Driving it Home: Leading with an Interprofessional Collaborative Team Approach in Home Care

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-63
Author(s):  
Cynthia Bergeron ◽  
Gina Barton ◽  
Wendy Gamache-Holmes ◽  
Mary Ellen Barry ◽  
Barbara Butler ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Melissa LeCuyer ◽  
Victoria Nyman ◽  
Frances Sykes ◽  
Kimberly Thomas

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S317-S318
Author(s):  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
Marie-Lee Yous ◽  
Kimberly Fraser ◽  
Sinéad Dufour ◽  
Sharon Kaasalainen ◽  
...  

Abstract The management of multiple chronic conditions (MCC) in older adults living in the community is complex. Little is known about the experiences of interdisciplinary primary care and home providers who care for this vulnerable group. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of healthcare providers in managing the care of community-living older adults with MCC and to highlight their recommendations for improving care delivery for this group. A qualitative interpretive description design was used. A total of 42 healthcare providers from two provinces in Canada participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants represented diverse disciplines (e.g., physicians, nurses, social workers, personal support workers) and settings (e.g., primary care and home care). Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. The experiences of healthcare providers managing care for older adults with MCC were organized into six major themes: (1) managing complexity associated with MCC, (2) implementing person-centred care, (3), involving and supporting family caregivers, (4) using a team approach for holistic care delivery, (5) encountering rewards and challenges in caring for older adults with MCC, and (6) recommending ways to address the challenges of the healthcare system. Healthcare providers highlighted the need for a more comprehensive integrated system of care to improve care management for older adults with MCC and their family caregivers. Specifically, they suggested increased care coordination, more comprehensive primary care visits with an interprofessional team, and increased home care support.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen W. Leff ◽  
Janel Sonstegard-Gamm
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 541-561
Author(s):  
Lauren Clatch ◽  
Ashley Walters ◽  
Eugene Borgida

Contemporary inquiries in psychology and law increasingly cross disciplinary boundaries for inspiration. Our focus is on whether such research is substantive in both directions and whether interdisciplinary psychology-and-law author teams produce more meaningful interdisciplinary work, specifically in decision-making research conducted between 2004 and 2017. We found that interdisciplinary psychology-and-law author teams ( a) produce publications that show more cross-disciplinary integration in methods than single-discipline teams, ( b) produce publications with more conceptual integration in the introduction and discussion than only law author teams, and ( c) elicit more citations than only law or only psychology author teams. When considering a collaborative team approach, we suggest that the disciplinary background of the collaborators is a meaningful indicator of the type of interdisciplinary research to be conducted. We also suggest that it would be beneficial for both psychology and law journals to be more open to publishing scholarship from mixed disciplinary teams.


1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Molinari ◽  
Alberto Taverna ◽  
Giulio Gasca ◽  
Annalisa L. Constantino

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document