scholarly journals Sequential development of B-cell lymphoma of alternative lineage after treatment for mantle cell lymphoma in a dog

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
Keiko Kodama ◽  
Kazuhito Kodama
1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (12) ◽  
pp. 1182-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca C. Hankin ◽  
Susan V. Hunter

Abstract Objective.—This article summarizes the most useful ancillary immunohistochemical and molecular assays for use in the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma. Data Sources.—The English language literature was surveyed, with an emphasis on recent publications, for articles presenting key advances in the molecular characterization of mantle cell lymphomas and for series of cases testing the utility of molecular diagnostic tests. The authors' series of 26 small B-cell lymphomas, analyzed for the cyclin D1 protein by paraffin immunohistochemistry and for t(11;14) by polymerase chain reaction, is included. Conclusions.—Mantle cell lymphoma, a B-cell lymphoma now recognized in the 1994 Revised European-American Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms (REAL) classification, is a relatively aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Its characteristic t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation has a role in oncogenesis and has been exploited for molecular diagnostic tests, but these tests vary in sensitivity, specificity, and ease of use. Improved immunohistochemical tests are sufficient to confirm the diagnosis in most cases. Conventional cytogenetics and molecular diagnostic tests for t(11;14)—Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction analysis—may be helpful in selected cases, but are laborious or of limited sensitivity. Other methods, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization, need further development to provide faster, more sensitive diagnosis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vii86
Author(s):  
Toshiki Yamada ◽  
Yuhei Shibata ◽  
Nobuhiko Nakamura ◽  
Jun-ichi Kitagawa ◽  
Senji Kasahara ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 120 (12) ◽  
pp. 1137-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anke Maes ◽  
Ken Maes ◽  
Hendrik De Raeve ◽  
Eva De Smedt ◽  
Philip Vlummens ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Chuan Hsiao ◽  
Inmaculada Ribera Cortada ◽  
Luis Colomo ◽  
Hongtao Ye ◽  
Hongxiang Liu ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1707-1707
Author(s):  
Mathias Witzens-Harig ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Michael Rieger ◽  
Fabienne McClanahan ◽  
Manfred Hensel ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1707 Poster Board I-733 Background Clinical and pharmacokinetic data suggest that the effect of rituximab could be improved by prolonged exposure to the drug. To test for this hypothesis we performed a prospective randomized trial of rituximab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with CD20+ B-cell Non-Hodgkin-Lymphoma. Methods After completion of standard treatment pts with CD20+ B-cell lymphoma were randomized to either observation or maintenance therapy with rituximab (375 mg/m2) administered every 3 months for 2 years. Both pts after first line therapy and pts after relapse treatment were included in the study. Pts with aggressive lymphoma were enrolled if they had achieved a complete response (CR) after initial treatment. Pts with aggressive lymphoma with residual tumor mass underwent positron emission tomography (PET) and qualified for randomization if this examination showed no signs of tumor activity. Pts with indolent lymphoma were eligible for the study if at least a partial response (PR) was achieved. Primary endpoint of the study was event free survival (EFS), secondary endpoints were relapse rate (RR), relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). EFS and OS were analysed using an asymptotic logrank test, RFS using a competing risk model and RR using Fisher's exact test. Results After recruitment of 171 pts the planned final analysis was performed on an intention to treat basis. Complete data sets of 163 pts were evaluable. 91 (62%) pts were male, median age was 58 years, 130 pts (80%) hat one previous therapy, 27 pts (17%) 2 previous therapies, 4 pts (2%) 3 previous therapies and 1 pt (1%) 4 previous therapies. At study entry, 120 pts (74%) were in CR, 2 pts (2%) in unconfirmed CR and 41 pts (25%) in PR. Histological subtypes included diffuse large cell lymphoma (67 pts), follicular lymphoma (35 pts), mantle cell lymphoma (18 pts), primary mediastinal lymphoma (16 pts), marginal zone lymphoma (7 pts), Burkitt's lymphoma (5 pts), and other lymphomas (15 pts). Age, sex, number of previous therapies, remission state and diagnoses were well balanced between the rituximab maintenance and the observation group (p>0.05). After a median follow up of 28 months, EFS (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-1.09, p=0.037,) and RFS (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.11-5.70 p=0.03) were superior for the maintenance group. In regards to diagnostic subgroups, EFS was in particular prolonged in pts with mantle cell lymphoma (p=0.055, one sided logrank test) and to a lesser extent in pts with follicular lymphoma (p=0.16) and diffuse large cell B cell lymphoma (p=0.18). Relapse occurred more often in the observation group than in the treatment group, however this effect was not significant (relapse rate observation group/treatment group = 2.31, 95% CI 0.86-6.75, p=0.08). There was no difference in OS between the two groups (p=0.74). Maintenance therapy was generally well tolerated: in 5 pts a WHO Grade 3 toxicity event occurred, which were arrhythmia, neuropathy, leucopenia (n=1 each) and infections (n=2). In one pt two WHO Grade 3 toxicities were observed (pain and infection). Conclusion Rituximab maintenance therapy is feasible, safe and well tolerated and improves EFS in patients with CD20+ B-cell lymphoma. In this analysis, the benefit of rituximab maintenance was particularly striking in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. This study has been continued with an amendment including additional pts with mantle cell and diffuse large cell lymphoma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 886-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lapo Alinari ◽  
Erin Hertlein ◽  
David M. Goldenberg ◽  
Rosa Lapalombella ◽  
Fengting Yan ◽  
...  

