge taught in medical schools has affected the way that physicians have practiced medicine, but it has also been tested by practitioners and fed back to the faculty for modification and refinement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (166) ◽  
pp. 201-223
Author(s):  
Pierce Grace

AbstractBetween c.1350 and c.1750 a small group of professional hereditary physicians served the Gaelic communities of Ireland and Scotland. Over fifty medical kindreds provided advice regarding health maintenance and treatment with herbs and surgery. Their medical knowledge was derived from Gaelic translations of medieval European Latin medical texts grounded in the classical works of Hippocrates and Galen, and the Arab world. Students studied in medical schools where they copied and compiled medical texts in Irish, some for use as handbooks. Over 100 texts are extant. Political upheaval and scientific advances led to the eclipse of this medical world. Through examination of the Gaelic medical manuscripts and other sources this article provides an assessment of medicine in Gaelic Ireland and Scotland from the mid-fourteenth to the mid-eighteenth centuries.


Author(s):  
William G. Rothstein

During the early nineteenth century, medical practice became professionalized and medical treatment standardized as medical school training became more popular and medical societies and journals were organized. Dispensary and hospital care increased with the growth in urban populations. Medical students became dissatisfied with the theoretical training in medical schools and turned to private courses from individual physicians and clinical instruction at hospitals and dispensaries. By mid-century, private instruction had become almost as important as medical school training. Because little progress occurred in medical knowledge during the first half of the nineteenth century, the quality of medical care remained low, although it became more standardized due to the greater popularity of medical school training. Diagnosis continued to be unsystematic and superficial. The physical examination consisted of observing the patient’s pulse, skin color, manner of breathing, and the appearance of the urine. Physicians attributed many diseases to heredity and often attached as much credence to the patient’s emotions and surmises as the natural history of the illness. Although the invention of the stethoscope in France in 1819 led to the use of auscultation and percussion, the new diagnostic tools contributed little to medical care in the short run because more accurate diagnoses did not lead to better treatment. Few useful drugs existed in the materia medica and they were often misused. According to Dowling, the United States Pharmacopoeia of 1820 contained only 20 active drugs, including 3 specifics: quinine for malaria, mercury for syphilis, and ipecac for amebic dysentery. Alkaloid chemistry led to the isolation of morphine from opium in 1817 and quinine from cinchona bark in 1820. Morphine was prescribed with a casual indifference to its addictive properties and quinine was widely used in nonmalarial fevers, where it was ineffective and produced dangerous side effects. Strychnine, a poisonous alkaloid isolated in 1818, was popular as a tonic for decades, and colchine, another alkaloid discovered in 1819, was widely used for gout despite its harmful side effects. Purgatives and emetics remained the most widely used drugs, although mineral drugs replaced botanical ones among physicians trained in medical schools because their actions were more drastic and immediate.


JAMA ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 204 (11) ◽  
pp. 1012
Author(s):  
P. C. Anderson
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 994-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis J Rosebraugh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document