Resistance exercise interventions during and following cancer treatment: a systematic review

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-60
Author(s):  
Brian Focht ◽  
Steven Clinton ◽  
Steven Devor ◽  
Matthew Garver ◽  
Alexander Lucas ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biran Focht ◽  
Steven Clinton ◽  
Steven Devor ◽  
Matthew Garver ◽  
Alexander Lucas ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio García-Hermoso ◽  
Robinson Ramírez-Vélez ◽  
Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo ◽  
Mark D Peterson ◽  
Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno

ObjectiveTo determine if the combination of aerobic and resistance exercise is superior to aerobic exercise alone for the health of obese children and adolescents.DesignSystematic review with meta-analysis.Data sourcesComputerised search of 3 databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry).Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies that compared the effect of supervised concurrent exercise versus aerobic exercise interventions, with anthropometric and metabolic outcomes in paediatric obesity (6–18 years old). The mean differences (MD) of the parameters from preintervention to postintervention between groups were pooled using a random-effects model.Results12 trials with 555 youths were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with aerobic exercise alone, concurrent exercise resulted in greater reductions in body mass (MD=−2.28 kg), fat mass (MD=−3.49%; and MD=−4.34 kg) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD=−10.20 mg/dL); as well as greater increases in lean body mass (MD=2.20 kg) and adiponectin level (MD=2.59 μg/mL). Differences were larger for longer term programmes (>24 weeks).SummaryConcurrent aerobic plus resistance exercise improves body composition, metabolic profiles, and inflammatory state in the obese paediatric population.Trial registration numberCRD42016039807.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 147-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Martin ◽  
Samuel Beard ◽  
Nathan Clissold ◽  
Kameel Andraos ◽  
Luke Currey

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.L. Ormel ◽  
G.G.F. van der Schoot ◽  
W.J. Sluiter ◽  
M. Jalving ◽  
J.A. Gietema ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e031374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Ubago-Guisado ◽  
Luis Gracia-Marco ◽  
Iván Cavero-Redondo ◽  
Vicente Martinez-Vizcaino ◽  
Blanca Notario-Pacheco ◽  
...  

IntroductionCancer (and survival) is known to affect the quality of life. Strategies as physical activity and exercise during and after cancer may improve health-related qualify of life (HRQOL) outcomes and are, therefore, of clinical and public health importance. To the best of our knowledge, comparative evidence of the effect of the different types of exercise on improving HRQOL in cancer patients has not been synthesised thus far. We aim to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis in order to synthesise all available evidence regarding the effect of different types of exercise interventions on HRQOL during and after cancer treatment.Methods and analysisMEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library and SPORTDiscus will be searched from inception to December 2018 for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. Studies assessing physical activity and exercise interventions in cancer patients (during treatment) and survivors (after treatment) will be selected. Two independent reviewers will identify eligible studies. After quality appraisal and data extraction, we will conduct meta-analyses for outcomes of interest, including data from mental and physical dimensions of cancer-specific and/or generic HRQOL questionnaires. Risk of bias assessments will be completed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Study heterogeneity will be measured by the I2 statistic. Bayesian (and traditional approach) network meta-analysis will be performed when possible to determine the comparative effect of the different physical activity or exercise interventions.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review and network meta-analysis will synthesise evidence on the effect of different types of exercise interventions on HRQOL during and after cancer treatment. The results will be disseminated by publication in a peer-reviewed journal and through scientific conferences and symposia. Ethical approval will not be required because the data used for this work will be exclusively extracted from published studies.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019125028.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000331 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Stephensen ◽  
Ferhana Hashem ◽  
Kevin Corbett ◽  
Amanda Bates ◽  
Michelle George ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of preoperative and postoperative resistance exercise training on the recovery of physical function in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for cancer.Data sourcesA systematic review of English articles using Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library electronic databases was undertaken.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies were included if they used a randomised, quasi-randomised or controlled trial study design and compared the effects of a muscle-strengthening exercise intervention (±other therapy) with a comparative non-exercise group; involved adult participants (≥18 years) who had elected to undergo abdominal surgery for cancer; and used muscle strength, physical function, self-reported functional ability, range of motion and/or a performance-based test as an outcome measure.ResultsFollowing screening of titles and abstracts of the 588 publications retrieved from the initial search, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were accessed for review of the full-text version of the article, and 2 eligible studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. One exercise programme was undertaken preoperatively and the other postoperatively, until discharge from hospital. The exercise interventions of the included studies were performed for five and eight sessions, respectively. There were no differences between groups in either study.ConclusionThe only two studies designed to determine whether preoperative or postoperative resistance muscle-strengthening exercise programmes improved or negatively affected physical function outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for cancer provide inconclusive results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 456-470
Author(s):  
Tifanny Gita Sesaria ◽  
Kusnanto Kusnanto ◽  
Abu Bakar

Introduction :  Physical exercise have been considered as on of ‘standart intervention’ in management of type 2 diabetes. Types of exercise that related with patients such as aerobic exercise, also resistance  training. Nevertheless, there is still a low progress and prevalence of exercise in diabetes people Objectives : The aim of study for present effect of various physical exercise aerobic, resistance exercise also combined aerobic and resistance exercise to decrease Hba1c and  blood glucose Method: Search the scientific article about diabetes and physical exercise in the database Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Spinger Link and Science Direct for original and full researchResult : The study review combined aerobicand resistance exercise improved the glycemic control of T2DM and it was widely used and significant for glycemic controlConclusion: This systematic  review  could  be  used  as  evidence  when  increase  combine aerobic and resistance exercise  as choice physical  exercise  interventions  for  the  purpose  of glycemic control


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document