scholarly journals Stress-Free Reference for Neutron Diffraction Measurement of Residual Stress in Butt-Welded Joints of Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipes

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 950-964
Author(s):  
Akira MAEKAWA ◽  
Tsuneo TAKAHASHI ◽  
Takashi TSUJI ◽  
Hiroshi SUZUKI ◽  
Atsushi MORIAI
2006 ◽  
Vol 524-525 ◽  
pp. 697-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinobu Okido ◽  
Hiroshi Suzuki ◽  
K. Saito

Residual stress generated in Type-316 austenitic stainless steel butt-weld jointed by Inconel-182 was measured using a neutron diffraction method and compared with values calculated using FEM analysis. The measured values of Type-316 austenitic stainless steel as base material agreed well with the calculated ones. The diffraction had high intensity and a sharp profile in the base metal. However, it was difficult to measure the residual stress at the weld metal due to very weak diffraction intensities. This phenomenon was caused by the texture in the weld material generated during the weld procedure. As a result, this texture induced an inaccurate evaluation of the residual stress. Procedures for residual stress evaluation to solve this textured material problem are discussed in this paper. As a method for stress evaluation, the measured strains obtained from a different diffraction plane with strong intensity were modified with the ratio of the individual elastic constant. The values of residual stress obtained using this method were almost the same as those of the standard method using Hooke’s law. Also, these residual stress values agreed roughly with those from the FEM analysis. This evaluation method is effective for measured samples with a strong texture like Ni-based weld metal.


Author(s):  
G. Ubertalli ◽  
M. Ferraris ◽  
P. Matteis ◽  
D. Di Saverio

Lean duplex stainless steels have similar corrosion and better mechanical properties than the austenitic grades, which ensure their extensive spreading in industrial applications as a substitute of austenitic grades. In the construction of liquid tanks, however, it is often necessary to weld such steels with a range of fittings which are commonly fabricated with austenitic stainless steel grades. Therefore, this paper examines dissimilar welded joints between LDX 2101 (or X2CrMnNiN22-5-2) lean duplex stainless steels plates and austenitic stainless steel pipes, carried out by different arc welding processes. The investigation focuses on the correlation between the welding procedures and the microstructural and mechanical properties of the welded joints.


2001 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianni Albertini ◽  
Ru Lin Peng ◽  
Adrian Manescu ◽  
Araldo Ponzetti

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenchun Jiang ◽  
Yun Luo ◽  
BingYing Wang ◽  
Wanchuck Woo ◽  
S. T. Tu

Welding is often used to repair the defects in pressure vessels and piping, but residual stresses are generated inevitably and have a great effect on structure integrity. According to the defect size, different repair depth will be carried out, which leads to different stress state. In this paper, the effect of repair depth on residual stress in 316L stainless steel repair weld has been studied by neutron diffraction measurement and finite element modeling (FEM). The results show that the residual stresses in the deep repair are larger than those in shallow repair weld, because the deep repair involves multipass welding and brings a serious work hardening. In the weld metal, the longitudinal stress has exceeded the yield stress, and increases slightly with the increase of repair depth. In contrast to the longitudinal stress, the transverse stress is more sensitive to the repair depth. With the increase of repair depth, the transverse stress increases and even exceeds the yield strength as the repair depth is 45% of the plate thickness. At the bottom surface of the plate and heat affected zone (HAZ), both the longitudinal and transverse stresses increase as the repair depth increases. It also shows that the mixed hardening model gives the best agreement with the measurement, while isotropic and kinematic hardening models cause an overestimation and underestimation, respectively. Therefore, the mixed hardening model is recommended for the prediction of residual stresses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document