The Decision-Making Types, Public Entrepreneurship and Performance Management of Local Public Hospital Directors

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Jung-Woo Lee ◽  
◽  
No-Sa Kim
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-173
Author(s):  
Eun Jae Ho

"Even the best governance and public administration systems can fail because of lack of accountability. This paper reviews the factors likely to affect the accountability of the collaborative governance system and suggests concrete measures to ensure accountability. As an empirical case of collaborative governance, 300 Korean community centers were sampled by region and by size. Exploratory Factor Analysis was conducted to identify the determinant factors for the accountability of collaborative governance. This analysis found the following factors to be the most important in ensuring accountability in a collaborative governance system: clarity of laws and regulations, representativeness of participants, transparency and democracy in the decision-making process, and performance management and incentive systems. The analysis also found that it is necessary to conceive different performance management and incentive systems for public and civil groups."


Author(s):  
Ezzat Kamal Abdalla Mousa

The study builds for accounting Activity-Based Costing (ABC) analysis supporting decision-making concerning product modularity and the accounting cost system for whether assessing performance to pricing basic and control to the product cost and allocate the activity. the paper aims to investigate the merits. of the Activity-Based Costing (ABC) as a method for assessing the cost consequences of better applied in modularization. This is done through a case study followed by reflections on how ABC (might) need to be developed to be able to serve as the relevant costing tool for assessing and performance in cost system and to whether allocate cost to each unit. The second aim some general rules on the cost efficiency of modularization from the case study the main problem study ABC is not sufficient enough to applying at any organization that may lower overhead costs. the result of this study The ABC provided the more accurate cost per unit as results good price, sales strategy, performance management and decision making that should be improved It provided much better insight into what drivers overhead costs. ABC recognizes that overhead costs are not all related to production and sale volume applying ABCTD in the manufacturing cost and to whether this more study about ABC in public sectors.


2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert George ◽  
Sebastian Desmidt

This study draws on information processing theory to investigate predictors of strategic-decision quality in public organizations. Information processing theory argues that (a) rational planning practices contribute to strategic-decision quality by injecting information into decision making and (b) decision makers contribute to strategic-decision quality by exchanging information during decision making. These assumptions are tested upon 55 Flemish pupil guidance centers. Rational planning practices are operationalized as strategic planning, performance measurement, and performance management. Information exchange by decision makers during decision making is operationalized as procedural justice of the decision-making process. Results suggest that procedural justice, strategic planning, and performance management contribute to strategic-decision quality while performance measurement does not.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shradha Gawankar ◽  
Sachin S. Kamble ◽  
Rakesh Raut

This paper aims to propose the idea of briefly explaining the balance scorecard by highlighting its use, application in depth. A critical enabler in achieving desired performance goals is the ability to measure performance. Despite the importance of accurately measuring organizational performance in most areas of academic research, there have been very few studies that have directly addressed the question of how overall organizational performance is or should be measured. Perhaps more importantly, none of these studies seems to have significantly influenced how overall organizational performance is actually measured in most of the empirical research that uses this construct as a dependent measure. The most popular of the performance measurement framework has been the balanced scorecard abbreviated as BSC. The BSC is widely acknowledged to have moved beyond the original ideology. It has now become a strategic change management and performance management process. The approach used in this paper is the combination of literature review on evolution of balance score card and its applications in various sectors/organizations/ areas. This paper identify that the balanced scorecard is a powerful but simple strategic tool and the simplicity of the scorecard is in its design. By encompassing four primary perspectives, the tool allows an organization to turn its attention to external concerns, such as the financial outcomes and its customers expectations, and internal areas, which include its internal processes to meet external requirements and its integration of learning and growth, to successfully meet its strategic expectations. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the balanced scorecard combined with application and strategy, which are now in a better position to begin to recognize managements expectations and to discover new ways to build value for workplace learning and performance within organization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document