scholarly journals Estimation of Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Deep Cement Mixing Method for Reinforcing the Greenhouse Foundation on Reclaimed Land

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-294
Author(s):  
Haksung Lee ◽  
Bang Hun Kang ◽  
Kwang-seung Lee ◽  
Su Hwan Lee
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Reclaimed Land ◽  
Allowable Bearing Capacity ◽  
Mixing Method

Development of allowable bearing capacity for strip foundations in unsaturated soils

2019 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 103138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changguang Zhang ◽  
Benxian Gao ◽  
Qing Yan ◽  
Junhai Zhao ◽  
Lizhou Wu
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Unsaturated Soils ◽  
Allowable Bearing Capacity

scholarly journals Regional Geotechnical Mapping Employing Kriging on Electronic Geodatabase

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 7625
Author(s):  
Muhammad Usman Arshid ◽  
M. A. Kamal
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Soil Classification ◽  
Geostatistical Analysis ◽  
Kriging Interpolation ◽  
Geospatial Information ◽  
State Highway ◽  
Capacity Evaluation ◽  
Geotechnical Investigations ◽  
Allowable Bearing Capacity ◽  
Spatial Analyst

A regional geotechnical map was developed by employing kriging using spatial and s geostatistical analysis tools. Many studies have been carried out in the field of topography, digital elevation modeling, agriculture, geological, crop, and precipitation mapping. However, no significant contribution to the development of geotechnical mapping has been made. For the appraisal of a geotechnical map, extensive field explorations were carried out throughout the geotechnically diversified plateau spread over an area of approximately 23,000 km2. In total, 450 soil samples were collected from 75 data stations to determine requisite index properties and soil classification for the subsequent allowable bearing capacity evaluation. The formatted test results, along with associated geospatial information, were uploaded to ArcMap, which created an initial input electronic database. The kriging technique of geostatistical analysis was determined to be more feasible for generating a geotechnical map. The developed map represents the distribution of soil in the region as per the engineering classification system, allowable bearing capacity, and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) subgrade rating for 1.5-, 3.0-, and 4.5-m depths. The accuracy of the maps generated using kriging interpolation technique under spatial analyst tools was verified by comparing the values in the generated surface with the actual values measured at randomly selected validation points. The database was primarily created for the appraisal of geotechnical maps and can also be used for preliminary geotechnical investigations, which saves the cost of soil investigations. In addition, this approach allows establishing useful correlations among the geotechnical properties of soil.

Nomographs for predicting allowable bearing capacity and elastic settlement of shallow foundation on granular soil

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maher Omar ◽  
Abdallah Shanableh ◽  
Khaled Hamad ◽  
Ali Tahmaz ◽  
Mohamed G. Arab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Shallow Foundation ◽  
Granular Soil ◽  
Allowable Bearing Capacity ◽  
Elastic Settlement

Bearing capacity of soils for crawler cranes

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1282-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiteng Liu ◽  
Dave H. Chan ◽  
Brian Gerbrandt
Keyword(s):  
Computer Simulation ◽  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Soil Type ◽  
Traditional Method ◽  
Design Procedure ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Shallow Foundations ◽  
Allowable Bearing Capacity ◽  
Total Settlement

Few studies have been carried out on the bearing capacity of soils for crawler cranes. Directly applying the bearing capacity equations used for shallow foundations to cranes often leads to conservative design. The total settlement is of less concern for cranes than for buildings, and cranes can normally tolerate larger differential settlements. Computer simulation and field studies have been carried out to study the allowable bearing capacity of soils for cranes. Equations modified from the traditional method to calculate the bearing capacity for shallow foundations have been proposed. In general, it was found that the bearing capacity for crawler cranes could be increased by as much as 50% from that for foundations. This depends on the soil type, crane, and mat configuration. A design procedure in evaluating foundation support for crawler cranes is also proposed.

scholarly journals Correlation between Electrical Resistivity and Cone Penetrometer Test Data for Geotechnical Site Investigation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. A. Akinlabi
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Resistivity ◽  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Empirical Relation ◽  
Site Investigation ◽  
Cone Penetrometer ◽  
Soil Resistivity ◽  
Empirical Relationships ◽  
Cone Resistance ◽  
Allowable Bearing Capacity

