scholarly journals Developmental dysplasia of the hip screening during the lockdown for COVID-19: experience from Northern Italy

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nicola Guindani ◽  
Maurizio De Pellegrin
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Late Diagnosis ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Western World ◽  
Type I ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Type D ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Purpose Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) ultrasound screening (USS), which is usually performed in Italy as an outpatient, was halted for an indefinite period in most centres during lockdown. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of COVID-19 on DDH-USS, in two paediatric orthopaedic centres in one of the most critical areas of the western World. Methods An academic teaching hospital and paediatric trauma centre (T) and a University hospital and DDH referral centre (H), classified as national COVID-19 hubs, were involved. Graf’s method was applied in both centres. In T, paediatricians directly referred only patients with delayed DDH-USS or suspicious unstable hips; in H, paediatricians or parents could directly refer to the screening service. Results The mean age of the 95 patients (190 hips) who were referred for DDH-USS in T, was 3.85 months (0.1 to 7.4); 175 were type I, nine were type IIa (+ and -), five type D and one type IV. In H, the screened patients in 2020 were only 78% of the same period in 2019. A total of 28 patients with 32 hips (8 IIb, 5 IIc, 8 D, 11 III) had late diagnosis at a mean age of 114 days (96 to 146). In the same period in 2019 only eight patients with 11 hips (8 IIb, 1 D, 1 III, 1 IV) at a mean age of 142 days (92 to 305) had late diagnosis. Conclusion DDH-USS was the only screening in newborns which halted during lockdown. Few centres, which still performed diagnosis and treatment, were overloaded causing a delay in DDH management. Level of evidence IV.

scholarly journals Prevalence of trochlear dysplasia in infants evaluated for developmental dysplasia of the hip

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Clarabelle A. DeVries ◽  
Peter Hahn ◽  
James D. Bomar ◽  
Vidyadhar V. Upasani ◽  
Andrew T. Pennock
Keyword(s):  
Trochlear Dysplasia ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Sulcus Angle ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip ◽  
Dysplastic Hip

Purpose The purpose of this study was to define the incidence of trochlear dysplasia in an infant cohort being screened for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods Newborns screened for DDH that were evaluated with ultrasound for the presence of trochlear dysplasia were retrospectively reviewed. The sulcus angle and trochlear depth were measured. Based on previous work, trochlear dysplasia was defined as a sulcus angle of > 159°. Our newborn cohort was then analyzed to identify potential risk factors for trochlear dysplasia. Results A total of 383 knees in 196 infants were studied. In total, 52% were referred for breech intrauterine positioning and 21% were ultimately diagnosed with DDH and had treatment initiated with a Pavlik harness. Of the entire cohort, 8% of knees were deemed to have trochlear dysplasia. Breech patients were found to have a flatter sulcus angle than those that were not breech (149.5° (sd 7.2°) versus 147.9° (sd 7.5°); p = 0.028). Similarly, a shallower trochlear depth was identified in breech patients versus non-breech patients (1.6 mm (sd 0.4) versus 1.8 mm (sd 0.4); p = 0.019). Those with trochlear dysplasia (as defined by sulcus angle > 159°) did show a smaller alpha angle (i.e. more dysplastic hip) as compared with those without trochlear dysplasia (59.2° (sd 10.2°) versus 65.9° (sd 7.5°); p < 0.001). Hips with DDH were 2.4-times more likely to have knees with trochlear dysplasia (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.3). Conclusion Ultrasound screening of newborn knees reveals that trochlear dysplasia is relatively common in breech babies with DDH. Level of Evidence III

Results of universal ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (10) ◽  
pp. 1399-1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Biedermann ◽  
J. Riccabona ◽  
J. M. Giesinger ◽  
A. Brunner ◽  
M. Liebensteiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Reduction ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Type I ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Treatment Rate ◽  
Cumulative Rate ◽  
Graf Method ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Aims The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of the different ultrasound phenotypes of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and to determine their subsequent course. Patients and Methods A consecutive series of 28 092 neonates was screened and classified according to the Graf method as part of a nationwide surveillance programme, and then followed prospectively. Abnormal hips were followed until they became normal (Graf type I). Type IIb hips and higher grades were treated by abduction in a Tübinger orthosis until normal. Dislocated hips underwent closed or open reduction. Results Overall, 90.2% of hips were normal at birth. Type IIa hips (8.9%) became normal at a median of six weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 6 to 9). Type IIc and IId hips (0.67%) became normal after ten weeks (IQR 7 to 13). There were 19 type lll and eight type lV hips at baseline. There were 24 closed reductions and one open reduction. No late presentations of DDH were detected within the first five years of life. Conclusion The incidence of DDH was eight per 1000 live births. The treatment rate was 1% (n = 273). The rate of first operations on the newborn hip was 0.86, and rate of open surgery was 0.04. The cumulative rate of open surgery was 0.07. The authors take the view that early identification and treatment in abduction of all dysplastic hips in early childhood reduces the rate of open reduction and secondary DDH-related surgery later in life. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1399–1404.

