scholarly journals Comment on “Racial Limitations of Fitzpatrick Skin Type”

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A Pimentel
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 490-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol L. Shields ◽  
Antonio Yaghy ◽  
Lauren A. Dalvin ◽  
Sarangdev Vaidya ◽  
Richard R. Pacheco ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.210626
Author(s):  
Chay Bae ◽  
Michael Cheng ◽  
Christina N. Kraus ◽  
Sheetal Desai

Objective To investigate the availability of images representing black, indigenous, and people of color in rheumatology educational resources. Methods Colorized images were collected from 5 major educational resources and cataloged by educational resources they came from, underlying rheumatic conditions, and skin type. Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) was used to categorize images into "light", "dark", or "indeterminate". The images were initially scored by a fellow in the Division of Rheumatology and subsequently validated by a faculty member from the Department of Dermatology. Results Of the thousands of images reviewed, 1604 images met study criteria. Fitzpatrick skin type validation from Dermatology resulted in the re-coding of 111 images. The final scoring revealed 86% of the images to be light skin, 9% of images to be dark skin, and 5% of images to be indeterminate. Conclusion The paucity of dark skin images in rheumatology resources is incongruent with current diversity estimates in the United States. Significant efforts should be made to incorporate images of black, indigenous, and people of color into educational resources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document