The use of the electrical resistivity method provides cost-effective subsurface information faster and allows reliable interpolation to be made between the tested points. It is therefore desirable to generate consistent data from resistivity measurements by using empirical relationships while only few zones of interest will require testing. This study, therefore, developed empirical relationships between electrical resistivity sounding and cone penetrometer test data for engineering site investigation using a case study from the Basement Complex Terrain of Southwestern Nigeria. Regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between the soil resistivity and cone resistance and the validity of the empirical relation was evaluated by comparing values estimated from the soil resistivity vs. cone resistance cross plot with field values obtained from cone penetration tests. The values of allowable bearing pressure computed by using both values in Meyerhof’s equation were also compared with the allowable bearing capacity deduced with laboratory values of soil strength parameters (cohesion, angle of internal friction, soil unit weight) in Terzaghi’s general formula. The results show close agreement between the measured and estimated values with the differences typically less than 10%. The standard errors of the estimates for the cone resistance and allowable bearing capacity are 2.70 and 4.16 respectively, implying reliability of the estimates. The proposed empirical relationships, therefore, appear to provide reasonable estimation of soil cone resistance and allowable bearing capacity from soil resistivity. Few complimentary cone penetrometer and laboratory tests will thus be required while the cost and duration of site investigation for engineering structures are expected to reduce.

scholarly journals Daya Dukung Tanah Fondasi Dangkal Pada Bukit Hambalang Bagian Selatan, Kecamatan Citeureup, Kabupaten Bogor

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
Rifki Asrul Sani
Keyword(s):  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Standard Penetration Test ◽  
Geological Mapping ◽  
Shallow Foundation ◽  
Soil Parameters ◽  
Penetration Test ◽  
Square Footing ◽  
Local Soil ◽  
Allowable Bearing Capacity ◽  
Shear Condition

ABSTRAKSeiring dengan terjadinya longsoran di beberapa titik wilayah di bukit Hambalang, maka diperlukan kajian data kondisi geologi teknik berupa sifat fisik dan mekanik tanah serta batuan bawah permukaan, terutama mengenai daya dukung tanah dalam menahan beban bangunan di atasnya agar tidak terjadi penurunan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dibagi menjadi tiga, yaitu metode penelitian studio dengan memanfaatkan data-data sekunder yang telah ada, metode penelitian di lapangan melalui pemetaan geologi untuk mendapatkan data litologi yang tersingkap di permukaan, zonasi longsoran yang terjadi, dan identifikasi kekuatan tanah hasil pemboran geoteknik dengan Standard Penetration Test (SPT), serta metode penelitian di laboratorium untuk mendapatkan parameter sifat fisik dan mekanik tanah sebagai penunjang data daya dukung tanah serta geologi teknik daerah penelitian. Hasil perhitungan fondasi dangkal untuk general soil shear condition dan local soil shear condition dapat disimpulkan bahwa daya dukung tanah yang diizinkan (qa) untuk setiap kedalaman yang paling tinggi pada fondasi bujur sangkar (square footing) dan nilai tertinggi yang terdapat pada kedalaman 2 m, yaitu 57,32 ton/m2 dan 36,11 ton/m2. Fondasi yang paling rendah untuk semua kedalaman pada fondasi menerus (continuous footing) untuk kedalaman 2 m memiliki nilai 34,49 ton/m2 dan 21,25 ton/m2. Berdasarkan data SPT, nilai daya dukung yang diizinkan (qa) pada masing-masing titik bor berkisar pada rentang 2,85 ton/m2 sampai 16,85 ton/m2. Kata kunci: longsoran, daya dukung, Standard Penetration Test (SPT). ABSTRACTAlong with the landslide in some areas on the Hambalang Hill, it needs data of engineering geological study such as mechanical and physical properties of soil also subsurface rocks. Especially regarding the soil bearing capacity in order to restrain the building from settlement. There are three methods which used in this research, those are studio research by using secondary data, fieldwork research that is geological mapping conducted to obtain data on lithological rocks at surface, landslide zone and soil strength identification from geotechnical drilling with Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and laboratory research to obtain the soil parameters of physical and mechanical properties, which used to support soil bearing capacity data and engineering geology in research area. The calculation results of the shallow foundation for general soil shear condition and the local soil shear condition it could be concluded that the allowable bearing capacity for all depth which is highest at the square footing and the highest value found to a depth of 2 m, that is 57.32 ton/m2 and 36.11 ton/m2. The lowest foundation for all the depth of the continuous footing to a depth of 2 m had value 34.49 ton/m2 and 21.25 ton/m2. Based on data from SPT, the allowable bearing capacity on each of borehole ranging from 2.85 ton/m2 to 16.85 ton/m2. Keywords: landslide, bearing capacity, Standard Penetration Test (SPT).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document