scholarly journals The potential role of the Alsberg angle as a predictor of lateral growth disturbance of the capital femoral epiphysis in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronghua Gui ◽  
Federico Canavese ◽  
Shuang Liu ◽  
Lianyong Li ◽  
Lijun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Normal Values ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Lateral Growth ◽  
Growth Disturbance ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
One Year ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Purpose Early diagnosis and prevention of lateral growth disturbance of the capital femoral epiphysis is challenging after treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The aim of the study was to evaluate the radiographic changes of the Alsberg angle (AA) in normal children and those with DDH, and to assess the role of AA as a potential predictor of lateral growth disturbance of the capital femoral epiphysis. Methods AA was measured on the anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs of 1000 normal children ranging in age from one to ten years and in 66 children (92 hips) with DDH treated by closed reduction (CR). A comparative analysis was performed. Results In the normal children, mean AA decreased linearly with age, from 76° at age one year to 65° at age ten years, irrespective of gender and laterality. In children with DDH, the average AA was 81.5°(sd 3.9°; 74° to 87°) prior to CR; it was 75.9° (sd 4.5°; 68° to 83°) in normal children of the same age (p < 0.001). Among the 42 children (64 hips) with successfully and uneventfully treated DDH, AA reached normal values between the ages of five and six years. In contrast, children with lateral growth disturbance of the proximal femur physis (24 children, 28 hips) showed significantly higher AA values in comparison with the age-matched controls. Conclusion In DDH patients with successful CR, AA could be expected to match normal values in children between the ages of five and six years. On the other hand, AA can be used as an early predictor for lateral growth disturbance of the capital femoral epiphysis. Level of Evidence Level III

scholarly journals Should We Continue to Screen for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Clubfoot? Our Experience and Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Hip Dysplasia ◽  
Screening Programme ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
The Other ◽  
Idiopathic Clubfoot ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Targeted Ultrasound ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Objective: The association between clubfoot and developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) remains uncertain, with only a few studies linking both. However, clubfoot is considered as a risk factor for DDH. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of DDH and evaluate the need for routine hip imaging in our population of children with clubfoot. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients treated for clubfoot in our center between 2010 and 2019. We included patients with hip imaging for DDH in the first 12 months of life. Results: There were 108 children with clubfoot who underwent DDH screening. 92 had idiopathic clubfoot and 16 had syndromic clubfoot. Of the patients with idiopathic clubfoot, 2 (2.2%) had DDH; one had a clinically unstable hip and the other patient underwent hip screening on account of the clubfoot alone. Among patients with syndromic clubfoot, 3 (18.8%) had developmental dysplasia of the hip. Two of them had an abnormal hip examination while the other had normal hip clinical examination but other established risk factors for DDH. Conclusion: A targeted ultrasound or radiological screening programme for DDH in idiopathic clubfoot diagnosed hip dysplasia in only 1 child that would have otherwise been missed by clinical examination alone. We conclude that hip imaging is not warranted in children with idiopathic clubfoot and regular clinical screening may suffice. In syndromic clubfoot, due to the higher incidence of DDH, we recommend specific ultrasound screening even in the presence of a normal hip examination. Keywords: Clubfoot, Screening, Developmental dysplasia of the hip.

The ‘clicky hip’

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (9) ◽  
pp. 1249-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Humphry ◽  
D. Thompson ◽  
N. Price ◽  
P. R. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Service Provision ◽  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Ultrasound Scan ◽  
Type Iv ◽  
Referral Practices ◽  
Adductor Tenotomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

Aims The significance of the ‘clicky hip’ in neonatal and infant examination remains controversial with recent conflicting papers reigniting the debate. We aimed to quantify rates of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in babies referred with ‘clicky hips’ to our dedicated DDH clinic. Patients and Methods A three-year prospective cohort study was undertaken between 2014 and 2016 assessing the diagnosis and treatment outcomes of all children referred specifically with ‘clicky hips’ as the primary reason for referral to our dedicated DDH clinic. Depending on their age, they were all imaged with either ultrasound scan or radiographs. Results There were 69 ‘clicky hip’ referrals over the three-year period. This represented 26.9% of the total 257 referrals received in that time. The mean age at presentation was 13.6 weeks (1 to 84). A total of 19 children (28%) referred as ‘clicky hips’ were noted to have hip abnormalities on ultrasound scan, including 15 with Graf Type II hips (7 bilateral), one Graf Type III hip, and three Graf Type IV hips. Of these, ten children were treated with a Pavlik harness, with two requiring subsequent closed reduction in theatre; one child was treated primarily with a closed reduction and adductor tenotomy. In total, 11 (15.9%) of the 69 ‘clicky hip’ referrals required intervention with either harness or surgery. Conclusion Our study provides further evidence that the ‘clicky hip’ referral can represent an underlying diagnosis of DDH and should, in our opinion, always lead to further clinical and radiological assessment. In the absence of universal ultrasound screening, we would encourage individual units to carefully assess their own outcomes and protocols for ‘clicky hip’ referrals and tailor ongoing service provision to local populations and local referral practices. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1249–52.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anish Sanghrajka ◽  
Deborah M Eastwood
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Hip Instability ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Aggressive Surgical Approach ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip ◽  
All Treatment