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable B-cell malignancy and patients with this disease have limited therapeutic options. Despite the success of Rituximab in treatment of B-cell malignancies, its use as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy in MCL has demonstrated modest activity; thus, novel strategies are needed. CD74 is an integral membrane protein expressed on malignant B cells and implicated in promoting survival and growth, making it an attractive therapeutic target. The humanized anti-CD74 monoclonal antibody (mAb), Milatuzumab, (Immunomedics) has shown promising preclinical activity against several human B-cell lymphoma cell lines, but has not been studied in MCL. Since Rituximab and Milatuzumab target distinct antigens lacking known association, we explored a combination strategy with these mAbs in MCL cell lines, patient samples, and in a preclinical model of MCL. Flow cytometric analysis shows that the MCL cell lines Mino and JeKo, and MCL patient tumor cells, express abundant surface CD74 compared to the CD74-negative cell line, Jurkat. Incubation of Mino and JeKo cells with immobilized (goat anti-human IgG) Milatuzumab (5 μg/ml) resulted in mitochondrial depolarization and significant induction of apoptosis determined by Annexin V/PI and flow cytometry (apoptosis at 8hr=38.3±0.85% and 25.4±2.6%; 24hr=73.6±3.47% and 36±3.57%; 48hr=84.9±3.91% and 50.4±4.17%, respectively, compared to Trastuzumab (control). Expression of surviving cells from anti-CD74-treated MCL cells consistently demonstrated marked induction of surface CD74 (MFI 762) compared to control (MFI 6.1). Incubation with immobilized Rituximab (10 μg/ml) resulted in 39.5±2.5% and 37.1±8.35% apoptotic events at 8hr, 58.8±3.14%, 41.2±8.27% at 24hr, and 40.1±1.3% and 45.6±3.25% at 48hr, respectively. Combination treatment of Mino and JeKo cells with Milatuzumab and Rituximab led to significant enhancement in cell death, with 77.6±3.95% and 79.6±2.62% apoptosis at 8hr in Jeko and Mino cells (P=0.0008 and P=0.00004 vs. Milatuzumab alone; P=0.00015 and P=0.001 vs. Rituximab alone); 90.4±3.53% and 76.6±4.3% at 24hr, respectively (P=0.0042 and P=0.0002 vs. Milatuzumab, P=0.0003 and P=0.0027 vs. Rituximab alone); 92.8±0.77% and 85.6±2.62% at 48hr, respectively (P= 0.026 and P=0.0002 vs. Milatuzumab alone, P=0.0000005 and P=0.00008 compared to Rituximab alone, respectively). To examine the in vivo activity of Rituximab and Milatuzumab, a preclinical model of human MCL using the SCID (cb17 scid/scid) mouse depleted of NK cells with TMβ1 mAb (anti-murine IL2Rb) was used. In this model, intravenous injection of 40×106 JeKo cells results in disseminated MCL 3–4 weeks after engraftment. The primary end-point was survival, defined as the time to develop cachexia/wasting syndrome or hind limb paralysis. Mice were treated starting at day 17 postengraftment with intraperitoneal Trastuzumab mAb control (300 μg qod), Milatuzumab (300 μg qod), Rituximab (300 μg qod), or a combination of Milatuzumab and Rituximab. The mean survival for the combination-treated group was 55 days (95%CI:41, upper limit not reached as study was terminated at day 70), compared to 33 days for Trastuzumab-treated mice (95% CI:31,34), 35.5 days for the Milatuzumab-treated mice (95% CI:33,37), and 45 days for the Rituximab-treated mice (95%CI:30,46). The combination treatment prolonged survival of this group compared to Trastuzumab control (P=0.001), Milatuzumab (P=0.0006) and Rituximab (P=0.098). No overt toxicity from Milatuzumab or the combination regimen was noted. A confirmatory study with a larger group of mice and detailed mechanistic studies are now underway. These preliminary results provide justification for further evaluation of Milatuzumab and Rituximab in combination in MCL.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2681-2681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne W Beaven ◽  
David A. Rizzieri ◽  
Zachary Powell ◽  
Zhiguo Li ◽  
