scholarly journals National Asthma Education and Prevention Program 2020 Guidelines: What’s Important for Primary Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (6 Supplement) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Prevention Program ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Persistent Asthma ◽  
Asthma Severity ◽  
Asthma Education ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Primary Care Clinicians ◽  
Global Initiative

KEY TAKEAWAYS • The 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines: A Report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group provides updated recommendations for 6 topics related to the management of individuals with asthma. • The classification of asthma severity and asthma control, as well as the concept of utilizing a stepwise approach to pharmacologic treatment, were not updated from the Expert Panel Report 3, released in 2007. • However, important updates in preferred therapies for intermittent and persistent asthma at treatment steps 1 through 5 were suggested. • Recommendations regarding biologic therapy were not included in the 2020 update, as only evidence and US Food and Drug Administration approvals through October 2018 were considered. • The most recent 2021 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines are not included in this review but can be used in a complementary manner to assist primary care clinicians to optimize decisions regarding the care of patients with asthma.

scholarly journals Assessment of Asthma Control and Severity among Children According to Global Initiative for Asthma Guidelines in Sulaimani City-Iraq

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Adnan M. H. Hamawandi ◽  
Kosar M Ali ◽  
Ali Z. Naji
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Persistent Asthma ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Asthmatic Children ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Severe Persistent Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Gina Guidelines

Background: Asthma is a common and potentially serious chronic disease that imposes a substantial burden on patients, their families and the community. Objective: Assessment of the level of asthma control and severity in asthmatic children in Sulaimani city according to the global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 82 patients who are known cases of asthma, aged 5 – 15 years , from 1st of March 2014 to 1st of August 2014. Results: Out of 82 patients in our study, 20.8%were classified as having intermittent asthma all of them have well controlled asthma, 42.7% of those classified as having mild persistent asthma 65.7% of them have well controlled asthma, 26.8% of those classified as having moderate persistent asthma 54.5% of them have partly controlled asthma, and 9.8%of those classified as having severe persistent asthma the majority of them 87.5% have uncontrolled asthma and none of them reached to the controlled asthma level according to GINA guidelines. Regarding the peak expiratory flow (PFT) we notice that 58.8% of asthmatic children who were classified as having intermittent severity, their PEF measurements ranged between 160- 250 l/min while those with severe persistent asthma 75% of them have readings between 50-150 l/min. Conclusion: Current levels of asthma control in the Sulaimani city fall far short of the goals specified in the GINA guidelines for asthma management. Also there is a strong correlation between PEF measurements and the level of asthma severity,

scholarly journals Comparing LAMA with LABA and LTRA as add-on therapies in primary care asthma management

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Kaplan ◽  
J. Mark FitzGerald ◽  
Roland Buhl ◽  
Christian Vogelberg ◽  
Eckard Hamelmann
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Control Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract The Global Initiative for Asthma recommends a stepwise approach to adjust asthma treatment to the needs of individual patients; inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the core pharmacological treatment. However, many patients remain poorly controlled, and evidence-based algorithms to decide on the best order and rationale for add-on therapies are lacking. We explore the challenges of asthma management in primary care and review outcomes from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses comparing the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) as add-on to ICS in patients with asthma. In adults, LAMAs and LABAs provide a greater improvement in lung function than LTRAs as add-on to ICS. In children, results were positive and comparable between therapies, but data are scarce. This information could aid decision-making in primary care, supporting the use of add-on therapy to ICS to help improve lung function, control asthma symptoms and prevent exacerbations.

scholarly journals Using Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines to assess asthma severity in populations

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 615 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Liard ◽  
B. Leynaert ◽  
M. Zureik ◽  
F-X Beguin ◽  
F Neukirch
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Severity ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative

Asthma Severity According to Global Initiative for Asthma and Its Determinants: An International Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Cazzoletti ◽  
Alessandro Marcon ◽  
Angelo Corsico ◽  
Christer Janson ◽  
Deborah Jarvis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
International Study ◽  
Asthma Severity ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative

scholarly journals The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): 25 years later

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 1900598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Philippe Boulet ◽  
Helen K. Reddel ◽  
Eric Bateman ◽  
Søren Pedersen ◽  
J. Mark FitzGerald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Treatment Guideline ◽  
Global Strategy ◽  
World Health ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was launched in 1993 under the auspices of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA, and the World Health Organization to produce a global strategy on asthma management and prevention. Now constituted as a non-profit entity, it continues to produce, on an annual basis, the most widely cited evidence-based report on the optimal management of asthma in both adults and children intended for global use. Although the GINA Report is often viewed and used as an asthma treatment guideline, it is designed to be a clinically oriented strategy document that supports the development of practice guidelines in different countries and regions.Other GINA products, including the report's pocket guides, teaching slide kits and implementation tools, are also offered free of charge for public use. The GINA Scientific Committee comprises recognised international experts from primary, secondary and tertiary centres of care who are actively involved in both the care of patients and research in asthma. The GINA Assembly is a forum for exchange of scientific information and discussions on initiatives to improve asthma care in various countries, focusing on implementation strategies. GINA plays a role in shaping research on the diagnosis and treatment of asthma and informs the development of point of care practice guides and decision support tools. GINA supports the objectives of raising awareness of asthma and improving access to therapy and quality of care for asthmatic patients, in addition to presenting and promoting continuously updated evidence-based treatment approaches for global use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document