♦ Developmental dysplasia of the hip represents a spectrum of hip pathology with or without hip instability♦ Controversy continues regarding the relative roles of clinical and ultrasound screening programmes♦ Early diagnosis and prompt, appropriate treatment is important♦ All treatment methods risk compromising the vascularity of the developing femoral head♦ Residual dysplasia may require an aggressive surgical approach.

scholarly journals Developmental dysplasia of the hip: update of management

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 548-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Vaquero-Picado ◽  
Gaspar González-Morán ◽  
Enrique Gil Garay ◽  
Luis Moraleda
Keyword(s):  
Physical Examination ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Acetabular Dysplasia ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Spontaneous Correction ◽  
Hip Reduction ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip

The term ‘developmental dysplasia of the hip’ (DDH) includes a wide spectrum of hip alterations: neonatal instability; acetabular dysplasia; hip subluxation; and true dislocation of the hip. DDH alters hip biomechanics, overloading the articular cartilage and leading to early osteoarthritis. DDH is the main cause of total hip replacement in young people (about 21% to 29%). Development of the acetabular cavity is determined by the presence of a concentrically reduced femoral head. Hip subluxation or dislocation in a child will cause an inadequate development of the acetabulum during the remaining growth. Clinical screening (instability manoeuvres) should be done universally as a part of the physical examination of the newborn. After two or three months of life, limited hip abduction is the most important clinical sign. Selective ultrasound screening should be performed in any child with abnormal physical examination or in those with high-risk factors (breech presentation and positive family history). Universal ultrasound screening has not demonstrated its utility in diminishing the incidence of late dysplasia. Almost 90% of patients with mild hip instability at birth are resolved spontaneously within the first eight weeks and 96% of pathologic changes observed in echography are resolved spontaneously within the first six weeks of life. However, an Ortolani-positive hip requires immediate treatment. When the hip is dislocated or subluxated, a concentric and stable reduction without forceful abduction needs to be obtained by closed or open means. Pavlik harness is usually the first line of treatment under the age of six months. Hip arthrogram is useful for guiding the decision of performing a closed or open reduction when needed. Acetabular dysplasia improves in the majority due to the stimulus provoked by hip reduction. The best parameter to predict persistent acetabular dysplasia at maturity is the evolution of the acetabular index. Pelvic or femoral osteotomies should be performed when residual acetabular dysplasia is present or in older children when a spontaneous correction after hip reduction is not expected. Avascular necrosis is the most serious complication and is related to: an excessive abduction of the hip; a force closed reduction when obstacles for reduction are present; a maintained dislocated hip within the harness or spica cast; and a surgical open reduction.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:548-556. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180019

scholarly journals The lateral edge and sourcil acetabular indices for surgical decision-making in developmental dysplasia of the hip

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-520
Author(s):  
Alpesh Kothari ◽  
Saqib Noor ◽  
Connor L. Maddock ◽  
Jan H. H. Vanderstappen ◽  
Catharine S. Bradley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Acetabular Dysplasia ◽  
Developmental Dysplasia ◽  
Poor Agreement ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Lateral Edge ◽  
Surgical Decision Making ◽  
Dysplasia Of The Hip ◽  
Level Of Agreement

Purpose The acetabular index (AI) is a radiographic measure that guides surgical decision-making in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Two AI measurement methods are described; to the lateral edge of the acetabulum (AI-L) and to the lateral edge of the sourcil (AI-S). The purpose of this study was to determine the level of agreement between AI-L and AI-S on the diagnosis and degree of acetabular dysplasia in DDH. Methods A total of 35 patients treated for DDH with Pavlik harness were identified. The AI-L and AI-S were measured on radiographs (70 hips) at two and five years of age. AI-L and AI-S were then transformed relative to published normative data (tAI-L and tAI-S). Bland-Altman plots, linear regression and heat mapping were used to evaluate the agreement between tAI-L and tAI-S. Results There was poor agreement between tAI-S and tAI-L on the Bland-Altman plots with wide limits of agreement and no proportional bias. The two AI measurements were in agreement as to the presence and severity of dysplasia in only 63% of hips at two years of age and 81% at five years of age, leaving the remaining hips classified as various combinations of normal, mildly and severely dysplastic. Conclusion AI-L and AI-S have poor agreement on the presence or degree of acetabular dysplasia in DDH and cannot be used interchangeably. Clinicians are cautioned to prudently evaluate both measures of AI in surgical decision-making. Level of evidence I

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document