Peggy Alton ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2681 Background: Despite recent advances, the 5 year overall survival for patients with high risk diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is approximately 50% and there is still no known cure for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This phase II study of multimodal dose dense therapy evaluated 2 courses of dose intense chemotherapy followed by radioimmunotherapy (RIT) consolidation in patients with previously untreated, mantle cell or high/high intermediate (int) risk aggressive B cell lymphoma. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dose intense/dose dense, multimodal chemo-immunotherapy combined with RIT. Methods: Patients with untreated MCL or high int/high risk DLBCL were enrolled. Treatment regimen involved 3 phases of therapy: induction 1, induction 2 and consolidation with RIT (Table 1). Induction 2 occurred approximately 5 weeks after induction 1 and RIT was given 12–24 weeks after rituximab was completed. Patients were evaluated after each treatment phase and those with stable disease (SD) or better and blood count recovery could proceed to the next phase of therapy. Results: Thirty nine patients (pts) with high/high int risk DLBCL (n=25) or MCL (n=14) were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (range 21–80). Toxicity: Common, anticipated toxicities in the induction phases were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, and anemia. During Ind1 (n=39), grade (gr) III mucositis occurred in 13 pts (33%) and febrile neutropenia (FN) in 31 (79%). Three pts did not proceed to Ind2 due to death (1 candidemia, 1 septic knee prosthesis, 1 from complications of colectomy for prolonged diverticulitis after count recovery) and 2 withdrew to pursue less intense chemotherapy. During Ind2 (n=34) gr III mucositis occurred in 12pts (35%) and FN in 24 (67%). Two pts had gr III/IV cerebellar toxicity that was disabling in 1 pt. Of the 34 pts who received the Ind2, 9 did not receive RIT due to progressive disease (PD) (4), prolonged cytopenias (4), or diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (1). Twenty five pts received RIT and 3 (12%) had FN, 20 (80%) had gr III/IV neutropenia, 23 (92%) had gr III/IV thrombocytopenia, 1 pt died from bacteremia. Two pts developed myelodysplasia 21 and 48 months after starting therapy. Response: Pts were evaluated for response after Ind1, Ind2 and RIT. 38/39 pts were evaluable for response, with 1 pt withdrawing prior to assessment. The pts who died prior to response evaluation were counted as non-responders. The best overall response rate (ORR) was 95% (36/38) with a complete response rate (CR) of 84% (32/38). See tables 2 and 3 for more detailed response data by phase of treatment and disease type. After a median follow up of 17.2 months, 30 pts (77%) are alive (see figure). The median overall survival for MCL has not been reached and is 36.5 months for DLBCL. Deaths were from Hodgkin lymphoma (1), infection (3), DLBCL (2), complications of surgery (1), MCL (2). The median progression free survival is 36.5 months with 11/14 (79%) MCL and 14/25 (56%) DLBCL pts alive and in continued CR. Conclusion: The combination of dose dense, dose intense chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody, and RIT demonstrates considerable efficacy, despite expected toxicity, in high risk DLBCL and MCL pts. The response rates seen in this study are higher than expected from standard R-CHOP in this pt population. Further follow up to determine impact on OS and long term complications will be required to confirm these promising outcomes. Disclosures: Beaven: Glaxo Smith Kline: Family Member Employed by GSK. Off Label Use: Tositumomab is approved for use in relapsed/refractory low grade CD20 positive NHL. It is not FDA approved for first line use in diffuse large B cell lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma. Neither cytarabine nor etoposide are approved for use in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Rizzieri:Glaxo Smith Kline: Speakers Bureau. Moore:Glaxo Smith Kline: Speakers Bureau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document